The nature of confounding in genome-wide association studies (original) (raw)

Nature Reviews Genetics volume 14, pages 1–2 (2013) Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The authors argue that population structure per se is not a problem in genome-wide association studies — the true sources are the environment and the genetic background, and the latter is greatly underappreciated. They conclude that mixed models effectively address this issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$259.00 per year

only $21.58 per issue

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

References

  1. Lander, E. S. & Schork, N. J. Science 265, 2037–2048 (1994).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Devlin, B. & Roeder, K. Biometrics 55, 997–1004 (1999).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Pritchard, J. K. et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 67, 170–181 (2000).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  4. Price, A. L. et al. Nature Genet. 38, 904–909 (2006).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits (Sinauer Associates, 1998).
    Google Scholar
  6. Fisher, R. A. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 52, 399–433 (1918).
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Haseman, J. K. & Elston, R. C. Behav. Genet. 2, 3–19 (1972).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Henderson, C. R. Applications of Linear Models in Animal Breeding (Univ. Guelph Press, 1984).
    Google Scholar
  9. Yu, J. et al. Nature Genet. 38, 203–208 (2006).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Zhao, K. et al. PLoS Genet. 3, e4 (2007).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  11. Kang, H. M. et al. Nature Genet. 42, 348–354 (2010).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Price, A. L. et al. Nature Rev. Genet. 11, 459–463 (2010).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Yang, J. et al. Nature Genet. 42, 565–569 (2010).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Segura, V. et al. Nature Genet. 44, 825–830 (2012).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Zaitlen, N. & Kraft, P. Hum. Genet. 131, 1655–1664 (2012).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  16. Zuk, O. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 1193–1198 (2012).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  17. Atwell, S. et al. Nature 465, 627–631 (2010).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  18. Platt, A., Vilhjálmsson, B. J. & Nordborg, M. Genetics 186, 1045–1052 (2010).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  19. Dickson, S. P. et al. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000294 (2010).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  20. Huang, X. et al. Nature Genet. 42, 961–967 (2010).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Listgarten, J. et al. Nature Methods 9, 525–526 (2012).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  22. Zhou, X., Carbonetto, P. & Stephens, M. Preprint at arXiv [online], (2012).
  23. Deary, I. J. et al. Nature 482, 212–215 (2012).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Korte, A. et al. Nature Genet. 44, 1066–1071 (2012).Article
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank E. Buckler, D. Balding, P. Donnelly, A. Hancock, I. Hellmann, M. Horton, A. Korte, Q. Long, D. Meng, N. Patterson, A. Platt, A. Price, V. Segura, O. Stegle and Q. Zhang for discussions and/or comments on the manuscript. We are especially grateful to A. Price for sharing the observation that mixed models can explain a substantial fraction of the phenotypic covariance in randomly generated individuals. Remaining errors or omissions are our responsibility. This work was supported by US National Institutes of Health grant HG002790, European Research Council grant AdG-268962 and the Gregor Mendel Institute. We apologize to authors whose work could not be cited owing to space constraints.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, 02115, Massachusetts, USA
    Bjarni J. Vilhjálmsson
  2. The Broad Institute, Cambridge, 02143, Massachusetts, USA
    Bjarni J. Vilhjálmsson
  3. Gregor Mendel Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, 1030, Austria
    Magnus Nordborg
  4. Molecular and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 90089, California, USA
    Magnus Nordborg

Authors

  1. Bjarni J. Vilhjálmsson
  2. Magnus Nordborg

Corresponding authors

Correspondence toBjarni J. Vilhjálmsson or Magnus Nordborg.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vilhjálmsson, B., Nordborg, M. The nature of confounding in genome-wide association studies.Nat Rev Genet 14, 1–2 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3382

Download citation