Sequence-Tagged-Site (STS) Markers of Arbitrary Genes: Development, Characterization and Analysis of Linkage in Black Spruce (original) (raw)

Journal Article

,

Centre de Recherche en Biologie Forestière

, Université Laval, Ste-Foy, Québec, Canada G1K 7P4

Corresponding author: Daniel J. Perry, Centre de Recherche en Biologie Forestière, Pavillon Charles-Eugène-Marchand, Université Laval, Ste-Foy, PQ, G1K 7P4 Canada. E-mail: dperry@rsvs.ulaval.ca

Search for other works by this author on:

Centre de Recherche en Biologie Forestière

, Université Laval, Ste-Foy, Québec, Canada G1K 7P4

Search for other works by this author on:

Received:

11 November 1997

Accepted:

23 February 1998

Cite

Daniel J Perry, Jean Bousquet, Sequence-Tagged-Site (STS) Markers of Arbitrary Genes: Development, Characterization and Analysis of Linkage in Black Spruce, Genetics, Volume 149, Issue 2, 1 June 1998, Pages 1089–1098, https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/149.2.1089
Close

Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search

Abstract

Sequence-tagged-site (STS) markers of arbitrary genes were investigated in black spruce [Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.]. Thirty-nine pairs of PCR primers were used to screen diverse panels of haploid and diploid DNAs for variation that could be detected by standard agarose gel electrophoresis without further manipulation of amplification products. Codominant length polymorphisms were revealed at 15 loci. Three of these loci also had null amplification alleles as did 3 other loci that had no apparent product-length variation. Dominant length polymorphisms were observed at 2 other loci. Alleles of codominant markers differed in size by as little as 1 bp to as much as an estimated 175 bp with nearly all insertions/deletions found in noncoding regions. Polymorphisms at 3 loci involved large (33 bp to at least 114 bp) direct repeats and similar repeats were found in 7 of 51 cDNAs sequenced. Allelic segregation was in accordance with Mendelian inheritance and linkage was detected for 5 of 63 pairwise combinations of loci tested. Codominant STS markers of 12 loci revealed an average heterozygosity of 0.26 and an average of 2.8 alleles in a range-wide sample of 22 trees.

OUR ability to evaluate genetic parameters in individuals or populations is directly related to our ability to detect polymorphisms at multiple genetic loci. Currently, several molecular marker technologies are available to reveal variation in nuclear genomes. Markers based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are attractive because they may be essentially unlimited in numbers and require mere nanogram quantities of DNA, permitting analysis of single megagametophytes and embryos in conifers (Bousquet et al. 1990).

Of PCR-based markers, random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs; Welsh and McClelland 1990; Williams et al. 1990) and simple sequence repeats (SSRs, also known as microsatellites; Tautz 1989; Weber and May 1989) have received much attention. RAPDs are simple to develop, but equally migrating amplification products from different individuals (or species) may not represent the same locus, making it difficult to compare or combine linkage maps. In population studies, the dominant nature of RAPDs can be problematic; estimates of population genetic parameters may be unreliable if RAPDs are surveyed in diploid material (Isabel et al. 1995; Szmidt et al. 1996).

SSR markers represent single specific loci and are often highly variable with multiple codominant alleles, but their development is rather complex, often requiring enrichment cloning steps. Nonetheless, primer sequences are now available for some nuclear SSR markers in a few conifer species (Echt et al. 1996; Pfeiffer et al. 1997; Smith and Devey 1994; van de Ven and McNicol 1996). The assessment of allelic variation of SSR markers often requires high resolution, labor intensive techniques such as polyacrylimide gel electrophoresis followed by silver staining. Also, a high mutation rate, including backward mutations, and a limited range of SSR allele sizes may have a homogenizing effect, limiting the potential for divergence of SSR loci among populations (Nauta and Weissing 1996).

We are considering different approaches for obtaining PCR-based markers in black spruce [Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.]. In this paper, we investigate sequence-tagged-site (STS) markers having polymorphisms that may be observed without manipulation of amplified products. Such markers combine the technical simplicity of RAPDs with the specificity of SSRs and, as we demonstrate, they may often be codominant. In addition to designing STS primers for black spruce genes, we characterize observed polymorphisms at the DNA sequence level and examine allelic segregation in megagametophyte arrays of individual trees, confirming Mendelian inheritance and in a few instances demonstrating linkage between locus pairs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

cDNA sequencing: The black spruce cDNA library (provided by B. Rutledge, Natural Resources Canada) derived from an embryonic cell culture of a single diploid genotype. Reverse transcription had been initiated with a NotI primer-adapter (5′AATTCGCGGCCGC(T)15), facilitating the inclusion of the 3′-untranslated region (UTR) and directional cloning into λgt22A. We plated the library with Escherichia coli Y1090 (Promega, Madison, WI) following standard procedures. Arbitrarily selected plaques were each transferred to 1 ml of SM buffer (Sambrook et al. 1989) containing one drop of chloroform. Inserts were amplified directly using primers GT11-F (5′ATTGGTGGCGACGACTCCTGGAG) and GT11-R (5′CAGACCAACTGGTAATGGTAGCG) in PCRs containing 0.1 μm each primer, 0.2 mm each dNTP, 1 μl of a plaque suspension (in a 50 μl reaction), 0.025 units/μl Taq DNA polymerase (Pharmacia Biotech Inc., Piscataway, NJ) and 1× of the supplied reaction buffer (included 1.5 mm MgCl2). PCR was carried out for 35 cycles (94°, 1 min; 55°, 1 min; 72°, 2 min) followed by 10 min at 72° in a DNA Thermal Cycler (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT). Products were examined by gel electrophoresis (1.2% agarose in TAE) and ethidium bromide staining.

cDNAs were candidates for sequencing if a single product of size 600 to 1350 bp was present in the insert amplification. Sequencing templates were PCR-amplified as above, purified using a QIAquick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN, Chatsworth, CA) and, starting with primer GT11-F, sequenced using dideoxy dye terminator cycle sequencing analyzed on a Perkin-Elmer-ABI model 373 automated DNA sequencer. With larger inserts of more than 600 bp, a second sequencing run was initiated from a clone-specific internal primer that was chosen such that its position would also allow it to be used as a forward amplification primer (see below). The deduced amino acid sequences of cDNAs were compared to the nonredundant protein sequence databases using BLASTX (Altschul et al. 1990) accessed at the National Center for Biotechnology Information/BLAST server (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cgibin/BLAST/nph-blast). When BLASTX results were negative, BLASTN was used to compare the insert sequences with the nonredundant nucleotide sequence databases. We also examined the cDNA sequences for the presence of large repeats using the program REPEAT of the Genetics Computer Group (GCG) Wisconsin Package v8.1 (Devereux et al. 1984).

Selection and testing of amplification primers: For each sequenced cDNA, our aim was to select a reverse primer in the presumed 3′-UTR and a forward primer about 350 to 600 bp upstream within the coding region. Occasionally, possible intron locations were identified by examining genomic sequences of similar plant genes that were found in BLASTX searches and, when possible, the forward primer was located such that the predicted amplification product would include one or two introns. Typically, 21 mers with G+C contents near 50%, minimal secondary structure and no significant inter-primer complementarity were selected.

The performance of primer pairs was tested in amplifications of the original plaque suspension and of genomic DNA of the same genotype from which the cDNA library was cloned (reference DNA). Genomic amplifications were conducted using 50 ng of reference DNA in 15 μl reaction mixtures having the same composition as that used for cDNA templates above. All PCR of genomic templates was carried out for 40 cycles (94°, 1 min; 55°, 2 min; 72°, 3 min) followed by 10 min at 72°. The ramp time to annealing and extension temperatures was 4 sec/degree.

Screening of DNA panels for polymorphism: Primer pairs that performed satisfactorily in initial tests were used to screen range-wide haploid and diploid panels of black spruce DNAs. The diploid panel (provenance trees) consisted of one tree from each of 22 provenances distributed across the species range. Needle samples were collected near Quebec City in a provenance test established in 1975 (Beaulieu et al. 1989). DNA was extracted from 50–75 mg of needles following Bousquet et al. (1990) with an additional chloroform extraction. About 50 ng of this DNA was used per 15 μl PCR with reaction conditions as for reference DNA amplifications above. The haploid panel consisted of one megagametophyte from each of the 22 provenances, usually from the same trees included on the diploid panel. Seedcoats and embryos were removed and DNA isolation from individual megagametophytes followed Bousquet et al. (1990) modified to include a phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) extraction and precipitation with ethanol. About 1–5 ng DNA was used per 15 μl PCR. Amplification products were subjected to electrophoresis through thin (3 mm) gels (1.2 or 2% agarose in TAE, see results) followed by ethidium bromide staining.

Marker segregation analyses: Polymorphic markers were examined in 22to 30 megagametophytes from each heterozygote among 11 individuals that were a subset of the provenance trees. For each locus, goodness-of-fit to a 1:1 ratio of alternate alleles was tested using a G-test (Sokal and Rohlf 1981). In the absence of heterogeneity, data of heterozygotes with like alleles were pooled.

Linkage was examined between pairwise combinations of loci using a method equivalent to the double backcross (Bailey 1961; Narain 1990). This involved the calculation of three χ 2 statistics; two for testing segregation at individual loci (⁠χA2 and χB2⁠) and the third for testing linkage (⁠χL2⁠). When data were available from more than one double-heterozygote for a pairwise combination, heterogeneity χ2's were obtained following Narain (1990). If heterogeneity was found for the linkage component, tests for linkage were conducted using individual tree data. Otherwise, data were pooled. For each pair of loci demonstrating linkage, the recombination frequency (y) and its standard error (SEy) were estimated following Bailey (1961). The possibility of heterogeneous recombination frequencies among trees was also investigated using a χ2 test (Adams and Joly 1980).

Genomic sequences of alternative alleles: Sequencing templates of individual alleles were amplified from single megagametophytes and purified using QIAquick PCR or gel purification kits (QIAGEN). Sequencing was from the same forward primer used for template amplification. Allelic sequences were aligned manually.

Production of synthetic heterozygotes: Amplification products of heterozygote genotypes that were not represented in the panel of provenance trees were simulated by template mixing. Approximately 0.25 ng of each of two allelic sequencing templates were combined and amplified by PCR. Alternatively, approximately equal quantities of allelic products from separate PCRs of haploid megagametophyte DNAs were combined and subjected to five additional thermal cycles as used in amplification. The validity of these procedures was confirmed by constructing several synthetic heterozygotes corresponding to genotypes for which comparison with true heterozygotes was possible.

RESULTS

Characterization of cDNAs: Upon examination of amplification products of each of 100 plaques, 71 cDNA clones satisfied the requirements for sequencing. Of these, 51 were sequenced. With one exception (SB66), sequencing was full length.

Many (78%) of the sequenced cDNAs encoded products similar to those of genes previously characterized in other organisms (Table 1). Of the 11 sequences that did not produce positive BLASTX results, two (SB07 and SB08) shared about 70% nucleotide identity with Arabidopsis thaliana sequences in the GenBank expressed sequence tag (EST) division (accessions ATT-S1819 and AA394640, respectively). Two pairs of cDNAs

TABLE 1

Black spruce cDNAs with similarity to known genes of other organisms

Clone Putative identification Source organism and GenBank accession no. Amino acid identity
SB01 Aquaporin Spinacia oleracea L77969 83 (264)
SB06 Acyl-CoA oxidase homolog Phalaenopsis sp. U66299 73 (223)
SB09 Thioredoxin Nicotiana tabacum X58527 58 (115)
SB11 Ribosomal protein L15 Rattus norvegicus X78167 68 (204)
SB12 Nucleolysin TIA-1 Homo sapiens M77142 51 (49)
SB13 DNA-binding protein CROC-1B Homo sapiens U39361 49 (136)
SB14 NADH-glutamate synthase Medicago sativa L01660 74 (147)
SB15 Calcium dependent protein kinase Vigna radiata U08140 82 (264)
SB16 Ribosomal protein L13a Cyanophora paradoxa Y09971 68 (177)
SB18 Glutathione S-transferase Nicotiana tabacum X56266 53 (139)
SB21 Fibrillarin Schizosaccharomyces pombe X69930 75 (236)
SB23 Ribosomal protein S15 Arabidopsis thaliana Z23161 89 (139)
SB25 Protein kinase Spinacia oleracea Z30332 52 (98)
SB29 ATAF1 Arabidopsis thaliana X74755 65 (46)
SB30 Rac-like protein Arabidopsis thaliana U43501 85 (198)
SB31 Actin Striga asiatica S68003 100 (53)
SB32 Mitotic cyclin (S13-7) Glycine max X62303 59 (224)
SB34 Regulatory protein preg Neurospora crassa L07314 42 (117)
SB35 GASA5 Arabidopsis thaliana U53221 76 (72)
SB38 Ribosomal protein L17 Nicotiana tabacum L18915 96 (133)
SB40 Heat shock protein 82 Oryza sativa Z11920 89 (196)
SB41 Mitochondrial import site protein ISP42 Saccharomyces cerevisiae X56885 36 (60)
SB42 Ribosomal protein L31 Nicotiana glutinosa U23784 78 (120)
SB46 KIAA0107 Homo sapiens D14663 58 (232)
SB48 BTF3-like transcription factor Nicotiana plumbaginifolia Y09106 56 (111)
SB49 YGL010w Saccharomyces cerevisiae Z72532 54 (53)
SB50 C01F1.3 Caenorhabditis elegans U58761 26 (129)
SB51 Ribosomal protein L3 Oryza sativa D12630 88 (86)
SB52 Glutathione S-transferase Nicotiana tabacum X56266 50 (148)
SB53 Ubiquitin-activating enzyme 2 Arabidopsis thaliana U40566 44 (49)
SB55 Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Saccharomyces cerevisiae U18839 51 (152)
SB56 Phosphoglycerate kinase (cytosolic) Nicotiana tabacum Z48976 89 (146)
SB58 Ribosomal protein L5 Solanum melongena AB001583 62 (88)
SB62 Ribosomal protein L15 Rattus norvegicus X78167 68 (204)
SB65 Proteasome subunit HsC10-II Homo sapiens D26598 62 (112)
SB66 Defender against cell death 1 homolog Malus domestica U68560 82 (113)
SB67 Late embryogenesis abundant protein Picea glauca L47117 45 (77)
SB68 Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 beta subunit Synechocystis sp. D90906 75 (285)
SB71 TAT-binding protein homolog TBP10 Dictyostelium discoideum L16579 83 (175)
SB72 Ribosomal protein L27A Arabidopsis thaliana X91959 78 (56)
Clone Putative identification Source organism and GenBank accession no. Amino acid identity
SB01 Aquaporin Spinacia oleracea L77969 83 (264)
SB06 Acyl-CoA oxidase homolog Phalaenopsis sp. U66299 73 (223)
SB09 Thioredoxin Nicotiana tabacum X58527 58 (115)
SB11 Ribosomal protein L15 Rattus norvegicus X78167 68 (204)
SB12 Nucleolysin TIA-1 Homo sapiens M77142 51 (49)
SB13 DNA-binding protein CROC-1B Homo sapiens U39361 49 (136)
SB14 NADH-glutamate synthase Medicago sativa L01660 74 (147)
SB15 Calcium dependent protein kinase Vigna radiata U08140 82 (264)
SB16 Ribosomal protein L13a Cyanophora paradoxa Y09971 68 (177)
SB18 Glutathione S-transferase Nicotiana tabacum X56266 53 (139)
SB21 Fibrillarin Schizosaccharomyces pombe X69930 75 (236)
SB23 Ribosomal protein S15 Arabidopsis thaliana Z23161 89 (139)
SB25 Protein kinase Spinacia oleracea Z30332 52 (98)
SB29 ATAF1 Arabidopsis thaliana X74755 65 (46)
SB30 Rac-like protein Arabidopsis thaliana U43501 85 (198)
SB31 Actin Striga asiatica S68003 100 (53)
SB32 Mitotic cyclin (S13-7) Glycine max X62303 59 (224)
SB34 Regulatory protein preg Neurospora crassa L07314 42 (117)
SB35 GASA5 Arabidopsis thaliana U53221 76 (72)
SB38 Ribosomal protein L17 Nicotiana tabacum L18915 96 (133)
SB40 Heat shock protein 82 Oryza sativa Z11920 89 (196)
SB41 Mitochondrial import site protein ISP42 Saccharomyces cerevisiae X56885 36 (60)
SB42 Ribosomal protein L31 Nicotiana glutinosa U23784 78 (120)
SB46 KIAA0107 Homo sapiens D14663 58 (232)
SB48 BTF3-like transcription factor Nicotiana plumbaginifolia Y09106 56 (111)
SB49 YGL010w Saccharomyces cerevisiae Z72532 54 (53)
SB50 C01F1.3 Caenorhabditis elegans U58761 26 (129)
SB51 Ribosomal protein L3 Oryza sativa D12630 88 (86)
SB52 Glutathione S-transferase Nicotiana tabacum X56266 50 (148)
SB53 Ubiquitin-activating enzyme 2 Arabidopsis thaliana U40566 44 (49)
SB55 Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Saccharomyces cerevisiae U18839 51 (152)
SB56 Phosphoglycerate kinase (cytosolic) Nicotiana tabacum Z48976 89 (146)
SB58 Ribosomal protein L5 Solanum melongena AB001583 62 (88)
SB62 Ribosomal protein L15 Rattus norvegicus X78167 68 (204)
SB65 Proteasome subunit HsC10-II Homo sapiens D26598 62 (112)
SB66 Defender against cell death 1 homolog Malus domestica U68560 82 (113)
SB67 Late embryogenesis abundant protein Picea glauca L47117 45 (77)
SB68 Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 beta subunit Synechocystis sp. D90906 75 (285)
SB71 TAT-binding protein homolog TBP10 Dictyostelium discoideum L16579 83 (175)
SB72 Ribosomal protein L27A Arabidopsis thaliana X91959 78 (56)

Putative identification was determined from the highest scoring BLASTX alignment. Amino acid identity shows the percentage of identical amino acids, with the length of the alignment in parentheses.

TABLE 1

Black spruce cDNAs with similarity to known genes of other organisms

Clone Putative identification Source organism and GenBank accession no. Amino acid identity
SB01 Aquaporin Spinacia oleracea L77969 83 (264)
SB06 Acyl-CoA oxidase homolog Phalaenopsis sp. U66299 73 (223)
SB09 Thioredoxin Nicotiana tabacum X58527 58 (115)
SB11 Ribosomal protein L15 Rattus norvegicus X78167 68 (204)
SB12 Nucleolysin TIA-1 Homo sapiens M77142 51 (49)
SB13 DNA-binding protein CROC-1B Homo sapiens U39361 49 (136)
SB14 NADH-glutamate synthase Medicago sativa L01660 74 (147)
SB15 Calcium dependent protein kinase Vigna radiata U08140 82 (264)
SB16 Ribosomal protein L13a Cyanophora paradoxa Y09971 68 (177)
SB18 Glutathione S-transferase Nicotiana tabacum X56266 53 (139)
SB21 Fibrillarin Schizosaccharomyces pombe X69930 75 (236)
SB23 Ribosomal protein S15 Arabidopsis thaliana Z23161 89 (139)
SB25 Protein kinase Spinacia oleracea Z30332 52 (98)
SB29 ATAF1 Arabidopsis thaliana X74755 65 (46)
SB30 Rac-like protein Arabidopsis thaliana U43501 85 (198)
SB31 Actin Striga asiatica S68003 100 (53)
SB32 Mitotic cyclin (S13-7) Glycine max X62303 59 (224)
SB34 Regulatory protein preg Neurospora crassa L07314 42 (117)
SB35 GASA5 Arabidopsis thaliana U53221 76 (72)
SB38 Ribosomal protein L17 Nicotiana tabacum L18915 96 (133)
SB40 Heat shock protein 82 Oryza sativa Z11920 89 (196)
SB41 Mitochondrial import site protein ISP42 Saccharomyces cerevisiae X56885 36 (60)
SB42 Ribosomal protein L31 Nicotiana glutinosa U23784 78 (120)
SB46 KIAA0107 Homo sapiens D14663 58 (232)
SB48 BTF3-like transcription factor Nicotiana plumbaginifolia Y09106 56 (111)
SB49 YGL010w Saccharomyces cerevisiae Z72532 54 (53)
SB50 C01F1.3 Caenorhabditis elegans U58761 26 (129)
SB51 Ribosomal protein L3 Oryza sativa D12630 88 (86)
SB52 Glutathione S-transferase Nicotiana tabacum X56266 50 (148)
SB53 Ubiquitin-activating enzyme 2 Arabidopsis thaliana U40566 44 (49)
SB55 Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Saccharomyces cerevisiae U18839 51 (152)
SB56 Phosphoglycerate kinase (cytosolic) Nicotiana tabacum Z48976 89 (146)
SB58 Ribosomal protein L5 Solanum melongena AB001583 62 (88)
SB62 Ribosomal protein L15 Rattus norvegicus X78167 68 (204)
SB65 Proteasome subunit HsC10-II Homo sapiens D26598 62 (112)
SB66 Defender against cell death 1 homolog Malus domestica U68560 82 (113)
SB67 Late embryogenesis abundant protein Picea glauca L47117 45 (77)
SB68 Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 beta subunit Synechocystis sp. D90906 75 (285)
SB71 TAT-binding protein homolog TBP10 Dictyostelium discoideum L16579 83 (175)
SB72 Ribosomal protein L27A Arabidopsis thaliana X91959 78 (56)
Clone Putative identification Source organism and GenBank accession no. Amino acid identity
SB01 Aquaporin Spinacia oleracea L77969 83 (264)
SB06 Acyl-CoA oxidase homolog Phalaenopsis sp. U66299 73 (223)
SB09 Thioredoxin Nicotiana tabacum X58527 58 (115)
SB11 Ribosomal protein L15 Rattus norvegicus X78167 68 (204)
SB12 Nucleolysin TIA-1 Homo sapiens M77142 51 (49)
SB13 DNA-binding protein CROC-1B Homo sapiens U39361 49 (136)
SB14 NADH-glutamate synthase Medicago sativa L01660 74 (147)
SB15 Calcium dependent protein kinase Vigna radiata U08140 82 (264)
SB16 Ribosomal protein L13a Cyanophora paradoxa Y09971 68 (177)
SB18 Glutathione S-transferase Nicotiana tabacum X56266 53 (139)
SB21 Fibrillarin Schizosaccharomyces pombe X69930 75 (236)
SB23 Ribosomal protein S15 Arabidopsis thaliana Z23161 89 (139)
SB25 Protein kinase Spinacia oleracea Z30332 52 (98)
SB29 ATAF1 Arabidopsis thaliana X74755 65 (46)
SB30 Rac-like protein Arabidopsis thaliana U43501 85 (198)
SB31 Actin Striga asiatica S68003 100 (53)
SB32 Mitotic cyclin (S13-7) Glycine max X62303 59 (224)
SB34 Regulatory protein preg Neurospora crassa L07314 42 (117)
SB35 GASA5 Arabidopsis thaliana U53221 76 (72)
SB38 Ribosomal protein L17 Nicotiana tabacum L18915 96 (133)
SB40 Heat shock protein 82 Oryza sativa Z11920 89 (196)
SB41 Mitochondrial import site protein ISP42 Saccharomyces cerevisiae X56885 36 (60)
SB42 Ribosomal protein L31 Nicotiana glutinosa U23784 78 (120)
SB46 KIAA0107 Homo sapiens D14663 58 (232)
SB48 BTF3-like transcription factor Nicotiana plumbaginifolia Y09106 56 (111)
SB49 YGL010w Saccharomyces cerevisiae Z72532 54 (53)
SB50 C01F1.3 Caenorhabditis elegans U58761 26 (129)
SB51 Ribosomal protein L3 Oryza sativa D12630 88 (86)
SB52 Glutathione S-transferase Nicotiana tabacum X56266 50 (148)
SB53 Ubiquitin-activating enzyme 2 Arabidopsis thaliana U40566 44 (49)
SB55 Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Saccharomyces cerevisiae U18839 51 (152)
SB56 Phosphoglycerate kinase (cytosolic) Nicotiana tabacum Z48976 89 (146)
SB58 Ribosomal protein L5 Solanum melongena AB001583 62 (88)
SB62 Ribosomal protein L15 Rattus norvegicus X78167 68 (204)
SB65 Proteasome subunit HsC10-II Homo sapiens D26598 62 (112)
SB66 Defender against cell death 1 homolog Malus domestica U68560 82 (113)
SB67 Late embryogenesis abundant protein Picea glauca L47117 45 (77)
SB68 Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 beta subunit Synechocystis sp. D90906 75 (285)
SB71 TAT-binding protein homolog TBP10 Dictyostelium discoideum L16579 83 (175)
SB72 Ribosomal protein L27A Arabidopsis thaliana X91959 78 (56)

Putative identification was determined from the highest scoring BLASTX alignment. Amino acid identity shows the percentage of identical amino acids, with the length of the alignment in parentheses.

(SB18 and SB52; Sb11 and SB62) encoded similar products. These pairs had 83.2% and 81.3% nucleotide identities, respectively, within protein coding regions, but their 3′-UTRs appeared completely divergent. All remaining cDNAs were unique.

Large (38 bp to 106 bp) direct repeats were found in noncoding regions of seven cDNAs (SB06, SB08, SB13, SB24, SB42, SB49 and SB52). In SB13 and SB52, repeat elements were notably decayed (about 85% identity). A 38 bp direct repeat in SB08 was itself interrupted by another of 24 bp.

Two other peculiarities were noted. SB40 consisted entirely of open reading frame, encoding 206 amino acids (a.a.), and no 3′-UTR. And, a BLASTX search with the SB25 sequence suggested similarity to a protein kinase, but the similarity existed in what we inferred to be the 3′-UTR of SB25. This may reflect a rearrangement, perhaps a cloning artifact.

Selection and testing of amplification primers: Amplification primers were selected for each of the sequenced cDNAs, excepting SB40 owing to its lack of 3′-UTR sequence. All 50 primer pairs produced cleanly amplified products of predicted sizes from corresponding plaque suspensions. Based upon amplification trials using reference genomic DNA, 39 pairs (78%) were judged suitable for screening of haploid and diploid panels. Of these, 18 pairs did not reveal polymorphism. With SB41 primers, a double-banded pattern was obtained for some trees, but single invariant products were amplified from megagametophytes of those trees. We did not investigate this putative locus further. Markers generated using the remaining 20 primer pairs could be classified into four general groups based on the types of polymorphisms revealed: (1) those with null amplification alleles, but no length variants evident (three loci); (2) loci with null alleles and length variants (three loci); (3) loci at which only codominant, length variants were observed (12 loci); and (4) markers revealing dominant, length polymorphisms (two loci).

Loci with null amplification alleles: Null amplification alleles were apparent at six loci (Sb16, Sb17, Sb18, Sb52, Sb53 and Sb66). Segregation of null alleles appeared consistent with the expected 1:1 ratio but replication of results was at times problematic. In some trials, alleles first characterized as null were better described as low amplification alleles and occasionally, a range of product concentrations was present. Also, the misclassification of occasional failed reactions as nulls became evident upon repetition.

Three of these loci (Sb17, Sb18 and Sb52) also had codominant length polymorphisms that segregated in accordance with a 1:1 ratio among megagametophytes of heterozygous trees. Differences in sizes of alleles at these loci were small, likely less than 5 bp in most cases. Since the presence of null alleles would limit their potential value as markers in population studies, they were not characterized further. Codominant alleles were initially suspected at Sb66 too, because amplification of diploid DNAs of some trees resulted in the production of additional bands consistent with heteroduplex products. However, no length variation was detected among products from corresponding megagametophyte DNAs.

Loci at which all observed polymorphisms were codominant: Codominant markers were obtained for 12 loci at which there was no evidence of null alleles (Figure 1). All were resolved on 2% agarose gels excepting Sb01 for which 1.2% gels were used. Size differences among alleles ranged from 1 bp to an estimated 175 bp. The presence of slower migrating heteroduplex DNA made it possible to detect heterozygotes on the diploid panel using short gels (10 cm), even when differences in sizes among alleles were small. But, when alleles differed in length by less than 10 bp, and for Sb01, long gels (22 cm) were necessary to assess allelic segregation among megagametophytes and to assign diploid genotypes with confidence. Genotypes of Sb21 were the least resolved of these 12 loci. Three alleles could be distinguished in homozygotes or haploid megagametophytes, but Sb21-473/474 heterozygotes appeared no different than Sb21-474/474 homozygotes and Sb21-471/473 heterozygotes were essentially indistinguishable from Sb21-471/474 heterozygotes (Figure 1g). Pooling of alleles Sb21-473 and Sb21-474 will be required in population studies if electrophoretic conditions are similar to ours.

The DNA sequences of all observed allelic products were determined for each of these loci except Sb01. Of the codominant markers, the amplification products of Sb01 were the largest and, with five alleles and an observed heterozygosity of 0.77 among the range-wide panel of 22 trees, they were also the most variable. We inferred that the Sb01 polymorphisms were likely within an intron corresponding to intron 2 of the three introns in similar plant genes (Guerrero and Crossland 1993; Kaldenhoff et al. 1993). Amplification using a reverse primer within the coding region (SB01-Rb) and the original forward primer (SB01-F) was adopted because it excluded the apparently invariant intron 3 and downstream sequence, thereby shortening product lengths by about 400 bp and improving resolution of alleles.

DNA sequencing revealed that most of the remaining polymorphisms were due to one or more small (≤15 bp) insertions/deletions in introns (Sb07, Sb11, Sb31, Sb62), the 3′-UTR (Sb70, Sb72) or both (Sb08, Sb21). Two markers are noteworthy because the observed polymorphisms involved large tandem direct repeats of 3′-UTR sequences. At Sb06, the common allele (Sb06-539) had two copies of a 70 bp element where Sb06-609 had three. At Sb24, the two observed alleles differed by the presence or absence of a 33 bp repeat. Polymorphisms at Sb29 were unique in that they were located within the protein coding sequence. Relative to the common allele (Sb29-574), the Sb29-553 product would have a deletion of 7 a.a. and the Sb29-580 product would have an insertion of 2 a.a.

Without exception, segregation of alleles among megagametophytes from heterozygous trees was consistent with the expected 1:1 ratio indicative of Mendelian inheritance. In the range-wide sample of 22 trees, these 12 loci showed an average observed heterozygosity (Ho) of 0.26 and an average of 2.8 alleles (Table 2).

Markers with dominant length polymorphisms: Amplification of Sb35 from diploid DNA of provenance trees produced either a single band of 440 bp or a 440 bp product and a 496 bp product. This two-banded phenotype behaved in a dominant manner (Figure 2a). We sequenced both products amplified from a single megagametophyte and found the 496 bp product to be identical to the 440 bp product except that it was extended by 56 bp of sequence that was composed of 35 bp of additional 3′-UTR sequence (as seen in cDNA SB35) plus the 21 bp of primer SB35-R. There was no sequence at this location in cDNA SB35 bearing any resemblance to a SB35-R priming site and it is not clear how the alleles differed such that priming also occurred at this distal site in some genotypes.

When segregation at Sb42 was examined among megagametophytes, either a 582 bp or a 766 bp product predominated. However, in a diploid state, the larger product was dominant (Figure 2b). Amplification primers

Codominant sequence-tagged-site (STS) markers of black spruce genes. Polymorphisms were observed on ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels without further manipulation of amplification products. Negative images are shown. Size markers (left-hand lanes) are fragments of a 100-bp ladder (Pharmacia). Lanes with numbers marked by asterisks contain synthetic heterozygote products representing genotypes not found on the provenance tree panel (see materials and methods). (a) Lanes 1–5, genotypes Sb01-1930/2075, Sb01-1930/2010, Sb01-1930/1960, Sb01-1930/1930 and Sb01-1900/1930. (b) Allelic segregation among eight megagametophytes of an Sb01-1900/2075 heterozygote. (c) Lanes 1 and 2, alleles Sb06-539 and Sb06-609; lane 3 an Sb06-539/609 heterozygote. (d) Lanes 1–4, alternating alleles Sb07-648 and Sb07-645; lane 5, an Sb07-645/648 heterozygote. (e) Lanes 1–4, alleles Sb08-634, Sb08-645, Sb08-646 and Sb08-653; lanes 5–10, heterozygotes Sb08-634/645, Sb08-634/646, Sb08-634/653, Sb08-645/646, Sb08-645/653 and Sb08-646/653. (f) Lanes 1–4, alternating alleles Sb11-695 and Sb11-691; lane 5, an Sb11-691/695 heterozygote. (g) Lanes 1–3, alleles Sb21-474, Sb21-473 and Sb21-471; lanes 4–6, heterozygotes Sb21-473/474, Sb21-471/474 and Sb21-471/473. (h) Lanes 1 and 2, alleles Sb24-738 and Sb24-771; lane 3 an Sb24-738/771 heterozygote. (i) Lanes 1–3, alleles Sb29-553, Sb29-574 and Sb29-580; lanes 4–6, heterozygotes Sb29-553/574, Sb29-553/580 and Sb29-574/580. (j) Lanes 1 and 2, alleles Sb31-449 and Sb31-439; lane 3 an Sb31-439/449 heterozygote. (k) Lanes 1–3, alleles Sb70-417, Sb70-410 and Sb70-404; lanes 4–6, heterozygotes Sb70-410/417, Sb70-404/417 and Sb70-404/410. (l) Lanes 1–4, alleles Sb62-681, Sb62-689, Sb62-691 and Sb62-706; lanes 5–10, heterozygotes Sb62-681/689, Sb62-681/691, Sb62-681/706, Sb62-689/691, Sb62-689/706 and Sb62-691/706. (m) Lanes 1 and 2, alleles Sb72-523 and Sb72-515; lane 3, an Sb72-515/523 heterozygote.

Figure 1.

Codominant sequence-tagged-site (STS) markers of black spruce genes. Polymorphisms were observed on ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels without further manipulation of amplification products. Negative images are shown. Size markers (left-hand lanes) are fragments of a 100-bp ladder (Pharmacia). Lanes with numbers marked by asterisks contain synthetic heterozygote products representing genotypes not found on the provenance tree panel (see materials and methods). (a) Lanes 1–5, genotypes Sb01-1930/2075, Sb01-1930/2010, Sb01-1930/1960, Sb01-1930/1930 and Sb01-1900/1930. (b) Allelic segregation among eight megagametophytes of an Sb01-1900/2075 heterozygote. (c) Lanes 1 and 2, alleles Sb06-539 and Sb06-609; lane 3 an Sb06-539/609 heterozygote. (d) Lanes 1–4, alternating alleles Sb07-648 and Sb07-645; lane 5, an Sb07-645/648 heterozygote. (e) Lanes 1–4, alleles Sb08-634, Sb08-645, Sb08-646 and Sb08-653; lanes 5–10, heterozygotes Sb08-634/645, Sb08-634/646, Sb08-634/653, Sb08-645/646, Sb08-645/653 and Sb08-646/653. (f) Lanes 1–4, alternating alleles Sb11-695 and Sb11-691; lane 5, an Sb11-691/695 heterozygote. (g) Lanes 1–3, alleles Sb21-474, Sb21-473 and Sb21-471; lanes 4–6, heterozygotes Sb21-473/474, Sb21-471/474 and Sb21-471/473. (h) Lanes 1 and 2, alleles Sb24-738 and Sb24-771; lane 3 an Sb24-738/771 heterozygote. (i) Lanes 1–3, alleles Sb29-553, Sb29-574 and Sb29-580; lanes 4–6, heterozygotes Sb29-553/574, Sb29-553/580 and Sb29-574/580. (j) Lanes 1 and 2, alleles Sb31-449 and Sb31-439; lane 3 an Sb31-439/449 heterozygote. (k) Lanes 1–3, alleles Sb70-417, Sb70-410 and Sb70-404; lanes 4–6, heterozygotes Sb70-410/417, Sb70-404/417 and Sb70-404/410. (l) Lanes 1–4, alleles Sb62-681, Sb62-689, Sb62-691 and Sb62-706; lanes 5–10, heterozygotes Sb62-681/689, Sb62-681/691, Sb62-681/706, Sb62-689/691, Sb62-689/706 and Sb62-691/706. (m) Lanes 1 and 2, alleles Sb72-523 and Sb72-515; lane 3, an Sb72-515/523 heterozygote.

TABLE 2

Allelic length polymorphisms observed at 12 codominant STS loci in black spruce

Locus Putative identification Allele frequenciesa Observed heterozygosity
Sb01 Aquaporin 0.34, 0.45, 0.05, 0.11, 0.05 0.77
Sb06 Acyl-CoA oxidase homolog 0.95, 0.05 0.09
Sb07 unknown 0.02, 0.98 0.05
Ab08 unknown 0.05, 0.27, 0.55, 0.14 0.59
Sb11 Ribosomal protein L15 0.11, 0.89 0.23
Sb21 Fibrillarin 0.18, 0.82b 0.18
Sb24 unknown 0.84, 0.16 0.32
Sb29 ATAF1 0.14, 0.84, 0.02 0.23
Sb31 Actin 0.11, 0.89 0.23
Sb62 Ribosomal protein L15 0.80, 0.05, 0.07, 0.09 0.32
Sb70 unknown 0.02, 0.02, 0.95 0.09
Sb72 Ribosomal protein L27A 0.02, 0.98 0.05
Locus Putative identification Allele frequenciesa Observed heterozygosity
Sb01 Aquaporin 0.34, 0.45, 0.05, 0.11, 0.05 0.77
Sb06 Acyl-CoA oxidase homolog 0.95, 0.05 0.09
Sb07 unknown 0.02, 0.98 0.05
Ab08 unknown 0.05, 0.27, 0.55, 0.14 0.59
Sb11 Ribosomal protein L15 0.11, 0.89 0.23
Sb21 Fibrillarin 0.18, 0.82b 0.18
Sb24 unknown 0.84, 0.16 0.32
Sb29 ATAF1 0.14, 0.84, 0.02 0.23
Sb31 Actin 0.11, 0.89 0.23
Sb62 Ribosomal protein L15 0.80, 0.05, 0.07, 0.09 0.32
Sb70 unknown 0.02, 0.02, 0.95 0.09
Sb72 Ribosomal protein L27A 0.02, 0.98 0.05

Putative identification refers to gene products identified in BLASTX searches (Table 1). Polymorphisms were directly observed on agarose gels without further manipulation of amplification products. Estimates of allele frequencies and observed heterozygosities are based on a range-wide sample of 22 black spruce trees.

a

Alleles are listed in order of increasing sizes (see Figure 1).

b

Alleles Sb21-473 and Sb21-474 were pooled (see results).

TABLE 2

Allelic length polymorphisms observed at 12 codominant STS loci in black spruce

Locus Putative identification Allele frequenciesa Observed heterozygosity
Sb01 Aquaporin 0.34, 0.45, 0.05, 0.11, 0.05 0.77
Sb06 Acyl-CoA oxidase homolog 0.95, 0.05 0.09
Sb07 unknown 0.02, 0.98 0.05
Ab08 unknown 0.05, 0.27, 0.55, 0.14 0.59
Sb11 Ribosomal protein L15 0.11, 0.89 0.23
Sb21 Fibrillarin 0.18, 0.82b 0.18
Sb24 unknown 0.84, 0.16 0.32
Sb29 ATAF1 0.14, 0.84, 0.02 0.23
Sb31 Actin 0.11, 0.89 0.23
Sb62 Ribosomal protein L15 0.80, 0.05, 0.07, 0.09 0.32
Sb70 unknown 0.02, 0.02, 0.95 0.09
Sb72 Ribosomal protein L27A 0.02, 0.98 0.05
Locus Putative identification Allele frequenciesa Observed heterozygosity
Sb01 Aquaporin 0.34, 0.45, 0.05, 0.11, 0.05 0.77
Sb06 Acyl-CoA oxidase homolog 0.95, 0.05 0.09
Sb07 unknown 0.02, 0.98 0.05
Ab08 unknown 0.05, 0.27, 0.55, 0.14 0.59
Sb11 Ribosomal protein L15 0.11, 0.89 0.23
Sb21 Fibrillarin 0.18, 0.82b 0.18
Sb24 unknown 0.84, 0.16 0.32
Sb29 ATAF1 0.14, 0.84, 0.02 0.23
Sb31 Actin 0.11, 0.89 0.23
Sb62 Ribosomal protein L15 0.80, 0.05, 0.07, 0.09 0.32
Sb70 unknown 0.02, 0.02, 0.95 0.09
Sb72 Ribosomal protein L27A 0.02, 0.98 0.05

Putative identification refers to gene products identified in BLASTX searches (Table 1). Polymorphisms were directly observed on agarose gels without further manipulation of amplification products. Estimates of allele frequencies and observed heterozygosities are based on a range-wide sample of 22 black spruce trees.

a

Alleles are listed in order of increasing sizes (see Figure 1).

b

Alleles Sb21-473 and Sb21-474 were pooled (see results).

were positioned to include a large (106 bp) repeat found in cDNA SB42, but the structure of this repeat did not vary among the allelic products. Rather, Sb42-766

Segregation of dominant length polymorphisms of sequence-tagged-site (STS) markers among megagametophytes of heterozygous trees. Polymorphisms were observed on ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels without further manipulation of amplification products. Negative images are shown. Size markers (left-hand lanes) are fragments of a 100 bp ladder (Pharmacia). (a) Lanes 1–6, segregation of alleles Sb35-440 and Sb35-440&496 among six megagametophytes of an Sb35-440/440&496 heterozygote (lane 7). (b) Lanes 1–6, segregation of alleles Sb42-582 and Sb42-766 among six megagametophytes of an Sb42-582/766 heterozygote (lane 7).

Figure 2.

Segregation of dominant length polymorphisms of sequence-tagged-site (STS) markers among megagametophytes of heterozygous trees. Polymorphisms were observed on ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels without further manipulation of amplification products. Negative images are shown. Size markers (left-hand lanes) are fragments of a 100 bp ladder (Pharmacia). (a) Lanes 1–6, segregation of alleles Sb35-440 and Sb35-440&496 among six megagametophytes of an Sb35-440/440&496 heterozygote (lane 7). (b) Lanes 1–6, segregation of alleles Sb42-582 and Sb42-766 among six megagametophytes of an Sb42-582/766 heterozygote (lane 7).

had an additional large direct repeat of at least 114 bp that included the SB42-R primer site. Although the first element of this additional repeat had a site exactly complementary to SB42-R, amplification from the distal site was favored. The distal site was either not present or was not favored in amplifications of the common allele (Sb42-582). The mechanism of suppression of amplification from the proximal site in heterozygotes is unknown.

Analysis of linkage: All codominant markers and the dominant markers of Sb35 and Sb42 (a total of 17 loci) were included in the analysis of linkage. We examined 63 of 136 possible two-locus combinations; five were indicative of linkage (Table 3) with no heterogeneity of recombination frequencies detected among trees. It may be appropriate to exclude one member of linked pairs in analyses that require an assumption of independence among loci, retaining those having higher heterozygosities. However, the results for the Sb07/Sb62 and

TABLE 3

Linkage of STS markers of black spruce genes

Sample sizes
Loci Trees Megagametophytes y SEy
Sb01/Sb06 2 46 0.17 0.06
Sb01/Sb29 3 76 0.28 0.05
Sb07/Sb62 1 23 0.26 0.09
Sb11/Sb24 1 30 0.23 0.08
Sb11/Sb62 2 60 0.33 0.06
Sample sizes
Loci Trees Megagametophytes y SEy
Sb01/Sb06 2 46 0.17 0.06
Sb01/Sb29 3 76 0.28 0.05
Sb07/Sb62 1 23 0.26 0.09
Sb11/Sb24 1 30 0.23 0.08
Sb11/Sb62 2 60 0.33 0.06

Estimates of recombination frequencies (y) and standard errors (SEy) are given for pairs of loci for which significant linkage was detected.

TABLE 3

Linkage of STS markers of black spruce genes

Sample sizes
Loci Trees Megagametophytes y SEy
Sb01/Sb06 2 46 0.17 0.06
Sb01/Sb29 3 76 0.28 0.05
Sb07/Sb62 1 23 0.26 0.09
Sb11/Sb24 1 30 0.23 0.08
Sb11/Sb62 2 60 0.33 0.06
Sample sizes
Loci Trees Megagametophytes y SEy
Sb01/Sb06 2 46 0.17 0.06
Sb01/Sb29 3 76 0.28 0.05
Sb07/Sb62 1 23 0.26 0.09
Sb11/Sb24 1 30 0.23 0.08
Sb11/Sb62 2 60 0.33 0.06

Estimates of recombination frequencies (y) and standard errors (SEy) are given for pairs of loci for which significant linkage was detected.

Sb11/Sb24 combinations should be viewed as tentative because only one doubly heterozygous tree was available for each.

DISCUSSION

Allelic variation that can be detected directly on agarose gels without additional manipulation of PCR products is reasonably common among STS markers of black spruce genes. Out of 39 markers screened, 12 showed codominant length polymorphisms suitable for use in population studies. Codominant markers were also found for three additional loci, but these are less suited to population studies owing to the presence of null alleles which could cause erroneous heterozygosity estimates. However, these three markers and dominant length polymorphisms identified at two additional loci should be well suited to applications such as genome mapping.

Most (78%) of the black spruce cDNAs sequenced here were similar to previously characterized genes. This high number probably reflects the fact that we made no effort to avoid abundantly expressed messages that are more likely to be already represented in sequence databases. To obtain markers of a wider variety of types of genes, techniques such as cold-plaque screening (Hodge et al. 1992) could be used to identify clones of rarely expressed mRNAs. Markers could also be tailored to represent different classes of genes by using libraries derived from specific tissues, developmental stages, or environmental treatments. Also, for some species, an increasingly large variety of precharacterized sequences are becoming available in publicly accessible databases.

STS markers have been developed in other plants (Bradshaw et al. 1994; Ghareyazie et al. 1995; Talbert et al. 1994; Tragoonrung et al. 1992) including the conifer Cryptomeria japonica (Tsumura et al. 1997). In general, the proportion of directly observable length polymorphisms has been low and digestion of amplification products with restriction enzymes (PCR-RFLP) has routinely been used. Also, the source of sequence information for previous STS marker development has often been genomic clones rather than cDNAs. However, there are scattered reports of allelic length polymorphisms of plant genes (Bradshaw et al. 1994; Davis and Yu 1997; Perry and Furnier 1996; Tragoonrung et al. 1992). A low frequency of directly observable length polymorphism may be a reflection of the screening panels that have been used; small panels, or panels with a restricted genetic base, may have encompassed little of the total genetic diversity. When 15 pairs of STS primers were screened against a diverse panel of 40 rice varieties, six (40%) revealed length polymorphisms (Ghareyazie et al. 1995), a proportion similar to that found here for black spruce (15/39, 38%), suggesting that potential success rates may be reasonably high for a wide range of plant species. But, we also note that in cases where interspecific crosses have been used to create presumably highly heterozygous mapping populations, the amount of length polymorphism has remained low (Bradshaw et al. 1994; Slabaugh et al. 1997).

Polymorphisms, and length polymophisms in particular, are most likely to occur in noncoding regions. Therefore, when possible intron locations were identified based upon similar gene sequences in other plants, we placed the amplification primers such that one or two introns would be included in genomic products. To ensure that noncoding DNA was included even if no introns were present, reverse amplification primers were placed in the 3′-UTR. This strategy was also intended to increase specificity when primers were based upon one member of a gene family, a concern of particular importance in conifers where large gene families are common (Ahuja et al. 1994; Kinlaw et al. 1994; Perry and Furnier 1996). Our results indicate that very similar members of a gene family are generally sufficiently divergent in their 3′-UTRs that PCR can be directed toward single genes. In addition to large gene families, another interesting feature of conifer genomes is an abundance of large tandem direct repeats. Large repeats are common in noncoding regions of jack pine (Pinus banksiana) alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) genes (Perry and Furnier 1996) and, in that same study, similar repeats were identified in five of seven genomic sequences of conifer genes found in GenBank. In the present study, large direct repeats ranging in size from 38 to 106 bp were found in seven of 51 cDNAs. Considering the smaller noncoding component of cDNAs, it is not unexpected that this frequency is lower than that reported for genomic gene sequences.

In codominant STS markers of three Adh loci in jack pine (Perry and Furnier 1996), alleles differed by the presence or absence of large repeats. With this in mind, when a large repeat was present in a black spruce cDNA, PCR primers were positioned, when possible, to include the repeat in the amplified products. In one case (Sb06), this strategy was successful and resulted in a codominant marker with alleles differing in size by 70 bp. However, the polymorphism was not due to the presence or absence of the repeat as anticipated, rather, alleles differed by having either a duplication or a triplication of the sequence. In both other cases where primers were positioned to flank a large repeat in the cDNA (Sb24 and Sb42), polymorphisms were found but they involved additional large repeats rather than the elements originally targeted. The presence of the targeted repeats was apparently fixed. As illustrated by Sb42, additional repeats may lead to unpredictable results, including dominant length polymorphisms when a primer site is duplicated.

Of the 11 codominant markers characterized at the DNA sequence level, only those of Sb06 and Sb24 involved large repeated sequences. The remainder were based on relatively small insertions or deletions with net differences among alleles ranging from 1 bp to 27 bp. In nearly all cases, each possible heterozygote could be identified unambiguously, even when differences among alleles were small. Sb21 was an exception where pooling of alleles may be necessary. In many cases, classification of heterozygous genotypes was simplified by the presence of genotype-specific heteroduplex bands. For example, the alleles Sb62-689 and Sb62-691 were very similar in size, but Sb62-681/689 and Sb62-681/691 heterozygotes were readily discriminated by their distinctive heteroduplex products (Figure 1l). Moreover, we have demonstrated that it is possible to predict the heteroduplex banding patterns of hitherto unseen genotypes by construction of synthetic heterozygotes via template mixing. In some cases, template mixing may also be a useful tool to ensure that rare homozygotes are properly identified when the possible genotypes would give products of similar size, e.g., Sb62-689/689 and Sb62-691/691, and, owing to their low frequencies, examples of both are not available for direct comparison.

With codominant length polymorphisms revealed by 15 of a total of 50 pairs of primers synthesized, our overall success rate may be similar to that of finding SSR polymorphisms in conifers. An intensive effort to develop SSR markers has been directed toward eastern white pine (Pinus strobus; Echt et al. 1996). Primer pairs were selected from 77 SSR containing clones and of those, 16 pairs amplified well and revealed polymorphisms in a panel of 16 trees. A similar success rate has been reported for SSR marker development in Norway spruce (Picea abies), with 7 of 36 primer pairs amplifying single polymorphic loci (Pfeiffer et al. 1997). An overall success rate similar to that for developing SSR markers is perhaps unexpected since, unlike SSR markers, STS markers do not target specific sequences that are expected to promote polymorphism. Therefore, they do not entail the added effort and expense of isolating and identifying regions containing such sequences.

However, SSR markers will likely surpass STS markers having directly observed polymorphisms in terms of heterozygosity and numbers of alleles per locus. Average heterozygosities of 0.515 and 0.79, and averages of 5.4 and 13 alleles per locus were reported for the polymorphic SSR markers in 16 white pine and 18 Norway spruce, respectively (Echt et al. 1996; Pfeiffer et al. 1997), compared to an observed heterozygosity of 0.26 and 2.8 alleles per locus for codominant STS markers in 22 black spruce. The amount of variation revealed by these STS markers appears more in line with that of RAPD and allozyme loci in black spruce (Boyle and Morgenstern 1987; Isabel et al. 1995). As with SSR markers, the total information per PCR may be increased by multiplexing. Indeed, we have conducted successful trials employing several two-set combinations of STS primers (data not presented).

STS markers may be useful when incorporated into linkage maps. Placement of known genes on maps would add to our knowledge of conifer genome organization and assist in combining maps from different individuals. Although RAPD-based maps are commonly constructed for conifers, it is often difficult to use the same RAPD markers in different trees (Devey et al. 1995). Plomion et al. (1995) have suggested the use of protein polymorphisms revealed by 2-D electrophoresis to aid in establishing the correspondence of RAPD linkage groups among trees. STS markers may be a more convenient choice for this purpose since they use the same technology as RAPDs and gene identifications may be more easily determined. However, owing to relatively low levels of heterozygosity, few of the markers described here are likely to be shared among maps if mapped individuals are selected arbitrarily with respect to these loci. Our efforts were focused on a low sensitivity screening of an extensive sampling of genes in a diverse panel of individuals. More sensitive (and more laborious) detection techniques, e.g., PCR-RFLP or single-strand conformation polymorphism, may be warranted for some applications such as genome mapping. Primer pairs producing products that appear monomorphic under current conditions may be a valuable resource in such endeavors.

The codominant STS markers developed here provide an additional means to explore natural genetic variation in black spruce populations. It remains to be determined to what extent these primers can be used in other spruces and conifers. Preliminary results indicate that primers producing invariant products in black spruce may reveal polymorphisms in related species. Clearly, the wider the range of taxa in which primers are useful, the more attractive future STS marker development will be.

Acknowledgement

B. Rutledge (Natural Resources Canada) kindly provided the cDNA library, J. Beaulieu and N. Isabel (Natural Resources Canada) provided seeds, F. Larochelle and M. Perron helped with tissue collections, and D. Fournier, I. Gamache, G. Pelletier and P. Perry provided much assistance in the laboratory. This work was supported by grants to J.B. from Fonds pour la Formation de Chercheurs et l'Aide à la Recherche of Québec, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and Network of Centres of Excellence in Sustainable Forest Management. The sequences reported in this article have been deposited in the GenBank database (accession nos. AF051202–AF051252 and AF051733–AF051765).

APPENDIX

Product size (bp)
Clone Forward primer Reverse primer cDNA Genomic
SB01 GCGTTCCAGAAATCCTACTAC CCAAATGCACCATAAATACAGa 220 1900–2075
SB06 TAAGGCAATTCTTCGGCTCAC ACTAAGACAACCATTCTCTCC 539 539–609
SB07 AACAATGGGTTGGAGATCGTC CGCTTGACAGGTCTTGGTAAC 382 645–648
SB08 TTCGATGCTAGGTCTTGAGTC CAGAAATTGGAAGTAAGAACG 382 634–653
SB09 CGTGTTTGCATGTCACTCTAC CAGCATATCCACACCGACATA 449
SB11 GTATTACCCAGCTCAAGTTCC AACTATCCCACCACTCCTGTC 469 691–695
SB12 TTATTGAGGATGTCCGTGTTC AGAGGTAGACCATCTAGTCAC 497 600
SB13 AATAGGCGATGGAAGTGTCAG CAGAAGCAAGTACAGATGAGC 502
SB14 TACTTCGAGTGTCTCTCATTG GCTGTCAGAGTTTGTAACATC 446 446
SB15 ACAAACTGGAGCGTGAAGAGC ACTATGACGGGAGCCAAGTTG 602
SB16 GATTCCACACAAAACCAAGCG CAAAGTATACCCCTTGAACAC 553 1050b
SB17 GAGGGATGAATATGGTCTACG AATAACGCCAAATGCCTCCAC 515 640bc
SB18 TCCTTATGACCGAGCCATTGC AACACGGTGAGAACTGATAGC 597 720bc
SB19 TTTGCGGAAGAGGAGACTATC CGCTGCCCTATATCTTGTATG 397 397
SB21 CAGATCAGGCACGCATTGTTG GTCCATCAGGGCTCATGTTTG 381 471–474
SB23 GGTTTGAAGAGGCAGCCAATG TTGGGAAAGGCGGCACTAATG 412
SB24 CAGTATGTGGGTTCATGTTAG TTTGATAGCAGAGACCACTTC 474 738–771
SB25 ACTTACCTGACATGCCCATTG CTCCGAGCTGTTTCATATGTG 351
SB26 TTGGGGAAGCTACAGAGATAC GCGAACTAAGAGACAGCAGAC 366
SB28 CCAACAAGAAAGCCACGTCAG ACCAACAAACGCCCTCTTCAC 453 550
SB29 AGCGGCATTGAACAGAGTAAC AATGGAAATGAAGGCAGACTC 574 553–580
SB30 CAGTGCTGTGCCTATAACAAC GGCTGATGTGATTCCAGAAAG 525
SB31 TTGGCATCTCTCAGCACATTC TAGGTTTCTGGTCACGTCTAC 311 439–449
SB32 TGCTGTCTACACTGCTCAATG CAGAAGCCTGAGGATGTTACC 529 760
SB34 TATCCATCGCCTGCTTCTCAC TGTAGTCAGTCCGAATGTACC 498 1160
SB35 AGTATGGCGAGGGCAGTCTTC TTCACTCCCGATCCACTCATC 327 440–496
SB36 TTCAGATCCATTGCCTGTGAG TGAGGACAAGCAACCACAGAC 429 429
SB38 GATATGGTCATGGCTACAGTG GCAAAAACTGGACCTTATTTC 433
SB41 GCTGAGGGGAAGGATTGATAC GCTTCGACAGGCATATTACAG 404 520
SB42 GAAGCTTAACAAGGCCGTATG CCCAAACATAGGCAATAATCC 582 582–766
SB46 GGCTGTCAATACAAGTCATTC TCACGTTGTTATTGTTGTCAC 599 2320
SB48 TCGTAAACCCAAAAGTTCAAG ACCGCATATCCTAAAGGTAAC 504
SB49 AGGTCCTCCAAAAGTTCTGTG GCCTCATGTTCCCAAAGTCTC 323 323
SB50 GCGGAACCTTACAGGAATTTG GCATTTAGACCCCGAGGACAG 451 451
SB51 TGAAACAGACTTCTCGTACTG TTCTTACGTAGCTGCTCTAAC 358 358
SB52 d AAATCATCGCACATAGCTACAG 756 900bc
SB53 CTGATCCTCCAGAAGAAACTC AGTCCGATGGTTGCTTATGTG 569 800b
SB55 TCCAATGTGGTCAGTCTCAAG GCAGATTGAAAGATTCCAGTC 544
SB56 CTTTGGACACAACTAAGACTG TAGTGTCACTCCATCTGAAAC 372 475
SB58 CCGACAATCAAATACACTGAG TACCAGACCAGACCTTCAATG 392 520
SB60 TGGGAGAATGACTAGATTGTG AAGCCTTGACAATAGTAAGTG 378 378
SB62 e ACAGTACGCCGCAGACAAATG 424 681–706
SB64 AGGAGGATATAGCTCGGATAC TGTTACACCGAAACTGTTCAG 510 510
SB65 CGAGTCTTGTTTCTGCGTTAC CTTCGTCCATTGAAAGACTTG 600
SB66 AGGTTGTGTACATGGCAATAG AGGCAAGGAGAATTAACAAAG 382 740b
SB67 CAATTCAAGTTCTTCAATCTC GTCAATGGATTTAATGAGTTC 417 417
SB68 ACGTCCAGGTGCAGATGTAAC TCGAACAATGTTGAGATCAAG 502 502
SB70 AAATGGCGGTGTCATCTCTTC AAAATGAGTTCCCTGCCAATC 417 404–417
SB71 AGTATAGGATCTGCTCGAATG CCAATATGAAACACACGGTAG 536 2500
SB72 GCTCAGGAATCACTATCATTG CAAAGATACCAACCGATTAAG 523 515–523
Product size (bp)
Clone Forward primer Reverse primer cDNA Genomic
SB01 GCGTTCCAGAAATCCTACTAC CCAAATGCACCATAAATACAGa 220 1900–2075
SB06 TAAGGCAATTCTTCGGCTCAC ACTAAGACAACCATTCTCTCC 539 539–609
SB07 AACAATGGGTTGGAGATCGTC CGCTTGACAGGTCTTGGTAAC 382 645–648
SB08 TTCGATGCTAGGTCTTGAGTC CAGAAATTGGAAGTAAGAACG 382 634–653
SB09 CGTGTTTGCATGTCACTCTAC CAGCATATCCACACCGACATA 449
SB11 GTATTACCCAGCTCAAGTTCC AACTATCCCACCACTCCTGTC 469 691–695
SB12 TTATTGAGGATGTCCGTGTTC AGAGGTAGACCATCTAGTCAC 497 600
SB13 AATAGGCGATGGAAGTGTCAG CAGAAGCAAGTACAGATGAGC 502
SB14 TACTTCGAGTGTCTCTCATTG GCTGTCAGAGTTTGTAACATC 446 446
SB15 ACAAACTGGAGCGTGAAGAGC ACTATGACGGGAGCCAAGTTG 602
SB16 GATTCCACACAAAACCAAGCG CAAAGTATACCCCTTGAACAC 553 1050b
SB17 GAGGGATGAATATGGTCTACG AATAACGCCAAATGCCTCCAC 515 640bc
SB18 TCCTTATGACCGAGCCATTGC AACACGGTGAGAACTGATAGC 597 720bc
SB19 TTTGCGGAAGAGGAGACTATC CGCTGCCCTATATCTTGTATG 397 397
SB21 CAGATCAGGCACGCATTGTTG GTCCATCAGGGCTCATGTTTG 381 471–474
SB23 GGTTTGAAGAGGCAGCCAATG TTGGGAAAGGCGGCACTAATG 412
SB24 CAGTATGTGGGTTCATGTTAG TTTGATAGCAGAGACCACTTC 474 738–771
SB25 ACTTACCTGACATGCCCATTG CTCCGAGCTGTTTCATATGTG 351
SB26 TTGGGGAAGCTACAGAGATAC GCGAACTAAGAGACAGCAGAC 366
SB28 CCAACAAGAAAGCCACGTCAG ACCAACAAACGCCCTCTTCAC 453 550
SB29 AGCGGCATTGAACAGAGTAAC AATGGAAATGAAGGCAGACTC 574 553–580
SB30 CAGTGCTGTGCCTATAACAAC GGCTGATGTGATTCCAGAAAG 525
SB31 TTGGCATCTCTCAGCACATTC TAGGTTTCTGGTCACGTCTAC 311 439–449
SB32 TGCTGTCTACACTGCTCAATG CAGAAGCCTGAGGATGTTACC 529 760
SB34 TATCCATCGCCTGCTTCTCAC TGTAGTCAGTCCGAATGTACC 498 1160
SB35 AGTATGGCGAGGGCAGTCTTC TTCACTCCCGATCCACTCATC 327 440–496
SB36 TTCAGATCCATTGCCTGTGAG TGAGGACAAGCAACCACAGAC 429 429
SB38 GATATGGTCATGGCTACAGTG GCAAAAACTGGACCTTATTTC 433
SB41 GCTGAGGGGAAGGATTGATAC GCTTCGACAGGCATATTACAG 404 520
SB42 GAAGCTTAACAAGGCCGTATG CCCAAACATAGGCAATAATCC 582 582–766
SB46 GGCTGTCAATACAAGTCATTC TCACGTTGTTATTGTTGTCAC 599 2320
SB48 TCGTAAACCCAAAAGTTCAAG ACCGCATATCCTAAAGGTAAC 504
SB49 AGGTCCTCCAAAAGTTCTGTG GCCTCATGTTCCCAAAGTCTC 323 323
SB50 GCGGAACCTTACAGGAATTTG GCATTTAGACCCCGAGGACAG 451 451
SB51 TGAAACAGACTTCTCGTACTG TTCTTACGTAGCTGCTCTAAC 358 358
SB52 d AAATCATCGCACATAGCTACAG 756 900bc
SB53 CTGATCCTCCAGAAGAAACTC AGTCCGATGGTTGCTTATGTG 569 800b
SB55 TCCAATGTGGTCAGTCTCAAG GCAGATTGAAAGATTCCAGTC 544
SB56 CTTTGGACACAACTAAGACTG TAGTGTCACTCCATCTGAAAC 372 475
SB58 CCGACAATCAAATACACTGAG TACCAGACCAGACCTTCAATG 392 520
SB60 TGGGAGAATGACTAGATTGTG AAGCCTTGACAATAGTAAGTG 378 378
SB62 e ACAGTACGCCGCAGACAAATG 424 681–706
SB64 AGGAGGATATAGCTCGGATAC TGTTACACCGAAACTGTTCAG 510 510
SB65 CGAGTCTTGTTTCTGCGTTAC CTTCGTCCATTGAAAGACTTG 600
SB66 AGGTTGTGTACATGGCAATAG AGGCAAGGAGAATTAACAAAG 382 740b
SB67 CAATTCAAGTTCTTCAATCTC GTCAATGGATTTAATGAGTTC 417 417
SB68 ACGTCCAGGTGCAGATGTAAC TCGAACAATGTTGAGATCAAG 502 502
SB70 AAATGGCGGTGTCATCTCTTC AAAATGAGTTCCCTGCCAATC 417 404–417
SB71 AGTATAGGATCTGCTCGAATG CCAATATGAAACACACGGTAG 536 2500
SB72 GCTCAGGAATCACTATCATTG CAAAGATACCAACCGATTAAG 523 515–523

Primers sequences are given 5′ to 3′. Clone refers to the cDNA from which the primer sequences were selected. Sizes of cDNA products were inferred from sequences of cDNA clones. For genomic products, sizes were estimated from relative electrophoretic mobilities, or inferred from sequences of different alleles. Multiple alleles are represented by a range of genomic product sizes. Dashes in the genomic size column indicate that genomic amplifications were unsatisfactory.

a

Sequence shown is of SB01-Rb, a primer in the coding region within the presumed exon 3. The original reverse primer located in the 3′-UTR (SB01-R) was CAACAGAATCAGCAGCATAAG.

b

Null amplification allele(s) also detected.

c

Amplification products that differed slightly in size were observed but not characterized.

d

Amplification of Sb52 was performed using the forward primer of Sb18 (SB18-F).

e

Amplification of Sb62 was performed using the forward primer of Sb11 (SB11-F).

Product size (bp)
Clone Forward primer Reverse primer cDNA Genomic
SB01 GCGTTCCAGAAATCCTACTAC CCAAATGCACCATAAATACAGa 220 1900–2075
SB06 TAAGGCAATTCTTCGGCTCAC ACTAAGACAACCATTCTCTCC 539 539–609
SB07 AACAATGGGTTGGAGATCGTC CGCTTGACAGGTCTTGGTAAC 382 645–648
SB08 TTCGATGCTAGGTCTTGAGTC CAGAAATTGGAAGTAAGAACG 382 634–653
SB09 CGTGTTTGCATGTCACTCTAC CAGCATATCCACACCGACATA 449
SB11 GTATTACCCAGCTCAAGTTCC AACTATCCCACCACTCCTGTC 469 691–695
SB12 TTATTGAGGATGTCCGTGTTC AGAGGTAGACCATCTAGTCAC 497 600
SB13 AATAGGCGATGGAAGTGTCAG CAGAAGCAAGTACAGATGAGC 502
SB14 TACTTCGAGTGTCTCTCATTG GCTGTCAGAGTTTGTAACATC 446 446
SB15 ACAAACTGGAGCGTGAAGAGC ACTATGACGGGAGCCAAGTTG 602
SB16 GATTCCACACAAAACCAAGCG CAAAGTATACCCCTTGAACAC 553 1050b
SB17 GAGGGATGAATATGGTCTACG AATAACGCCAAATGCCTCCAC 515 640bc
SB18 TCCTTATGACCGAGCCATTGC AACACGGTGAGAACTGATAGC 597 720bc
SB19 TTTGCGGAAGAGGAGACTATC CGCTGCCCTATATCTTGTATG 397 397
SB21 CAGATCAGGCACGCATTGTTG GTCCATCAGGGCTCATGTTTG 381 471–474
SB23 GGTTTGAAGAGGCAGCCAATG TTGGGAAAGGCGGCACTAATG 412
SB24 CAGTATGTGGGTTCATGTTAG TTTGATAGCAGAGACCACTTC 474 738–771
SB25 ACTTACCTGACATGCCCATTG CTCCGAGCTGTTTCATATGTG 351
SB26 TTGGGGAAGCTACAGAGATAC GCGAACTAAGAGACAGCAGAC 366
SB28 CCAACAAGAAAGCCACGTCAG ACCAACAAACGCCCTCTTCAC 453 550
SB29 AGCGGCATTGAACAGAGTAAC AATGGAAATGAAGGCAGACTC 574 553–580
SB30 CAGTGCTGTGCCTATAACAAC GGCTGATGTGATTCCAGAAAG 525
SB31 TTGGCATCTCTCAGCACATTC TAGGTTTCTGGTCACGTCTAC 311 439–449
SB32 TGCTGTCTACACTGCTCAATG CAGAAGCCTGAGGATGTTACC 529 760
SB34 TATCCATCGCCTGCTTCTCAC TGTAGTCAGTCCGAATGTACC 498 1160
SB35 AGTATGGCGAGGGCAGTCTTC TTCACTCCCGATCCACTCATC 327 440–496
SB36 TTCAGATCCATTGCCTGTGAG TGAGGACAAGCAACCACAGAC 429 429
SB38 GATATGGTCATGGCTACAGTG GCAAAAACTGGACCTTATTTC 433
SB41 GCTGAGGGGAAGGATTGATAC GCTTCGACAGGCATATTACAG 404 520
SB42 GAAGCTTAACAAGGCCGTATG CCCAAACATAGGCAATAATCC 582 582–766
SB46 GGCTGTCAATACAAGTCATTC TCACGTTGTTATTGTTGTCAC 599 2320
SB48 TCGTAAACCCAAAAGTTCAAG ACCGCATATCCTAAAGGTAAC 504
SB49 AGGTCCTCCAAAAGTTCTGTG GCCTCATGTTCCCAAAGTCTC 323 323
SB50 GCGGAACCTTACAGGAATTTG GCATTTAGACCCCGAGGACAG 451 451
SB51 TGAAACAGACTTCTCGTACTG TTCTTACGTAGCTGCTCTAAC 358 358
SB52 d AAATCATCGCACATAGCTACAG 756 900bc
SB53 CTGATCCTCCAGAAGAAACTC AGTCCGATGGTTGCTTATGTG 569 800b
SB55 TCCAATGTGGTCAGTCTCAAG GCAGATTGAAAGATTCCAGTC 544
SB56 CTTTGGACACAACTAAGACTG TAGTGTCACTCCATCTGAAAC 372 475
SB58 CCGACAATCAAATACACTGAG TACCAGACCAGACCTTCAATG 392 520
SB60 TGGGAGAATGACTAGATTGTG AAGCCTTGACAATAGTAAGTG 378 378
SB62 e ACAGTACGCCGCAGACAAATG 424 681–706
SB64 AGGAGGATATAGCTCGGATAC TGTTACACCGAAACTGTTCAG 510 510
SB65 CGAGTCTTGTTTCTGCGTTAC CTTCGTCCATTGAAAGACTTG 600
SB66 AGGTTGTGTACATGGCAATAG AGGCAAGGAGAATTAACAAAG 382 740b
SB67 CAATTCAAGTTCTTCAATCTC GTCAATGGATTTAATGAGTTC 417 417
SB68 ACGTCCAGGTGCAGATGTAAC TCGAACAATGTTGAGATCAAG 502 502
SB70 AAATGGCGGTGTCATCTCTTC AAAATGAGTTCCCTGCCAATC 417 404–417
SB71 AGTATAGGATCTGCTCGAATG CCAATATGAAACACACGGTAG 536 2500
SB72 GCTCAGGAATCACTATCATTG CAAAGATACCAACCGATTAAG 523 515–523
Product size (bp)
Clone Forward primer Reverse primer cDNA Genomic
SB01 GCGTTCCAGAAATCCTACTAC CCAAATGCACCATAAATACAGa 220 1900–2075
SB06 TAAGGCAATTCTTCGGCTCAC ACTAAGACAACCATTCTCTCC 539 539–609
SB07 AACAATGGGTTGGAGATCGTC CGCTTGACAGGTCTTGGTAAC 382 645–648
SB08 TTCGATGCTAGGTCTTGAGTC CAGAAATTGGAAGTAAGAACG 382 634–653
SB09 CGTGTTTGCATGTCACTCTAC CAGCATATCCACACCGACATA 449
SB11 GTATTACCCAGCTCAAGTTCC AACTATCCCACCACTCCTGTC 469 691–695
SB12 TTATTGAGGATGTCCGTGTTC AGAGGTAGACCATCTAGTCAC 497 600
SB13 AATAGGCGATGGAAGTGTCAG CAGAAGCAAGTACAGATGAGC 502
SB14 TACTTCGAGTGTCTCTCATTG GCTGTCAGAGTTTGTAACATC 446 446
SB15 ACAAACTGGAGCGTGAAGAGC ACTATGACGGGAGCCAAGTTG 602
SB16 GATTCCACACAAAACCAAGCG CAAAGTATACCCCTTGAACAC 553 1050b
SB17 GAGGGATGAATATGGTCTACG AATAACGCCAAATGCCTCCAC 515 640bc
SB18 TCCTTATGACCGAGCCATTGC AACACGGTGAGAACTGATAGC 597 720bc
SB19 TTTGCGGAAGAGGAGACTATC CGCTGCCCTATATCTTGTATG 397 397
SB21 CAGATCAGGCACGCATTGTTG GTCCATCAGGGCTCATGTTTG 381 471–474
SB23 GGTTTGAAGAGGCAGCCAATG TTGGGAAAGGCGGCACTAATG 412
SB24 CAGTATGTGGGTTCATGTTAG TTTGATAGCAGAGACCACTTC 474 738–771
SB25 ACTTACCTGACATGCCCATTG CTCCGAGCTGTTTCATATGTG 351
SB26 TTGGGGAAGCTACAGAGATAC GCGAACTAAGAGACAGCAGAC 366
SB28 CCAACAAGAAAGCCACGTCAG ACCAACAAACGCCCTCTTCAC 453 550
SB29 AGCGGCATTGAACAGAGTAAC AATGGAAATGAAGGCAGACTC 574 553–580
SB30 CAGTGCTGTGCCTATAACAAC GGCTGATGTGATTCCAGAAAG 525
SB31 TTGGCATCTCTCAGCACATTC TAGGTTTCTGGTCACGTCTAC 311 439–449
SB32 TGCTGTCTACACTGCTCAATG CAGAAGCCTGAGGATGTTACC 529 760
SB34 TATCCATCGCCTGCTTCTCAC TGTAGTCAGTCCGAATGTACC 498 1160
SB35 AGTATGGCGAGGGCAGTCTTC TTCACTCCCGATCCACTCATC 327 440–496
SB36 TTCAGATCCATTGCCTGTGAG TGAGGACAAGCAACCACAGAC 429 429
SB38 GATATGGTCATGGCTACAGTG GCAAAAACTGGACCTTATTTC 433
SB41 GCTGAGGGGAAGGATTGATAC GCTTCGACAGGCATATTACAG 404 520
SB42 GAAGCTTAACAAGGCCGTATG CCCAAACATAGGCAATAATCC 582 582–766
SB46 GGCTGTCAATACAAGTCATTC TCACGTTGTTATTGTTGTCAC 599 2320
SB48 TCGTAAACCCAAAAGTTCAAG ACCGCATATCCTAAAGGTAAC 504
SB49 AGGTCCTCCAAAAGTTCTGTG GCCTCATGTTCCCAAAGTCTC 323 323
SB50 GCGGAACCTTACAGGAATTTG GCATTTAGACCCCGAGGACAG 451 451
SB51 TGAAACAGACTTCTCGTACTG TTCTTACGTAGCTGCTCTAAC 358 358
SB52 d AAATCATCGCACATAGCTACAG 756 900bc
SB53 CTGATCCTCCAGAAGAAACTC AGTCCGATGGTTGCTTATGTG 569 800b
SB55 TCCAATGTGGTCAGTCTCAAG GCAGATTGAAAGATTCCAGTC 544
SB56 CTTTGGACACAACTAAGACTG TAGTGTCACTCCATCTGAAAC 372 475
SB58 CCGACAATCAAATACACTGAG TACCAGACCAGACCTTCAATG 392 520
SB60 TGGGAGAATGACTAGATTGTG AAGCCTTGACAATAGTAAGTG 378 378
SB62 e ACAGTACGCCGCAGACAAATG 424 681–706
SB64 AGGAGGATATAGCTCGGATAC TGTTACACCGAAACTGTTCAG 510 510
SB65 CGAGTCTTGTTTCTGCGTTAC CTTCGTCCATTGAAAGACTTG 600
SB66 AGGTTGTGTACATGGCAATAG AGGCAAGGAGAATTAACAAAG 382 740b
SB67 CAATTCAAGTTCTTCAATCTC GTCAATGGATTTAATGAGTTC 417 417
SB68 ACGTCCAGGTGCAGATGTAAC TCGAACAATGTTGAGATCAAG 502 502
SB70 AAATGGCGGTGTCATCTCTTC AAAATGAGTTCCCTGCCAATC 417 404–417
SB71 AGTATAGGATCTGCTCGAATG CCAATATGAAACACACGGTAG 536 2500
SB72 GCTCAGGAATCACTATCATTG CAAAGATACCAACCGATTAAG 523 515–523

Primers sequences are given 5′ to 3′. Clone refers to the cDNA from which the primer sequences were selected. Sizes of cDNA products were inferred from sequences of cDNA clones. For genomic products, sizes were estimated from relative electrophoretic mobilities, or inferred from sequences of different alleles. Multiple alleles are represented by a range of genomic product sizes. Dashes in the genomic size column indicate that genomic amplifications were unsatisfactory.

a

Sequence shown is of SB01-Rb, a primer in the coding region within the presumed exon 3. The original reverse primer located in the 3′-UTR (SB01-R) was CAACAGAATCAGCAGCATAAG.

b

Null amplification allele(s) also detected.

c

Amplification products that differed slightly in size were observed but not characterized.

d

Amplification of Sb52 was performed using the forward primer of Sb18 (SB18-F).

e

Amplification of Sb62 was performed using the forward primer of Sb11 (SB11-F).

Footnotes

Communicating editor: A. H. D. Brown

LITERATURE CITED

Adams

W T

,

Joly

R J

,

1980

Linkage relationships among twelve allozyme loci in loblolly pine

.

J. Hered.

71

:

199

202

.

Ahuja

M R

,

Devey

M E

,

Groover

A T

,

Jermstad

K D

,

Neale

D B

,

1994

Mapped DNA probes from loblolly pine can be used for restriction fragment length polymorphism mapping in other conifers

.

Theor. Appl. Genet.

88

:

279

282

.

Altschul

S F

,

Gish

W

,

Miller

W

,

Myers

E W

,

Lipman

D J

,

1990

Basic local alignment search tool

.

J. Mol. Biol.

215

:

403

410

.

Bailey

N T J

,

1961

Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of Genetic Linkage

.

Oxford University Press

,

London

.

Beaulieu

J

,

Corriveau

A

,

Daoust

G

,

1989

Phenotypic stability and delineation of black spruce breeding zones in Quebec

.

Forestry Canada Information Report LAU-X-85E

.

Bousquet

J

,

Simon

L

,

Lalonde

M

,

1990

DNA amplification from vegetative and sexual tissues of trees using polymerase chain reaction

.

Can. J. For. Res.

20

:

254

257

.

Boyle

T J B

,

Morgenstern

E K

,

1987

Some aspects of the population structure of black spruce in central New Brunswick

.

Silvae Genet.

36

:

53

60

.

Bradshaw

H D

Jr.,

Villar

M

,

Watson

B D

,

Otto

K G

,

Stewart

S

et al. ,

1994

Molecular genetics of growth and development in Populus. III. A genetic linkage map of a hybrid poplar composed of RFLP, STS and RAPD markers

.

Theor. Appl. Genet.

89

:

167

178

.

Davis

T M

,

Yu

H

,

1997

A linkage map of the diploid strawberry, Fragaria vesca

.

J. Hered.

88

:

215

221

.

Devereux

J

,

Haeberli

P

,

Smithies

O

,

1984

A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX

.

Nucl. Acids Res.

12

:

387

395

.

Devey

M E

,

Delfino-Mix

A

,

Kinloch

B B

,

Neale

D B

,

1995

Random amplified polymorphic DNA markers tightly linked to a gene for resistance to white pine blister rust in sugar pine

.

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

92

:

2066

2070

.

Echt

C S

,

May-Marquardt

P

,

Hseih

M

,

Zahorchak

R

,

1996

Characterization of microsatellite markers in eastern white pine

.

Genome

39

:

1102

1108

.

Ghareyazie

B

,

Huang

N

,

Second

G

,

Bennett

J

,

Khush

G S

,

1995

Classification of rice germplasm. I. Analysis using ALP and PCR-based RFLP

.

Theor. Appl. Genet.

91

:

218

227

.

Guerrero

F D

,

Crossland

L

,

1993

Tissue-specific expression of a plant turgor-responsive gene with amino acid sequence homology to transport-facilitating proteins

.

Plant Mol. Biol.

21

:

929

935

.

Hodge

R

,

Paul

W

,

Draper

J

,

Scott

R

,

1992

Cold-plaque screening: a simple technique for the isolation of low abundance, differentially expressed transcripts from conventional libraries

.

Plant J.

2

:

257

260

.

Isabel

N

,

Beaulieu

J

,

Bousquet

J

,

1995

Complete congruence between gene diversity estimates derived from genotypic data at enzyme and random amplified polymorphic DNA loci in black spruce

.

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

92

:

6369

6373

.

Kaldenhoff

R

,

Kolling

A

,

Richter

G

,

1993

A novel blue light- and abscisic acid-inducible gene of Arabidopsis thaliana encoding an intrinsic membrane protein

.

Plant Mol. Biol.

23

:

1187

1198

.

Kinlaw

C S

,

Gerttula

S M

,

Carter

M C

,

1994

Lipid transfer protein genes of loblolly pine are members of a complex gene family

.

Plant Mol. Biol.

26

:

1213

1216

.

Narain

P

,

1990

Statistical Genetics

.

John Wiley and Sons

,

New York

.

Nauta

M J

,

Weissing

F J

,

1996

Constraints on allele size at microsatellite loci: implicationsfor genetic differentiation

.

Genetics

143

:

1021

1032

.

Perry

D J

,

Furnier

G R

,

1996

Pinus banksiana has at least seven expressed alcohol dehydrogenase genes in two linked groups

.

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

93

:

13020

13023

.

Pfeiffer

A

,

Olivieri

A M

,

Morgante

M

,

1997

Identification and characterization of microsatellites in Norway spruce (Picea abies K.)

.

Genome

40

:

411

419

.

Plomion

C

,

Bahrman

N

,

Durel

C E

,

O'Malley

D M

,

1995

Genomic mapping in Pinus pinaster (maritime pine) using RAPD and protein markers

.

Heredity

74

:

661

668

.

Sambrook

J

,

Fritsch

E F

,

Maniatis

T

,

1989

Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual

, Ed. 2.

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

,

New York

.

Slabaugh

M B

,

Huestis

G M

,

Leonard

J

,

Holloway

J L

,

Rosato

C

et al. ,

1997

Sequence-based genetic markers for genes and gene families: single-strand conformational polymorphisms for the fatty acid synthesis genes of Cuphea

.

Theor. Appl. Genet.

94

:

400

408

.

Smith

D N

,

Devey

M E

,

1994

Occurrence and inheritance of microsatellites in Pinus radiata

.

Genome

37

:

977

983

.

Sokal

R R

,

Rohlf

F J

,

1981

Biometry

, Ed. 2.

W. H. Freeman

,

San Francisco

.

Szmidt

A E

,

Wang

X R

,

Lu

M Z

,

1996

Empirical assessment of allozyme and RAPD variation in Pinus sylvestris (L.) using haploid tissue analysis

.

Heredity

76

:

412

420

.

Talbert

L E

,

Blake

N K

,

Chee

P W

,

Blake

T K

,

Magyar

G M

,

1994

Evaluation of “sequence-tagged-site” PCR products as molecular markers in wheat

.

Theor. Appl. Genet.

87

:

789

794

.

Tautz

D

,

1989

Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA markers

.

Nucl. Acids Res.

17

:

6463

6471

.

Tragoonrung

S

,

Kanazin

V

,

Hayes

P M

,

Blake

T K

,

1992

Sequence-tagged-site-facilitated PCR for barley genome mapping

.

Theor. Appl. Genet.

84

:

1002

1008

.

Tsumura

Y

,

Suyama

Y

,

Yoshimura

K

,

Shirato

N

,

Mukai

Y

,

1997

Sequence-tagged-sites (STSs) of cDNA clones in Cryptomeria japonica and their evaluation as molecular markers in conifers

.

Theor. Appl. Genet.

94

:

764

772

.

van de Ven

W T G

,

McNicol

R J

,

1996

Microsatellites as DNA markers in Sitka spruce

.

Theor. Appl. Genet.

93

:

613

617

.

Weber

J L

,

May

P E

,

1989

Abundant class of human DNA polymorphisms which can be typed using the polymerase chain reaction

.

Am. J. Hum. Genet.

44

:

388

396

.

Welsh

J

,

McClelland

M

,

1990

Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers

.

Nucl. Acids Res.

18

:

7213

7218

.

Williams

J G

,

Kubelik

A R

,

Livak

K J

,

Rafalski

J A

,

Tingey

S V

,

1990

DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers

.

Nucl. Acids Res.

18

:

6531

6535

.

© Genetics 1998

Citations

Views

Altmetric

Metrics

Total Views 348

251 Pageviews

97 PDF Downloads

Since 3/1/2021

Month: Total Views:
March 2021 7
April 2021 12
May 2021 9
June 2021 18
July 2021 2
August 2021 2
September 2021 6
October 2021 16
November 2021 7
December 2021 1
January 2022 11
February 2022 9
March 2022 12
April 2022 10
May 2022 6
June 2022 11
July 2022 5
August 2022 12
September 2022 10
October 2022 3
November 2022 6
December 2022 7
January 2023 1
February 2023 5
March 2023 9
April 2023 4
May 2023 8
June 2023 4
July 2023 2
August 2023 5
September 2023 3
October 2023 3
November 2023 8
December 2023 9
January 2024 9
February 2024 7
March 2024 7
April 2024 3
May 2024 16
June 2024 5
July 2024 11
August 2024 15
September 2024 13
October 2024 16
November 2024 3

×

Email alerts

Citing articles via

More from Oxford Academic