An applications-focused review of comparative genomics tools: Capabilities, limitations and future challenges (original) (raw)

Journal Article

,

Responsible for the Biodefense Division's sequencing and Comparative Analysis Group within the Biology and Biotechnology Research Program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California.

Search for other works by this author on:

,

Professor for Computer Science in the Center for Bioinformatics at the University of Hamburg, Germany.

Search for other works by this author on:

,

Professor for Theoretical Bioinformatics at the University of Ulm, Germany.

Search for other works by this author on:

Leads a Pathogen Bioinformatics team at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

Search for other works by this author on:

Received:

24 February 2003

Cite

Patrick Chain, Stefan Kurtz, Enno Ohlebusch, Tom Slezak, An applications-focused review of comparative genomics tools: Capabilities, limitations and future challenges, Briefings in Bioinformatics, Volume 4, Issue 2, June 2003, Pages 105–123, https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/4.2.105
Close

Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search

Abstract

A team at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) was given the task of using computational tools to speed up the development of DNA diagnostics for pathogen detection. This work will be described in another paper in this issue (see pages 133–149). To achieve this goal it was necessary to understand the merits and limitations of the various available comparative genomics tools. A review of some recent tools for multisequence/genome alignment and substring comparison is presented, within the general framework of applicability to a large-scale application. We note that genome alignments are important for many things, only one of which is pathogen detection. Understanding gene function, gene regulation, gene networks, phylogenetic studies and other aspects of evolution all depend on accurate nucleic acid and protein sequence alignment. Selecting appropriate tools can make a large difference in the quality of results obtained and the effort required.

This content is only available as a PDF.

© Henry Stewart Publications

Citations

Views

Altmetric

Metrics

Total Views 2,248

136 Pageviews

2,112 PDF Downloads

Since 11/1/2016

Month: Total Views:
November 2016 3
January 2017 3
February 2017 14
March 2017 17
April 2017 5
May 2017 4
June 2017 10
July 2017 17
August 2017 9
September 2017 6
October 2017 14
November 2017 13
December 2017 37
January 2018 14
February 2018 14
March 2018 33
April 2018 40
May 2018 29
June 2018 9
July 2018 13
August 2018 12
September 2018 20
October 2018 12
November 2018 16
December 2018 20
January 2019 18
February 2019 15
March 2019 34
April 2019 38
May 2019 18
June 2019 20
July 2019 9
August 2019 13
September 2019 20
October 2019 27
November 2019 31
December 2019 16
January 2020 9
February 2020 17
March 2020 16
April 2020 30
May 2020 21
June 2020 19
July 2020 23
August 2020 11
September 2020 31
October 2020 31
November 2020 31
December 2020 57
January 2021 17
February 2021 41
March 2021 52
April 2021 29
May 2021 33
June 2021 33
July 2021 36
August 2021 90
September 2021 113
October 2021 78
November 2021 51
December 2021 48
January 2022 45
February 2022 38
March 2022 39
April 2022 13
May 2022 17
June 2022 38
July 2022 23
August 2022 27
September 2022 20
October 2022 27
November 2022 17
December 2022 11
January 2023 18
February 2023 17
March 2023 8
April 2023 17
May 2023 4
June 2023 6
July 2023 7
August 2023 12
September 2023 7
October 2023 7
November 2023 19
December 2023 19
January 2024 14
February 2024 20
March 2024 33
April 2024 32
May 2024 32
June 2024 15
July 2024 15
August 2024 18
September 2024 11
October 2024 29
November 2024 13

×

Email alerts

Citing articles via

More from Oxford Academic