BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets (original) (raw)
Journal Article
,
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +416 586 8371; Fax: +416 586 8869; Email: tyers@mshri.on.ca
Search for other works by this author on:
,
Search for other works by this author on:
,
Search for other works by this author on:
,
Search for other works by this author on:
,
Search for other works by this author on:
Search for other works by this author on:
Received:
23 September 2005
Revision received:
17 October 2005
Accepted:
17 October 2005
Published:
01 January 2006
Cite
Chris Stark, Bobby-Joe Breitkreutz, Teresa Reguly, Lorrie Boucher, Ashton Breitkreutz, Mike Tyers, BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets, Nucleic Acids Research, Volume 34, Issue suppl_1, 1 January 2006, Pages D535–D539, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkj109
Close
Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search
Abstract
Access to unified datasets of protein and genetic interactions is critical for interrogation of gene/protein function and analysis of global network properties. BioGRID is a freely accessible database of physical and genetic interactions available at http://www.thebiogrid.org. BioGRID release version 2.0 includes >116 000 interactions from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens. Over 30 000 interactions have recently been added from 5778 sources through exhaustive curation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae primary literature. An internally hyper-linked web interface allows for rapid search and retrieval of interaction data. Full or user-defined datasets are freely downloadable as tab-delimited text files and PSI-MI XML. Pre-computed graphical layouts of interactions are available in a variety of file formats. User-customized graphs with embedded protein, gene and interaction attributes can be constructed with a visualization system called Osprey that is dynamically linked to the BioGRID.
INTRODUCTION
Protein interactions assemble the molecular machines of the cell and underlie the dynamics of virtually all cellular responses (1), while genetic interactions reveal functional relationships between and within regulatory modules (2). The sum of all such interactions defines the global regulatory network of the cell (3). Proteomic and functional genomics platform technologies now generate large datasets of protein and genetic interactions, but these datasets vary widely in coverage, data quality, annotation and availability (4,5). The collation of interaction data in a consistent, well-annotated format is essential for interrogation of gene function, investigation of system level attributes and benchmarking of high throughput (HTP) interaction studies. A number of interaction databases, including BIND (6), DIP (7), HPRD (8), IntAct (9), MINT (10), and MIPS (11), provide a variety of datasets and analysis tools. We have developed a biological General Repository for Interaction Datasets (BioGRID) to house and distribute comprehensive collections of physical and genetic interactions. The precursor to BioGRID was originally conceived as a laboratory information management system (LIMS) for HTP interaction data (12). The first public release of BioGRID (version 1.0; July 2002; then termed GRID) housed HTP two-hybrid and mass spectrometric protein interaction data generated from the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (13). The BioGRID has since been elaborated into a resource for HTP interaction data from other species, including the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster and human. In addition, the BioGRID now contains many genetic and protein interactions curated from focused studies reported in the primary literature [Reguly,T., Breitkreutz,A., Boucher,L., Breikreutz,B.-J., Hon,G., Myers,C., Parsons,A., Friesen,H., Oughtred,R., Tong,A. et al. (2005) Comprehensive curation and analysis of global interaction networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (submitted)]. The BioGRID has been queried for over 38 000 000 interactions since its inception. The recent version 2.0 release of BioGRID is a fully integrated cross-species database that supports most major model organisms, with increased data content and improved functionality.
HIGH THROUGHPUT INTERACTIONS
HTP approaches to identify novel protein and gene networks have begun to augment hypothesis-driven biochemical and genetic approaches (14). These hypothesis-generating HTP techniques include the two-hybrid (2-H) method for detecting pair-wise protein interactions (15–17), mass spectrometric (MS) analysis of purified protein complexes (12,18), and the synthetic genetic array (SGA) and molecular barcode (dSLAM) methods for systematic detection of synthetic lethal genetic interactions (19,20). BioGRID currently includes HTP protein interaction datasets from two systematic mass spectrometric studies (12,18) and three two-hybrid studies (15–17) in S.cerevisiae, which total 12 994 interactions between 4478 proteins (Table 1). In addition, BioGRID contains all extant HTP genetic interaction datasets from both SGA and dSLAM approaches (19–22), totaling 6119 interactions between 1440 genes. Finally, BioGRID incorporates large-scale HTP two-hybrid surveys for C.elegans (23) and D.melanogaster (24,25), among others.
LITERATURE-DERIVED INTERACTIONS
HTP datasets are laden with false positive and negative interactions (4,5). This shortfall compromises both prediction of gene/protein function and network-level analysis. The primary literature contains a vast collection of well-validated physical and genetic interactions that, while searchable on a publication by publication basis in PubMed, are not available in a relational database. A comprehensive set of literature-derived interactions would serve as a gold standard both for HTP datasets and for automated text mining approaches, augment the predictive power of HTP data and enable a re-analysis of global network properties. Spurred on by these potential applications, significant efforts to curate interaction data from the primary literature are underway by several databases (6–11), as well as by the Gene Ontology (GO) consortium (26). We have recently manually parsed the entire S.cerevisiae literature for protein and genetic interactions [Reguly,T., Breitkreutz,A., Boucher,L., Breikreutz,B.-J., Hon,G., Myers,C., Parsons,A., Friesen,H., Oughtred,R., Tong,A. et al., submitted for publication]. This comprehensive curation effort yielded 19 744 protein interactions and 11 234 genetic interactions, all of which have been placed into BioGRID. We note that the size of this literature dataset exceeds all HTP datasets combined. BioGRID also contains imports of 10 943 literature-derived genetic interactions from Flybase (27) and 30 761 literature-derived interactions from HPRD (8). The total number of literature interactions in BioGRID currently stands at over 70 000 (Table 1). In addition to the S.cerevisiae literature, we have curation efforts underway for the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster and focused aspects of the human protein interaction literature, all of which will be deposited in BioGRID.
SEARCH FEATURES
The primary method of data access for BioGRID is via the web-based search interface. Combined JavaScript, PHP and Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) enable an interface that is both easy to interpret and navigate. BioGRID is supported by all main standards-compliant web browsers. Searches may be based on a wide range of supported identifiers, including gene name, ORF name, PubMed ID and free text. All genes/proteins retrieved by the query are listed in tabular format and are internally hyperlinked to allow rapid recursive searches. The BioGRID search interface retrieves the results, compiles interaction redundancies often found in large datasets and/or in combined multiple datasets, and provides an annotation-rich results page for further investigation (Figure 1). Annotation features include descriptions of gene/protein function and GO biological process, molecular function and cellular compartment terms (26).
VISUALIZATION
As network complexity increases, tabular formats for data display quickly overwhelm human comprehension. Graphical representation of interaction networks not only enables a high density of data to be visualized but immediately conveys complex inter-relationships between graph nodes, in this case either proteins or genes. A defining feature of the GRID database is an inter-dependent visualization tool called Osprey (http://biodata.mshri.on.ca/osprey) that runs as a desktop application in Windows, Linux and OSX environments (28). The Osprey platform is a facile graphical interface to query BioGRID datasets, from which the user can build custom graphical representations of any chosen set of interactions. Osprey represents individual genes/proteins by nodes and interactions by edges that connect nodes. Additional color-coded annotation is embedded in nodes and edges to represent GO categories, experimental evidence and/or data source information. A variety of graphical layouts and toggle options afford different views of the network. The Osprey file format captures all annotation associated with each node/edge in the graph, and can thus be used as a graphical file exchange format for interaction data. User-defined datasets can be up-loaded into Osprey for annotation and integration with public datasets in BioGRID. Osprey graphs can also be saved in JPEG, PNG, SVG file formats for figure construction. Pre-computed graphical representations of the first-order interaction shell for every gene/protein in the BioGRID are included on each results page and are available for direct download (Figure 1).
DATABASE STRUCTURE AND ANNOTATION
The BioGRID web interface was developed with PHP 5.0.4 and is hosted on an Apache 2.0 web server at our primary mirror (http://www.thebiogrid.org). The entire package is capable of running on any PHP 4.x compatible web server, and has been tested successfully on IIS, Apache 1.3 and Apache 2.0. BioGRID currently uses freely available MySQL 4.1 as its primary database management system (http://www.mysql.com) for both the web-based interface and interaction curation. The BioGRID is readily established on in-house servers and is easily adapted as an internal data management system by the individual laboratory.
Consistent annotation is essential in order to collapse redundant interactions into a single search result and ensure accuracy for queries and results. All ancillary annotation is compiled from over 25 popular web-based resources, extracted and stored via an annotation compilation system (ACS) written with Java Technology and Java SDK version 1.4.2. BioGRID annotation tables are updated on a monthly basis and made freely available via the web-based interface. The BioGRID ACS currently supports 294140 genes in 13 different organisms: Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Caenorhabditis elegans, Homo sapiens, Mus musculus, Rattus norvegicus, Drosophila melanogaster, Canis familiaris, Bos taurus, Arabidopsis thaliana, Xenopus laevis, Takifugu rubripes and Danio rerio.
DOWNLOADS AND ACCESS
All the interaction data present in BioGRID is freely downloadable at http://www.thebiogrid.org. Data is available in multiple formats including tab-delimited text file and PSI-MI XML (29), as well as in Osprey and other graphical file formats. BioGRID supports the data exchange standard PSI version 2.5, as mandated by the International Molecular Exchange Consortium (IMEx) that aims to facilitate the open distribution of interaction data (see http://imex.sourceforge.net/). Interaction data is updated regularly, and all downloadable files are refreshed to reflect the most recent changes. Download files are customizable by publication, record, organism and experimental system. To maximize performance and minimize database downtime, mirror versions of BioGRID are under construction in the US and Europe. Information on curation contributions or hosting a mirror may be obtained from the BioGRID website. Source code is freely available on request. The BioGRID is actively linked to the Saccharomyces Genome Database (30), Flybase (27) and Germ Online (31) websites.
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
We will continue to curate interactions from major model organisms, including human, which will be posted as monthly updates of interaction data. Annotation will be routinely updated to allow unambiguous retrieval of protein/gene names. Capability to house quantitative genetic interactions and curated post-translational modifications will be implemented in the near future. We also plan to support complex and pathway descriptions, and to enable cross-species predictions though BLAST-based alignments of orthologous networks (32). A planned open source release version of the BioGRID platform, called ProtoGRID, will simplify installation of local versions of BioGRID. Similarly, the curation management system will be released to facilitate curation of interaction data by interested groups. Finally, graphical representations will be augmented through network clustering based on user-defined attributes, including co-expression and co-localization.
Table 1
Total number of interactions currently housed in BioGRID for indicated species
Species | Set | No. of nodes | No. of edges | No. of sources |
---|---|---|---|---|
S.cerevisiae | HTP-PI | 4478 | 12 994 | 5 |
LC-PI | 3099 | 19 744 | 3132 | |
HTP-GI | 1440 | 6119 | 21 | |
LC-GI | 2656 | 11 234 | 3581 | |
Total | 5370 | 50 091 | 5794 | |
D.melanogaster | HTP-PI | 6840 | 21 944 | 2 |
LC-GI | 1312 | 9164 | 1398 | |
Total | 7216 | 31 108 | 1400 | |
C.elegans | HTP-PI | 2801 | 4453 | 1 |
H.sapiens | LC-PI | 6374 | 30 761 | 11 921 |
All interactions | Total | 21 761 | 116 413 | 19 116 |
Species | Set | No. of nodes | No. of edges | No. of sources |
---|---|---|---|---|
S.cerevisiae | HTP-PI | 4478 | 12 994 | 5 |
LC-PI | 3099 | 19 744 | 3132 | |
HTP-GI | 1440 | 6119 | 21 | |
LC-GI | 2656 | 11 234 | 3581 | |
Total | 5370 | 50 091 | 5794 | |
D.melanogaster | HTP-PI | 6840 | 21 944 | 2 |
LC-GI | 1312 | 9164 | 1398 | |
Total | 7216 | 31 108 | 1400 | |
C.elegans | HTP-PI | 2801 | 4453 | 1 |
H.sapiens | LC-PI | 6374 | 30 761 | 11 921 |
All interactions | Total | 21 761 | 116 413 | 19 116 |
Interactions include self edges, multiple sources and multiple experimental evidence types. HTP, high throughput; LC, literature curated; PI, protein interactions; GI, genetic interactions.
Table 1
Total number of interactions currently housed in BioGRID for indicated species
Species | Set | No. of nodes | No. of edges | No. of sources |
---|---|---|---|---|
S.cerevisiae | HTP-PI | 4478 | 12 994 | 5 |
LC-PI | 3099 | 19 744 | 3132 | |
HTP-GI | 1440 | 6119 | 21 | |
LC-GI | 2656 | 11 234 | 3581 | |
Total | 5370 | 50 091 | 5794 | |
D.melanogaster | HTP-PI | 6840 | 21 944 | 2 |
LC-GI | 1312 | 9164 | 1398 | |
Total | 7216 | 31 108 | 1400 | |
C.elegans | HTP-PI | 2801 | 4453 | 1 |
H.sapiens | LC-PI | 6374 | 30 761 | 11 921 |
All interactions | Total | 21 761 | 116 413 | 19 116 |
Species | Set | No. of nodes | No. of edges | No. of sources |
---|---|---|---|---|
S.cerevisiae | HTP-PI | 4478 | 12 994 | 5 |
LC-PI | 3099 | 19 744 | 3132 | |
HTP-GI | 1440 | 6119 | 21 | |
LC-GI | 2656 | 11 234 | 3581 | |
Total | 5370 | 50 091 | 5794 | |
D.melanogaster | HTP-PI | 6840 | 21 944 | 2 |
LC-GI | 1312 | 9164 | 1398 | |
Total | 7216 | 31 108 | 1400 | |
C.elegans | HTP-PI | 2801 | 4453 | 1 |
H.sapiens | LC-PI | 6374 | 30 761 | 11 921 |
All interactions | Total | 21 761 | 116 413 | 19 116 |
Interactions include self edges, multiple sources and multiple experimental evidence types. HTP, high throughput; LC, literature curated; PI, protein interactions; GI, genetic interactions.
Figure 1
A sample search and result page provided by the BioGRID for the query yeast gene KSS1. Annotated results are collapsed to remove redundancy and hyperlinked to allow recursive searches and access to external resources. Graphical representation at upper left shows all interactions annotated with color-coded GO terms and experimental evidence. Graphs are generated by Osprey and may be downloaded in JPEG, PNG and SVG formats.
The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first two authors should be regarded as joint First Authors
We thank Jim Woodgett for generous support and advice, Rachel Drysdale and Don Gilbert for assistance in parsing genetic interactions from FlyBase; Kara Dolinski, Michael Cherry and David Botstein for helpful discussions and support at SGD; and, Russ Finley, Joel Bader, Marc Vidal, Jef Boeke, Tim Hughes and Charlie Boone for pre-publication release of large-scale datasets. L.B. is supported by a National Cancer Institute of Canada Doctoral Award with funds from the Terry Fox Foundation; M.T. is supported by a Canada Research Chair in Functional Genomics and Bioinformatics. This work was funded by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research to M.T. Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research.
Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
REFERENCES
1
Pawson, T. and Nash, P.
2003
Assembly of cell regulatory systems through protein interaction domains
Science
300
445
–452
2
Hartwell, L.H., Hopfield, J.J., Leibler, S., Murray, A.W.
1999
From molecular to modular cell biology
Nature
402
C47
–C52
3
Bader, G.D., Heilbut, A., Andrews, B., Tyers, M., Hughes, T., Boone, C.
2003
Functional genomics and proteomics: charting a multidimensional map of the yeast cell
Trends Cell Biol
.
13
344
–356
4
Bader, G.D. and Hogue, C.W.
2002
Analyzing yeast protein–protein interaction data obtained from different sources
Nat. Biotechnol
.
20
991
–997
5
von Mering, C., Krause, R., Snel, B., Cornell, M., Oliver, S.G., Fields, S., Bork, P.
2002
Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein–protein interactions
Nature
417
399
–403
6
Alfarano, C., Andrade, C.E., Anthony, K., Bahroos, N., Bajec, M., Bantoft, K., Betel, D., Bobechko, B., Boutilier, K., Burgess, E., et al.
2005
The biomolecular interaction network database and related tools 2005 update
Nucleic Acids Res
.
33
D418
–D424
7
Salwinski, L., Miller, C.S., Smith, A.J., Pettit, F.K., Bowie, J.U., Eisenberg, D.
2004
The database of interacting proteins: 2004 update
Nucleic Acids Res
.
32
D449
–D451
8
Peri, S., Navarro, J.D., Amanchy, R., Kristiansen, T.Z., Jonnalagadda, C.K., Surendranath, V., Niranjan, V., Muthusamy, B., Gandhi, T.K., Gronborg, M., et al.
2003
Development of human protein reference database as an initial platform for approaching systems biology in humans
Genome Res
.
13
2363
–2371
9
Hermjakob, H., Montecchi-Palazzi, L., Lewington, C., Mudali, S., Kerrien, S., Orchard, S., Vingron, M., Roechert, B., Roepstorff, P., Valencia, A., et al.
2004
IntAct: an open source molecular interaction database
Nucleic Acids Res
.
32
D452
–D455
10
Zanzoni, A., Montecchi-Palazzi, L., Quondam, M., Ausiello, G., Helmer-Citterich, M., Cesareni, G.
2002
MINT: a Molecular INTeraction database
FEBS Lett
.
513
135
–140
11
Mewes, H.W., Amid, C., Arnold, R., Frishman, D., Guldener, U., Mannhaupt, G., Munsterkotter, M., Pagel, P., Strack, N., Stumpflen, V., et al.
2004
MIPS: analysis and annotation of proteins from whole genomes
Nucleic Acids Res
.
32
D41
–D44
12
Ho, Y., Gruhler, A., Heilbut, A., Bader, G.D., Moore, L., Adams, S.L., Millar, A., Taylor, P., Bennett, K., Boutilier, K., et al.
2002
Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry
Nature
415
180
–183
13
Breitkreutz, B.J., Stark, C., Tyers, M.
2003
The GRID: the General Repository for Interaction Datasets
Genome Biol
.
4
R23
14
Jorgensen, P., Breitkreutz, B.J., Breitkreutz, K., Stark, C., Liu, G., Cook, M., Sharom, J., Nishikawa, J.L., Ketela, T., Bellows, D., et al.
2003
Harvesting the genome's bounty: integrative genomics
Cold Spring Harb Symp. Quant. Biol
.
68
431
–443
15
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T.A., Judson, R.S., Knight, J.R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al.
2000
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Nature
403
623
–627
16
Ito, T., Chiba, T., Ozawa, R., Yoshida, M., Hattori, M., Sakaki, Y.
2001
A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome
Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA
98
4569
–4574
17
Ito, T., Tashiro, K., Muta, S., Ozawa, R., Chiba, T., Nishizawa, M., Yamamoto, K., Kuhara, S., Sakaki, Y.
2000
Toward a protein–protein interaction map of the budding yeast: a comprehensive system to examine two-hybrid interactions in all possible combinations between the yeast proteins
Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA
97
1143
–1147
18
Gavin, A.C., Bosche, M., Krause, R., Grandi, P., Marzioch, M., Bauer, A., Schultz, J., Rick, J.M., Michon, A.M., Cruciat, C.M., et al.
2002
Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes
Nature
415
141
–147
19
Tong, A.H., Evangelista, M., Parsons, A.B., Xu, H., Bader, G.D., Page, N., Robinson, M., Raghibizadeh, S., Hogue, C.W., Bussey, H., et al.
2001
Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants
Science
294
2364
–2368
20
Pan, X., Yuan, D.S., Xiang, D., Wang, X., Sookhai-Mahadeo, S., Bader, J.S., Hieter, P., Spencer, F., Boeke, J.D.
2004
A robust toolkit for functional profiling of the yeast genome
Mol. Cell
16
487
–496
21
Tong, A.H., Lesage, G., Bader, G.D., Ding, H., Xu, H., Xin, X., Young, J., Berriz, G.F., Brost, R.L., Chang, M., et al.
2004
Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network
Science
303
808
–813
22
Davierwala, A.P., Haynes, J., Li, Z., Brost, R.L., Robinson, M.D., Yu, L., Mnaimneh, S., Ding, H., Zhu, H., Chen, Y., et al.
2005
The synthetic genetic interaction spectrum of essential genes
Nature Genet
37
1147
–1152
23
Li, S., Armstrong, C.M., Bertin, N., Ge, H., Milstein, S., Boxem, M., Vidalain, P.O., Han, J.D., Chesneau, A., Hao, T., et al.
2004
A map of the interactome network of the metazoan C. elegans
Science
303
540
–543
24
Giot, L., Bader, J.S., Brouwer, C., Chaudhuri, A., Kuang, B., Li, Y., Hao, Y.L., Ooi, C.E., Godwin, B., Vitols, E., et al.
2003
A protein interaction map of Drosophila melanogaster
Science
302
1727
–1736
25
Stanyon, C.A., Liu, G., Mangiola, B.A., Patel, N., Giot, L., Kuang, B., Zhang, H., Zhong, J., Finley, R.L., Jr.
2004
A Drosophila protein-interaction map centered on cell-cycle regulators
Genome Biol
.
5
R96
26
Harris, M.A., Clark, J., Ireland, A., Lomax, J., Ashburner, M., Foulger, R., Eilbeck, K., Lewis, S., Marshall, B., Mungall, C., et al.
2004
The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource
Nucleic Acids Res
.
32
D258
–D261
27
Drysdale, R.A. and Crosby, M.A.
2005
FlyBase: genes and gene models
Nucleic Acids Res
.
33
D390
–D395
28
Breitkreutz, B.J., Stark, C., Tyers, M.
2003
Osprey: a network visualization system
Genome Biol
.
4
R22
29
Hermjakob, H., Montecchi-Palazzi, L., Bader, G., Wojcik, J., Salwinski, L., Ceol, A., Moore, S., Orchard, S., Sarkans, U., von Mering, C., et al.
2004
The HUPO PSI's molecular interaction format—a community standard for the representation of protein interaction data
Nat. Biotechnol
.
22
177
–183
30
Christie, K.R., Weng, S., Balakrishnan, R., Costanzo, M.C., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S.S., Engel, S.R., Feierbach, B., Fisk, D.G., Hirschman, J.E., et al.
2004
Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) provides tools to identify and analyze sequences from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and related sequences from other organisms
Nucleic Acids Res
.
32
D311
–D314
31
Wiederkehr, C., Basavaraj, R., Sarrauste de Menthiere, C., Hermida, L., Koch, R., Schlecht, U., Amon, A., Brachat, S., Breitenbach, M., Briza, P., et al.
2004
GermOnline, a cross-species community knowledgebase on germ cell differentiation
Nucleic Acids Res
.
32
D560
–D567
32
Sharan, R., Suthram, S., Kelley, R.M., Kuhn, T., McCuine, S., Uetz, P., Sittler, T., Karp, R.M., Ideker, T.
2005
Conserved patterns of protein interaction in multiple species
Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA
102
1974
–1979
© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
I agree to the terms and conditions. You must accept the terms and conditions.
Submit a comment
Name
Affiliations
Comment title
Comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.
Citations
Views
Altmetric
Metrics
Total Views 16,947
13,299 Pageviews
3,648 PDF Downloads
Since 11/1/2016
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
November 2016 | 2 |
December 2016 | 11 |
January 2017 | 23 |
February 2017 | 63 |
March 2017 | 64 |
April 2017 | 49 |
May 2017 | 41 |
June 2017 | 52 |
July 2017 | 56 |
August 2017 | 63 |
September 2017 | 47 |
October 2017 | 59 |
November 2017 | 67 |
December 2017 | 191 |
January 2018 | 268 |
February 2018 | 481 |
March 2018 | 375 |
April 2018 | 373 |
May 2018 | 408 |
June 2018 | 399 |
July 2018 | 424 |
August 2018 | 301 |
September 2018 | 244 |
October 2018 | 257 |
November 2018 | 175 |
December 2018 | 143 |
January 2019 | 129 |
February 2019 | 105 |
March 2019 | 174 |
April 2019 | 218 |
May 2019 | 157 |
June 2019 | 113 |
July 2019 | 181 |
August 2019 | 173 |
September 2019 | 150 |
October 2019 | 194 |
November 2019 | 145 |
December 2019 | 116 |
January 2020 | 121 |
February 2020 | 116 |
March 2020 | 117 |
April 2020 | 127 |
May 2020 | 117 |
June 2020 | 113 |
July 2020 | 134 |
August 2020 | 139 |
September 2020 | 166 |
October 2020 | 108 |
November 2020 | 144 |
December 2020 | 134 |
January 2021 | 123 |
February 2021 | 134 |
March 2021 | 211 |
April 2021 | 193 |
May 2021 | 177 |
June 2021 | 169 |
July 2021 | 207 |
August 2021 | 182 |
September 2021 | 131 |
October 2021 | 176 |
November 2021 | 185 |
December 2021 | 151 |
January 2022 | 182 |
February 2022 | 186 |
March 2022 | 234 |
April 2022 | 237 |
May 2022 | 228 |
June 2022 | 151 |
July 2022 | 171 |
August 2022 | 144 |
September 2022 | 146 |
October 2022 | 193 |
November 2022 | 177 |
December 2022 | 197 |
January 2023 | 166 |
February 2023 | 204 |
March 2023 | 201 |
April 2023 | 178 |
May 2023 | 138 |
June 2023 | 168 |
July 2023 | 174 |
August 2023 | 150 |
September 2023 | 172 |
October 2023 | 174 |
November 2023 | 186 |
December 2023 | 237 |
January 2024 | 235 |
February 2024 | 306 |
March 2024 | 358 |
April 2024 | 238 |
May 2024 | 212 |
June 2024 | 157 |
July 2024 | 167 |
August 2024 | 206 |
September 2024 | 223 |
October 2024 | 260 |
November 2024 | 125 |
×
Email alerts
Citing articles via
More from Oxford Academic