Reaching peak emissions (original) (raw)

Nature Climate Change volume 6, pages 7–10 (2016) Cite this article

Subjects

Rapid growth in global CO2 emissions from fossil fuels and industry ceased in the past two years, despite continued economic growth. Decreased coal use in China was largely responsible, coupled with slower global growth in petroleum and faster growth in renewables.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$259.00 per year

only $21.58 per issue

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Figure 1: Global CO2 emissions from fossil-fuel use and industry since 1990 and emissions intensity CO2/GDP.

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Figure 2: Change in CO2 emissions from fossil-fuel use and industry since 2011.

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Figure 3: Energy consumption by fuel source from 2000 to 2014, with growth rates indicated for the more recent period of 2010 to 2014.

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

References

  1. January–June 2015 Hottest on Record: NOAA (World Meteorological Organization, accessed 1 September 2015); http://go.nature.com/5yynV1
  2. Friedlingstein, P. et al. Nature Geosci. 7, 709–715 (2014).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Jackson, R. B., Friedlingstein, P., Canadell, J. G. & Andrew, R. M. The Bridge 45, 16–21 (2015).
    Google Scholar
  4. Le Quéré et al. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 7, 349–396 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Statistical Review of World Energy 2015 (BP, 2015); http://go.nature.com/KxRNK9
  6. Pacala, S. & Socolow, R. Science 305, 968–972 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Global Wind Report Annual Market Update 2014 (Global Wind Energy Council, accessed 21 August 2015); http://go.nature.com/soCk1e
  8. Snapshot of Global PV Markets 2014 (International Energy Agency, accessed 21 August, 2015); http://go.nature.com/9BFh4O
  9. Smith, P. et al. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) Ch. 11 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
    Google Scholar
  10. Federici, S. et al. Forest Ecol. Manage. 352, 89–98 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Achard, F. et al. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 2540–2554 (2014).
    Google Scholar
  12. Davis, S. J. & Socolow, R. H. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 084018 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Peters, G. P. et al. Nature Clim. Change 2, 2–4 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Adjusting to Lower Commodity Prices (International Monetary Fund, accessed 10 October 2015); http://go.nature.com/YAbczX
  15. National Bureau of Statistics of China. 2015 China Statistical Yearbook (China Statistics Press, 2015).
  16. Liu, Z. et al. Nature 524, 335–338 (2015).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Energy Statistical Yearbook 2014 (China Statistics Press, 2015).
  18. Peters, G. P., Andrew, R. M., Solomon, S. & Friedlingstein, P. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 105004 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  19. Energy from Renewable Resources (European Commission, accessed 20 October 2015); http://go.nature.com/f4IGkb

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is a collaborative effort of the Global Carbon Project, part of the International Geosphere-Biosphere Program and Future Earth, to provide regular analyses of the main global carbon emissions and sinks (www.globalcarbonproject.org). The authors wish to thank the US Carbon Cycle Science Program and Stanford University (R.B.J.), the Australian Climate Change Science Program (J.G.C.), Research Council of Norway projects 236296 and 209701 (R.M.A., J.I.K. and G.P.P.), and the UK Natural Environment Research Council International Opportunities Fund (NE/103002X/1) (C.L.Q.) for their support. We thank the Jackson lab for comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Earth, Energy, and Environmental Sciences, Woods Institute for the Environment, and Precourt Institute for Energy, Stanford University, Stanford, 94305, California, USA
    Robert B. Jackson
  2. Global Carbon Project, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
    Josep G. Canadell
  3. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
    Corinne Le Quéré
  4. Center for International Climate and Environmental Research – Oslo, PO Box 1129 Blindern, Oslo, 0318, Norway
    Robbie M. Andrew, Jan Ivar Korsbakken & Glen P. Peters
  5. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Schlossplatz 1, Laxenburg, 2361, Austria
    Nebojsa Nakicenovic

Authors

  1. Robert B. Jackson
  2. Josep G. Canadell
  3. Corinne Le Quéré
  4. Robbie M. Andrew
  5. Jan Ivar Korsbakken
  6. Glen P. Peters
  7. Nebojsa Nakicenovic

Corresponding author

Correspondence toRobert B. Jackson.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jackson, R., Canadell, J., Le Quéré, C. et al. Reaching peak emissions.Nature Clim Change 6, 7–10 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2892

Download citation

This article is cited by