Anaemia in chronic heart failure is not only related to impaired renal perfusion and blunted erythropoietin production, but to fluid retention as well (original) (raw)
,
1
Department of Cardiology
,
University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen
,
The Netherlands
2
Department of Clinical Pharmacology
,
University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen
,
The Netherlands
*Corresponding author:
Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter
,
University Medical Center Groningen
,
Hanzeplein 1, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB Groningen
,
The Netherlands
. Tel: +31 50 361 3876; fax:
+31 50 361 4391
. E-mail address: b.d.westenbrink@thorax.umcg.nl
Search for other works by this author on:
,
3
Department of Nephrology
,
University Medical Center Groningen
,
University of Groningen
,
The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
,
1
Department of Cardiology
,
University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen
,
The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
,
1
Department of Cardiology
,
University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen
,
The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
,
1
Department of Cardiology
,
University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen
,
The Netherlands
2
Department of Clinical Pharmacology
,
University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen
,
The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
,
3
Department of Nephrology
,
University Medical Center Groningen
,
University of Groningen
,
The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
,
1
Department of Cardiology
,
University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen
,
The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
,
2
Department of Clinical Pharmacology
,
University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen
,
The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
1
Department of Cardiology
,
University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen
,
The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
Revision received:
13 November 2006
Accepted:
17 November 2006
Published:
11 December 2006
Cite
B. Daan Westenbrink, Folkert W. Visser, Adriaan A. Voors, Tom D.J. Smilde, Erik Lipsic, Gerjan Navis, Hans L. Hillege, Wiek H. van Gilst, Dirk J. van Veldhuisen, Anaemia in chronic heart failure is not only related to impaired renal perfusion and blunted erythropoietin production, but to fluid retention as well, European Heart Journal, Volume 28, Issue 2, January 2007, Pages 166–171, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehl419
Close
Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search
Abstract
Aims Anaemia is prevalent in the chronic heart failure (CHF) population, but its cause is often unknown. The present study aims to investigate the relation between anaemia, renal perfusion, erythropoietin production, and fluid retention in CHF patients.
Methods and results We studied 97 patients with CHF, of which 15 had anaemia (Hb < 13.0 g/dL in men and Hb < 12.0 g/dL in women), without haematinic deficiencies. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and extracellular volume (ECV) were measured as the clearance and the distribution volume of constantly infused 125I-iothalamate, respectively. Effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) was determined as the clearance of 131I-hippuran. Anaemic CHF patients displayed significantly reduced GFR (P = 0.002), ERPF (P = 0.005) and EPO production (P = 0.001), and an elevated ECV (P = 0.015). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that lower GFR (P = 0.003), lower ERPF (P = 0.004), lower EPO production (P = 0.006), and a higher ECV (P = 0.001) were significant independent predictors of lower haemoglobin levels.
Conclusion Anaemia in CHF is not only independently associated with impaired renal perfusion and blunted EPO production, but to fluid retention as well.
Introduction
Anaemia is present in a substantial part of the chronic heart failure (CHF) population, ranging from 15–55%, depending on the definition of anaemia and severity of disease.1 Anaemia is independently associated with increased morbidity and impaired prognosis, although the cause of anaemia is frequently unknown.1–5 CHF is associated with elevated levels of erythropoietin (EPO), suggesting impaired erythropoietic activity in the bone marrow.1,6,7 Recently, we demonstrated that anaemia in CHF could partly be explained by increased serum levels of AcSDKP, a negative regulator of haematopoietic stem cell proliferation.8 In addition, we hypothesize that CHF will compromise renal perfusion resulting in impaired EPO production, thereby causing anaemia. Finally, it has been suggested that anaemia in CHF may be partly explained by fluid retention and consequent haemodilution.9 However, the relative contribution of renal perfusion, EPO production, and fluid retention to the presence of anaemia in CHF has so far not been well described. We therefore evaluated the relation between anaemia, effective renal plasma flow (ERPF), EPO production, and extracellular volume (ECV) in CHF patients.
Methods
Patient population
Clinically stable CHF patients on outpatient follow-up at our department were asked to participate, as described in detail previously.10 Approximately 121 patients were asked to participate. In total, 110 patient were included into the original analysis and finished the study. Owing to missing haemoglobin levels, 13 patients were excluded form analysis, leaving 97 subjects for analysis. Briefly, inclusion criteria were age > 18 years and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 45%. All patients used renin–angiotensin system blockers, and medication had remained stable for at least 1 month. Exclusion criteria included stroke, myocardial infarction, or cardiac revascularization procedures within the last 3 months or scheduled for these procedures, unstable angina, primary renal disease, prior organ transplant, or chronic use of renal function compromising medication.
Cardio-renal haemodynamic parameters
LVEF was determined by nuclear ventriculography or echocardiography using Simpsons rule. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was calculated from systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements obtained immediately before 125I-iotholamate and 131I-hippuran clearance measurements from 10 consecutive measurements in supine position using an automated system. N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) was determined by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay on the Roche Elecsys (Roche diagnostics, Netherlands). Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and ERPF were measured by constant infusion of the radiolabelled tracers 125I-iothalamate and 131I-hippuran.11 Briefly, after drawing a blank blood sample, a priming solution containing 0.4 mL/kg body weight of the infusion solution (0.04 MBq of 125I-iothalamate and 0.03 MBq of 131I-hippuran) plus an extra amount of 0.6 MBq of 125I-iothalamate was given at 8 a.m., followed by infusion at 12 mL/h, adapted to 9 mL/h in subjects with renal function impairment as estimated from previously obtained serum creatinine values. This ensures steady-state plasma levels of 131I-hippuran and 125I-iothalamate after a run-in period of 2 h, as verified by hourly blood samples. Subsequently, clearances of 125I-iothalamate and 131I-hippuran and the distribution volume of 125I-iothalamate were measured during steady state. The GFR and ERPF were calculated as (U · V)/P(iothalamate) and (I · V)/P(hippuran), respectively, and (U · V)/P(iothalamate) was corrected for voiding errors by the ratio of the urinary to plasma clearance of 131I-hippuran. U · V represents the urinary excretion of the tracer and I · V the infusion rate of the tracer; P represents the values in plasma calculated from the samples bracketing each clearance period. The body surface area (BSA) was calculated as 0.007184 · weight0.425 · length0.725, and GFR and ERPF were expressed per 1.73 m2 of BSA. Renal blood flow (RBF) was calculated as ERPF/1-haematocrit. The filtration fraction (FF) was calculated as the ratio of GFR and ERPF and expressed as percentage. ECV was estimated from the distribution volume of 125I-iotholamate12,13 and calculated as [(I · V + B · V) − U · _V_]/_P_iothalamate during steady state. B · V represents the bolus infusion of the tracer. GFR and ERPF were expressed per 1.73 m2 of BSA, and ECV was expressed as L/kg body weight.
Haemoglobin levels, haematinic parameters, and EPO levels
Haemoglobin, iron, ferritin, transferrin, and vitamin B11 and B12 levels were determined at the local laboratory facilities. EPO levels were determined by IMMULITE EPO assay (DPC, Los Angeles, CA, USA). To define the relation between EPO levels and a given Hb, we included 15 reference subjects referred to our department with complaints of chest pain or palpitations. The reference subjects had a mean age of 50 ± 4.5 and had normal LVEF (LVEF > 60%), normal renal function, no signs of inflammation, or symptoms of CHF.14 An exponential regression equation of serum EPO vs. Hb (mmol/L) was calculated, resulting in the following equation log EPO = 3.015 − (0.130 * Hb). Predicted log EPO and observed/predicted log EPO ratio (log serum EPO/predicted log EPO) were calculated with this equation. Mean O/P ratio in reference subjects was 0.90 ± 0.029 (95% CI 0.64–1.12). Total iron binding capacity (TIBC) was calculated by multiplying serum transferrin × 20. Transferrin saturation (FeSat) was calculated as (serum iron/TIBC) * 100%. Iron deficiency was defined as ferritin levels < 30 µg/L or FeSat < 15%. According to local laboratory reference ranges, deficiency in vitamin B11 and B12 was defined as levels < 142 pmol/L and 50 pg/mL, respectively.
High-sensitivity CRP was determined by nepholometry. The threshold for detection was 0.156 mg/L; when CRP levels were below the detection limit, they were assigned the value 0.156 mg/L for statistical purposes.
Statistics
Data are given as mean ± standard deviation when normally distributed, as median and interquartile range when skewed distributed, and as frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. Differences between groups were compared with Student's _t_-test, Mann–Whitney U test, χ2 of Fisher's exact test where appropriate. A _P_-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and all reported probability values are two-sided. Correlation between Hb, EPO or O/P ratio, and various other variables was performed using Pearson's correlation coefficients. Non-normally distributed continuous variables were log-transformed. The variables age, sex, pharmacological treatments, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, LVEF, ERPF, GFR, FF, ECV, NT-proBNP, CRP, and MAP were assessed for univariate linear association with Hb or log EPO. Variables that showed a significant (P < 0.15) univariate association were included stepwise in a multivariable linear regression model on the basis of on the strength of the univariate association. All the variables described earlier were added to the final model simultaneously to assure that addition of these variables did not significantly increase the predictive accuracy of the model. The final model was assessed for first line interaction.
Results
Patient characteristics
Seventy six percent of subjects were male and age ranged from 27 to 81 years. NYHA functional classes I, II, III, and IV comprised 14, 44, 31, and 10% of patients, respectively.
Difference in characteristics between anaemic and non-anaemic CHF patients
In the total population, 19 patients (20%) were anaemic according to the WHO criteria (Hb < 13.0 g/dL in men and Hb < 12.0 g/dL in women). Iron deficiency was present in four out of 19 anaemic (21%) and three out of 78 non-anaemic (4%) CHF patients. Other haematinic deficiencies were not observed. The iron-deficient patients were excluded from further analysis, leaving 75 non-anaemic subjects and 15 subjects with unexplained anaemia. Differences in characteristics between anaemic and non-anaemic subjects are summarized in Table 1. Anaemic subjects were significantly older and in a higher NYHA class. Although LVEF was comparable, compared with non-anaemic patients, anaemic patients showed more severe haemodynamic impairment, reflected by reduced MAP (86.8 ± 13 vs. 76.8 ± 14 mmHg; P = 0.007), ERPF (286 ± 83 vs. 219 ± 74 mL/min/1.73 m2; P = 0.005) and RBF (502 ± 150 vs. 348 ± 121 mL/min/1.73 m2; P < 0.001), and elevated NT-proBNP levels [10 (260–1355) vs. 1004 (720–1904) pg/mL; P = 0.029]. Anaemic CHF patients were more often using diuretics (65 vs. 87%; P = 0.045) and despite this displayed significantly elevated ECV (0.25 ± 0.5 vs. 0.29 ± 0.4 L/kg; P = 0.015), implicating fluid overload. The fluid retention was subclinical, as anaemic patients did not display oedema, nocturia, or dyspnoea more frequently (data not shown). Plasma sodium levels and fractional sodium excretion were similar, implicating that the elevated ECV was not caused by excess sodium intake. Although creatinine levels were comparable between groups, urea levels were elevated [19 (16–22) vs. 35 (23–40) mg/dL; P = 0.007] and GFR (79 ± 25 vs. 56 ± 28 mL/min/1.73 m2; P = 0.002) was significantly reduced in anaemic patients. Moreover, anaemic patients had a higher incidence of moderate renal failure (GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) and a trend towards more severe renal failure (GFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) (21 vs. 60%, P < 0.005 and 5 vs. 20%, P = 0.088, respectively).
Table 1
Characteristics of anaemic and non-anaemic CHF patients
Non-anaemic (n = 75) | Anaemic (n = 15) | _P_-value | |
---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | 56.3 ± 12 | 65.6 ± 9 | 0.004* |
Sex (n, % male) | 58 (85) | 10 (71) | 0.510 |
NYHA class | 2.3 ± 0.8 | 2.8 ± 0.8 | 0.036* |
BMI (kg/m2) | 27.8 ± 3.9 | 26.1 ± 3.0 | 0.140 |
Ischaemic aetiology (n, %) | 38 (50) | 7 (47) | 1 |
Cardiorenal haemodynamic parameters | |||
Heart rate | 65 ± 2 | 64 ± 3 | 0.834 |
MAP (mmHg) | 86.8 ± 1.5 | 76.8 ± 3.6 | 0.007* |
LVEF (%) | 28 ± 10 | 26 ± 6 | 0.525 |
NT-proBNP (pg/mL) | 510 (260–1355) | 1004 (720–1904) | 0.029* |
Creatinine (mg/dL) | 1.2 (1–2) | 1.2 (1.1–1.7) | 0.150 |
Urea (mg/dL) | 19 (16–22) | 35 (23–40) | <0.001* |
Plasma sodium (mEq/L) | 137 ± 3 | 136 ± 3 | 0.589 |
GFR (mL/min /1.73 m2) | 79 ± 25 | 56 ± 28 | 0.002* |
ERPF (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 286 ± 83 | 219 ± 74 | 0.005* |
RBF (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 502 ± 150 | 348 ± 121 | <0.001* |
FF (%) | 28 (26–30) | 26 (20–29) | 0.370 |
FENa (%) | 0.88 ± 0.33 | 0.97 ± 0.52 | 0.370 |
ECV/body weight (L/kg) | 0.25 ± 0.5 | 0.29 ± 0.4 | 0.015* |
Mild RF (GFR < 60) | 16 (21%) | 9 (60%) | 0.004* |
Severe RF (GFR < 30) | 4 (5%) | 3 (20%) | 0.088 |
Erythropoietic and inflammatory parameters | |||
Hb (mg/dL) | 15 ± 0.7 | 12.7 ± 0.4 | <0.001* |
Serum EPO (U/L) | 15.7 (11–21) | 18.5 (12–31) | 0.357 |
O/P ratio | 1.15 ± 0.20 | 0.93 ± 0.18 | 0.001* |
CRP (mg/L) | 2.15 (0.95–4.06) | 2.38 (0.77–5.66) | 0.733 |
Medication | |||
ACE-inhibitors, n (%) | 66 (88) | 12 (80) | 1 |
ARB, n (%) | 9 (12) | 3 (20) | 0.414 |
Beta-blockers, n (%) | 62 (83) | 13 (87) | 1 |
Diuretic, n (%) | 49 (65) | 13 (87) | 0.045* |
Aldosterone ant. (%) | 51 (88) | 7 (47) | 0.144 |
Non-anaemic (n = 75) | Anaemic (n = 15) | _P_-value | |
---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | 56.3 ± 12 | 65.6 ± 9 | 0.004* |
Sex (n, % male) | 58 (85) | 10 (71) | 0.510 |
NYHA class | 2.3 ± 0.8 | 2.8 ± 0.8 | 0.036* |
BMI (kg/m2) | 27.8 ± 3.9 | 26.1 ± 3.0 | 0.140 |
Ischaemic aetiology (n, %) | 38 (50) | 7 (47) | 1 |
Cardiorenal haemodynamic parameters | |||
Heart rate | 65 ± 2 | 64 ± 3 | 0.834 |
MAP (mmHg) | 86.8 ± 1.5 | 76.8 ± 3.6 | 0.007* |
LVEF (%) | 28 ± 10 | 26 ± 6 | 0.525 |
NT-proBNP (pg/mL) | 510 (260–1355) | 1004 (720–1904) | 0.029* |
Creatinine (mg/dL) | 1.2 (1–2) | 1.2 (1.1–1.7) | 0.150 |
Urea (mg/dL) | 19 (16–22) | 35 (23–40) | <0.001* |
Plasma sodium (mEq/L) | 137 ± 3 | 136 ± 3 | 0.589 |
GFR (mL/min /1.73 m2) | 79 ± 25 | 56 ± 28 | 0.002* |
ERPF (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 286 ± 83 | 219 ± 74 | 0.005* |
RBF (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 502 ± 150 | 348 ± 121 | <0.001* |
FF (%) | 28 (26–30) | 26 (20–29) | 0.370 |
FENa (%) | 0.88 ± 0.33 | 0.97 ± 0.52 | 0.370 |
ECV/body weight (L/kg) | 0.25 ± 0.5 | 0.29 ± 0.4 | 0.015* |
Mild RF (GFR < 60) | 16 (21%) | 9 (60%) | 0.004* |
Severe RF (GFR < 30) | 4 (5%) | 3 (20%) | 0.088 |
Erythropoietic and inflammatory parameters | |||
Hb (mg/dL) | 15 ± 0.7 | 12.7 ± 0.4 | <0.001* |
Serum EPO (U/L) | 15.7 (11–21) | 18.5 (12–31) | 0.357 |
O/P ratio | 1.15 ± 0.20 | 0.93 ± 0.18 | 0.001* |
CRP (mg/L) | 2.15 (0.95–4.06) | 2.38 (0.77–5.66) | 0.733 |
Medication | |||
ACE-inhibitors, n (%) | 66 (88) | 12 (80) | 1 |
ARB, n (%) | 9 (12) | 3 (20) | 0.414 |
Beta-blockers, n (%) | 62 (83) | 13 (87) | 1 |
Diuretic, n (%) | 49 (65) | 13 (87) | 0.045* |
Aldosterone ant. (%) | 51 (88) | 7 (47) | 0.144 |
All continuous variable are presented as mean ± SE if normally distributed and as median value with 25th—75th percentile when skewed distributed. BMI, body mass index; FENa, fractional Na excretion; Hb, haemoglobin; RF, renal failure; O/P ratio, ratio between observed and predicted log EPO; CRP, C-reactive protein; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; aldosteron ant, aldosteron antagonists.
*P < 0.05.
Table 1
Characteristics of anaemic and non-anaemic CHF patients
Non-anaemic (n = 75) | Anaemic (n = 15) | _P_-value | |
---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | 56.3 ± 12 | 65.6 ± 9 | 0.004* |
Sex (n, % male) | 58 (85) | 10 (71) | 0.510 |
NYHA class | 2.3 ± 0.8 | 2.8 ± 0.8 | 0.036* |
BMI (kg/m2) | 27.8 ± 3.9 | 26.1 ± 3.0 | 0.140 |
Ischaemic aetiology (n, %) | 38 (50) | 7 (47) | 1 |
Cardiorenal haemodynamic parameters | |||
Heart rate | 65 ± 2 | 64 ± 3 | 0.834 |
MAP (mmHg) | 86.8 ± 1.5 | 76.8 ± 3.6 | 0.007* |
LVEF (%) | 28 ± 10 | 26 ± 6 | 0.525 |
NT-proBNP (pg/mL) | 510 (260–1355) | 1004 (720–1904) | 0.029* |
Creatinine (mg/dL) | 1.2 (1–2) | 1.2 (1.1–1.7) | 0.150 |
Urea (mg/dL) | 19 (16–22) | 35 (23–40) | <0.001* |
Plasma sodium (mEq/L) | 137 ± 3 | 136 ± 3 | 0.589 |
GFR (mL/min /1.73 m2) | 79 ± 25 | 56 ± 28 | 0.002* |
ERPF (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 286 ± 83 | 219 ± 74 | 0.005* |
RBF (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 502 ± 150 | 348 ± 121 | <0.001* |
FF (%) | 28 (26–30) | 26 (20–29) | 0.370 |
FENa (%) | 0.88 ± 0.33 | 0.97 ± 0.52 | 0.370 |
ECV/body weight (L/kg) | 0.25 ± 0.5 | 0.29 ± 0.4 | 0.015* |
Mild RF (GFR < 60) | 16 (21%) | 9 (60%) | 0.004* |
Severe RF (GFR < 30) | 4 (5%) | 3 (20%) | 0.088 |
Erythropoietic and inflammatory parameters | |||
Hb (mg/dL) | 15 ± 0.7 | 12.7 ± 0.4 | <0.001* |
Serum EPO (U/L) | 15.7 (11–21) | 18.5 (12–31) | 0.357 |
O/P ratio | 1.15 ± 0.20 | 0.93 ± 0.18 | 0.001* |
CRP (mg/L) | 2.15 (0.95–4.06) | 2.38 (0.77–5.66) | 0.733 |
Medication | |||
ACE-inhibitors, n (%) | 66 (88) | 12 (80) | 1 |
ARB, n (%) | 9 (12) | 3 (20) | 0.414 |
Beta-blockers, n (%) | 62 (83) | 13 (87) | 1 |
Diuretic, n (%) | 49 (65) | 13 (87) | 0.045* |
Aldosterone ant. (%) | 51 (88) | 7 (47) | 0.144 |
Non-anaemic (n = 75) | Anaemic (n = 15) | _P_-value | |
---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | 56.3 ± 12 | 65.6 ± 9 | 0.004* |
Sex (n, % male) | 58 (85) | 10 (71) | 0.510 |
NYHA class | 2.3 ± 0.8 | 2.8 ± 0.8 | 0.036* |
BMI (kg/m2) | 27.8 ± 3.9 | 26.1 ± 3.0 | 0.140 |
Ischaemic aetiology (n, %) | 38 (50) | 7 (47) | 1 |
Cardiorenal haemodynamic parameters | |||
Heart rate | 65 ± 2 | 64 ± 3 | 0.834 |
MAP (mmHg) | 86.8 ± 1.5 | 76.8 ± 3.6 | 0.007* |
LVEF (%) | 28 ± 10 | 26 ± 6 | 0.525 |
NT-proBNP (pg/mL) | 510 (260–1355) | 1004 (720–1904) | 0.029* |
Creatinine (mg/dL) | 1.2 (1–2) | 1.2 (1.1–1.7) | 0.150 |
Urea (mg/dL) | 19 (16–22) | 35 (23–40) | <0.001* |
Plasma sodium (mEq/L) | 137 ± 3 | 136 ± 3 | 0.589 |
GFR (mL/min /1.73 m2) | 79 ± 25 | 56 ± 28 | 0.002* |
ERPF (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 286 ± 83 | 219 ± 74 | 0.005* |
RBF (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 502 ± 150 | 348 ± 121 | <0.001* |
FF (%) | 28 (26–30) | 26 (20–29) | 0.370 |
FENa (%) | 0.88 ± 0.33 | 0.97 ± 0.52 | 0.370 |
ECV/body weight (L/kg) | 0.25 ± 0.5 | 0.29 ± 0.4 | 0.015* |
Mild RF (GFR < 60) | 16 (21%) | 9 (60%) | 0.004* |
Severe RF (GFR < 30) | 4 (5%) | 3 (20%) | 0.088 |
Erythropoietic and inflammatory parameters | |||
Hb (mg/dL) | 15 ± 0.7 | 12.7 ± 0.4 | <0.001* |
Serum EPO (U/L) | 15.7 (11–21) | 18.5 (12–31) | 0.357 |
O/P ratio | 1.15 ± 0.20 | 0.93 ± 0.18 | 0.001* |
CRP (mg/L) | 2.15 (0.95–4.06) | 2.38 (0.77–5.66) | 0.733 |
Medication | |||
ACE-inhibitors, n (%) | 66 (88) | 12 (80) | 1 |
ARB, n (%) | 9 (12) | 3 (20) | 0.414 |
Beta-blockers, n (%) | 62 (83) | 13 (87) | 1 |
Diuretic, n (%) | 49 (65) | 13 (87) | 0.045* |
Aldosterone ant. (%) | 51 (88) | 7 (47) | 0.144 |
All continuous variable are presented as mean ± SE if normally distributed and as median value with 25th—75th percentile when skewed distributed. BMI, body mass index; FENa, fractional Na excretion; Hb, haemoglobin; RF, renal failure; O/P ratio, ratio between observed and predicted log EPO; CRP, C-reactive protein; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; aldosteron ant, aldosteron antagonists.
*P < 0.05.
By definition, Hb level was significantly lower in anaemic subjects. However, EPO levels were comparable between anaemic and non-anaemic CHF patients. Additionally observed/predicted (O/P) ratio was significantly reduced in anaemic subjects (1.15 ± 0.2 vs. 0.93 ± 0.2, P = 0.001), indicating blunted EPO production. O/P ratio was significantly higher in non-anaemic CHF patients compared with reference subjects (P = 0.026), whereas O/P ratio in anaemic CHF patients and controls were comparable. Thus, EPO production is elevated in both anaemic and non-anaemic CHF patients. But based on their Hb, it should have been higher in anaemic CHF patients. It therefore seems that the compensatory rise in response to anaemia is impaired.
Hb levels and EPO production in the CHF population
As previously described, CHF patients displayed a relatively moderate negative correlation between EPO and Hb levels (R = − 0.281, P = 0.007). A moderate significant correlation was also observed between EPO levels and both CRP (R = 0.281, P = 0.007) and NYHA class (R = 0.210, P = 0.05), and a trend with NT-proBNP (R = 0.193, P = 0.07). No significant correlation was observed between EPO levels and other markers for cardiorenal haemodynamic status, or renal function parameters. O/P ratio correlated with Hb (R = 0.397, P = 0.001), GFR (R = 0.237, P = 0.024), and FF (R = 0.285, P = 0.007).
Predictors of Hb and serum EPO
Univariate and multivariable linear associations between Hb and EPO levels are displayed in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. Sex, lower EPO (Figure 1A), lower GFR (Figure 1B), lower ERPF (Figure 1C), and higher ECV (Figure 1D) were independently associated with lower Hb levels, accounting for 31–44% of the variance in Hb levels. The variables CRP, NYHA class, NT-proBNP, and Hb showed significant univariate association with plasma EPO. However, higher CRP and lower Hb levels were the only independent predictors of higher serum EPO levels. Inclusion of the full list of possible predictive variables did not result in a significant increase in the adjusted _R_2, slope, or partial correlation coefficient of the variables in our model.
Figure 1
Relation between haemoglobin levels and EPO, GFR, ERPF, and ECV.
Table 2
Univariate and multivariable predictors of Hb levels
Haemoglobin | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | Univariate | Multivariable | ||||||
B | SE | _P_-value | B | SE | β | Part. cor. | _P_-value | |
Sex | −1.41 | 0.30 | <0.001 | −1.189 | 0.258 | −0.394 | −0.449 | <0.001 |
Age | −0.022 | 0.012 | 0.077 | |||||
GFR | 0.02 | 0.005 | <0.001 | 0.037 | 0.009 | 0.744 | 0.414 | <0.001 |
ERPF | −0.004 | 0.002 | 0.013 | −0.008 | 0.003 | −0.534 | −0.310 | 0.004 |
NYHA | −0.04 | 0.17 | 0.013 | |||||
EPO | −1.55 | 0.57 | 0.007 | −1.422 | 0.430 | −0.266 | −0.399 | 0.001 |
ECV | −6.36 | 2.95 | 0.034 | −7.120 | 2.215 | −0.259 | −0.330 | 0.004 |
MAP | −0.03 | 0.01 | 0.002 | |||||
BNP | −0.399 | 0.144 | 0.007 |
Haemoglobin | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | Univariate | Multivariable | ||||||
B | SE | _P_-value | B | SE | β | Part. cor. | _P_-value | |
Sex | −1.41 | 0.30 | <0.001 | −1.189 | 0.258 | −0.394 | −0.449 | <0.001 |
Age | −0.022 | 0.012 | 0.077 | |||||
GFR | 0.02 | 0.005 | <0.001 | 0.037 | 0.009 | 0.744 | 0.414 | <0.001 |
ERPF | −0.004 | 0.002 | 0.013 | −0.008 | 0.003 | −0.534 | −0.310 | 0.004 |
NYHA | −0.04 | 0.17 | 0.013 | |||||
EPO | −1.55 | 0.57 | 0.007 | −1.422 | 0.430 | −0.266 | −0.399 | 0.001 |
ECV | −6.36 | 2.95 | 0.034 | −7.120 | 2.215 | −0.259 | −0.330 | 0.004 |
MAP | −0.03 | 0.01 | 0.002 | |||||
BNP | −0.399 | 0.144 | 0.007 |
Adjusted _R_2 = 0.436. β, standardized beta; part. cor., partial correlation coefficient.
Table 2
Univariate and multivariable predictors of Hb levels
Haemoglobin | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | Univariate | Multivariable | ||||||
B | SE | _P_-value | B | SE | β | Part. cor. | _P_-value | |
Sex | −1.41 | 0.30 | <0.001 | −1.189 | 0.258 | −0.394 | −0.449 | <0.001 |
Age | −0.022 | 0.012 | 0.077 | |||||
GFR | 0.02 | 0.005 | <0.001 | 0.037 | 0.009 | 0.744 | 0.414 | <0.001 |
ERPF | −0.004 | 0.002 | 0.013 | −0.008 | 0.003 | −0.534 | −0.310 | 0.004 |
NYHA | −0.04 | 0.17 | 0.013 | |||||
EPO | −1.55 | 0.57 | 0.007 | −1.422 | 0.430 | −0.266 | −0.399 | 0.001 |
ECV | −6.36 | 2.95 | 0.034 | −7.120 | 2.215 | −0.259 | −0.330 | 0.004 |
MAP | −0.03 | 0.01 | 0.002 | |||||
BNP | −0.399 | 0.144 | 0.007 |
Haemoglobin | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | Univariate | Multivariable | ||||||
B | SE | _P_-value | B | SE | β | Part. cor. | _P_-value | |
Sex | −1.41 | 0.30 | <0.001 | −1.189 | 0.258 | −0.394 | −0.449 | <0.001 |
Age | −0.022 | 0.012 | 0.077 | |||||
GFR | 0.02 | 0.005 | <0.001 | 0.037 | 0.009 | 0.744 | 0.414 | <0.001 |
ERPF | −0.004 | 0.002 | 0.013 | −0.008 | 0.003 | −0.534 | −0.310 | 0.004 |
NYHA | −0.04 | 0.17 | 0.013 | |||||
EPO | −1.55 | 0.57 | 0.007 | −1.422 | 0.430 | −0.266 | −0.399 | 0.001 |
ECV | −6.36 | 2.95 | 0.034 | −7.120 | 2.215 | −0.259 | −0.330 | 0.004 |
MAP | −0.03 | 0.01 | 0.002 | |||||
BNP | −0.399 | 0.144 | 0.007 |
Adjusted _R_2 = 0.436. β, standardized beta; part. cor., partial correlation coefficient.
Table 3
Univariate and multivariable predictors of serum EPO levels
EPO | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | Univariate | Multivariable | |||||
B | SE | _P_- value | B | SE | β | _P_- value | |
Sex | 0.03 | 0.233 | 0.6 | ||||
Age | 0.027 | 0.6 | 0.233 | ||||
Hb | −0.052 | 0.019 | 0.007 | −0.044 | 0.019 | −0.233 | 0.025 |
NYHA | −0.06 | 0.031 | 0.061 | ||||
CRP | 0.345 | 0.126 | 0.006 | 0.125 | 0.054 | 0.234 | 0.024 |
EPO | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | Univariate | Multivariable | |||||
B | SE | _P_- value | B | SE | β | _P_- value | |
Sex | 0.03 | 0.233 | 0.6 | ||||
Age | 0.027 | 0.6 | 0.233 | ||||
Hb | −0.052 | 0.019 | 0.007 | −0.044 | 0.019 | −0.233 | 0.025 |
NYHA | −0.06 | 0.031 | 0.061 | ||||
CRP | 0.345 | 0.126 | 0.006 | 0.125 | 0.054 | 0.234 | 0.024 |
Table 3
Univariate and multivariable predictors of serum EPO levels
EPO | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | Univariate | Multivariable | |||||
B | SE | _P_- value | B | SE | β | _P_- value | |
Sex | 0.03 | 0.233 | 0.6 | ||||
Age | 0.027 | 0.6 | 0.233 | ||||
Hb | −0.052 | 0.019 | 0.007 | −0.044 | 0.019 | −0.233 | 0.025 |
NYHA | −0.06 | 0.031 | 0.061 | ||||
CRP | 0.345 | 0.126 | 0.006 | 0.125 | 0.054 | 0.234 | 0.024 |
EPO | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | Univariate | Multivariable | |||||
B | SE | _P_- value | B | SE | β | _P_- value | |
Sex | 0.03 | 0.233 | 0.6 | ||||
Age | 0.027 | 0.6 | 0.233 | ||||
Hb | −0.052 | 0.019 | 0.007 | −0.044 | 0.019 | −0.233 | 0.025 |
NYHA | −0.06 | 0.031 | 0.061 | ||||
CRP | 0.345 | 0.126 | 0.006 | 0.125 | 0.054 | 0.234 | 0.024 |
Discussion
The present study demonstrated that anaemia in CHF patients was not only independently related to impaired renal perfusion and blunted EPO production, but to an increased ECV as well. However, in contrast to our expectations, serum EPO levels were not directly related to renal perfusion.
The association between anaemia in CHF and impaired EPO production has been suggested previously.3,7 Nevertheless, the presence of defective endogenous EPO production was not formally evaluated until recently. In a comprehensive retrospective analysis on the cause of anaemia in CHF patients, Opasich et al.15 found that 50% of anaemic CHF patients showed evidence of impaired EPO production. Our data further substantiate these findings.
The relation between renal perfusion and EPO levels has been evaluated previously in two populations comprising 13 and 14 CHF patients.16,17 In these studies, EPO production inversely correlated with RBF, ERPF, and renal oxygen delivery, suggesting that impaired renal oxygenation caused the elevated EPO levels. However, in our far larger cohort, these findings could not be reproduced. Although there was no relation between ERPF and EPO production, a univariate mild correlation between EPO production and GFR was observed, which might implicate that blunted EPO production results from impaired renal function and structural renal damage. Furthermore, circulating inflammatory cytokines and ACE-inhibitors can directly inhibit EPO production in the kidney and might contribute to the blunted EPO production.18,19 Additionally, impaired GFR could attenuate the excretion of circulating erythropoiesis-inhibiting factors (e.g. AcSDKP), leading to enhanced plasma levels, as has been demonstrated in a haemodialysis population.20
The non-anaemic CHF patients displayed higher EPO levels and O/P ratios than reference subjects, as has been described previously. Elevated EPO levels were independently related to higher CRP levels, suggesting that elevated EPO production is directly related to an enhanced inflammatory state. Several pro-inflammatory cytokines have inhibitory effects on erythropoiesis and are established as the cause of anaemia associated with chronic inflammatory disease.21 CHF is associated with enhanced expression of a variety of pro-inflammatory cytokines, possibly contributing to the development of anaemia.6 In addition, we have recently demonstrated that anaemia in CHF could be partially explained by elevated levels of AcSDKP, a negative regulator of haematopoietic stem cells.8 These circulating factors inhibit erythropoiesis and can eventually result in elevated EPO requirements. Indeed, although EPO production was blunted, the circulating EPO levels in anaemic CHF patients were not reduced but slightly elevated compared with non-anaemic patients. The slightly elevated EPO levels were however insufficient for the prevailing Hb, reflected by significantly impaired O/P ratio. Hence, anaemia in CHF does not result from the inability to produce EPO, but an inability to further increase baseline EPO production.
As expected, anaemic patients displayed elevated ECV, which was independently related to lower Hb levels. Impaired renal haemodynamics in CHF cause activation of RAS and vasopressin systems, resulting in salt and fluid retention and consequently increased ECV. Fluid retention in CHF can cause haemodilution, resulting in pseudo-anaemia, which carries even a worse prognosis than true anaemia.9 In the present study, anaemic subjects more frequently received diuretics but nonetheless displayed elevated ECV. Importantly, although fluid retention was related to anaemia, signs and symptoms of fluid retention were absent. Thus, haemodilution seems to precede the clinical presentation of fluid retention. Therefore, starting or increasing the dose of diuretics should be considered before starting with EPO treatment. Since the aetiology of anaemia in CHF seems multifactorial, the preponderant cause should be identified on an individual basis, for instance, by determining the O/P ratio or ECV in addition to regular diagnostic procedures.
Although the reduced renal perfusion, blunted EPO production, and elevated ECV could be the cause of anaemia in CHF, they could also be a consequence. Lower Hb levels can result in peripheral tissue hypoxia, causing vasodilatation and consequently reducing blood pressure.22 This will result in activation of the RAS and further compromise of RBF by renal vasoconstriction and fluid retention. The compromised kidney seems unable to meet the increased demand, and anaemia ensues. The vicious cycle of CHF causing anaemia and anaemia causing further deterioration of CHF has been described as the cardiorenal anaemia syndrome.23
Thus, anaemia in CHF is directly related to an impaired haemodynamic state, compromising renal perfusion, attenuating EPO production, and increasing fluid retention. Therefore, improvement of cardiac function and cardiorenal haemodynamics would be the most rational approach for the treatment of anaemia in CHF. Additionally, administration of recombinant human EPO might break the vicious cycle by replenishing the insufficient EPO levels.24 It is however uncertain whether supplementation of EPO in anaemic CHF patients will decrease morbidity and mortality, as anaemia might merely be a marker for impaired cardiac function. This will emerge from scheduled randomized clinical trails. The elevated ECV in our population suggests that concomitant meticulous correction of fluid overload might be feasible. Whether this will improve Hb and outcome in this population is however uncertain.
Limitations
Our study has limitations. Apart from the obvious cross-sectional design, the CHF population contained relatively few anaemic CHF patients and anaemic subjects had relatively mild anaemia. Therefore, our data might not be representative for more severe forms of anaemia and should be regarded as hypothesis generating.
Conclusion
Anaemia in CHF is not only independently associated with impaired renal perfusion and blunted EPO production, but to fluid retention as well.
Acknowledgements
B.D.W. is supported by NWO-ZonMW. F.W.V. and E.L. are supported by GUIDE. D.J.v.V. is an established investigator of the Netherlands Heart Foundation (grant D97–017).
Conflict of interest: none declared.
References
1
Erythropoietin in cardiovascular diseases
,
EurHeart J
,
2004
, vol.
25
(pg.
285
-
291
)
2
Anemia is associated with worse symptoms, greater impairment in functional capacity and a significant increase in mortality in patients with advanced heart failure
,
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2002
, vol.
39
(pg.
1780
-
1786
)
3
Anemia in chronic heart failure: pathogenetic mechanisms
,
J Card Fail
,
2004
, vol.
10
(pg.
S5
-
S9
)
4
Effect of anemia on exercise tolerance in chronic heart failure in men
,
Am J Cardiol
,
2003
, vol.
91
(pg.
888
-
891
)
5
Anaemia is an independent predictor of poor outcome in patients with chronic heart failure
,
Int J Cardiol
,
2003
, vol.
90
(pg.
303
-
308
)
6
Circulating erythropoietin levels and prognosis in patients with congestive heart failure: comparison with neurohormonal and inflammatory markers
,
Arch Intern Med
,
2005
, vol.
165
(pg.
1304
-
1309
)
7
The importance of anemia and its correction in the management of severe congestive heart failure
,
Eur J Heart Fail
,
2002
, vol.
4
(pg.
681
-
686
)
8
Levels of hematopoiesis inhibitor N-acetyl-seryl-aspartyl-lysyl-proline partially explain the occurrence of anemia in heart failure
,
Circulation
,
2005
, vol.
112
(pg.
1743
-
1747
)
9
Hemodilution is common in patients with advanced heart failure
,
Circulation
,
2003
, vol.
107
(pg.
226
-
229
)
10
Drawbacks and prognostic value of formulas estimating renal function in patients with chronic heart failure and systolic dysfunction
,
Circulation
,
2006
, vol.
114
(pg.
1572
-
1580
)
11
A radioisotope method for simultaneous determination of the glomerular filtration rate and the effective renal plasma flow
,
Neth J Med
,
1977
, vol.
20
(pg.
97
-
103
)
12
Total clearance and extracellular volume with 125I-iothalamate in peritoneal dialysis
,
Adv Perit Dial
,
1996
, vol.
12
(pg.
147
-
150
)
13
Extracellular fluid and plasma volumes during water immersion in nephrectomized dogs
,
Am J Physiol
,
1987
, vol.
252
(pg.
R972
-
R978
)
14
Prognostic value of plasma erythropoietin on mortality in patients with chronic heart failure
,
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2004
, vol.
44
(pg.
63
-
67
)
15
Blunted erythropoietin production and defective iron supply for erythropoiesis as major causes of anaemia in patients with chronic heart failure
,
Eur Heart J
,
2005
, vol.
26
(pg.
2232
-
2237
)
16
Elevated level of erythropoietin in congestive heart failure relationship to renal perfusion and plasma renin
,
J Intern Med
,
1993
, vol.
233
(pg.
125
-
130
)
17
Increased erythropoietin synthesis in patients with COLD or left heart failure is related to alterations in renal haemodynamics
,
Eur J Clin Invest
,
2001
, vol.
31
(pg.
103
-
109
)
18
Serum erythropoietin in heart failure patients treated with ACE-inhibitors or AT(1) antagonists
,
Eur J Heart Fail
,
2000
, vol.
2
(pg.
393
-
398
)
19
Anemia of chronic disease
,
N Engl J Med
,
2005
, vol.
352
(pg.
1011
-
1023
)
20
Plasma levels and metabolism of AcSDKP in patients with chronic renal failure: relationship with erythropoietin requirements
,
Am J Kidney Dis
,
2001
, vol.
38
(pg.
510
-
517
)
21
Role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of anemia of chronic disease in rheumatoid arthritis
,
Clin Immunol
,
1999
, vol.
92
(pg.
153
-
160
)
22
Pathogenesis of oedema in chronic severe anaemia: studies of body water and sodium, renal function, haemodynamic variables, and plasma hormones
,
Br Heart J
,
1993
, vol.
70
(pg.
357
-
362
)
23
The interaction between heart failure, renal failure and anemia—the cardio-renal anemia syndrome
,
Blood Purif
,
2004
, vol.
22
(pg.
277
-
284
)
24
The effect of correction of mild anemia in severe, resistant congestive heart failure using subcutaneous erythropoietin and intravenous iron: a randomized controlled study
,
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2001
, vol.
37
(pg.
1775
-
1780
)
© The European Society of Cardiology 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Topic:
- anemia
- chronic heart failure
- congestive heart failure
- drug clearance
- erythropoietin
- glomerular filtration rate
- hematinics
- renal plasma flow, effective
- fluid retention
- hemoglobin measurement
- external cephalic version
- renal perfusion
Advertisement intended for healthcare professionals
Citations
Views
Altmetric
Metrics
Total Views 1,470
1,095 Pageviews
375 PDF Downloads
Since 1/1/2017
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
January 2017 | 1 |
February 2017 | 4 |
March 2017 | 2 |
April 2017 | 2 |
May 2017 | 6 |
June 2017 | 2 |
August 2017 | 4 |
September 2017 | 2 |
October 2017 | 2 |
November 2017 | 11 |
December 2017 | 22 |
January 2018 | 17 |
February 2018 | 25 |
March 2018 | 23 |
April 2018 | 26 |
May 2018 | 31 |
June 2018 | 24 |
July 2018 | 24 |
August 2018 | 18 |
September 2018 | 10 |
October 2018 | 9 |
November 2018 | 20 |
December 2018 | 15 |
January 2019 | 7 |
February 2019 | 16 |
March 2019 | 17 |
April 2019 | 39 |
May 2019 | 33 |
June 2019 | 13 |
July 2019 | 9 |
August 2019 | 9 |
September 2019 | 38 |
October 2019 | 7 |
November 2019 | 16 |
December 2019 | 12 |
January 2020 | 18 |
February 2020 | 17 |
March 2020 | 17 |
April 2020 | 26 |
May 2020 | 17 |
June 2020 | 18 |
July 2020 | 10 |
August 2020 | 16 |
September 2020 | 16 |
October 2020 | 9 |
November 2020 | 19 |
December 2020 | 28 |
January 2021 | 19 |
February 2021 | 15 |
March 2021 | 22 |
April 2021 | 19 |
May 2021 | 11 |
June 2021 | 18 |
July 2021 | 13 |
August 2021 | 20 |
September 2021 | 10 |
October 2021 | 12 |
November 2021 | 15 |
December 2021 | 22 |
January 2022 | 14 |
February 2022 | 15 |
March 2022 | 13 |
April 2022 | 12 |
May 2022 | 11 |
June 2022 | 11 |
July 2022 | 16 |
August 2022 | 10 |
September 2022 | 13 |
October 2022 | 10 |
November 2022 | 16 |
December 2022 | 16 |
January 2023 | 18 |
February 2023 | 15 |
March 2023 | 22 |
April 2023 | 11 |
May 2023 | 21 |
June 2023 | 8 |
July 2023 | 18 |
August 2023 | 16 |
September 2023 | 26 |
October 2023 | 13 |
November 2023 | 12 |
December 2023 | 11 |
January 2024 | 22 |
February 2024 | 24 |
March 2024 | 20 |
April 2024 | 35 |
May 2024 | 25 |
June 2024 | 11 |
July 2024 | 15 |
August 2024 | 14 |
September 2024 | 10 |
October 2024 | 15 |
November 2024 | 8 |
Citations
2 Web of Science
×
Email alerts
Related articles in PubMed
Citing articles via
More from Oxford Academic
Advertisement intended for healthcare professionals