From DNA sequence to transcriptional behaviour: a quantitative approach (original) (raw)
Casadaban, M. J. Transposition and fusion of the lac genes to selected promoters in Escherichia coli using bacteriophage lambda and Mu. J. Mol. Biol.104, 541–555 (1976). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Guarente, L. & Ptashne, M. Fusion of Escherichia coli lacZ to the cytochrome c gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA78, 2199–2203 (1981). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Bellen, H. J. et al. P-element-mediated enhancer detection: a versatile method to study development in Drosophila. Genes Dev.3, 1288–1300 (1989). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Wilson, M. D. et al. Species-specific transcription in mice carrying human chromosome 21. Science322, 434–438 (2008). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Rajewsky, N., Vergassola, M., Gaul, U. & Siggia, E. D. Computational detection of genomic _cis_-regulatory modules applied to body patterning in the early Drosophila embryo. BMC Bioinformatics3, 30 (2002). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Sinha, S., van Nimwegen, E. & Siggia, E. D. A probabilistic method to detect regulatory modules. Bioinformatics19 (Suppl. 1), i292–i301 (2003). PubMed Google Scholar
Granek, J. A. & Clarke, N. D. Explicit equilibrium modeling of transcription-factor binding and gene regulation. Genome Biol.6, R87 (2005). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Segal, E. et al. A genomic code for nucleosome positioning. Nature442, 772–778 (2006). This paper shows that genomes encode the location of many of their nucleosomes and that this intrinsically encoded nucleosome organization might facilitate specific chromosome functions. CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ioshikhes, I. P., Albert, I., Zanton, S. J. & Pugh, B. F. Nucleosome positions predicted through comparative genomics. Nature Genet.38, 1210–1215 (2006). This paper shows that different nucleosome architectures might be encoded at different classes of regulatory sequences. CASPubMed Google Scholar
Segal, E., Raveh-Sadka, T., Schroeder, M., Unnerstall, U. & Gaul, U. Predicting expression patterns from regulatory sequence in Drosophila segmentation. Nature451, 535–540 (2008). This study develops an equilibrium-based thermodynamic model that relates factor binding to gene expression inDrosophila melanogasterearly embryonic patterning. CASPubMed Google Scholar
Buchler, N. E., Gerland, U. & Hwa, T. On schemes of combinatorial transcription logic. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA100, 5136–5141 (2003). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Dodd, I. B., Shearwin, K. E. & Sneppen, K. Modelling transcriptional interference and DNA looping in gene regulation. J. Mol. Biol.369, 1200–1213 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Kuhlman, T., Zhang, Z., Saier, M. H. Jr & Hwa, T. Combinatorial transcriptional control of the lactose operon of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA104, 6043–6048 (2007). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kaplan, N. et al. The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome. Nature458, 362–366 (2009). This study directly measured the intrinsically encoded nucleosome organization of the genome and showed that it is similar to thein vivoorganization. A model of nucleosome occupancy trained onin vitroreconstituted yeast nucleosomes significantly predicts nucleosome organization inCaenorhabditis elegans. CASPubMed Google Scholar
Gertz, J., Siggia, E. D. & Cohen, B. A. Analysis of combinatorial _cis_-regulation in synthetic and genomic promoters. Nature457, 215–218 (2009). This paper develops and experimentally verifies an equilibrium-based thermodynamic analysis that relates transcription factor binding to gene expression, and shows that these contributions explain a significant fraction of the measured variability in gene expression. CASPubMed Google Scholar
Foat, B. C., Morozov, A. V. & Bussemaker, H. J. Statistical mechanical modeling of genome-wide transcription factor occupancy data by MatrixREDUCE. Bioinformatics22, e141–e149 (2006). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Gupta, S. et al. Predicting human nucleosome occupancy from primary sequence. PLoS Comput. Biol.4, e1000134 (2008). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Sinha, S., Adler, A. S., Field, Y., Chang, H. Y. & Segal, E. Systematic functional characterization of _cis_-regulatory motifs in human core promoters. Genome Res.18, 477–488 (2008). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Richmond, T. J. & Davey, C. A. The structure of DNA in the nucleosome core. Nature423, 145–150 (2003). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Gencheva, M. et al. In vitro and in vivo nucleosome positioning on the ovine β-lactoglobulin gene are related. J. Mol. Biol.361, 216–230 (2006). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Thastrom, A., Bingham, L. M. & Widom, J. Nucleosomal locations of dominant DNA sequence motifs for histone–DNA interactions and nucleosome positioning. J. Mol. Biol.338, 695–709 (2004). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Satchwell, S. C., Drew, H. R. & Travers, A. A. Sequence periodicities in chicken nucleosome core DNA. J. Mol. Biol.191, 659–675 (1986). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Albert, I. et al. Translational and rotational settings of H2A.Z nucleosomes across the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature446, 572–576 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Johnson, S. M., Tan, F. J., McCullough, H. L., Riordan, D. P. & Fire, A. Z. Flexibility and constraint in the nucleosome core landscape of Caenorhabditis elegans chromatin. Genome Res.16, 1505–1516 (2006). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Field, Y. et al. Distinct modes of regulation by chromatin encoded through nucleosome positioning signals. PLoS Comput. Biol.4, e1000216 (2008). This study shows that the encoded nucleosome organization is predictive of, and might be the cause of, differences in the transcriptional noise and activation dynamics of regulatory sequences and the utilization efficiency of DNA replication origins. PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Yuan, G. C. & Liu, J. S. Genomic sequence is highly predictive of local nucleosome depletion. PLoS Comput. Biol.4, e13 (2008). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Lee, W. et al. A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast. Nature Genet.39, 1235–1244 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Korber, P., Luckenbach, T., Blaschke, D. & Horz, W. Evidence for histone eviction in trans upon induction of the yeast PHO5 promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol.24, 10965–10974 (2004). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Vignali, M., Hassan, A. H., Neely, K. E. & Workman, J. L. ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol.20, 1899–1910 (2000). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Pavlovic, J., Banz, E. & Parish, R. W. The effects of transcription on the nucleosome structure of four Dictyostelium genes. Nucleic Acids Res.17, 2315–2332 (1989). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Henikoff, S. Nucleosome destabilization in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression. Nature Rev. Genet.9, 15–26 (2008). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Gasser, R., Koller, T. & Sogo, J. M. The stability of nucleosomes at the replication fork. J. Mol. Biol.258, 224–239 (1996). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Johnson, D. S., Mortazavi, A., Myers, R. M. & Wold, B. Genome-wide mapping of in vivo protein–DNA interactions. Science316, 1497–1502 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Bulyk, M. L., Gentalen, E., Lockhart, D. J. & Church, G. M. Quantifying DNA–protein interactions by double-stranded DNA arrays. Nature Biotechnol.17, 573–577 (1999). CAS Google Scholar
Mukherjee, S. et al. Rapid analysis of the DNA-binding specificities of transcription factors with DNA microarrays. Nature Genet.36, 1331–1339 (2004). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Maerkl, S. J. & Quake, S. R. A systems approach to measuring the binding energy landscapes of transcription factors. Science315, 233–237 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Berger, M. F. et al. Variation in homeodomain DNA binding revealed by high-resolution analysis of sequence preferences. Cell133, 1266–1276 (2008). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhu, C. et al. High-resolution DNA binding specificity analysis of yeast transcription factors. Genome Res.19, 556–566 (2009). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Badis, G. et al. A library of yeast transcription factor motifs reveals a widespread function for Rsc3 in targeting nucleosome exclusion at promoters. Mol. Cell32, 878–887 (2008). This study provides direct quantitative measurements of the sequence preferences of over 100 transcription factors from yeast. CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Schroeder, M. D. et al. Transcriptional control in the segmentation gene network of Drosophila. PLoS Biol.2, e271 (2004). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Tanay, A. Extensive low-affinity transcriptional interactions in the yeast genome. Genome Res.16, 962–972 (2006). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Miller, J. A. & Widom, J. Collaborative competition mechanism for gene activation in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol.23, 1623–1632 (2003). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Li, X. Y. et al. Transcription factors bind thousands of active and inactive regions in the Drosophila blastoderm. PLoS Biol.6, e27 (2008). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Shea, M. A. & Ackers, G. K. The OR control system of bacteriophage lambda. A physical–chemical model for gene regulation. J. Mol. Biol.181, 211–230 (1985). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Hayes, J. J. & Wolffe, A. P. The interaction of transcription factors with nucleosomal DNA. Bioessays14, 597–603 (1992). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Thomas, G. H. & Elgin, S. C. Protein/DNA architecture of the DNase I hypersensitive region of the Drosophila hsp26 promoter. EMBO J.7, 2191–2201 (1988). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Zeitlinger, J. et al. RNA polymerase stalling at developmental control genes in the Drosophila melanogaster embryo. Nature Genet.39, 1512–1516 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Hendrix, D. A., Hong, J. W., Zeitlinger, J., Rokhsar, D. S. & Levine, M. S. Promoter elements associated with RNA pol II stalling in the Drosophila embryo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA105, 7762–7767 (2008). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Mavrich, T. N. et al. A barrier nucleosome model for statistical positioning of nucleosomes throughout the yeast genome. Genome Res.18, 1073–1083 (2008). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Shivaswamy, S. et al. Dynamic remodeling of individual nucleosomes across a eukaryotic genome in response to transcriptional perturbation. PLoS Biol.6, e65 (2008). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Yuan, G. C. et al. Genome-scale identification of nucleosome positions in S. cerevisiae. Science309, 626–630 (2005). The first high-resolution analysis of nucleosome positionsin vivoat a genomic scale. The results show that there are stereotyped nucleosome organizations at promoters and add to the evidence that poly(dA:dT) tracts are unfavourable to nucleosome occupancy genome-wide. CASPubMed Google Scholar
Liu, X., Lee, C. K., Granek, J. A., Clarke, N. D. & Lieb, J. D. Whole-genome comparison of Leu3 binding in vitro and in vivo reveals the importance of nucleosome occupancy in target site selection. Genome Res.16, 1517–1528 (2006). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Sekinger, E. A., Moqtaderi, Z. & Struhl, K. Intrinsic histone–DNA interactions and low nucleosome density are important for preferential accessibility of promoter regions in yeast. Mol. Cell18, 735–748 (2005). An early demonstration that particular regulatory sequences encode low nucleosome occupancy. CASPubMed Google Scholar
Valouev, A. et al. A high-resolution, nucleosome position map of C. elegans reveals a lack of universal sequence-dictated positioning. Genome Res.18, 1051–1063 (2008). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kornberg, R. D. & Stryer, L. Statistical distributions of nucleosomes: nonrandom locations by a stochastic mechanism. Nucleic Acids Res.16, 6677–6690 (1988). This paper develops the idea of statistical nucleosome positioning. Simple steric exclusion together with the high density of nucleosomes along the genome leads to a periodic ordering of nucleosomes away from boundary constraints. CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Schones, D. E. et al. Dynamic regulation of nucleosome positioning in the human genome. Cell132, 887–898 (2008). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Raveh-Sadka, T., Levo, M. & Segal, E. Incorporating nucleosomes into thermodynamic models of transcription regulation. Genome Res. 19 May 2009 (doi:10.1101/gr.088260.108). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Khorasanizadeh, S. The nucleosome: from genomic organization to genomic regulation. Cell116, 259–272 (2004). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Narlikar, G. J., Fan, H. Y. & Kingston, R. E. Cooperation between complexes that regulate chromatin structure and transcription. Cell108, 475–487 (2002). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Kornberg, R. D. & Lorch, Y. Twenty-five years of the nucleosome, fundamental particle of the eukaryote chromosome. Cell98, 285–294 (1999). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Lam, F. H., Steger, D. J. & O'Shea, E. K. Chromatin decouples promoter threshold from dynamic range. Nature453, 246–250 (2008). This paper shows experimentally that the relationship between nucleosome organization and the factor-binding affinity landscape determines the dynamics of activation of Pho genes in yeast. CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kim, H. D. & O'Shea, E. K. A quantitative model of transcription factor-activated gene expression. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol.15, 1192–1198 (2008). CAS Google Scholar
Polach, K. J. & Widom, J. A model for the cooperative binding of eukaryotic regulatory proteins to nucleosomal target sites. J. Mol. Biol.258, 800–812 (1996). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Giniger, E. & Ptashne, M. Cooperative DNA binding of the yeast transcriptional activator GAL4. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA85, 382–386 (1988). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Tanaka, M. Modulation of promoter occupancy by cooperative DNA binding and activation-domain function is a major determinant of transcriptional regulation by activators in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA93, 4311–4315 (1996). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ma, X., Yuan, D., Diepold, K., Scarborough, T. & Ma, J. The Drosophila morphogenetic protein Bicoid binds DNA cooperatively. Development122, 1195–1206 (1996). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Rubin-Bejerano, I., Mandel, S., Robzyk, K. & Kassir, Y. Induction of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends on conversion of the transcriptional represssor Ume6 to a positive regulator by its regulated association with the transcriptional activator Ime1. Mol. Cell. Biol.16, 2518–2526 (1996). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ma, J. Crossing the line between activation and repression. Trends Genet.21, 54–59 (2005). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Felsenfeld, G. & Groudine, M. Controlling the double helix. Nature421, 448–453 (2003). PubMed Google Scholar
Robert, F. et al. Global position and recruitment of HATs and HDACs in the yeast genome. Mol. Cell16, 199–209 (2004). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Dion, M. F. et al. Dynamics of replication-independent histone turnover in budding yeast. Science315, 1405–1408 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Newman, J. R. et al. Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature441, 840–846 (2006). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, Z., Gu, J. & Gu, X. How much expression divergence after yeast gene duplication could be explained by regulatory motif evolution? Trends Genet.20, 403–407 (2004). PubMed Google Scholar
Tirosh, I., Weinberger, A., Bezalel, D., Kaganovich, M. & Barkai, N. On the relation between promoter divergence and gene expression evolution. Mol. Syst. Biol.4, 159 (2008). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Field, Y. et al. Gene expression divergence in yeast is coupled to evolution of DNA-encoded nucleosome organization. Nature Genet.41, 438–445 (2009). This paper shows that DNA sequence changes that directly alter the intrinsically encoded nucleosome organization of the genome are associated with, and might be important drivers of, evolutionary divergence in gene expression patterns. CASPubMed Google Scholar
Bar-Even, A. et al. Noise in protein expression scales with natural protein abundance. Nature Genet.38, 636–643 (2006). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Raser, J. M. & O'Shea, E. K. Control of stochasticity in eukaryotic gene expression. Science304, 1811–1814 (2004). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Landry, C. R., Lemos, B., Rifkin, S. A., Dickinson, W. J. & Hartl, D. L. Genetic properties influencing the evolvability of gene expression. Science317, 118–121 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Tirosh, I., Weinberger, A., Carmi, M. & Barkai, N. A genetic signature of interspecies variations in gene expression. Nature Genet.38, 830–834 (2006). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Blake, W. J., M, K. A., Cantor, C. R. & Collins, J. J. Noise in eukaryotic gene expression. Nature422, 633–637 (2003). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Heichinger, C., Penkett, C. J., Bahler, J. & Nurse, P. Genome-wide characterization of fission yeast DNA replication origins. EMBO J.25, 5171–5179 (2006). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kim, S. M., Zhang, D. Y. & Huberman, J. A. Multiple redundant sequence elements within the fission yeast ura4 replication origin enhancer. BMC Mol. Biol.2, 1 (2001). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Rippe, K., von Hippel, P. H. & Langowski, J. Action at a distance: DNA-looping and initiation of transcription. Trends Biochem. Sci.20, 500–506 (1995). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Fyodorov, D. V. & Kadonaga, J. T. Dynamics of ATP-dependent chromatin assembly by ACF. Nature418, 897–900 (2002). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Yang, J. G., Madrid, T. S., Sevastopoulos, E. & Narlikar, G. J. The chromatin-remodeling enzyme ACF is an ATP-dependent DNA length sensor that regulates nucleosome spacing. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol.13, 1078–1083 (2006). CAS Google Scholar
Whitehouse, I., Rando, O. J., Delrow, J. & Tsukiyama, T. Chromatin remodelling at promoters suppresses antisense transcription. Nature450, 1031–1035 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Rippe, K. et al. DNA sequence- and conformation-directed positioning of nucleosomes by chromatin-remodeling complexes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA104, 15635–15640 (2007). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
von Hippel, P. H. & Delagoutte, E. A general model for nucleic acid helicases and their “coupling” within macromolecular machines. Cell104, 177–190 (2001). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Dechering, K. J., Cuelenaere, K., Konings, R. N. & Leunissen, J. A. Distinct frequency-distributions of homopolymeric DNA tracts in different genomes. Nucleic Acids Res.26, 4056–4062 (1998). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar