Improvement of individual camouflage through background choice in ground-nesting birds (original) (raw)

References

1. Cott, H. B. Adaptive Coloration in Animals (Methuen & Co, London, 1940).
   Google Scholar
2. Diamond, J. & Bond, A. B. Concealing Coloration in Animals (Harvard Univ. Press, Harvard, 2013).
   Book Google Scholar
3. Kettlewell, H. B. D. Selection experiments on industrial melanism in the Lepidoptera. Heredity 9, 323–342 (1955).
   Article Google Scholar
4. Stevens, M. Cheats and Deceits: How Animals and Plants Exploit and Mislead (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2016).
   Google Scholar
5. Stevens, M. & Merilaita, S. Animal camouflage: current issues and new perspectives. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 423–427 (2009).
   Article PubMed Google Scholar
6. Thayer, G. H. Concealing-Coloration in the Animal Kingdom: An Exposition of the Laws of Disguise Through Color and Pattern: Being a Summary of Abbott H. Thayer’s Discoveries (Macmillan, New York, 1909).
   Book Google Scholar
7. Wallace, A. R. Darwinism. An Exposition of the Theory of Natural Selection With Some of its Applications (Macmillan, London, 1889).
   Google Scholar
8. Stevens, M. & Merilaita, S. Animal Camouflage: From Mechanisms to Function (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2011).
   Book Google Scholar
9. Bond, A. B. & Kamil, A. C. Visual predators select for crypticity and polymorphism in virtual prey. Nature 415, 609–613 (2002).
   Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
10. Cuthill, I. C. et al. Disruptive coloration and background pattern matching. Nature 434, 72–74 (2005).
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
11. Merilaita, S. & Lind, J. Background-matching and disruptive coloration, and the evolution of cryptic coloration. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 665–670 (2005).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
12. Merilaita, S., Tuomi, J. & Jormalainen, V. Optimization of cryptic coloration in heterogeneous habitats. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 67, 151–161 (1999).
    Article Google Scholar
13. Rowland, H. M., Cuthill, I. C., Harvey, I. F., Speed, M. P. & Ruxton, G. D. Can’t tell the caterpillars from the trees: countershading enhances survival in a woodland. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 2539–2545 (2008).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
14. Schaefer, M. H. & Stobbe, N. Disruptive coloration provides camouflage independent of background matching. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 2427–2432 (2006).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
15. Stevens, M. & Cuthill, I. C. Disruptive coloration, crypsis and edge detection in early visual processing. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 2141–2147 (2006).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
16. Troscianko, J., Lown, A. E., Hughes, A. E. & Stevens, M. Defeating crypsis: detection and learning of camouflage strategies. PLoS ONE 8, e73733 (2013).
    Article PubMed CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar
17. Webster, R. J., Hassall, C., Herdman, C. M. & Sherratt, T. N. Disruptive camouflage impairs object recognition. Biol. Lett. 9, 20130501 (2013).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
18. Duarte, R. C., Flores, A. A. V. & Stevens, M. Camouflage through colour change: mechanisms, adaptive value, and ecological significance. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 372, 20160342 (2017).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
19. Nachman, M. W., Hoekstra, H. E. & D’Agostino, S. L. The genetic basis of adaptive melanism in pocket mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 5268–5273 (2003).
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
20. Rosenblum, E. B. Convergent evolution and divergent selection: lizards at the White Sands ecotone. Am. Nat. 167, 1–15 (2006).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
21. Wallace, A. R. Mimicry and other protective resemblances among animals. Westminster Rev. 1 (July), 1–43 (1867).
    Google Scholar
22. Merilaita, S., Lyytinen, A. & Mappes, J. Selection for cryptic coloration in a visually heterogeneous habitat. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 1925–1929 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
23. Kettlewell, H. B. D. Recognition of appropriate backgrounds by the pale and black phases of Lepidoptera. Nature. 175, 943–944 (1955).
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
24. Endler, J. A. Progressive background matching in moths, and a quantitative measure of crypsis. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 22, 187–231 (1984).
    Article Google Scholar
25. Kettlewell, H. B. D. & Conn, D. L. T. Further background-choice experiments on cryptic Lepidoptera. J. Zool. 181, 371–376 (1977).
    Article Google Scholar
26. Sargent, T. D. Background selections of geometrid and noctuid moths. Science 154, 1674–1675 (1966).
    Article Google Scholar
27. Lovell, P. G., Ruxton, G. D., Langridge, K. V. & Spencer, K. A. Individual quail select egg-laying substrate providing optimal camouflage for their egg phenotype. Curr. Biol. 23, 260–264 (2013).
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
28. Marshall, K. L. A., Philpot, K. E. & Stevens, M. Microhabitat choice in island lizards enhances camouflage against avian predators. Sci. Rep. 6, 19815 (2016).
    Article PubMed CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar
29. Marshall, K. L. A. & Stevens, M. Wall lizards display conspicuous signals to conspecifics and reduce detection by avian predators. Behav. Ecol. 25, 1325–1337 (2014).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
30. Duarte, R. C., Stevens, M. & Flores, A. A. V. Shape, colour plasticity, and habitat use indicate morph-specific camouflage strategies in a marine shrimp. BMC Evol. Biol. 16, 218 (2016).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
31. Gilby, B. L. et al. Colour change in a filefish (Monacanthus chinensis) faced with the challenge of changing backgrounds. Environ. Biol. Fish. 98, 2021–2029 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
32. Sargent, T. D. Behavioural adaptations of cryptic moths III: resting attitutes of two bark-like species, Melanolophia canadaria and Catocala ultronia. Anim. Behav. 17, 670–672 (1969).
    Article Google Scholar
33. Kang, C. K., Moon, J. Y., Lee, S. I. & Jablonski, P. G. Camouflage through an active choice of a resting spot and body orientation in moths. J. Evol. Biol. 25, 1695–1702 (2012).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
34. Kang, C. K., Stevens, M., Moon, J. Y., Lee, S. I. & Jablonski, P. G. Camouflage through behavior in moths: the role of background matching and disruptive coloration. Behav. Ecol. 26, 45–54 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
35. Kang, C. K., Moon, J. Y., Lee, S. I. & Jablonski, P. G. Moths on tree trunks seek out more cryptic positions when their current crypticity is low. Anim. Behav. 86, 587–594 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
36. Barbosa, A., Allen, J. J., Mäthger, L. M. & Hanlon, R. T. Cuttlefish use visual cues to determine arm postures for camouflage. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 84–90 (2012).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
37. Troscianko, J., Wilson-Aggarwal, J., Stevens, M. & Spottiswoode, C. N. Camouflage predicts survival in ground-nesting birds. Sci. Rep. 6, 19966 (2016).
    Article PubMed CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar
38. Wilson-Aggarwal, J., Troscianko, J., Stevens, M. & Spottiswoode, C. N. Escape distance in ground-nesting birds differs with individual level of camouflage. Am. Nat. 188, 231–239 (2016).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
39. Stevens, M., Párraga, C. A., Cuthill, I. C., Partridge, J. C. & Troscianko, T. S. Using digital photography to study animal coloration. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 90, 211–237 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
40. Stoddard, M. C. & Stevens, M. Pattern mimicry of host eggs by the common cuckoo, as seen through a bird’s eye. Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 1387–1393 (2010).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
41. Vorobyev, M. & Osorio, D. Receptor noise as a determinant of colour thresholds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 351–358 (1998).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
42. Nosil, P. & Crespi, B. J. Experimental evidence that predation promotes divergence in adaptive radiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 9090–9095 (2006).
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
43. Stevens, M., Lown, A. E. & Wood, L. E. Camouflage and individual variation in shore crabs (Carcinus maenas) from different habitats. PLoS ONE 9, e115586 (2014).
    Article PubMed CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar
44. Dawkins, R. The Extended Phenotype (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1989).
    Google Scholar
45. Troscianko, J., Wilson-Aggarwal, J., Spottiswoode, C. N. & Stevens, M. Nest covering in plovers: how modifying the visual environment influences egg camouflage. Ecol. Evol. 6, 7536–7545 (2016).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
46. Gosler, A. G., Barnett, P. R. & Reynolds, S. J. Inheritance and variation in eggshell patterning in the great tit Parus major. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 2469–2473 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
47. Rothstein, S. I. Mechanisms of avian egg-recognition: do birds know their own eggs? Anim. Behav. 23, 268–278 (1975).
    Article Google Scholar
48. Doucet, S. M., Mennill, D. J. & Hill, G. E. The evolution of signal design in manakin plumage ornaments. Am. Nat. 169, S62–S80 (2007).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
49. Marchetti, K. Dark habitats and bright birds illustrate the role of the environment in species divergence. Nature. 362, 149–152 (1993).
    Article Google Scholar
50. Stevens, M. & Ruxton, G. D. Linking the evolution and form of warning coloration in nature. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 417–426 (2012).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
51. Troscianko, J. & Stevens, M. Image calibration and analysis toolbox – a free software suite for objectively measuring reflectance, colour and pattern. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 1320–1331 (2015).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
52. Stevens, M., Lown, A. E. & Wood, L. E. Colour change and camouflage in juvenile shore crabs Carcinus maenas. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2, 14 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
53. Stevens, M., Stoddard, M. C. & Higham, J. P. Studying primate color: towards visual system dependent methods. Int. J. Primatol. 30, 893–917 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
54. Calderone, J. B. & Jacobs, G. H. Spectral properties and retinal distribution of ferret cones. Visual Neurosci. 20, 11–17 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar
55. Govardovskii, V. I., Fyhrquist, N., Reuter, T., Kuzmin, D. G. & Donner, K. In search of the visual pigment template. Visual Neurosci. 17, 509–528 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
56. Douglas, R. H. & Jeffery, G. The spectral transmission of ocular media suggests ultraviolet sensitivity is widespread among mammals. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20132995 (2014).
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
57. Jacobs, G. H., Neitz, J., Crognale, M. A. & Brammer, G. L. Spectral sensitivity of vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus) and the issue of catarrhine trichromacy. Am. J. Primatol. 23, 185–195 (1991).
    Article Google Scholar
58. Stockman, A. & Sharpe, L. T. The spectral sensitivities of the middle-and long-wavelength-sensitive cones derived from measurements in observers of known genotype. Vision Res. 40, 1711–1737 (2000).
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
59. Ödeen, A., Håstad, O. & Alström, P. Evolution of ultraviolet vision in the largest avian radiation-the passerines. BMC Evol. Biol. 11, 313 (2011).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
60. Hart, N. S. Vision in the peafowl (Aves: Pavo cristatus). J. Exp. Biol. 205, 3925–3935 (2002).
    PubMed Google Scholar
61. Lovell, P. G. et al. Stability of the color-opponent signals under changes of illuminant in natural scenes. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 22, 2060–2071 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
62. Arnold, S. E., Faruq, S., Savolainen, V., McOwan, P. W. & Chittka, L. FReD: the floral reflectance database—a web portal for analyses of flower colour. PLoS ONE 5, e14287 (2010).
    Article PubMed CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar
63. Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012).
    Article PubMed CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar
64. R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2016).
    Google Scholar
65. Troscianko, J. A simple tool for calculating egg shape, volume and surface area from digital images. Ibis 156, 874–878 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
66. Troscianko, J., Skelhorn, J. & Stevens, M. Quantifying camouflage: how to predict detectability from appearance. BMC Evol. Biol. 17, 7 (2017).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
67. Osorio, D. & Vorobyev, M. Photoreceptor spectral sensitivities in terrestrial animals: adaptations for luminance and colour vision. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 1745–1752 (2005).
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
68. Chiao, C.-C., Chubb, C., Buresch, K. C., Siemann, L. & Hanlon, R. T. The scaling effects of substrate texture on camouflage patterning in cuttlefish. Vision Res. 49, 1647–1656 (2009).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
69. Renoult, J. P., Kelber, A. & Schaefer, H. M. Colour spaces in ecology and evolutionary biology. Biol. Rev. 92, 292–315 (2017).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
70. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models using Eigen and S4. R package v. 11-7 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2014).
    Google Scholar

Download references