BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets (original) (raw)

Journal Article

,

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +416 586 8371; Fax: +416 586 8869; Email: tyers@mshri.on.ca

Search for other works by this author on:

,

Search for other works by this author on:

,

Search for other works by this author on:

,

Search for other works by this author on:

,

Search for other works by this author on:

Search for other works by this author on:

Received:

23 September 2005

Revision received:

17 October 2005

Accepted:

17 October 2005

Published:

01 January 2006

Cite

Chris Stark, Bobby-Joe Breitkreutz, Teresa Reguly, Lorrie Boucher, Ashton Breitkreutz, Mike Tyers, BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets, Nucleic Acids Research, Volume 34, Issue suppl_1, 1 January 2006, Pages D535–D539, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkj109
Close

Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search

Abstract

Access to unified datasets of protein and genetic interactions is critical for interrogation of gene/protein function and analysis of global network properties. BioGRID is a freely accessible database of physical and genetic interactions available at http://www.thebiogrid.org. BioGRID release version 2.0 includes >116 000 interactions from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens. Over 30 000 interactions have recently been added from 5778 sources through exhaustive curation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae primary literature. An internally hyper-linked web interface allows for rapid search and retrieval of interaction data. Full or user-defined datasets are freely downloadable as tab-delimited text files and PSI-MI XML. Pre-computed graphical layouts of interactions are available in a variety of file formats. User-customized graphs with embedded protein, gene and interaction attributes can be constructed with a visualization system called Osprey that is dynamically linked to the BioGRID.

INTRODUCTION

Protein interactions assemble the molecular machines of the cell and underlie the dynamics of virtually all cellular responses (1), while genetic interactions reveal functional relationships between and within regulatory modules (2). The sum of all such interactions defines the global regulatory network of the cell (3). Proteomic and functional genomics platform technologies now generate large datasets of protein and genetic interactions, but these datasets vary widely in coverage, data quality, annotation and availability (4,5). The collation of interaction data in a consistent, well-annotated format is essential for interrogation of gene function, investigation of system level attributes and benchmarking of high throughput (HTP) interaction studies. A number of interaction databases, including BIND (6), DIP (7), HPRD (8), IntAct (9), MINT (10), and MIPS (11), provide a variety of datasets and analysis tools. We have developed a biological General Repository for Interaction Datasets (BioGRID) to house and distribute comprehensive collections of physical and genetic interactions. The precursor to BioGRID was originally conceived as a laboratory information management system (LIMS) for HTP interaction data (12). The first public release of BioGRID (version 1.0; July 2002; then termed GRID) housed HTP two-hybrid and mass spectrometric protein interaction data generated from the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (13). The BioGRID has since been elaborated into a resource for HTP interaction data from other species, including the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster and human. In addition, the BioGRID now contains many genetic and protein interactions curated from focused studies reported in the primary literature [Reguly,T., Breitkreutz,A., Boucher,L., Breikreutz,B.-J., Hon,G., Myers,C., Parsons,A., Friesen,H., Oughtred,R., Tong,A. et al. (2005) Comprehensive curation and analysis of global interaction networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (submitted)]. The BioGRID has been queried for over 38 000 000 interactions since its inception. The recent version 2.0 release of BioGRID is a fully integrated cross-species database that supports most major model organisms, with increased data content and improved functionality.

HIGH THROUGHPUT INTERACTIONS

HTP approaches to identify novel protein and gene networks have begun to augment hypothesis-driven biochemical and genetic approaches (14). These hypothesis-generating HTP techniques include the two-hybrid (2-H) method for detecting pair-wise protein interactions (1517), mass spectrometric (MS) analysis of purified protein complexes (12,18), and the synthetic genetic array (SGA) and molecular barcode (dSLAM) methods for systematic detection of synthetic lethal genetic interactions (19,20). BioGRID currently includes HTP protein interaction datasets from two systematic mass spectrometric studies (12,18) and three two-hybrid studies (1517) in S.cerevisiae, which total 12 994 interactions between 4478 proteins (Table 1). In addition, BioGRID contains all extant HTP genetic interaction datasets from both SGA and dSLAM approaches (1922), totaling 6119 interactions between 1440 genes. Finally, BioGRID incorporates large-scale HTP two-hybrid surveys for C.elegans (23) and D.melanogaster (24,25), among others.

LITERATURE-DERIVED INTERACTIONS

HTP datasets are laden with false positive and negative interactions (4,5). This shortfall compromises both prediction of gene/protein function and network-level analysis. The primary literature contains a vast collection of well-validated physical and genetic interactions that, while searchable on a publication by publication basis in PubMed, are not available in a relational database. A comprehensive set of literature-derived interactions would serve as a gold standard both for HTP datasets and for automated text mining approaches, augment the predictive power of HTP data and enable a re-analysis of global network properties. Spurred on by these potential applications, significant efforts to curate interaction data from the primary literature are underway by several databases (611), as well as by the Gene Ontology (GO) consortium (26). We have recently manually parsed the entire S.cerevisiae literature for protein and genetic interactions [Reguly,T., Breitkreutz,A., Boucher,L., Breikreutz,B.-J., Hon,G., Myers,C., Parsons,A., Friesen,H., Oughtred,R., Tong,A. et al., submitted for publication]. This comprehensive curation effort yielded 19 744 protein interactions and 11 234 genetic interactions, all of which have been placed into BioGRID. We note that the size of this literature dataset exceeds all HTP datasets combined. BioGRID also contains imports of 10 943 literature-derived genetic interactions from Flybase (27) and 30 761 literature-derived interactions from HPRD (8). The total number of literature interactions in BioGRID currently stands at over 70 000 (Table 1). In addition to the S.cerevisiae literature, we have curation efforts underway for the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster and focused aspects of the human protein interaction literature, all of which will be deposited in BioGRID.

SEARCH FEATURES

The primary method of data access for BioGRID is via the web-based search interface. Combined JavaScript, PHP and Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) enable an interface that is both easy to interpret and navigate. BioGRID is supported by all main standards-compliant web browsers. Searches may be based on a wide range of supported identifiers, including gene name, ORF name, PubMed ID and free text. All genes/proteins retrieved by the query are listed in tabular format and are internally hyperlinked to allow rapid recursive searches. The BioGRID search interface retrieves the results, compiles interaction redundancies often found in large datasets and/or in combined multiple datasets, and provides an annotation-rich results page for further investigation (Figure 1). Annotation features include descriptions of gene/protein function and GO biological process, molecular function and cellular compartment terms (26).

VISUALIZATION

As network complexity increases, tabular formats for data display quickly overwhelm human comprehension. Graphical representation of interaction networks not only enables a high density of data to be visualized but immediately conveys complex inter-relationships between graph nodes, in this case either proteins or genes. A defining feature of the GRID database is an inter-dependent visualization tool called Osprey (http://biodata.mshri.on.ca/osprey) that runs as a desktop application in Windows, Linux and OSX environments (28). The Osprey platform is a facile graphical interface to query BioGRID datasets, from which the user can build custom graphical representations of any chosen set of interactions. Osprey represents individual genes/proteins by nodes and interactions by edges that connect nodes. Additional color-coded annotation is embedded in nodes and edges to represent GO categories, experimental evidence and/or data source information. A variety of graphical layouts and toggle options afford different views of the network. The Osprey file format captures all annotation associated with each node/edge in the graph, and can thus be used as a graphical file exchange format for interaction data. User-defined datasets can be up-loaded into Osprey for annotation and integration with public datasets in BioGRID. Osprey graphs can also be saved in JPEG, PNG, SVG file formats for figure construction. Pre-computed graphical representations of the first-order interaction shell for every gene/protein in the BioGRID are included on each results page and are available for direct download (Figure 1).

DATABASE STRUCTURE AND ANNOTATION

The BioGRID web interface was developed with PHP 5.0.4 and is hosted on an Apache 2.0 web server at our primary mirror (http://www.thebiogrid.org). The entire package is capable of running on any PHP 4.x compatible web server, and has been tested successfully on IIS, Apache 1.3 and Apache 2.0. BioGRID currently uses freely available MySQL 4.1 as its primary database management system (http://www.mysql.com) for both the web-based interface and interaction curation. The BioGRID is readily established on in-house servers and is easily adapted as an internal data management system by the individual laboratory.

Consistent annotation is essential in order to collapse redundant interactions into a single search result and ensure accuracy for queries and results. All ancillary annotation is compiled from over 25 popular web-based resources, extracted and stored via an annotation compilation system (ACS) written with Java Technology and Java SDK version 1.4.2. BioGRID annotation tables are updated on a monthly basis and made freely available via the web-based interface. The BioGRID ACS currently supports 294140 genes in 13 different organisms: Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Caenorhabditis elegans, Homo sapiens, Mus musculus, Rattus norvegicus, Drosophila melanogaster, Canis familiaris, Bos taurus, Arabidopsis thaliana, Xenopus laevis, Takifugu rubripes and Danio rerio.

DOWNLOADS AND ACCESS

All the interaction data present in BioGRID is freely downloadable at http://www.thebiogrid.org. Data is available in multiple formats including tab-delimited text file and PSI-MI XML (29), as well as in Osprey and other graphical file formats. BioGRID supports the data exchange standard PSI version 2.5, as mandated by the International Molecular Exchange Consortium (IMEx) that aims to facilitate the open distribution of interaction data (see http://imex.sourceforge.net/). Interaction data is updated regularly, and all downloadable files are refreshed to reflect the most recent changes. Download files are customizable by publication, record, organism and experimental system. To maximize performance and minimize database downtime, mirror versions of BioGRID are under construction in the US and Europe. Information on curation contributions or hosting a mirror may be obtained from the BioGRID website. Source code is freely available on request. The BioGRID is actively linked to the Saccharomyces Genome Database (30), Flybase (27) and Germ Online (31) websites.

FUTURE DEVELOPMENT

We will continue to curate interactions from major model organisms, including human, which will be posted as monthly updates of interaction data. Annotation will be routinely updated to allow unambiguous retrieval of protein/gene names. Capability to house quantitative genetic interactions and curated post-translational modifications will be implemented in the near future. We also plan to support complex and pathway descriptions, and to enable cross-species predictions though BLAST-based alignments of orthologous networks (32). A planned open source release version of the BioGRID platform, called ProtoGRID, will simplify installation of local versions of BioGRID. Similarly, the curation management system will be released to facilitate curation of interaction data by interested groups. Finally, graphical representations will be augmented through network clustering based on user-defined attributes, including co-expression and co-localization.

Table 1

Total number of interactions currently housed in BioGRID for indicated species

Species Set No. of nodes No. of edges No. of sources
S.cerevisiae HTP-PI 4478 12 994 5
LC-PI 3099 19 744 3132
HTP-GI 1440 6119 21
LC-GI 2656 11 234 3581
Total 5370 50 091 5794
D.melanogaster HTP-PI 6840 21 944 2
LC-GI 1312 9164 1398
Total 7216 31 108 1400
C.elegans HTP-PI 2801 4453 1
H.sapiens LC-PI 6374 30 761 11 921
All interactions Total 21 761 116 413 19 116
Species Set No. of nodes No. of edges No. of sources
S.cerevisiae HTP-PI 4478 12 994 5
LC-PI 3099 19 744 3132
HTP-GI 1440 6119 21
LC-GI 2656 11 234 3581
Total 5370 50 091 5794
D.melanogaster HTP-PI 6840 21 944 2
LC-GI 1312 9164 1398
Total 7216 31 108 1400
C.elegans HTP-PI 2801 4453 1
H.sapiens LC-PI 6374 30 761 11 921
All interactions Total 21 761 116 413 19 116

Interactions include self edges, multiple sources and multiple experimental evidence types. HTP, high throughput; LC, literature curated; PI, protein interactions; GI, genetic interactions.

Table 1

Total number of interactions currently housed in BioGRID for indicated species

Species Set No. of nodes No. of edges No. of sources
S.cerevisiae HTP-PI 4478 12 994 5
LC-PI 3099 19 744 3132
HTP-GI 1440 6119 21
LC-GI 2656 11 234 3581
Total 5370 50 091 5794
D.melanogaster HTP-PI 6840 21 944 2
LC-GI 1312 9164 1398
Total 7216 31 108 1400
C.elegans HTP-PI 2801 4453 1
H.sapiens LC-PI 6374 30 761 11 921
All interactions Total 21 761 116 413 19 116
Species Set No. of nodes No. of edges No. of sources
S.cerevisiae HTP-PI 4478 12 994 5
LC-PI 3099 19 744 3132
HTP-GI 1440 6119 21
LC-GI 2656 11 234 3581
Total 5370 50 091 5794
D.melanogaster HTP-PI 6840 21 944 2
LC-GI 1312 9164 1398
Total 7216 31 108 1400
C.elegans HTP-PI 2801 4453 1
H.sapiens LC-PI 6374 30 761 11 921
All interactions Total 21 761 116 413 19 116

Interactions include self edges, multiple sources and multiple experimental evidence types. HTP, high throughput; LC, literature curated; PI, protein interactions; GI, genetic interactions.

A sample search and result page provided by the BioGRID for the query yeast gene KSS1. Annotated results are collapsed to remove redundancy and hyperlinked to allow recursive searches and access to external resources. Graphical representation at upper left shows all interactions annotated with color-coded GO terms and experimental evidence. Graphs are generated by Osprey and may be downloaded in JPEG, PNG and SVG formats.

Figure 1

A sample search and result page provided by the BioGRID for the query yeast gene KSS1. Annotated results are collapsed to remove redundancy and hyperlinked to allow recursive searches and access to external resources. Graphical representation at upper left shows all interactions annotated with color-coded GO terms and experimental evidence. Graphs are generated by Osprey and may be downloaded in JPEG, PNG and SVG formats.

The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first two authors should be regarded as joint First Authors

We thank Jim Woodgett for generous support and advice, Rachel Drysdale and Don Gilbert for assistance in parsing genetic interactions from FlyBase; Kara Dolinski, Michael Cherry and David Botstein for helpful discussions and support at SGD; and, Russ Finley, Joel Bader, Marc Vidal, Jef Boeke, Tim Hughes and Charlie Boone for pre-publication release of large-scale datasets. L.B. is supported by a National Cancer Institute of Canada Doctoral Award with funds from the Terry Fox Foundation; M.T. is supported by a Canada Research Chair in Functional Genomics and Bioinformatics. This work was funded by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research to M.T. Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

REFERENCES

1

Pawson, T. and Nash, P.

2003

Assembly of cell regulatory systems through protein interaction domains

Science

300

445

–452

2

Hartwell, L.H., Hopfield, J.J., Leibler, S., Murray, A.W.

1999

From molecular to modular cell biology

Nature

402

C47

–C52

3

Bader, G.D., Heilbut, A., Andrews, B., Tyers, M., Hughes, T., Boone, C.

2003

Functional genomics and proteomics: charting a multidimensional map of the yeast cell

Trends Cell Biol

.

13

344

–356

4

Bader, G.D. and Hogue, C.W.

2002

Analyzing yeast protein–protein interaction data obtained from different sources

Nat. Biotechnol

.

20

991

–997

5

von Mering, C., Krause, R., Snel, B., Cornell, M., Oliver, S.G., Fields, S., Bork, P.

2002

Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein–protein interactions

Nature

417

399

–403

6

Alfarano, C., Andrade, C.E., Anthony, K., Bahroos, N., Bajec, M., Bantoft, K., Betel, D., Bobechko, B., Boutilier, K., Burgess, E., et al.

2005

The biomolecular interaction network database and related tools 2005 update

Nucleic Acids Res

.

33

D418

–D424

7

Salwinski, L., Miller, C.S., Smith, A.J., Pettit, F.K., Bowie, J.U., Eisenberg, D.

2004

The database of interacting proteins: 2004 update

Nucleic Acids Res

.

32

D449

–D451

8

Peri, S., Navarro, J.D., Amanchy, R., Kristiansen, T.Z., Jonnalagadda, C.K., Surendranath, V., Niranjan, V., Muthusamy, B., Gandhi, T.K., Gronborg, M., et al.

2003

Development of human protein reference database as an initial platform for approaching systems biology in humans

Genome Res

.

13

2363

–2371

9

Hermjakob, H., Montecchi-Palazzi, L., Lewington, C., Mudali, S., Kerrien, S., Orchard, S., Vingron, M., Roechert, B., Roepstorff, P., Valencia, A., et al.

2004

IntAct: an open source molecular interaction database

Nucleic Acids Res

.

32

D452

–D455

10

Zanzoni, A., Montecchi-Palazzi, L., Quondam, M., Ausiello, G., Helmer-Citterich, M., Cesareni, G.

2002

MINT: a Molecular INTeraction database

FEBS Lett

.

513

135

–140

11

Mewes, H.W., Amid, C., Arnold, R., Frishman, D., Guldener, U., Mannhaupt, G., Munsterkotter, M., Pagel, P., Strack, N., Stumpflen, V., et al.

2004

MIPS: analysis and annotation of proteins from whole genomes

Nucleic Acids Res

.

32

D41

–D44

12

Ho, Y., Gruhler, A., Heilbut, A., Bader, G.D., Moore, L., Adams, S.L., Millar, A., Taylor, P., Bennett, K., Boutilier, K., et al.

2002

Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry

Nature

415

180

–183

13

Breitkreutz, B.J., Stark, C., Tyers, M.

2003

The GRID: the General Repository for Interaction Datasets

Genome Biol

.

4

R23

14

Jorgensen, P., Breitkreutz, B.J., Breitkreutz, K., Stark, C., Liu, G., Cook, M., Sharom, J., Nishikawa, J.L., Ketela, T., Bellows, D., et al.

2003

Harvesting the genome's bounty: integrative genomics

Cold Spring Harb Symp. Quant. Biol

.

68

431

–443

15

Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T.A., Judson, R.S., Knight, J.R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al.

2000

A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Nature

403

623

–627

16

Ito, T., Chiba, T., Ozawa, R., Yoshida, M., Hattori, M., Sakaki, Y.

2001

A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome

Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA

98

4569

–4574

17

Ito, T., Tashiro, K., Muta, S., Ozawa, R., Chiba, T., Nishizawa, M., Yamamoto, K., Kuhara, S., Sakaki, Y.

2000

Toward a protein–protein interaction map of the budding yeast: a comprehensive system to examine two-hybrid interactions in all possible combinations between the yeast proteins

Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA

97

1143

–1147

18

Gavin, A.C., Bosche, M., Krause, R., Grandi, P., Marzioch, M., Bauer, A., Schultz, J., Rick, J.M., Michon, A.M., Cruciat, C.M., et al.

2002

Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes

Nature

415

141

–147

19

Tong, A.H., Evangelista, M., Parsons, A.B., Xu, H., Bader, G.D., Page, N., Robinson, M., Raghibizadeh, S., Hogue, C.W., Bussey, H., et al.

2001

Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants

Science

294

2364

–2368

20

Pan, X., Yuan, D.S., Xiang, D., Wang, X., Sookhai-Mahadeo, S., Bader, J.S., Hieter, P., Spencer, F., Boeke, J.D.

2004

A robust toolkit for functional profiling of the yeast genome

Mol. Cell

16

487

–496

21

Tong, A.H., Lesage, G., Bader, G.D., Ding, H., Xu, H., Xin, X., Young, J., Berriz, G.F., Brost, R.L., Chang, M., et al.

2004

Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network

Science

303

808

–813

22

Davierwala, A.P., Haynes, J., Li, Z., Brost, R.L., Robinson, M.D., Yu, L., Mnaimneh, S., Ding, H., Zhu, H., Chen, Y., et al.

2005

The synthetic genetic interaction spectrum of essential genes

Nature Genet

37

1147

–1152

23

Li, S., Armstrong, C.M., Bertin, N., Ge, H., Milstein, S., Boxem, M., Vidalain, P.O., Han, J.D., Chesneau, A., Hao, T., et al.

2004

A map of the interactome network of the metazoan C. elegans

Science

303

540

–543

24

Giot, L., Bader, J.S., Brouwer, C., Chaudhuri, A., Kuang, B., Li, Y., Hao, Y.L., Ooi, C.E., Godwin, B., Vitols, E., et al.

2003

A protein interaction map of Drosophila melanogaster

Science

302

1727

–1736

25

Stanyon, C.A., Liu, G., Mangiola, B.A., Patel, N., Giot, L., Kuang, B., Zhang, H., Zhong, J., Finley, R.L., Jr.

2004

A Drosophila protein-interaction map centered on cell-cycle regulators

Genome Biol

.

5

R96

26

Harris, M.A., Clark, J., Ireland, A., Lomax, J., Ashburner, M., Foulger, R., Eilbeck, K., Lewis, S., Marshall, B., Mungall, C., et al.

2004

The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource

Nucleic Acids Res

.

32

D258

–D261

27

Drysdale, R.A. and Crosby, M.A.

2005

FlyBase: genes and gene models

Nucleic Acids Res

.

33

D390

–D395

28

Breitkreutz, B.J., Stark, C., Tyers, M.

2003

Osprey: a network visualization system

Genome Biol

.

4

R22

29

Hermjakob, H., Montecchi-Palazzi, L., Bader, G., Wojcik, J., Salwinski, L., Ceol, A., Moore, S., Orchard, S., Sarkans, U., von Mering, C., et al.

2004

The HUPO PSI's molecular interaction format—a community standard for the representation of protein interaction data

Nat. Biotechnol

.

22

177

–183

30

Christie, K.R., Weng, S., Balakrishnan, R., Costanzo, M.C., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S.S., Engel, S.R., Feierbach, B., Fisk, D.G., Hirschman, J.E., et al.

2004

Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) provides tools to identify and analyze sequences from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and related sequences from other organisms

Nucleic Acids Res

.

32

D311

–D314

31

Wiederkehr, C., Basavaraj, R., Sarrauste de Menthiere, C., Hermida, L., Koch, R., Schlecht, U., Amon, A., Brachat, S., Breitenbach, M., Briza, P., et al.

2004

GermOnline, a cross-species community knowledgebase on germ cell differentiation

Nucleic Acids Res

.

32

D560

–D567

32

Sharan, R., Suthram, S., Kelley, R.M., Kuhn, T., McCuine, S., Uetz, P., Sittler, T., Karp, R.M., Ideker, T.

2005

Conserved patterns of protein interaction in multiple species

Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA

102

1974

–1979

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

I agree to the terms and conditions. You must accept the terms and conditions.

Submit a comment

Name

Affiliations

Comment title

Comment

You have entered an invalid code

Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.

Citations

Views

Altmetric

Metrics

Total Views 16,924

13,279 Pageviews

3,645 PDF Downloads

Since 11/1/2016

Month: Total Views:
November 2016 2
December 2016 11
January 2017 23
February 2017 63
March 2017 64
April 2017 49
May 2017 41
June 2017 52
July 2017 56
August 2017 63
September 2017 47
October 2017 59
November 2017 67
December 2017 191
January 2018 268
February 2018 481
March 2018 375
April 2018 373
May 2018 408
June 2018 399
July 2018 424
August 2018 301
September 2018 244
October 2018 257
November 2018 175
December 2018 143
January 2019 129
February 2019 105
March 2019 174
April 2019 218
May 2019 157
June 2019 113
July 2019 181
August 2019 173
September 2019 150
October 2019 194
November 2019 145
December 2019 116
January 2020 121
February 2020 116
March 2020 117
April 2020 127
May 2020 117
June 2020 113
July 2020 134
August 2020 139
September 2020 166
October 2020 108
November 2020 144
December 2020 134
January 2021 123
February 2021 134
March 2021 211
April 2021 193
May 2021 177
June 2021 169
July 2021 207
August 2021 182
September 2021 131
October 2021 176
November 2021 185
December 2021 151
January 2022 182
February 2022 186
March 2022 234
April 2022 237
May 2022 228
June 2022 151
July 2022 171
August 2022 144
September 2022 146
October 2022 193
November 2022 177
December 2022 197
January 2023 166
February 2023 204
March 2023 201
April 2023 178
May 2023 138
June 2023 168
July 2023 174
August 2023 150
September 2023 172
October 2023 174
November 2023 186
December 2023 237
January 2024 235
February 2024 306
March 2024 358
April 2024 238
May 2024 212
June 2024 157
July 2024 167
August 2024 206
September 2024 223
October 2024 260
November 2024 102

×

Email alerts

Citing articles via

More from Oxford Academic