Genetic and Environmental Factors Affecting the de novo Appearance of the [PSI + ] Prion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (original) (raw)
Journal Article
,
Laboratory for Molecular Biology
, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60607
Search for other works by this author on:
,
Laboratory for Molecular Biology
, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60607
Search for other works by this author on:
,
Laboratory for Molecular Biology
, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60607
Search for other works by this author on:
,
School of Biology
, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0230
Search for other works by this author on:
Laboratory for Molecular Biology
, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60607
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
01 October 1997
Cite
Irina L Derkatch, Michael E Bradley, Ping Zhou, Yury O Chernoff, Susan W Liebman, Genetic and Environmental Factors Affecting the de novo Appearance of the [PSI + ] Prion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Genetics, Volume 147, Issue 2, 1 October 1997, Pages 507–519, https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/147.2.507
Close
Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search
It has previously been shown that yeast prion [PSI + ] is cured by GuHCl, although reports on reversibility of curing were contradictory. Here we show that GuHCl treatment of both [PSI + ] and [psi – ] yeast strains results in two classes of [psi – ] derivatives: Pin+, in which [PSI + ] can be reinduced by Sup35p overproduction, and Pin–, in which overexpression of the complete SUP35 gene does not lead to the [PSI + ] appearance. However, in both Pin+ and Pin– derivatives [PSI + ] is reinduced by overproduction of a short Sup35p N-terminal fragment, thus, in principle, [PSI + ] curing remains reversible in both cases. Neither suppression nor growth inhibition caused by SUP35 overexpression in Pin+ [psi – ] derivatives are observed in Pin– [psi – ] derivatives. Genetic analyses show that the Pin+ phenotype is determined by a non-Mendelian factor, which, unlike the [PSI + ] prion, is independent of the Sup35p N-terminal domain. A Pin– [psi – ] derivative was also generated by transient inactivation of the heat shock protein, Hsp104, while [PSI + ] curing by Hsp104 overproduction resulted exclusively in Pin+ [psi – ] derivatives. We hypothesize that in addition to the [PSI + ] prion-determining domain in the Sup35p N-terminus, there is another self-propagating conformational determinant in the C-proximal part of Sup35p and that this second prion is responsible for the Pin+ phenotype.
Communicating editor: F. Winston
This content is only available as a PDF.
© Genetics 1997
Citations
Views
Altmetric
Metrics
Total Views 248
0 Pageviews
248 PDF Downloads
Since 1/1/2021
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
January 2021 | 3 |
March 2021 | 1 |
May 2021 | 2 |
August 2021 | 1 |
September 2021 | 2 |
October 2021 | 2 |
November 2021 | 4 |
December 2021 | 9 |
February 2022 | 7 |
March 2022 | 12 |
April 2022 | 7 |
May 2022 | 8 |
June 2022 | 2 |
July 2022 | 3 |
August 2022 | 1 |
September 2022 | 4 |
October 2022 | 5 |
November 2022 | 6 |
December 2022 | 2 |
January 2023 | 4 |
February 2023 | 4 |
March 2023 | 9 |
April 2023 | 3 |
May 2023 | 7 |
June 2023 | 2 |
July 2023 | 7 |
August 2023 | 3 |
September 2023 | 2 |
October 2023 | 2 |
November 2023 | 4 |
December 2023 | 7 |
January 2024 | 5 |
February 2024 | 15 |
March 2024 | 13 |
April 2024 | 14 |
May 2024 | 7 |
June 2024 | 16 |
July 2024 | 14 |
August 2024 | 17 |
September 2024 | 10 |
October 2024 | 2 |
×
Email alerts
Citing articles via
More from Oxford Academic