Nanoscale stiffness topography reveals structure and mechanics of the transport barrier in intact nuclear pore complexes (original) (raw)

Nature Nanotechnology volume 10, pages 60–64 (2015)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The nuclear pore complex (NPC) is the gate for transport between the cell nucleus and the cytoplasm. Small molecules cross the NPC by passive diffusion, but molecules larger than ∼5 nm must bind to nuclear transport receptors to overcome a selective barrier within the NPC1. Although the structure and shape of the cytoplasmic ring of the NPC are relatively well characterized2,3,4,5, the selective barrier is situated deep within the central channel of the NPC and depends critically on unstructured nuclear pore proteins5,6, and is therefore not well understood. Here, we show that stiffness topography7 with sharp atomic force microscopy tips can generate nanoscale cross-sections of the NPC. The cross-sections reveal two distinct structures, a cytoplasmic ring and a central plug structure, which are consistent with the three-dimensional NPC structure derived from electron microscopy2,3,4,5. The central plug persists after reactivation of the transport cycle and resultant cargo release, indicating that the plug is an intrinsic part of the NPC barrier. Added nuclear transport receptors accumulate on the intact transport barrier and lead to a homogenization of the barrier stiffness. The observed nanomechanical properties in the NPC indicate the presence of a cohesive barrier to transport and are quantitatively consistent with the presence of a central condensate of nuclear pore proteins in the NPC channel.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$259.00 per year

only $21.58 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mohr, D., Frey, S., Fischer, T., Güttler, T. & Görlich, D. Characterisation of the passive permeability barrier of nuclear pore complexes. EMBO J. 28, 2541–2553 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Fahrenkrog, B. & Aebi, U. The nuclear pore complex: nucleocytoplasmic transport and beyond. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 757–766 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Alber, F. et al. The molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Nature 450, 695–701 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Beck, M., Lucic, V., Forster, F., Baumeister, W. & Medalia, O. Snapshots of nuclear pore complexes in action taken by cryoelectron tomography. Nature 449, 611–615 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Hoelz, A., Debler, E. W. & Blobel, G. Structure of the nuclear pore complex. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 80, 613–643 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Tetenbaum-Novatt, J. & Rout, M. P. The mechanism of nucleocytoplasmic transport through the nuclear pore complex. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 75, 567–584 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Roduit, C. et al. Stiffness tomography by atomic force microscopy. Biophys. J. 97, 674–677 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Adams, R. L. & Wente, S. R. Uncovering nuclear pore complexity with innovation. Cell 152, 1218–1221 (2013).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Lowe, A. R. et al. Selectivity mechanism of the nuclear pore complex characterized by single cargo tracking. Nature 467, 600–603 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Goryaynov, A., Ma, J. & Yang, W. Single-molecule studies of nucleocytoplasmic transport: from one dimension to three dimensions. Integr. Biol. (Camb.) 4, 10–21 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Macara, I. G. Transport into and out of the nucleus. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 65, 570–594 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Rout, M. P., Aitchison, J. D., Magnasco, M. O. & Chait, B. T. Virtual gating and nuclear transport: the hole picture. Trends Cell Biol. 13, 622–628 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Lim, R. Y. et al. Nanomechanical basis of selective gating by the nuclear pore complex. Science 318, 640–643 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Patel, S. S., Belmont, B. J., Sante, J. M. & Rexach, M. F. Natively unfolded nucleoporins gate protein diffusion across the nuclear pore complex. Cell 129, 83–96 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  15. Frey, S. & Görlich, D. A saturated FG-repeat hydrogel can reproduce the permeability properties of nuclear pore complexes. Cell 130, 512–523 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Jäggi, R. D. et al. Modulation of nuclear pore topology by transport modifiers. Biophys. J. 84, 665–670 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Kramer, A. et al. Apoptosis leads to a degradation of vital components of active nuclear transport and a dissociation of the nuclear lamina. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 11236–11241 (2008).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. Keminer, O., Siebrasse, J. P., Zerf, K. & Peters, R. Optical recording of signal-mediated protein transport through single nuclear pore complexes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 11842–11847 (1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  19. Eisele, N. B., Labokha, A. A., Frey, S., Görlich, D. & Richter, R. P. Cohesiveness tunes assembly and morphology of FG nucleoporin domain meshworks—implications for nuclear pore permeability. Biophys. J. 105, 1860–1870 (2013).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  20. Rangl, M. et al. Single-molecule analysis of the recognition forces underlying nucleo-cytoplasmic transport. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 10356–10359 (2013).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  21. Tetard, L., Passian, A. & Thundat, T. New modes for subsurface atomic force microscopy through nanomechanical coupling. Nature Nanotech. 5, 105–109 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Wilson, N. R. & Macpherson, J. V. Carbon nanotube tips for atomic force microscopy. Nature Nanotech. 4, 483–491 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  23. Yamada, J. et al. A bimodal distribution of two distinct categories of intrinsically disordered structures with separate functions in FG nucleoporins. Mol. Cell Proteomics 9, 2205–2224 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  24. Osmanović, D. et al. Bistable collective behavior of polymers tethered in a nanopore. Phys. Rev. E 85, 061917 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  25. Schoch, R. L., Kapinos, L. E. & Lim, R. Y. Nuclear transport receptor binding avidity triggers a self-healing collapse transition in FG-nucleoporin molecular brushes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16911–16916 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  26. Jovanovic-Talisman, T. et al. Artificial nanopores that mimic the transport selectivity of the nuclear pore complex. Nature 457, 1023–1027 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  27. Tagliazucchi, M., Peleg, O., Kröger, M., Rabin, Y. & Szleifer, I. Effect of charge, hydrophobicity, and sequence of nucleoporins on the translocation of model particles through the nuclear pore complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 3363–3368 (2013).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  28. Peleg, O., Tagliazucchi, M., Kröger, M., Rabin, Y. & Szleifer, I. Morphology control of hairy nanopores. ACS Nano 5, 4737–4747 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  29. Osmanović, D., Ford, I. J. & Hoogenboom, B. W. Model inspired by nuclear pore complex suggests possible roles for nuclear transport receptors in determining its structure. Biophys. J. 105, 2781–2789 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  30. Zaitseva, L., Myers, R. & Fassati, A. tRNAs promote nuclear import of HIV-1 intracellular reverse transcription complexes. PLoS Biol. 4, e332 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank H. Oberleithner for the use of laboratory facilities, P. Vergani for assistance with the preparation of X. laevis oocytes, D. Görlich for the expression plasmids for importin β and Ran-mix, S. Frey for Rch1-IBB-MBP-GFP protein, R.P. Richter for providing the data presented in Supplementary Fig. 8, J. Grech for the electron microscopy image in Fig. 1a, M. Goldberg for the protocol for removal of the nuclear basket from the NPCs, J. Bailey and A.H. Harker for support in initializing the modelling work, R. Thorogate for assistance with the confocal microscopy measurements, C. Leung for assistance in formatting the figures and T. Duke (deceased) and G. Aeppli for proofreading the manuscript. This work was partially funded by the European Molecular Biology Organization (ALTF 757-2008 to A.K.), the Kazakh Ministry of Education and Science (A.B.), the Sackler Foundation (D.O.), the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/G011729/1 to B.W.H.) and the Wellcome Trust (083810/Z/07/Z to A.F.). G.C. is a Royal Society University Research Fellow.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Aksana A. Labokha
    Present address: Present address: MedImmune, Granta Park, Cambridge CB21 6GH, UK,
  2. Aizhan Bestembayeva and Armin Kramer: These authors contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. London Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, 17–19 Gordon Street, London, WC1H 0AH, UK
    Aizhan Bestembayeva, Armin Kramer, Dino Osmanović, Ian J. Ford, Guillaume Charras & Bart W. Hoogenboom
  2. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College, London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
    Aizhan Bestembayeva, Dino Osmanović, Ian J. Ford & Bart W. Hoogenboom
  3. Institute of Physiology II, University of Münster, Robert-Koch Strasse 27b, 48149 Münster, Germany
    Armin Kramer & Ivan Liashkovich
  4. Division of Infection & Immunity, Wohl Virion Centre, MRC Centre for Medical Molecular Virology, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
    Aksana A. Labokha & Ariberto Fassati
  5. Department of Biological Sciences, Birkbeck College, Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Malet Street, London, WC1E 7HX, UK
    Elena V. Orlova
  6. Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
    Guillaume Charras

Authors

  1. Aizhan Bestembayeva
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Armin Kramer
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Aksana A. Labokha
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Dino Osmanović
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Ivan Liashkovich
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. Elena V. Orlova
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. Ian J. Ford
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  8. Guillaume Charras
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  9. Ariberto Fassati
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  10. Bart W. Hoogenboom
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.B., A.K., A.L., I.L., G.C., A.F. and B.W.H. designed the experiments. A.B., A.K., A.L. and I.L. performed the experiments. A.B., A.K. and B.W.H., with support from E.V.O., performed the data analysis. D.O., I.J.F. and B.W.H. designed and performed the polymer modelling. A.F. and B.W.H. wrote the manuscript. All authors read and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence toAriberto Fassati or Bart W. Hoogenboom.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bestembayeva, A., Kramer, A., Labokha, A. et al. Nanoscale stiffness topography reveals structure and mechanics of the transport barrier in intact nuclear pore complexes.Nature Nanotech 10, 60–64 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2014.262

Download citation