From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (original) (raw)

References

  1. Richards, B. A. et al. Patterns across multiple memories are identified over time. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 981–986 (2014).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Epstein, R. A., Patai, E. Z., Julian, J. B. & Spiers, H. J. The cognitive map in humans: spatial navigation and beyond. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 1504–1513 (2017).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Robin, J., Rivest, J., Rosenbaum, R. S. & Moscovitch, M. Remote spatial and autobiographical memory in cases of episodic amnesia and topographical disorientation. Cortex 119, 237–257 (2019).
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Miller, T. D. et al. Human hippocampal CA3 damage disrupts both recent and remote episodic memories. eLife 9, e41836 (2020).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Bartsch, T., Döhring, J., Rohr, A., Jansen, O. & Deuschl, G. CA1 neurons in the human hippocampus are critical for autobiographical memory, mental time travel, and autonoetic consciousness. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 17562–17567 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Rosenbaum, R. S. et al. Patterns of autobiographical memory loss in medial-temporal lobe amnesic patients. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 20, 1490–1506 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Bellmund, J. L. S., Gardenfors, P., Moser, E. I. & Doeller, C. F. Navigating cognition: spatial codes for human thinking. Science 362, eaat6766 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  8. Brunec, I. K., Moscovitch, M. & Barense, M. D. Boundaries shape cognitive representations of spaces and events. Trends Cogn. Sci. 22, 637–650 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  9. O’Keefe, J. & Nadel, L. The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map (Clarendon Press, 1978).
  10. Keinath, A. T., Rechnitz, O., Balasubramanian, V. & Epstein, R. A. Environmental deformations dynamically shift human spatial memory. Hippocampus 31, 89–101 (2021).
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Moser, E. I., Moser, M.-B. & McNaughton, B. L. Spatial representation in the hippocampal formation: a history. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 1448 (2017).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Alme, C. B. et al. Place cells in the hippocampus: eleven maps for eleven rooms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 18428–18435 (2014).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Leutgeb, S. et al. Independent codes for spatial and episodic memory in hippocampal neuronal ensembles. Science 309, 619–623 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Baraduc, P., Duhamel, J. R. & Wirth, S. Schema cells in the macaque hippocampus. Science 363, 635–639 (2019). Recordings from hippocampal neurons in the macaque monkey during virtual navigation show the existence of cells that generalize parts of similar environments across environments.
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  15. Spiers, H., Hayman, R. M., Jovalekic, A., Marozzi, E. & Jeffery, K. J. Place field repetition and purely local remapping in a multicompartment environment. Cereb. Cortex 25, 10–25 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Derdikman, D. et al. Fragmentation of grid cell maps in a multicompartment environment. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 1325–1332 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Singer, A. C., Karlsson, M. P., Nathe, A. R., Carr, M. F. & Frank, L. M. Experience-dependent development of coordinated hippocampal spatial activity representing the similarity of related locations. J. Neurosci. 30, 11586–11604 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. McKenzie, S. et al. Hippocampal representation of related and opposing memories develop within distinct, hierarchically organized neural schemas. Neuron 83, 202–215 (2014).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  19. Marchette, S. A., Ryan, J. & Epstein, R. A. Schematic representations of local environmental space guide goal-directed navigation. Cognition 158, 68–80 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Robin, J. & Moscovitch, M. Details, gist and schema: hippocampal–neocortical interactions underlying recent and remote episodic and spatial memory. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 17, 114–123 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  21. Bartlett, F. Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology (Cambridge University Press, 1932).
  22. Gilboa, A. & Marlatte, H. Neurobiology of schemas and schema-mediated memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 21, 618–631 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  23. Piaget, J. The Origins of Intelligence in Children (International Universities Press, 1952).
  24. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E. & Williams, R. J. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323, 533–536 (1986).
    Article Google Scholar
  25. Frankland, P. W. & Bontempi, B. The organization of recent and remote memories. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 119–130 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  26. Tonegawa, S., Morrissey, M. D. & Kitamura, T. The role of engram cells in the systems consolidation of memory. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 19, 485–498 (2018).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  27. Spiers, H. J. & Maguire, E. A. The neuroscience of remote spatial memory: a tale of two cities. Neuroscience 149, 7–27 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  28. de Lange, F. P., Heilbron, M. & Kok, P. How do expectations shape perception? Trends Cogn. Sci. 22, 764–779 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  29. Noack, H., Schick, W., Mallot, H. & Born, J. Sleep enhances knowledge of routes and regions in spatial environments. Learn. Mem. 24, 140–144 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  30. Brewer, W. F. & Treyens, J. C. Role of schemata in memory for places. Cogn. Psychol. 13, 207–230 (1981).
    Article Google Scholar
  31. Babichev, A., Cheng, S. & Dabaghian, Y. A. Topological schemas of cognitive maps and spatial learning. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 10, 18 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  32. Ocampo, A. C., Squire, L. R. & Clark, R. E. The beneficial effect of prior experience on the acquisition of spatial memory in rats with CA1, but not large hippocampal lesions: a possible role for schema formation. Learn. Mem. 25, 115–121 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  33. Lynch, K. The Image of the City. Vol. 11 (MIT Press, 1960).
  34. Filomena, G., Verstegen, J. & Manley, E. A computational approach to ‘The Image of the City’. Cities 89, 14–25 (2019). The authors apply a mathematical analysis to the layout of cities to identify hidden structures in the street layouts for regions.
    Article Google Scholar
  35. Portugali, J. Complexity, Cognition and the City (Springer Science & Business Media, 2011).
  36. Alonso, A., van der Meij, J., Tse, D. & Genzel, L. Naïve to expert: considering the role of previous knowledge in memory. Brain Neurosci. Adv. 4, 2398212820948686 (2020).
    Article Google Scholar
  37. He, Q., Beveridge, E. H., Starnes, J., Goodroe, S. C. & Brown, T. I. Environmental overlap and individual encoding strategy modulate memory interference in spatial navigation. Cognition 207, 104508 (2021).
    Article Google Scholar
  38. Zheng, L., Gao, Z., McAvan, A. S., Isham, E. A. & Ekstrom, A. D. Partially overlapping spatial environments trigger reinstatement in hippocampus and schema representations in prefrontal cortex. Nat. Commun. 12, 6231 (2021).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  39. Peer, M. & Epstein, R. A. The human brain uses spatial schemas to represent segmented environments. Curr. Biol. 31, 4677–4688.e8 (2021). Collectively, refs 37–39 investigate the cognitive and neural precursors to, and properties of, schema formation in humans, including the effects of overlap with previously learned environments, segmentation, and the roles of the hippocampus, retrosplenial cortex, and medial prefrontal cortex.
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  40. Lee, M., Barbosa, H., Youn, H., Holme, P. & Ghoshal, G. Morphology of travel routes and the organization of cities. Nat. Commun. 8, 2229 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  41. Lämmer, S., Gehlsen, B. & Helbing, D. Scaling laws in the spatial structure of urban road networks. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 363, 89–95 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
  42. Strano, E. et al. Urban street networks, a comparative analysis of ten European cities. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 40, 1071–1086 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  43. Roth, C., Kang, S. M., Batty, M. & Barthelemy, M. Structure of urban movements: polycentric activity and entangled hierarchical flows. PLoS One 6, e15923 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  44. Kostof, S. The City Shaped: Urban Patterns and Meanings Through History (Brown and Co., 1991).
  45. Wagner, I. C. et al. Schematic memory components converge within angular gyrus during retrieval. eLife 4, e09668 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  46. Kumaran, D., Hassabis, D. & McClelland, J. L. What learning systems do intelligent agents need? Complementary learning systems theory updated. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20, 512–534 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  47. Mack, M. L., Love, B. C. & Preston, A. R. Dynamic updating of hippocampal object representations reflects new conceptual knowledge. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 13203–13208 (2016).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  48. Moses, S. N., Ostreicher, M. L., Rosenbaum, R. S. & Ryan, J. D. Successful transverse patterning in amnesia using semantic knowledge. Hippocampus 18, 121–124 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
  49. Schlichting, M. L., Mumford, J. A. & Preston, A. R. Learning-related representational changes reveal dissociable integration and separation signatures in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Nat. Commun. 6, 8151 (2015).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  50. Spalding, K. N., Jones, S. H., Duff, M. C., Tranel, D. & Warren, D. E. Investigating the neural correlates of schemas: ventromedial prefrontal cortex is necessary for normal schematic influence on memory. J. Neurosci. 35, 15746–15751 (2015).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  51. Spalding, K. N. et al. Ventromedial prefrontal cortex is necessary for normal associative inference and memory integration. J. Neurosci. 38, 3767–3775 (2018).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  52. Zeithamova, D., Dominick, A. L. & Preston, A. R. Hippocampal and ventral medial prefrontal activation during retrieval-mediated learning supports novel inference. Neuron 75, 168–179 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  53. Tse, D. et al. Schemas and memory consolidation. Science 316, 76–82 (2007). This study in rodents with hippocampal lesions provides evidence for spatial schemas and the involvement of the hippocampus in rapid learning.
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  54. Tse, D. et al. Schema-dependent gene activation and memory encoding in neocortex. Science 333, 891–895 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  55. Gilboa, A., Alain, C., He, Y., Stuss, D. T. & Moscovitch, M. Ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions produce early functional alterations during remote memory retrieval. J. Neurosci. 29, 4871–4881 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  56. van Kesteren, M. T., Fernandez, G., Norris, D. G. & Hermans, E. J. Persistent schema-dependent hippocampal-neocortical connectivity during memory encoding and postencoding rest in humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 7550–7555 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  57. van Kesteren, M. T., Rijpkema, M., Ruiter, D. J. & Fernandez, G. Retrieval of associative information congruent with prior knowledge is related to increased medial prefrontal activity and connectivity. J. Neurosci. 30, 15888–15894 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  58. Tolman, E. C. Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol. Rev. 55, 189–208 (1948).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  59. Morris, R. G., Garrud, P., Rawlins, J. N. & O’Keefe, J. Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions. Nature 297, 681–683 (1982).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  60. O’Keefe, J. & Dostrovsky, J. The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat. Brain Res. 34, 171–175 (1971).
    Article Google Scholar
  61. Ekstrom, A. D. et al. Cellular networks underlying human spatial navigation. Nature 425, 184 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  62. Head, H. & Holmes, G. Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions. Brain 34, 102–254 (1911).
    Article Google Scholar
  63. Ghosh, V. E. & Gilboa, A. What is a memory schema? A historical perspective on current neuroscience literature. Neuropsychologia 53, 104–114 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  64. Moscovitch, M., Cabeza, R., Winocur, G. & Nadel, L. Episodic memory and beyond: the hippocampus and neocortex in transformation. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 67, 105–134 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  65. Rolls, E. T. On pattern separation in the primate, including human, hippocampus. Trends Cogn. Sci. 25, 920–922 (2021).
    Article Google Scholar
  66. Yassa, M. A. & Stark, C. E. Pattern separation in the hippocampus. Trends Neurosci. 34, 515–525 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  67. Bein, O., Reggev, N. & Maril, A. Prior knowledge promotes hippocampal separation but cortical assimilation in the left inferior frontal gyrus. Nat. Comm. 11, 4590 (2020).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  68. Woollett, K. & Maguire, E. A. The effect of navigational expertise on wayfinding in new environments. J. Environ. Psychol. 30, 565–573 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  69. Alonso, A. et al. The HexMaze: a previous knowledge task on map learning for mice. eNeuro 8, ENEURO.0554–20.2021 (2021).
    Article Google Scholar
  70. Winocur, G., Moscovitch, M., Fogel, S., Rosenbaum, R. S. & Sekeres, M. Preserved spatial memory after hippocampal lesions: effects of extensive experience in a complex environment. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 273–275 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  71. Gahnstrom, C. & Spiers, H. J. Striatal and hippocampal contributions to flexible navigation. Brain Neurosci. Adv. 4, 239821282097977 (2020).
    Article Google Scholar
  72. Sommer, T. The emergence of knowledge and how it supports the memory for novel related information. Cereb. Cortex 27, 1906–1921 (2017).
    Google Scholar
  73. van Buuren, M. et al. Initial investigation of the effects of an experimentally learned schema on spatial associative memory in humans. J. Neurosci. 34, 16662–16670 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  74. Guo, D. & Yang, J. Interplay of the long axis of the hippocampus and ventromedial prefrontal cortex in schema-related memory retrieval. Hippocampus https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.23154 (2019).
    Article Google Scholar
  75. van Kesteren, M. T. R., Brown, T. I. & Wagner, A. D. Learned spatial schemas and prospective hippocampal activity support navigation after one-shot learning. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 12, 486 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  76. Poppenk, J., Evensmoen, H. R., Moscovitch, M. & Nadel, L. Long-axis specialization of the human hippocampus. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17, 230–240 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  77. Brunec, I. K. et al. Multiple scales of representation along the hippocampal anteroposterior axis in humans. Curr. Biol. 28, 2129–2135.e6 (2018).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  78. Poppenk, J. & Moscovitch, M. A hippocampal marker of recollection memory ability among healthy young adults: contributions of posterior and anterior segments. Neuron 72, 931–937 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  79. Libby, L. A., Reagh, Z. M., Bouffard, N. R., Ragland, J. D. & Ranganath, C. The hippocampus generalizes across memories that share item and context information. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 31, 24–35 (2019).
    Article Google Scholar
  80. Rosenbaum, R. S. et al. Remote spatial memory in an amnesic person with extensive bilateral hippocampal lesions. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 1044–1048 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  81. Herdman, K. A., Calarco, N., Moscovitch, M., Hirshhorn, M. & Rosenbaum, R. S. Impoverished descriptions of familiar routes in three cases of hippocampal/medial temporal lobe amnesia. Cortex 71, 248–263 (2015). This patient-lesion study provides converging evidence that the hippocampus is needed to support remote spatial memory for visuospatial details but not the gist of environments learned long ago.
    Article Google Scholar
  82. Rosenbaum, R. S., Cassidy, B. N. & Herdman, K. A. Patterns of preserved and impaired spatial memory in a case of developmental amnesia. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9, 196 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  83. Rosenbaum, R. S., Ziegler, M., Winocur, G., Grady, C. L. & Moscovitch, M. “I have often walked down this street before”: fMRI studies on the hippocampus and other structures during mental navigation of an old environment. Hippocampus 14, 826–835 (2004).
    Article Google Scholar
  84. McAvan, A. S. et al. Largely intact memory for spatial locations during navigation in an individual with dense amnesia. Neuropsychologia 170, 108225 (2022).
    Article Google Scholar
  85. Rumelhart, D. E. Schemata: the building blocks. in Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension: Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence, and Education (Routledge, 2017).
  86. Preston, A. R. & Eichenbaum, H. Interplay of hippocampus and prefrontal cortex in memory. Curr. Biol. 23, R764–R773 (2013).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  87. Preston, A., Molitor, R. J., Pudhiyidath, A. & Schlichting, M. L. in Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference 125–132 (Elsevier Inc., 2017).
  88. van Kesteren, M. T., Ruiter, D. J., Fernández, G. & Henson, R. N. How schema and novelty augment memory formation. Trends Neurosci. 35, 211–219 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  89. Lewis, P. A. & Durrant, S. J. Overlapping memory replay during sleep builds cognitive schemata. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15, 343–351 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  90. Maviel, T., Durkin, T. P., Menzaghi, F. & Bontempi, B. Sites of neocortical reorganization critical for remote spatial memory. Science 305, 96–99 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  91. Ngo, C. T., Benear, S. L., Popal, H., Olson, I. R. & Newcombe, N. S. Contingency of semantic generalization on episodic specificity varies across development. Curr. Biol. 31, 2690–2697.e5 (2021).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  92. Winocur, G. & Moscovitch, M. Memory transformation and systems consolidation. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 17, 766–780 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  93. Sekeres, M. J., Winocur, G. & Moscovitch, M. The hippocampus and related neocortical structures in memory transformation. Neurosci. Lett. 680, 39–53 (2018).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  94. Gilboa, A. & Moscovitch, M. No consolidation without representation: correspondence between neural and psychological representations in recent and remote memory. Neuron 109, 2239–2255 (2021).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  95. Durrant, S. J., Taylor, C., Cairney, S. & Lewis, P. A. Sleep-dependent consolidation of statistical learning. Neuropsychologia 49, 1322–1331 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  96. Peyrache, A., Khamassi, M., Benchenane, K., Wiener, S. I. & Battaglia, F. P. Replay of rule-learning related neural patterns in the prefrontal cortex during sleep. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 919–926 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  97. Stickgold, R. & Walker, M. P. Sleep-dependent memory triage: evolving generalization through selective processing. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 139–145 (2013).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  98. Tamminen, J., Payne, J. D., Stickgold, R., Wamsley, E. J. & Gaskell, M. G. Sleep spindle activity is associated with the integration of new memories and existing knowledge. J. Neurosci. 30, 14356–14360 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  99. Maingret, N., Girardeau, G., Todorova, R., Goutierre, M. & Zugaro, M. Hippocampo-cortical coupling mediates memory consolidation during sleep. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 959–964 (2016).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  100. Ohki, T. & Takei, Y. Neural mechanisms of mental schema: a triplet of delta, low beta/spindle and ripple oscillations. Eur. J. Neurosci. 48, 2416–2430 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  101. Lee, A. K. & Wilson, M. A. Memory of sequential experience in the hippocampus during slow wave sleep. Neuron 36, 1183–1194 (2002).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  102. Wilson, M. A. & McNaughton, B. L. Reactivation of hippocampal ensemble memories during sleep. Science 265, 676–679 (1994).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  103. Girardeau, G., Benchenane, K., Wiener, S. I., Buzsaki, G. & Zugaro, M. B. Selective suppression of hippocampal ripples impairs spatial memory. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 1222–1223 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  104. Quiroga, R. Q., Reddy, L., Kreiman, G., Koch, C. & Fried, I. Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain. Nature 435, 1102–1107 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  105. Quiroga, R. Q. Neural representations across species. Science 363, 1388–1389 (2019).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  106. Quiroga, R. Concept cells: the building blocks of declarative memory functions. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 587–597 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  107. Duvelle, É. et al. Hippocampal place cells encode global location but not connectivity in a complex space. Curr. Biol. 31, 1221–1233.e9 (2021).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  108. Dillon, M. R., Huang, Y. & Spelke, E. S. Core foundations of abstract geometry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 14191–14195 (2013).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  109. Hermer, L. & Spelke, E. S. A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children. Nature 370, 57–59 (1994).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  110. Lee, S. A., Shusterman, A. & Spelke, E. S. Reorientation and landmark-guided search by young children: evidence for two systems. Psychol. Sci. 17, 577–582 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
  111. Spelke, E. S. & Lee, S. A. Core systems of geometry in animal minds. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 367, 2784–2793 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  112. Rosenbaum, R. S. et al. Dramatic changes to well-known places go unnoticed. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ypg96 (2020).
    Article Google Scholar
  113. Kubie, J. L., Levy, E. R. J. & Fenton, A. A. Is hippocampal remapping the physiological basis for context? Hippocampus https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.23160 (2019).
    Article Google Scholar
  114. Latuske, P., Kornienko, O., Kohler, L. & Allen, K. Hippocampal remapping and its entorhinal origin. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 11, 253 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  115. Hartley, T., Burgess, N., Lever, C., Cacucci, F. & O’Keefe, J. Modeling place fields in terms of the cortical inputs to the hippocampus. Hippocampus 10, 369–379 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  116. Sanders, H., Wilson, M. A. & Gershman, S. J. Hippocampal remapping as hidden state inference. eLife 9, e51140 (2020).
    Article Google Scholar
  117. Coutrot, A. et al. Entropy of city street networks linked to future spatial navigation ability. Nature 604, 104–110 (2022). This study reports evidence that growing up in griddy cities adapts navigators to navigate better in grid-like environments but less so in more disorganized environments.
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  118. Wirth, S., Baraduc, P., Plante, A., Pinede, S. & Duhamel, J. R. Gaze-informed, task-situated representation of space in primate hippocampus during virtual navigation. PLoS Biol. 15, e2001045 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  119. Antony, J. et al. Spatial gist extraction during human memory consolidation. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 48, 929–941 (2022). Distributional learning during spatial navigation is examined in three behavioural experiments, demonstrating the extraction of spatial gist representations that decrease over time.
    Article Google Scholar
  120. Schlichting, M. L., Guarino, K. F., Schapiro, A. C., Turk-Browne, N. B. & Preston, A. R. Hippocampal structure predicts statistical learning and associative inference abilities during development. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 29, 37–51 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  121. Wang, S. H., Tse, D. & Morris, R. G. Anterior cingulate cortex in schema assimilation and expression. Learn. Mem. 19, 315–318 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  122. Teng, E. & Squire, L. R. Memory for places learned long ago is intact after hippocampal damage. Nature 400, 675–677 (1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  123. Rosenbaum, R. S., Gao, F., Richards, B., Black, S. E. & Moscovitch, M. “Where to?” remote memory for spatial relations and landmark identity in former taxi drivers with Alzheimer’s disease and encephalitis. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 446–462 (2005).
    Article Google Scholar
  124. Maguire, E. A., Nannery, R. & Spiers, H. J. Navigation around London by a taxi driver with bilateral hippocampal lesions. Brain 129, 2894–2907 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
  125. Winocur, G., Moscovitch, M., Rosenbaum, R. S. & Sekeres, M. An investigation of the effects of hippocampal lesions in rats on pre- and postoperatively acquired spatial memory in a complex environment. Hippocampus 20, 1350–1365 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  126. Spiers, H. J. & Gilbert, S. J. Solving the detour problem in navigation: a model of prefrontal and hippocampal interactions. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9, 125 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  127. Rosenbaum, R. S. et al. fMRI studies of remote spatial memory in an amnesic person. Brain Cogn. 54, 170–172 (2004).
    CAS Google Scholar
  128. Hirshhorn, M., Grady, C., Rosenbaum, R. S., Winocur, G. & Moscovitch, M. Brain regions involved in the retrieval of spatial and episodic details associated with a familiar environment: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 50, 3094–3106 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  129. Batty, M. Cities and Complexity: Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent-Based Models, and Fractals (The MIT Press, 2007).
  130. Kim, M. & Maguire, E. A. Hippocampus, retrosplenial and parahippocampal cortices encode multicompartment 3D space in a hierarchical manner. Cereb. Cortex 28, 1898–1909 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  131. He, Q. & Brown, T. I. Environmental barriers disrupt grid-like representations in humans during navigation. Curr. Biol. 29, 2718–2722.e13 (2019).
    Article Google Scholar
  132. Zhong, C., Arisona, S. M., Huang, X., Batty, M. & Schmitt, G. Detecting the dynamics of urban structure through spatial network analysis. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 28, 2178–2199 (2014). The authors apply network analysis to transport network travel data in Singapore to reveal hierarchies in human movement patterns and their change over time.
    Article Google Scholar
  133. Schick, W., Halfmann, M., Hardiess, G. & Mallot, H. A. Language cues in the formation of hierarchical representation of space. Cogn. Process. 16, S78–S78 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  134. Schirmer, P. M. & Axhausen, K. W. A multiscale classification of urban morphology. J. Transp. Land Use 9, 101–130 (2016).
    Google Scholar
  135. Louail, T. et al. Uncovering the spatial structure of mobility networks. Nat. Commun. 6, 6007 (2015).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  136. Tversky, B. Distortions in cognitive maps. Geoforum 23, 131–138 (1992).
    Article Google Scholar
  137. Poucet, B. Spatial cognitive maps in animals: new hypotheses on their structure and neural mechanisms. Psychol. Rev. 100, 163–182 (1993).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  138. Waller, D. E. & Nadel, L. E. Handbook of Spatial Cognition (American Psychological Association, 2013).
  139. Brunec, I. K. & Momennejad, I. Predictive representations in hippocampal and prefrontal hierarchies. J. Neurosci. 42, 299–312 (2022).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  140. Tversky, B. Mind in Motion: How Action Shapes Thought (Hachette UK, 2019).
  141. Jafarpour, A. & Spiers, H. Familiarity expands space and contracts time. Hippocampus 27, 12–16 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  142. Schedlbauer, A. M., Copara, M. S., Watrous, A. J. & Ekstrom, A. D. Multiple interacting brain areas underlie successful spatiotemporal memory retrieval in humans. Sci. Rep. 4, 6431 (2014).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  143. Watrous, A. J., Tandon, N., Conner, C. R., Pieters, T. & Ekstrom, A. D. Frequency-specific network connectivity increases underlie accurate spatiotemporal memory retrieval. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 349–356 (2013).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  144. Ekstrom, A. D., Arnold, A. E. & Iaria, G. A critical review of the allocentric spatial representation and its neural underpinnings: toward a network-based perspective. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 803 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  145. Ekstrom, A. D., Huffman, D. J. & Starrett, M. Interacting networks of brain regions underlie human spatial navigation: a review and novel synthesis of the literature. J. Neurophysiol. 118, 3328–3344 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  146. Bicanski, A. & Burgess, N. A neural-level model of spatial memory and imagery. eLife 7, e33752 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  147. Jasnow, A. M., Lynch, J. F. III, Gilman, T. L. & Riccio, D. C. Perspectives on fear generalization and its implications for emotional disorders. J. Neurosci. Res. 95, 821–835 (2017).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  148. Takehara-Nishiuchi, K. Prefrontal–hippocampal interaction during the encoding of new memories. Brain Neurosci. Adv. 4, 2398212820925580 (2020).
    Article Google Scholar
  149. Sutherland, R. & Lehmann, H. Alternative conceptions of memory consolidation and the role of the hippocampus at the systems level in rodents. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 21, 446–451 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  150. Sutherland, R. J., Lee, J. Q., McDonald, R. J. & Lehmann, H. Has multiple trace theory been refuted? Hippocampus 30, 842–850 (2020).
    Article Google Scholar
  151. Alexander, A. S. & Nitz, D. A. Retrosplenial cortex maps the conjunction of internal and external spaces. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1143–1151 (2015).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  152. Marchette, S. A., Vass, L. K., Ryan, J. & Epstein, R. A. Anchoring the neural compass: coding of local spatial reference frames in human medial parietal lobe. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1598–1606 (2014).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  153. Patai, E. Z. et al. Hippocampal and retrosplenial goal distance coding after long-term consolidation of a real-world environment. Cereb. Cortex 29, 2748–2758 (2019). This fMRI study provides evidence that the retrosplenial cortex codes spatial information in familiar environments in line with extraction of spatial knowledge to cortical regions.
    Article Google Scholar
  154. Spiers, H. J., & Maguire, E. A. (2006). Thoughts, behaviour, and brain dynamics during navigation in the real world. Neuroimage, 31(4), 1826–1840.
    Article Google Scholar
  155. Nau, M., Julian, J. B. & Doeller, C. F. How the brain’s navigation system shapes our visual experience. Trends Cogn. Sci. 22, 810–825 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  156. Nau, M., Navarro Schroder, T., Bellmund, J. L. S. & Doeller, C. F. Hexadirectional coding of visual space in human entorhinal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 188–190 (2018).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  157. Behrens, T. E. J. et al. What is a cognitive map? Organizing knowledge for flexible behavior. Neuron 100, 490–509 (2018).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  158. Javadi, A. H. et al. Hippocampal and prefrontal processing of network topology to simulate the future. Nat. Commun. 8, 14652 (2017).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  159. Balaguer, J., Spiers, H., Hassabis, D. & Summerfield, C. Neural mechanisms of hierarchical planning in a virtual subway network. Neuron 90, 893–903 (2016).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  160. Schick, W., Halfmann, M., Hardiess, G. & Mallot, H. A. Language cues in the formation of hierarchical representation of space. Cogn. Process. 15, S63–S64 (2014).
    Google Scholar
  161. Summerfield, C., Luyckx, F. & Sheahan, H. Structure learning and the parietal cortex. Prog. Neurobiol. 184, 101717 (2020).
    Article Google Scholar
  162. Koolhaas, R. The Generic City (Sikkens Foundation, 1995).
  163. Kristan, W. B. & Katz, P. Form and function in systems neuroscience. Curr. Biol. 16, R828–R831 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  164. Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T. & Xu, J. Natural movement: or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 20, 29–66 (1993).
    Article Google Scholar
  165. Penn, A. & Turner, J. S. Can we identify general architectural principles that impact the collective behaviour of both human and animal systems? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 373, 20180253 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  166. Hillier, B. & Julienne, H. The Social Logic of Space (Cambridge University Press, 1989).
  167. Pallasmaa, J. The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses (John Wiley & Sons, 2012).
  168. Haq, S. & Zimring, C. Just down the road a piece: the development of topological knowledge of building layouts. Environ. Behav. 35, 132–160 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar
  169. Hillier, B. Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture (Space Syntax, 2007).
  170. Levi-Strauss, C. Structural Anthropology Translated from the French by Jacobson, C. & Grundfest Schoepf, B. (Basic Books, 1963).
  171. Sorrows, M. E. & Hirtle, S. C. The nature of landmarks for real and electronic spaces. Spatial Information Theory. Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Geographic Information Science, Vol. 1661, 37–50 (Springer, 1999).
  172. Peponis, J., Zimring, C. & Choi, Y. K. Finding the building in wayfinding. Environ. Behav. 22, 555–590 (1990).
    Article Google Scholar
  173. Manley, E., Addison, J. & Cheng, T. Shortest path or anchor-based route choice: a large-scale empirical analysis of minicab routing in London. J. Transp. Geogr. 43, 123–139 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  174. Manley, E., Orr, S. W. & Cheng, T. A heuristic model of bounded route choice in urban areas. Transp. Res. C. Emerg. Technol. 56, 195–209 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  175. Emo, B. Seeing the axial line: evidence from wayfinding experiments. Behav. Sci. 4, 167–180 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  176. Bettencourt, L. & West, G. A unified theory of urban living. Nature 467, 912 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  177. Schneider, C. M., Belik, V., Couronne, T., Smoreda, Z. & Gonzalez, M. C. Unravelling daily human mobility motifs. J. R. Soc. Interface 10, 20130246 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  178. Coutrot, A. et al. Global determinants of navigation ability. Curr. Biol. 28, 2861–2866.e4 (2018).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  179. Behrmann, M. & Kimchi, R. What does visual agnosia tell us about perceptual organization and its relationship to object perception? J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 29, 19–42 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar
  180. Elder, J. H. & Goldberg, R. M. Ecological statistics of Gestalt laws for the perceptual organization of contours. J. Vis. 2, 324–353 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
  181. Wannig, A., Stanisor, L. & Roelfsema, P. R. Automatic spread of attentional response modulation along Gestalt criteria in primary visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 1243 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  182. Wertheimer, M. in A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology (ed Willis. E) (Humanities Press, 1950).
  183. Juliani, A. W., Bies, A. J., Boydston, C. R., Taylor, R. P. & Sereno, M. E. Navigation performance in virtual environments varies with fractal dimension of landscape. J. Environ. Psychol. 47, 155–165 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  184. Encarnacao, S., Gaudiano, M., Santos, F. C., Tenedorio, J. A. & Pacheco, J. M. Fractal cartography of urban areas. Sci. Rep. 2, 527 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  185. Emo, B. Choice zones: architecturally relevant areas of interest. Spat. Cogn. Comput. 18, 173–193 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  186. Bonner, M. F. & Epstein, R. A. Computational mechanisms underlying cortical responses to the affordance properties of visual scenes. PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1006111 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  187. Barhorst-Cates, E. M., Meneghetti, C., Zhao, Y., Pazzaglia, F. & Creem-Regehr, S. H. Effects of home environment structure on navigation preference and performance: a comparison in Veneto, Italy and Utah, USA. J. Environ. Psychol. 74, 101580 (2021).
    Article Google Scholar
  188. Nitzan, N. et al. Propagation of hippocampal ripples to the neocortex by way of a subiculum-retrosplenial pathway. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–17 (2020).
    Google Scholar
  189. Crooks, A., Malleson, N., Manley, E. & Heppenstall, A. Agent-based Modelling and Geographical Information Systems: A Practical Primer (SAGE Publications Limited, 2018).
  190. Rosenbaum, R. S. et al. The case of KC: contributions of a memory-impaired person to memory theory. Neuropsychologia 43, 989–1021 (2005).
    Article Google Scholar
  191. Kan, I. P., Rosenbaum, R. S. & Verfaellie, M. Schema processing across the lifespan: from theory to applications. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 37, 1–7 (2020).
    Article Google Scholar
  192. Yu, L. Q., Kan, I. P. & Kable, J. W. Beyond a rod through the skull: a systematic review of lesion studies of the human ventromedial frontal lobe. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 37, 97–141 (2020).
    Article Google Scholar
  193. Amodio, D. M. & Frith, C. D. Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 268–277 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  194. Doeller, C. F., Barry, C. & Burgess, N. Evidence for grid cells in a human memory network. Nature 463, 657–661 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  195. Yeterian, E. H., Pandya, D. N., Tomaiuolo, F. & Petrides, M. (2012). The cortical connectivity of the prefrontal cortex in the monkey brain. Cortex 48, 58–81 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  196. Mack, M. L., Preston, A. R. & Love, B. C. Ventromedial prefrontal cortex compression during concept learning. Nat. Commun. 11, 46 (2020).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  197. Teixeira, C. M., Pomedli, S. R., Maei, H. R., Kee, N. & Frankland, P. W. Involvement of the anterior cingulate cortex in the expression of remote spatial memory. J. Neurosci. 26, 7555–7564 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
  198. Ross, R. S. & Eichenbaum, H. Dynamics of hippocampal and cortical activation during consolidation of a nonspatial memory. J. Neurosci. 26, 4852–4859 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  199. Rosenbaum, R. S., Winocur, G., Grady, C. L., Ziegler, M. & Moscovitch, M. Memory for familiar environments learned in the remote past: fMRI studies of healthy people and an amnesic person with extensive bilateral hippocampal lesions. Hippocampus 17, 1241–1251 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  200. Ciaramelli, E. The role of ventromedial prefrontal cortex in navigation: a case of impaired wayfinding and rehabilitation. Neuropsychologia 46, 2099–2105 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
  201. Goh, S., Choi, M., Lee, K. & Kim, K.-M. How complexity emerges in urban systems: Theory of urban morphology. Phys. Rev. E 93, 052309 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  202. Hwu, T. & Krichmar, J. L. A neural model of schemas and memory encoding. Biol. Cybern. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-019-00808-7 (2019).
    Article Google Scholar
  203. Hindy, N. C., Ng, F. Y. & Turk-Browne, N. B. Linking pattern completion in the hippocampus to predictive coding in visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 665–667 (2016).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  204. Kriegeskorte, N. & Douglas, P. K. Cognitive computational neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 1148–1160 (2018).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  205. McNamee, D., Wolpert, D. & Lengyel, M. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29 (NIPS, 2016).
  206. Wiener, J. M. & Mallot, H. A. ‘Fine-to-coarse’ route planning and navigation in regionalized environments. Spat. Cogn. Comput. 3, 331–358 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar
  207. Brown, T. I. et al. Prospective representation of navigational goals in the human hippocampus. Science 352, 1323–1326 (2016).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  208. de Cothi, W. J. et al. Predictive maps in rats and humans for spatial navigation. Curr. Biol. 32, 3676–3689.e5 (2022).
    Article Google Scholar
  209. Brelsford, C., Martin, T., Hand, J. & Bettencourt, L. M. A. Toward cities without slums: Topology and the spatial evolution of neighborhoods. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar4644 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  210. Berry, B. J. & Garrison, W. L. The functional bases of the central place hierarchy. Econ. Geogr. 34, 145–154 (1958).
    Article Google Scholar
  211. Jiang, S., Ferreira, J. & González, M. C. Clustering daily patterns of human activities in the city. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 25, 478–510 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  212. Girshick, A. R., Landy, M. S. & Simoncelli, E. P. Cardinal rules: visual orientation perception reflects knowledge of environmental statistics. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 926–932 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  213. Kok, P., Mostert, P. & de Lange, F. P. Prior expectations induce prestimulus sensory templates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 10473–10478 (2017).
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references