Diversity and evolution of class 2 CRISPR–Cas systems (original) (raw)

• Makarova, K. S., Grishin, N. V., Shabalina, S. A., Wolf, Y. I. & Koonin, E. V. A putative RNA-interference-based immune system in prokaryotes: computational analysis of the predicted enzymatic machinery, functional analogies with eukaryotic RNAi, and hypothetical mechanisms of action. Biol. Direct 1, 7 (2006).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Barrangou, R. et al. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science 315, 1709–1712 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Barrangou, R. CRISPR–Cas systems and RNA-guided interference. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 4, 267–278 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Marraffini, L. A. CRISPR–Cas immunity in prokaryotes. Nature 526, 55–61 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Mohanraju, P. et al. Diverse evolutionary roots and mechanistic variations of the CRISPR–Cas systems. Science 353, aad5147 (2016).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Van der Oost, J., Westra, E. R., Jackson, R. N. & Wiedenheft, B. Unravelling the structural and mechanistic basis of CRISPR–Cas systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 479–492 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Makarova, K. S., Aravind, L., Wolf, Y. I. & Koonin, E. V. Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin and evolution of CRISPR–Cas systems. Biol. Direct 6, 38 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Makarova, K. S., Wolf, Y. I. & Koonin, E. V. The basic building blocks and evolution of CRISPR–Cas systems. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 41, 1392–1400 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Takeuchi, N., Wolf, Y. I., Makarova, K. S. & Koonin, E. V. Nature and intensity of selection pressure on CRISPR-associated genes. J. Bacteriol. 194, 1216–1225 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bondy-Denomy, J. & Davidson, A. R. To acquire or resist: the complex biological effects of CRISPR–Cas systems. Trends Microbiol. 22, 218–225 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bondy-Denomy, J. et al. Multiple mechanisms for CRISPR–Cas inhibition by anti-CRISPR proteins. Nature 526, 136–139 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• van Houte, S. et al. The diversity-generating benefits of a prokaryotic adaptive immune system. Nature 532, 385–388 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Makarova, K. S. et al. Evolution and classification of the CRISPR–Cas systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 467–477 (2011).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Makarova, K. S. & Koonin, E. V. Annotation and classification of CRISPR–Cas systems. Methods Mol. Biol. 1311, 47–75 (2015).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Makarova, K. S. et al. An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR–Cas systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 722–736 (2015). This paper presents the latest classification of the CRISPR–Cas systems, prior to the application of the pipeline described here, along with computational approaches for the identification and quantitative comparison of CRISPR– cas loci.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Shmakov, S. et al. Discovery and functional characterization of diverse class 2 CRISPR–Cas systems. Mol. Cell 60, 385–397 (2015). This paper presents the first instalment of the computational pipeline that is described in this article, using Cas1 as the seed, and experimental validation of the activity of subtype V-B.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chylinski, K., Makarova, K. S., Charpentier, E. & Koonin, E. V. Classification and evolution of type II CRISPR–Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 6091–6105 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Brouns, S. J. et al. Small CRISPR RNAs guide antiviral defense in prokaryotes. Science 321, 960–964 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jore, M. M. et al. Structural basis for CRISPR RNA-guided DNA recognition by Cascade. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 529–536 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Beloglazova, N. et al. CRISPR RNA binding and DNA target recognition by purified Cascade complexes from Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 530–543 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. N. et al. Structural biology. Crystal structure of the CRISPR RNA-guided surveillance complex from Escherichia coli. Science 345, 1473–1479 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rouillon, C. et al. Structure of the CRISPR interference complex CSM reveals key similarities with cascade. Mol. Cell 52, 124–134 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Staals, R. H. et al. RNA targeting by the type III-A CRISPR–Cas Csm complex of Thermus thermophilus. Mol. Cell 56, 518–530 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Osawa, T., Inanaga, H., Sato, C. & Numata, T. Crystal structure of the CRISPR–Cas RNA silencing Cmr complex bound to a target analog. Mol. Cell 58, 418–430 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. W. et al. Structural biology. Structures of the CRISPR–Cmr complex reveal mode of RNA target positioning. Science 348, 581–585 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816–821 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819–823 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mali, P., Esvelt, K. M. & Church, G. M. Cas9 as a versatile tool for engineering biology. Nat. Methods 10, 957–963 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gasiunas, G., Barrangou, R., Horvath, P. & Siksnys, V. Cas9–crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E2579–E2586 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Nishimasu, H. et al. Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA. Cell 156, 935–949 (2014). This paper reports the first structure of Cas9, which provides insight into the interaction of class 2 effectors with crRNA and target DNA.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Nishimasu, H. et al. Crystal structure of Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Cell 162, 1113–1126 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S. H., LaFrance, B., Kaplan, M. & Doudna, J. A. Conformational control of DNA target cleavage by CRISPR–Cas9. Nature 527, 110–113 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sapranauskas, R. et al. The Streptococcus thermophilus CRISPR/Cas system provides immunity in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 9275–9282 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Deltcheva, E. et al. CRISPR RNA maturation by _trans_-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III. Nature 471, 602–607 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chylinski, K., Le Rhun, A. & Charpentier, E. The tracrRNA and Cas9 families of type II CRISPR–Cas immunity systems. RNA Biol. 10, 726–737 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Briner, A. E. et al. Guide RNA functional modules direct Cas9 activity and orthogonality. Mol. Cell 56, 333–339 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Schunder, E., Rydzewski, K., Grunow, R. & Heuner, K. First indication for a functional CRISPR/Cas system in Francisella tularensis. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 303, 51–60 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zetsche, B. et al. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR–Cas system. Cell 163, 759–771 (2015). This work demonstrates the interference activity of Cpf1 and shows that Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease that does not require tracrRNA.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Dong, D. et al. The crystal structure of Cpf1 in complex with CRISPR RNA. Nature 532, 522–526 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Yamano, T. et al. Crystal structure of Cpf1 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA. Cell 165, 949–962 (2016). Together with reference 39, this paper presents the structure of Cpf1 in complex with crRNA and target DNA, demonstrating that, despite similar overall shapes, the domain architectures of Cpf1 and Cas9 differ substantially.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fonfara, I., Richter, H., Bratovic, M., Le Rhun, A. & Charpentier, E. The CRISPR-associated DNA-cleaving enzyme Cpf1 also processes precursor CRISPR RNA. Nature 532, 517–521 (2016). This work demonstrates that Cpf1 is responsible not only for interference but also for pre-crRNA processing.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Abudayyeh, O. O. et al. C2c2 is a single-component programmable RNA-guided RNA-targeting CRISPR effector. Science 353, aaf5573 (2016). This paper describes the first CRISPR–Cas system that exclusively cleaves RNA, and demonstrates the switch from specific to non-specific RNA cleavage following target recognition.
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pasternak, C. et al. ISDra2 transposition in Deinococcus radiodurans is downregulated by TnpB. Mol. Microbiol. 88, 443–455 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bao, W. & Jurka, J. Homologues of bacterial TnpB_IS605 are widespread in diverse eukaryotic transposable elements. Mob. DNA 4, 12 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kapitonov, V. V., Makarova, K. S. & Koonin, E. V. ISC, a novel group of bacterial and archaeal DNA transposons that encode Cas9 homologs. J. Bacteriol. 198, 797–807 (2015). In this work, the direct evolutionary ancestors of Cas9 are identified.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Gomes-Filho, J. V. et al. Sense overlapping transcripts in IS1341-type transposase genes are functional non-coding RNAs in archaea. RNA Biol. 12, 490–500 (2015). This work demonstrates that TnpB proteins bind to RNA, which is compatible with their role as ancestors of class 2 CRISPR–Cas effectors.
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Westra, E. R., Buckling, A. & Fineran, P. C. CRISPR–Cas systems: beyond adaptive immunity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 317–326 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Anantharaman, V., Makarova, K. S., Burroughs, A. M., Koonin, E. V. & Aravind, L. Comprehensive analysis of the HEPN superfamily: identification of novel roles in intra-genomic conflicts, defense, pathogenesis and RNA processing. Biol. Direct 8, 15 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Makarova, K. S., Anantharaman, V., Grishin, N. V., Koonin, E. V. & Aravind, L. CARF and WYL domains: ligand-binding regulators of prokaryotic defense systems. Front. Genet. 5, 102 (2014).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Makarova, K. S., Anantharaman, V., Aravind, L. & Koonin, E. V. Live virus-free or die: coupling of antivirus immunity and programmed suicide or dormancy in prokaryotes. Biol. Direct 7, 40 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Iranzo, J., Lobkovsky, A. E., Wolf, Y. I. & Koonin, E. V. Immunity, suicide or both? Ecological determinants for the combined evolution of anti-pathogen defense systems. BMC Evol. Biol. 15, 43 (2015).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• East-Seletsky, A. et al. Two distinct RNase activities of CRISPR-C2c2 enable guide-RNA processing and RNA detection. Nature 538, 270–273 (2016). This paper describes experiments that show that, similar to Cpf1, C2c2, the subtype VI-A effector, catalyses pre-crRNA processing.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Koonin, E. V., Dolja, V. V. & Krupovic, M. Origins and evolution of viruses of eukaryotes: the ultimate modularity. Virology 479–480, 2–25 (2015).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Sheppard, N. F., Glover, C. V., Terns, R. M. & Terns, M. P. The CRISPR-associated Csx1 protein of Pyrococcus furiosus is an adenosine-specific endoribonuclease. RNA 22, 216–224 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Niewoehner, O. & Jinek, M. Structural basis for the endoribonuclease activity of the type III-A CRISPR-associated protein Csm6. RNA 22, 318–329 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Curtis, T. P., Sloan, W. T. & Scannell, J. W. Estimating prokaryotic diversity and its limits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 10494–10499 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Curtis, T. P. et al. What is the extent of prokaryotic diversity? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 361, 2023–2037 (2006).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fraser, C., Alm, E. J., Polz, M. F., Spratt, B. G. & Hanage, W. P. The bacterial species challenge: making sense of genetic and ecological diversity. Science 323, 741–746 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Quince, C., Curtis, T. P. & Sloan, W. T. The rational exploration of microbial diversity. ISME J. 2, 997–1006 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Chavez, A. et al. Comparison of Cas9 activators in multiple species. Nat. Methods 13, 563–567 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Thakore, P. I., Black, J. B., Hilton, I. B. & Gersbach, C. A. Editing the epigenome: technologies for programmable transcription and epigenetic modulation. Nat. Methods 13, 127–137 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chen, B. et al. Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized CRISPR/Cas system. Cell 155, 1479–1491 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Knight, S. C. et al. Dynamics of CRISPR–Cas9 genome interrogation in living cells. Science 350, 823–826 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nelles, D. A. et al. Programmable RNA tracking in live cells with CRISPR/Cas9. Cell 165, 488–496 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hsu, P. D., Lander, E. S. & Zhang, F. Development and applications of CRISPR–Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell 157, 1262–1278 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. Genome-wide specificities of CRISPR–Cas Cpf1 nucleases in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 869–874 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. et al. Generation of knockout mice by Cpf1-mediated gene targeting. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 808–810 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hur, J. K. et al. Targeted mutagenesis in mice by electroporation of Cpf1 ribonucleoproteins. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 807–808 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kim, D. et al. Genome-wide analysis reveals specificities of Cpf1 endonucleases in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 863–868 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Li, S. Y., Zhao, G. P. & Wang, J. C-Brick: a new standard for assembly of biological parts using Cpf1. ACS Synth. Biol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.6b00114 (2016).
• O'Connell, M. R. et al. Programmable RNA recognition and cleavage by CRISPR/Cas9. Nature 516, 263–266 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Edgar, R. C. PILER-CR: fast and accurate identification of CRISPR repeats. BMC Bioinformatics 8, 18 (2007).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Grissa, I., Vergnaud, G. & Pourcel, C. CRISPRFinder: a web tool to identify clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W52–W57 (2007).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Almendros, C., Guzman, N. M., Garcia-Martinez, J. & Mojica, F. J. Anti-cas spacers in orphan CRISPR4 arrays prevent uptake of active CRISPR–Cas I-F systems. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16081 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Makarova, K. S., Wolf, Y. I. & Koonin, E. V. Comparative genomics of defense systems in archaea and bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 4360–4377 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Liu, L. et al. C2c1–sgRNA complex structure reveals RNA-guided DNA cleavage mechanism. Mol. Cell http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2016.11.040 (2016).
• Yang, H., Gao, P., Rajashankar, K. R. & Patel, D. J. PAM-dependent target DNA recognition and cleavage by C2c1 CRISPR–Cas endonuclease. Cell 167, 1814–1828.e12 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Liu, L. et al. Two distant catalytic sites are responsible for C2c2 RNase activities. Cell 168, 121–134.e12. (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Smargon, A. A. et al. Cas13b is a type VI-B CRISPR-associated RNA-guided RNase differentially regulated by accessory proteins Csx27 and Csx28. Mol. Cell http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2016.12.023 (2017).
• Burstein, D. et al. New CRISPR–Cas systems from uncultivated microbes. Nature http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature21059 (2016).