Lack of evidence for DNA methylation of Invader4 retroelements in Drosophila and implications for Dnmt2-mediated epigenetic regulation (original) (raw)

Nature Genetics volume 42, pages 920–921 (2010)Cite this article

Subjects

To the Editor:

In a recent issue of Nature Genetics, Phalke et al.1 described a new pathway for transposon silencing and telomere integrity in Drosophila that depends on the DNA methyltransferase homolog Dnmt2. Dnmt2 proteins are the most conserved members of the DNA methyltransferase family, but their substrate specificity has been discussed controversially within the scientific community2. Previous observations include a weak and highly distributive DNA methyltransferase activity of human DNMT2 in cell-free assays3, spurious DNA methylation in Drosophila4 and highly specific transfer RNA (tRNA) methyltransferase activity for cytosine 38 of tRNAAsp in mice, flies and plants5. All these observations seemed difficult to reconcile with the processive DNA methyltransferase activity in every dinucleotide context, as observed by Phalke et al.1, at Drosophila Invader4 retroelements. Furthermore, a recent genome-wide bisulfite sequencing study concluded that transposons are unmethylated in various invertebrates and, specifically, in 0–3-hour-old Drosophila embryos6.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$209.00 per year

only $17.42 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Figure 1: Dnmt2 does not methylate Invader4 LTR sequences.

Accession codes

Accessions

GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ

References

  1. Phalke, S. et al. Nat. Genet. 41, 696–702 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Schaefer, M. & Lyko, F. Chromosoma 119, 35–40 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Hermann, A., Schmitt, S. & Jeltsch, A. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 31717–31721 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Lyko, F., Ramsahoye, B.H. & Jaenisch, R. Nature 408, 538–540 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Goll, M.G. et al. Science 311, 395–398 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Zemach, A., McDaniel, I.E., Silva, P. & Zilberman, D. Science 328, 916–919 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Schaefer, M., Pollex, T., Hanna, K. & Lyko, F. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, e12 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  8. Schaefer, M. et al. Genes Dev. 24, 1590–1595 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Jurkowski, T.P. et al. RNA 14, 1663–1670 (2008).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Kuhlmann, M. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 6405–6417 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to M.S and F.L. (Priority Programme Epigenetics, FOR1082).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Epigenetics, DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
    Matthias Schaefer & Frank Lyko

Authors

  1. Matthias Schaefer
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Frank Lyko
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.S. performed the DNA methylation analysis. M.S. and F.L. conceived the study and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence toFrank Lyko.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schaefer, M., Lyko, F. Lack of evidence for DNA methylation of Invader4 retroelements in Drosophila and implications for Dnmt2-mediated epigenetic regulation.Nat Genet 42, 920–921 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1110-920

Download citation

This article is cited by

Associated content