An empirical test of the mutational landscape model of adaptation using a single-stranded DNA virus (original) (raw)

• Letter
• Published: 20 March 2005

Nature Genetics volume 37, pages 441–444 (2005)Cite this article

• 1372 Accesses
• 211 Citations
• 8 Altmetric
• Metrics details

Abstract

The primary impediment to formulating a general theory for adaptive evolution has been the unknown distribution of fitness effects for new beneficial mutations1. By applying extreme value theory2, Gillespie circumvented this issue in his mutational landscape model for the adaptation of DNA sequences3,4,5, and Orr recently extended Gillespie's model1,6, generating testable predictions regarding the course of adaptive evolution. Here we provide the first empirical examination of this model, using a single-stranded DNA bacteriophage related to φX174, and find that our data are consistent with Orr's predictions, provided that the model is adjusted to incorporate mutation bias. Orr's work suggests that there may be generalities in adaptive molecular evolution that transcend the biological details of a system, but we show that for the model to be useful as a predictive or inferential tool, some adjustments for the biology of the system will be necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$259.00 per year

only $21.58 per issue

Buy this article

• Purchase on SpringerLink
• Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

• Log in
• Learn about institutional subscriptions
• Read our FAQs
• Contact customer support

Figure 1: A schematic depiction of the extreme value theory predictions for a single step.

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Figure 2: A comparison of the observed data with the expectations under Orr's model and the mutation-adjusted models.

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Accessions

GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ

References

1. Orr, H.A. The distribution of fitness effects among beneficial mutations. Genetics 163, 1519–1526 (2003).
   CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
2. Gumbel, E.J. Statistics of Extremes (Columbia University Press, New York, 1958).
   Google Scholar
3. Gillespie, J.H. A simple stochastic gene substitution model. Theor. Popul. Biol. 23, 202–215 (1983).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
4. Gillespie, J.H. Molecular evolution over the mutational landscape. Evolution 38, 1116–1129 (1984).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
5. Gillespie, J.H. The Causes of Molecular Evolution (Oxford University Press, New York, 1991).
   Google Scholar
6. Orr, H.A. The population genetics of adaptation: the adaptation of DNA sequences. Evolution 56, 1317–1330 (2002).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
7. Fisher, R.A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1930).
   Book Google Scholar
8. Orr, H.A. The population genetics of adaptation: the distribution of factors fixed during adaptive evolution. Evolution 52, 935–949 (1998).
   Article Google Scholar
9. Orr, H.A. Adaptation and the cost of complexity. Evolution 54, 13–20 (2000).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
10. Hartl, D.L. & Taubes, C.H. Towards a theory of evolutionary adaptation. Genetica 102/103, 525–533 (1998).
    Article Google Scholar
11. Haldane, J.B.S. A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection. V. selection and mutation. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 28, 838–844 (1927).
    Article Google Scholar
12. Orr, H.A. A minimum on the mean number of steps taken in adaptive walks. J. Theor. Biol. 220, 241–247 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar
13. Rokyta, D., Badgett, M.R., Molineux, I.J. & Bull, J.J. Experimental genomic evolution: extensive compensation for loss of DNA ligase activity in a virus. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 230–238 (2002).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
14. Wahl, L.M., Gerrish, P.J. & Saika-Voivod, I. Evaluating the impact of population bottlenecks in experimental evolution. Genetics 162, 961–971 (2002).
    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
15. Wahl, L.M. & Gerrish, P.J. The probability that beneficial mutations are lost in populations with periodic bottlenecks. Evolution 55, 2606–2610 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
16. Swofford, D.L. Phylogenetic Analysis using Parsimony * (PAUP *) ver. 4.0. (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 1998).
    Google Scholar
17. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G. & Gibson, T.J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673–4680 (1994).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
18. Minin, V., Abdo, Z., Joyce, P. & Sullivan, J. Performance-based selection of likelihood models for phylogeny estimation. Syst. Biol. 52, 1–10 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J.J. Bull, Z. Abdo, H.A. Orr and L. Wahl for discussions and comments. This work was supported by a grant from the US National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Author notes

1. S Brian Caudle
   Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, 78712, USA

Authors and Affiliations

1. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, 83844, Idaho, USA
   Darin R Rokyta, S Brian Caudle & Holly A Wichman
2. Program in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Idaho, Moscow, 83844, Idaho, USA
   Darin R Rokyta, Paul Joyce & Holly A Wichman
3. Initiative for Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Studies, University of Idaho, Moscow, 83844, Idaho, USA
   Darin R Rokyta, Paul Joyce & Holly A Wichman
4. Department of Mathematics, University of Idaho, Moscow, 83844, Idaho, USA
   Paul Joyce
5. Department of Statistics, University of Idaho, Moscow, 83844, Idaho, USA
   Paul Joyce

Authors

1. Darin R Rokyta
2. Paul Joyce
3. S Brian Caudle
4. Holly A Wichman

Corresponding author

Correspondence toHolly A Wichman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rokyta, D., Joyce, P., Caudle, S. et al. An empirical test of the mutational landscape model of adaptation using a single-stranded DNA virus.Nat Genet 37, 441–444 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1535

Download citation

• Received: 27 October 2004
• Accepted: 08 February 2005
• Published: 20 March 2005
• Issue date: 01 April 2005
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1535

This article is cited by

Associated content