Lack of evidence for DNA methylation of Invader4 retroelements in Drosophila and implications for Dnmt2-mediated epigenetic regulation (original) (raw)
- Correspondence
- Published: 27 October 2010
Nature Genetics volume 42, pages 920–921 (2010)Cite this article
- 1057 Accesses
- 48 Citations
- 6 Altmetric
- Metrics details
Subjects
To the Editor:
In a recent issue of Nature Genetics, Phalke et al.1 described a new pathway for transposon silencing and telomere integrity in Drosophila that depends on the DNA methyltransferase homolog Dnmt2. Dnmt2 proteins are the most conserved members of the DNA methyltransferase family, but their substrate specificity has been discussed controversially within the scientific community2. Previous observations include a weak and highly distributive DNA methyltransferase activity of human DNMT2 in cell-free assays3, spurious DNA methylation in Drosophila4 and highly specific transfer RNA (tRNA) methyltransferase activity for cytosine 38 of tRNAAsp in mice, flies and plants5. All these observations seemed difficult to reconcile with the processive DNA methyltransferase activity in every dinucleotide context, as observed by Phalke et al.1, at Drosophila Invader4 retroelements. Furthermore, a recent genome-wide bisulfite sequencing study concluded that transposons are unmethylated in various invertebrates and, specifically, in 0–3-hour-old Drosophila embryos6.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Additional access options:
Figure 1: Dnmt2 does not methylate Invader4 LTR sequences.
Accession codes
Accessions
GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ
References
- Phalke, S. et al. Nat. Genet. 41, 696–702 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Schaefer, M. & Lyko, F. Chromosoma 119, 35–40 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Hermann, A., Schmitt, S. & Jeltsch, A. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 31717–31721 (2003).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Lyko, F., Ramsahoye, B.H. & Jaenisch, R. Nature 408, 538–540 (2000).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Goll, M.G. et al. Science 311, 395–398 (2006).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Zemach, A., McDaniel, I.E., Silva, P. & Zilberman, D. Science 328, 916–919 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Schaefer, M., Pollex, T., Hanna, K. & Lyko, F. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, e12 (2009).
Article Google Scholar - Schaefer, M. et al. Genes Dev. 24, 1590–1595 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Jurkowski, T.P. et al. RNA 14, 1663–1670 (2008).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Kuhlmann, M. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 6405–6417 (2005).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to M.S and F.L. (Priority Programme Epigenetics, FOR1082).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- Division of Epigenetics, DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
Matthias Schaefer & Frank Lyko
Authors
- Matthias Schaefer
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - Frank Lyko
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Contributions
M.S. performed the DNA methylation analysis. M.S. and F.L. conceived the study and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Correspondence toFrank Lyko.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schaefer, M., Lyko, F. Lack of evidence for DNA methylation of Invader4 retroelements in Drosophila and implications for Dnmt2-mediated epigenetic regulation.Nat Genet 42, 920–921 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1110-920
- Published: 27 October 2010
- Issue Date: November 2010
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1110-920