Growth of Integrative Medicine at Leading Cancer Centers Between 2009 and 2016: A Systematic Analysis of NCI-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center Websites (original) (raw)

Journal Article

,

* Affiliations of authors: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (HY, LS, JJM); Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (HY); Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China (LS).

Search for other works by this author on:

,

* Affiliations of authors: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (HY, LS, JJM); Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (HY); Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China (LS).

Search for other works by this author on:

* Affiliations of authors: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (HY, LS, JJM); Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (HY); Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China (LS).

* Correspondence to: Jun J. Mao, MD, MSCE, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Bendheim Integrative Medicine Center, 1429 First Avenue, New York, NY 10021 (e-mail: maoj@mskcc.org).

Search for other works by this author on:

Received:

23 February 2017

Revision received:

04 May 2017

Published:

13 November 2017

Cite

Hyeongjun Yun, Lingyun Sun, Jun J. Mao, Growth of Integrative Medicine at Leading Cancer Centers Between 2009 and 2016: A Systematic Analysis of NCI-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center Websites, JNCI Monographs, Volume 2017, Issue 52, November 2017, lgx004, https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgx004
Close

Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search

Abstract

Background

Cancer centers have increasingly offered integrative medicine therapies in response to their patients’ unmet needs. We evaluated the growth of integrative medicine in leading academic cancer centers in the United States as reflected by their public-facing websites.

Methods

We performed a systematic review of 45 National Cancer Institute (NCI)–designated comprehensive cancer center websites. Two researchers independently evaluated whether the websites provided information regarding integrative medicine modalities and, if so, whether the services were provided in the same health system. They compared the proportion of cancer centers providing the information on each modality in 2016 with the data from the prior study in 2009.

Results

The most common integrative medicine therapies mentioned on the 45 NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center websites were exercise (97.8%) and acupuncture and meditation (88.9% each), followed by yoga (86.7%), massage (84.4%), and music therapy (82.2%). The majority of the websites also provided information on nutrition (95.6%), dietary supplements (93.3%), and herbs (88.9%). The most common therapies offered in the health systems were acupuncture/massage (73.3% each), meditation/yoga (68.9% each), and consultations about nutrition (91.1%), dietary supplements (84.4%), and herbs (66.7%). Compared with 2009, there was a statistically significant increase in the number of websites mentioning acupuncture, dance therapy, healing touch, hypnosis, massage, meditation, Qigong, and yoga (all P < .05).

Conclusions

Leading US cancer centers increasingly present integrative medicine content on their websites, and the majority of them provide these services to patients in the same health systems.

While conventional cancer treatments have greatly reduced cancer-related mortality, these therapies often produce adverse effects such as fatigue, hot flashes, nausea, and postoperative pain that may negatively impact quality of life (1,2). Consequently, many cancer patients suffer from both the symptoms of cancer itself and the side effects related to conventional treatments.

Patients’ unmet needs in managing these symptoms coupled with their desire to use natural approaches to improve their health have created a demand for integrative medicine (3,4). According to the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH), integrative medicine differs from complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) because it brings together conventional and complementary treatments in a coordinated way (5). Neither rejecting conventional therapies nor relying on alternative medicine, integrative medicine adopts only those complementary modalities supported by the highest evidence of safety and effectiveness (6). Numerous studies have evaluated the efficacy of utilizing integrative medicine modalities to treat the side effects of conventional cancer therapies. For instance, there is growing evidence that acupuncture may be effective in managing cancer therapy–related adverse effects such as fatigue (7–10), postoperative pain (11,12), vasomotor symptoms (13–16), and nausea and vomiting (17). Likewise, research supports the use of modalities such as massage (18,19) and mind-body therapies for symptom management and spiritual transformation; the latter remains a largely unmet need in the current health care system, yet directly impacts patients’ quality of life (4,20–23).

The use of integrative medicine is extensive among cancer survivors. Globally, up to 43% of patients with cancer have used integrative medicine therapies during their treatment, and the overall prevalence of integrative medicine use has increased noticeably over the past years (24–26). In the United States, cancer survivors use integrative medicine even more than individuals without cancer (27). Cancer survivors are more likely to use integrative medicine modalities for wellness, pain, and improving their immune functions. Interestingly, most of them started using integrative medicine because their conventional health providers recommended it to them (28).

In 2009, our group found that more than 60% of National Cancer Institute (NCI)–designated comprehensive cancer centers provided information related to integrative therapies on their websites (29). Despite increasing evidence for the effects of integrative medicine in recent literature, the pattern of growth in integrative medicine since 2009 is unknown. Thus, we conducted a systematic review of the websites of all 45 NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers to determine the change in integrative medicine content on their websites. In addition, we identified what services are provided in the same health system where the cancer centers are located.

Methods

We conducted a systematic analysis on the websites of all 45 NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers between January 2016 and May 2016 (30). After initial training, two researchers (HY and LS) independently evaluated whether these websites provided relevant information regarding integrative medicine modalities, and if so, they performed further searches to determine whether the services were provided in the same health systems where the cancer centers were located. The authors discussed discrepancies in data collection to reach consensus. Since the websites were regularly updated even within the research period (January–May 2016), we updated any changes in the interim in the final data set for analysis.

Criteria for Evaluation of Content

We approached analysis of web content from the perspective of a patient or family member attempting to access information on integrative medicine modalities or seeking integrative medicine services at a particular cancer center via its website. We searched for the specific types of integrative medicine modalities based on a prior study in 2009 (29). Furthermore, we included evaluation for accessibility, such as whether the websites had pages dedicated to integrative medicine and phone numbers available to access such services directly. Lastly, to determine whether integrative medicine services were provided in the same health system, we attempted to identify clinicians utilizing integrative medicine therapies on-site in that particular institution. For example, we searched the directory of clinicians on the cancer center websites to find licensed acupuncturists or physicians who practice acupuncture.

Analyses

We analyzed the frequency with which each integrative medicine modality was mentioned on the websites and compared the number of cancer centers providing the information on each modality with the data from the prior study in 2009 using chi-square tests. All analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics V21.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY), with a two-sided significance level of .05 indicating statistical significance.

Results

The most common integrative medicine modalities that appeared on the 45 NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center websites were exercise (97.8%) and acupuncture and meditation (88.9% each), followed by yoga (86.7%), massage (84.4%), and music therapy (82.2%). Additionally, many of the websites provided information on nutrition (95.6%), dietary supplements (93.3%), and herbs (88.9%).

Compared with the results from 2009, the number of cancer centers providing information on integrative medicine has increased for all modalities except guided imagery (Table 1). Among these changes, websites with references to dietary supplements experienced the largest growth (51.8%, P < .001), followed by exercise (51.5%, P < .001), and herbal supplements (45.0%, P < .002). Notably, there was more than 30% growth in each of the four representative integrative medicine modalities: acupuncture (30.3%, P = .005), massage (30.7%, P = .002), meditation (32.8%, P = .001), and yoga (30.6%, P = .002).

Table 1.

NCI Comprehensive Cancer Center web information on integrative oncology

Provided information Provided services
2009 (n = 41) 2016 (n = 45) 2009 vs 2016 2016 (n = 45) Info vs serv
No. (%) No. (%) % change P No. (%) P
Whole systems
Acupuncture 25 (58.6) 40 (88.9) 30.3 .005 33 (73.3) .06
Ayurveda 12 (29.3) 18 (40.0) 10.7 .367 3 (6.7) <.001
Consultations
Dietary supplements 17 (41.5) 42 (93.3) 51.8 <.001 38 (84.4) .18
Herbs 18 (43.9) 40 (88.9) 45.0 <.002 30 (66.7) .01
Nutrition 23 (56.1) 43 (95.6) 39.5 <.003 41 (91.1) .40
Physician IM N/A 27 (60.0) N/A N/A 27 (60.0) 1.0
Spiritual counseling 23 (56.1) 33 (73.3) 17.2 .116 27 (60.0) .18
Mind-body therapy
Biofeedback 22 (53.7) 26 (57.8) 4.1 .828 11 (24.4) .001
Guided imagery 18 (43.9) 17 (37.8) –6.1 .662 12 (26.7) .26
Hypnosis 13 (31.7) 27 (60.0) 28.3 .01 10 (22.2) <.001
Meditation 23 (56.1) 40 (88.9) 32.8 .001 31 (68.9) .02
Qigong 11 (26.8) 26 (57.8) 31.0 .005 16 (35.6) .04
Tai chi 15 (37.5) 23 (51.1) 13.6 .198 19 (42.2) .40
Yoga 23 (56.1) 39 (86.7) 30.6 .002 31 (68.9) .04
Touch therapy
Healing touch 12 (29.3) 26 (57.8) 28.5 .01 13 (28.9) .01
Massage 22 (53.7) 38 (84.4) 30.7 .002 33 (73.3) .20
Reiki 15 (36.6) 24 (53.3) 16.7 .135 18 (40.0) .21
Movement/creative
Art 19 (46.3) 27 (60.0) 13.7 .279 19 (42.2) .09
Dance 11 (26.8) 27 (60.0) 33.2 .002 12 (26.7) .001
Exercise 19 (46.3) 44 (97.8) 51.5 <.001 25 (55.6) <.001
Music 21 (51.2) 37 (82.2) 31.0 .003 22 (48.9) .001
Provided information Provided services
2009 (n = 41) 2016 (n = 45) 2009 vs 2016 2016 (n = 45) Info vs serv
No. (%) No. (%) % change P No. (%) P
Whole systems
Acupuncture 25 (58.6) 40 (88.9) 30.3 .005 33 (73.3) .06
Ayurveda 12 (29.3) 18 (40.0) 10.7 .367 3 (6.7) <.001
Consultations
Dietary supplements 17 (41.5) 42 (93.3) 51.8 <.001 38 (84.4) .18
Herbs 18 (43.9) 40 (88.9) 45.0 <.002 30 (66.7) .01
Nutrition 23 (56.1) 43 (95.6) 39.5 <.003 41 (91.1) .40
Physician IM N/A 27 (60.0) N/A N/A 27 (60.0) 1.0
Spiritual counseling 23 (56.1) 33 (73.3) 17.2 .116 27 (60.0) .18
Mind-body therapy
Biofeedback 22 (53.7) 26 (57.8) 4.1 .828 11 (24.4) .001
Guided imagery 18 (43.9) 17 (37.8) –6.1 .662 12 (26.7) .26
Hypnosis 13 (31.7) 27 (60.0) 28.3 .01 10 (22.2) <.001
Meditation 23 (56.1) 40 (88.9) 32.8 .001 31 (68.9) .02
Qigong 11 (26.8) 26 (57.8) 31.0 .005 16 (35.6) .04
Tai chi 15 (37.5) 23 (51.1) 13.6 .198 19 (42.2) .40
Yoga 23 (56.1) 39 (86.7) 30.6 .002 31 (68.9) .04
Touch therapy
Healing touch 12 (29.3) 26 (57.8) 28.5 .01 13 (28.9) .01
Massage 22 (53.7) 38 (84.4) 30.7 .002 33 (73.3) .20
Reiki 15 (36.6) 24 (53.3) 16.7 .135 18 (40.0) .21
Movement/creative
Art 19 (46.3) 27 (60.0) 13.7 .279 19 (42.2) .09
Dance 11 (26.8) 27 (60.0) 33.2 .002 12 (26.7) .001
Exercise 19 (46.3) 44 (97.8) 51.5 <.001 25 (55.6) <.001
Music 21 (51.2) 37 (82.2) 31.0 .003 22 (48.9) .001

Table 1.

NCI Comprehensive Cancer Center web information on integrative oncology

Provided information Provided services
2009 (n = 41) 2016 (n = 45) 2009 vs 2016 2016 (n = 45) Info vs serv
No. (%) No. (%) % change P No. (%) P
Whole systems
Acupuncture 25 (58.6) 40 (88.9) 30.3 .005 33 (73.3) .06
Ayurveda 12 (29.3) 18 (40.0) 10.7 .367 3 (6.7) <.001
Consultations
Dietary supplements 17 (41.5) 42 (93.3) 51.8 <.001 38 (84.4) .18
Herbs 18 (43.9) 40 (88.9) 45.0 <.002 30 (66.7) .01
Nutrition 23 (56.1) 43 (95.6) 39.5 <.003 41 (91.1) .40
Physician IM N/A 27 (60.0) N/A N/A 27 (60.0) 1.0
Spiritual counseling 23 (56.1) 33 (73.3) 17.2 .116 27 (60.0) .18
Mind-body therapy
Biofeedback 22 (53.7) 26 (57.8) 4.1 .828 11 (24.4) .001
Guided imagery 18 (43.9) 17 (37.8) –6.1 .662 12 (26.7) .26
Hypnosis 13 (31.7) 27 (60.0) 28.3 .01 10 (22.2) <.001
Meditation 23 (56.1) 40 (88.9) 32.8 .001 31 (68.9) .02
Qigong 11 (26.8) 26 (57.8) 31.0 .005 16 (35.6) .04
Tai chi 15 (37.5) 23 (51.1) 13.6 .198 19 (42.2) .40
Yoga 23 (56.1) 39 (86.7) 30.6 .002 31 (68.9) .04
Touch therapy
Healing touch 12 (29.3) 26 (57.8) 28.5 .01 13 (28.9) .01
Massage 22 (53.7) 38 (84.4) 30.7 .002 33 (73.3) .20
Reiki 15 (36.6) 24 (53.3) 16.7 .135 18 (40.0) .21
Movement/creative
Art 19 (46.3) 27 (60.0) 13.7 .279 19 (42.2) .09
Dance 11 (26.8) 27 (60.0) 33.2 .002 12 (26.7) .001
Exercise 19 (46.3) 44 (97.8) 51.5 <.001 25 (55.6) <.001
Music 21 (51.2) 37 (82.2) 31.0 .003 22 (48.9) .001
Provided information Provided services
2009 (n = 41) 2016 (n = 45) 2009 vs 2016 2016 (n = 45) Info vs serv
No. (%) No. (%) % change P No. (%) P
Whole systems
Acupuncture 25 (58.6) 40 (88.9) 30.3 .005 33 (73.3) .06
Ayurveda 12 (29.3) 18 (40.0) 10.7 .367 3 (6.7) <.001
Consultations
Dietary supplements 17 (41.5) 42 (93.3) 51.8 <.001 38 (84.4) .18
Herbs 18 (43.9) 40 (88.9) 45.0 <.002 30 (66.7) .01
Nutrition 23 (56.1) 43 (95.6) 39.5 <.003 41 (91.1) .40
Physician IM N/A 27 (60.0) N/A N/A 27 (60.0) 1.0
Spiritual counseling 23 (56.1) 33 (73.3) 17.2 .116 27 (60.0) .18
Mind-body therapy
Biofeedback 22 (53.7) 26 (57.8) 4.1 .828 11 (24.4) .001
Guided imagery 18 (43.9) 17 (37.8) –6.1 .662 12 (26.7) .26
Hypnosis 13 (31.7) 27 (60.0) 28.3 .01 10 (22.2) <.001
Meditation 23 (56.1) 40 (88.9) 32.8 .001 31 (68.9) .02
Qigong 11 (26.8) 26 (57.8) 31.0 .005 16 (35.6) .04
Tai chi 15 (37.5) 23 (51.1) 13.6 .198 19 (42.2) .40
Yoga 23 (56.1) 39 (86.7) 30.6 .002 31 (68.9) .04
Touch therapy
Healing touch 12 (29.3) 26 (57.8) 28.5 .01 13 (28.9) .01
Massage 22 (53.7) 38 (84.4) 30.7 .002 33 (73.3) .20
Reiki 15 (36.6) 24 (53.3) 16.7 .135 18 (40.0) .21
Movement/creative
Art 19 (46.3) 27 (60.0) 13.7 .279 19 (42.2) .09
Dance 11 (26.8) 27 (60.0) 33.2 .002 12 (26.7) .001
Exercise 19 (46.3) 44 (97.8) 51.5 <.001 25 (55.6) <.001
Music 21 (51.2) 37 (82.2) 31.0 .003 22 (48.9) .001

The most common therapies offered on-site in the same health system were acupuncture and massage (73.3% each), meditation and yoga (68.9% each), and consultations on nutrition (91.1%), dietary supplements (84.4%), and herbs (66.7%). Although other therapies such as art, dance, exercise, and music were not frequently offered on-site, many centers provided information on supportive groups or sports facilities offering these modalities for cancer patients. Furthermore, some cancer centers had web pages with self-guided multimedia such as mind-body therapy resources for meditation and guided imagery.

We found a statistically significant difference between the number of cancer centers that provide online information on integrative medicine and the number of cancer centers that actually deliver integrative medicine services on-site. Specifically, there is a statistically significant difference in online information vs on-site services for 11 modalities, including Ayurveda (40.0% vs 6.7%, P < .001), exercise (97.8% vs 55.6%, P < .001), herbal supplements consultation (88.9% vs 66.7%, P = .01), meditation (88.9% vs 68.9%, P = .02), music therapy (82.2% vs 48.9%, P = .001), and yoga (86.7% vs 68.9%, P = .04) (Table 1).

Among the 45 comprehensive cancer centers, 29 (64.4%) had phone numbers and 26 (57.8%) had web pages dedicated to integrative medicine, but they were not necessarily limited to cancer-specific therapy, with some web pages included in larger categories such as palliative medicine or quality of life care. Likewise, we found that 27 centers (60%) provided physician consultations on integrative medicine within the same academic health system.

Discussion

Between 2009 and 2016, increasing numbers of NCI-designated cancer centers have provided information on their websites about integrative medicine. In addition, we found that the majority of cancer centers offer some components of integrative medicine within the same academic health systems. These findings suggest that these leading centers are incorporating integrative medicine into their cancer care delivery systems. Our study offers novel insight on the extent to which cancer centers are providing information about integrative medicine on their websites.

Our findings are important because up to 81% of cancer patients obtain information about their disease and treatment on their own from the Internet or via friends and family members (31–33). Research also shows that the frequency of patients searching specifically for information on complementary and alternative medicine treatment options has increased (34). Because many commercial websites often include deceptive claims about unproven unconventional therapies (35), it is reassuring that increasing numbers of the 45 NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers provide information to their potential and current patients/families to help differentiate integrative medicine from alternative cancer therapies. Meeting patients’ information-seeking needs is important to ensure that cancer patients use evidence-informed complementary therapies together with, rather than instead of, conventional treatments.

Furthermore, as early detection and treatment advances have resulted in many cancers becoming treatable chronic conditions rather than fatal diseases, there is a growing recognition of cancer patients’ need for survivorship care that includes symptom management, psychosocial support, and health promotion as important components for their well-being (36–38). Emerging research suggests that meditation relieves cancer-related distress (22), yoga can help sleep (39), and acupuncture can help with pain (40) and hot flashes (14). Therefore, cancer centers have the opportunity to make these therapies a part of their comprehensive supportive care delivery to enhance symptom control and quality of life for patients during and beyond cancer treatment. Increasing research also demonstrates the value of lifestyle modifications such as healthy diet, weight control, and physical activity not only for cancer prevention, but also for the overall health and survival of cancer patients. Thus, incorporating these modifications into the cancer care delivery system is critical to support patients’ health and well-being.

Despite its potential, numerous challenges exist for the effective implementation of integrative medicine in conventional cancer care settings, including the credentialing and regulation of integrative medicine therapists, the development of sustainable funding models, and the fostering of interdisciplinary collaboration (41). For example, while exercise information is provided in 97.8% of cancer center websites, only 55.6% provide exercise/fitness services for their cancer patients. As scientific evidence accumulates, health policies that ensure adequate insurance coverage or novel payment models—such as including integrative medicine treatments as a part of bundled payments—are needed to explore how to make these services available to cancer patients.

We need to acknowledge several limitations to this study. First, given the constantly changing and evolving nature of the Internet, we are only reporting on a snapshot of the online information at the time of data collection. Second, the improved information presentation on websites about integrative medicine may be related to more medical information being presented overall on cancer centers’ websites rather than to a specific increase in information about integrative medicine. Third, even though we approached this analysis from the perspective of a patient or a family member attempting to access information on integrative oncology treatment modalities via the Internet, the researchers in this study are clinicians familiar with integrative medicine, not patients. Lastly, this study focused on information presented online rather than the actual integrative medicine services provided; thus, we may have missed the centers that provide integrative medicine services but do not reflect this on their websites.

Despite these limitations, we found that there has been substantial growth in the presence of integrative medicine on the websites of NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers since 2009. In addition, the majority of the centers provide integrative medicine services within the same academic health systems in which they are located. As these centers lead the way in cancer research and clinical innovation, we need to ensure that integrative medicine can be cohesively incorporated into the continuum of cancer treatment and survivorship care using a financially sustainable structure. In addition, evidence-informed integrative medicine needs to expand beyond the walls of academic medical centers into community cancer centers and clinics to benefit patients from diverse socio-economic backgrounds.

Funding

This work was supported in part by a National Cancer Institute grant to the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (grant number P30-CA008748) and the Byrne Fund at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

References

1

Findley

PA

,

Sambamoorthi

U.

Preventive health services and lifestyle practices in cancer survivors: A population health investigation

.

J Cancer Surviv.

2009

;

3

1

:

43

58

.

3

Bauml

JM

,

Chokshi

S

,

Schapira

MM

, et al.

Do attitudes and beliefs regarding complementary and alternative medicine impact its use among patients with cancer? A cross-sectional survey

.

Cancer.

2015

;

121

14

:

2431

2438

.

4

Mao

JJ

,

Palmer

SC

,

Straton

JB

, et al.

Cancer survivors with unmet needs were more likely to use complementary and alternative medicine

.

J Cancer Surviv.

2008

;

2

2

:

116

124

.

7

Mao

JJ

,

Farrar

JT

,

Bruner

D

, et al.

Electroacupuncture for fatigue, sleep, and psychological distress in breast cancer patients with aromatase inhibitor-related arthralgia: A randomized trial

.

Cancer.

2014

;

120

23

:

3744

3751

.

8

Molassiotis

A

,

Bardy

J

,

Finnegan-John

J

, et al.

Acupuncture for cancer-related fatigue in patients with breast cancer: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial

.

J Clin Oncol.

2012

;

30

36

:

4470

4476

.

9

Smith

C

,

Carmady

B

,

Thornton

C

, et al.

The effect of acupuncture on post-cancer fatigue and well-being for women recovering from breast cancer: A pilot randomised controlled trial

.

Acupunct Med.

2013

;

31

1

:

9

15

.

10

Vickers

AJ

,

Straus

DJ

,

Fearon

B

, et al.

Acupuncture for postchemotherapy fatigue: A phase II study

.

J Clin Oncol.

2004

;

22

9

:

1731

1735

.

11

Mehling

WE

,

Jacobs

B

,

Acree

M

, et al.

Symptom management with massage and acupuncture in postoperative cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial

.

J Pain Symptom Manage.

2007

;

33

3

:

258

266

.

12

Alimi

D

,

Rubino

C

,

Leandri

EP

, et al.

Analgesic effects of auricular acupuncture for cancer pain

.

J Pain Symptom Manage.

2000

;

19

2

:

81

82

.

13

Lesi

G

,

Razzini

G

,

Musti

MA

, et al.

Acupuncture as an integrative approach for the treatment of hot flashes in women with breast cancer: A prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial (AcCliMaT)

.

J Clin Oncol.

2016

;

34

15

:

1795

1802

.

14

Mao

JJ

,

Bowman

MA

,

Xie

SX

, et al.

Electroacupuncture versus gabapentin for hot flashes among breast cancer survivors: A randomized placebo-controlled trial

.

J Clin Oncol.

2015

;

33

31

:

3615

3620

.

15

Walker

EM

,

Rodriguez

AI

,

Kohn

B

, et al.

Acupuncture vs venlafaxine for the management of vasomotor symptoms in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial

.

J Clin Oncol.

2010

;

28

4

:

634

640

.

16

Filshie

J

,

Bolton

T

,

Browne

D

, et al.

Acupuncture and self acupuncture for long-term treatment of vasomotor symptoms in cancer patients—audit and treatment algorithm

.

Acupunct Med.

2005

;

23

4

:

171

180

.

17

Choo

SP

,

Kong

KH

,

Lim

WT

, et al.

Electroacupuncture for refractory acute emesis caused by chemotherapy

.

J Altern Complement Med.

2006

;

12

10

:

963

969

.

18

Cassileth

BR

,

Vickers

AJ.

Massage therapy for symptom control: Outcome study at a major cancer center

.

J Pain Symptom Manage.

2004

;

28

3

:

244

249

.

19

Wilkinson

SM

,

Love

SB

,

Westcombe

AM

, et al.

Effectiveness of aromatherapy massage in the management of anxiety and depression in patients with cancer: A multicenter randomized controlled trial

.

J Clin Oncol.

2007

;

25

5

:

532

539

.

20

Ben-Josef

AM

,

Wileyto

EP

,

Chen

J

, et al.

Yoga intervention for patients with prostate cancer undergoing external beam radiation therapy: A pilot feasibility study

.

Integr Cancer Ther.

2016

;

15

3

:

272

278

.

21

Bower

JE

,

Crosswell

AD

,

Stanton

AL

, et al.

Mindfulness meditation for younger breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial

.

Cancer.

2015

;

121

8

:

1231

1240

.

22

Carlson

LE

,

Tamagawa

R

,

Stephen

J

, et al.

Randomized-controlled trial of mindfulness-based cancer recovery vs supportive expressive group therapy among distressed breast cancer survivors (MINDSET): Long-term follow-up results

.

Psychooncology

.

2016

;

25

7

:

750

759

.

23

Kiecolt-Glaser

JK

,

Bennett

JM

,

Andridge

R

, et al.

Yoga's impact on inflammation, mood, and fatigue in breast cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial

.

J Clin Oncol.

2014

;

32

10

:

1040

1049

.

24

Horneber

M

,

Bueschel

G

,

Dennert

G

, et al.

How many cancer patients use complementary and alternative medicine: A systematic review and metaanalysis

.

Integr Cancer Ther.

2012

;

11

3

:

187

203

.

25

Boon

H

,

Stewart

M

,

Kennard

MA

, et al.

Use of complementary/alternative medicine by breast cancer survivors in Ontario: Prevalence and perceptions

.

J Clin Oncol.

2000

;

18

13

:

2515

2521

.

26

Boon

HS

,

Olatunde

F

,

Zick

SM.

Trends in complementary/alternative medicine use by breast cancer survivors: Comparing survey data from 1998 and 2005

.

BMC Womens Health.

2007

;

7

:

4

.

27

Mao

JJ

,

Farrar

JT

,

Xie

SX

, et al.

Use of complementary and alternative medicine and prayer among a national sample of cancer survivors compared to other populations without cancer

.

Complement Ther Med.

2007

;

15

1

:

21

29

.

28

Mao

JJ

,

Palmer

CS

,

Healy

KE

, et al.

Complementary and alternative medicine use among cancer survivors: A population-based study

.

J Cancer Surviv.

2011

;

5

1

:

8

17

.

29

Brauer

JA

,

El Sehamy

A

,

Metz

JM

, et al.

Complementary and alternative medicine and supportive care at leading cancer centers: A systematic analysis of websites

.

J Altern Complement Med

.

2010

;

16

2

:

183

186

.

31

Bass

SB

,

Ruzek

SB

,

Gordon

TF

, et al.

Relationship of Internet health information use with patient behavior and self-efficacy: Experiences of newly diagnosed cancer patients who contact the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service

.

J Health Commun.

2006

;

11

2

:

219

236

.

32

Ebel

MD

,

Stellamanns

J

,

Keinki

C

, et al.

Cancer patients and the Internet: A survey among German cancer patients

.

J Cancer Educ.

2017

;

32

3

:

503

508

.

33

van de Poll-Franse

LV

,

van Eenbergen

MC.

Internet use by cancer survivors: Current use and future wishes

.

Support Care Cancer.

2008

;

16

10

:

1189

1195

.

34

Mancini

J

,

Nogues

C

,

Adenis

C

, et al.

Patients' characteristics and rate of Internet use to obtain cancer information

.

J Public Health (Oxf).

2006

;

28

3

:

235

237

.

35

Schmidt

K

,

Ernst

E.

Assessing websites on complementary and alternative medicine for cancer

.

Ann Oncol.

2004

;

15

5

:

733

742

.

36

Rowland

JH

,

Baker

F.

Introduction: Resilience of cancer survivors across the lifespan

.

Cancer.

2005

;

104(11 Suppl)

:

2543

2548

.

37

Feuerstein

M.

Defining cancer survivorship

.

J Cancer Surviv.

2007

;

1

1

:

5

7

.

38

Earle

CC.

Failing to plan is planning to fail: Improving the quality of care with survivorship care plans

.

J Clin Oncol.

2006

;

24

32

:

5112

5116

.

39

Mustian

KM

,

Sprod

LK

,

Janelsins

M

, et al.

Multicenter, randomized controlled trial of yoga for sleep quality among cancer survivors

.

J Clin Oncol.

2013

;

31

26

:

3233

3241

.

40

Crew

KD

,

Capodice

JL

,

Greenlee

H

, et al.

Randomized, blinded, sham-controlled trial of acupuncture for the management of aromatase inhibitor-associated joint symptoms in women with early-stage breast cancer

.

J Clin Oncol.

2010

;

28

7

:

1154

1160

.

41

Cohen

M.

Challenges and future directions for integrative medicine in clinical practice

.

Evidence Based Integr Med.

2005

;

2

3

:

117

122

.

© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Topic:

Citations

Views

Altmetric

Metrics

Total Views 11,999

10,100 Pageviews

1,899 PDF Downloads

Since 11/1/2017

Month: Total Views:
November 2017 191
December 2017 1,228
January 2018 2,214
February 2018 1,269
March 2018 172
April 2018 32
May 2018 30
June 2018 49
July 2018 31
August 2018 32
September 2018 23
October 2018 48
November 2018 172
December 2018 136
January 2019 110
February 2019 91
March 2019 114
April 2019 138
May 2019 120
June 2019 107
July 2019 87
August 2019 132
September 2019 115
October 2019 120
November 2019 83
December 2019 126
January 2020 141
February 2020 125
March 2020 71
April 2020 131
May 2020 70
June 2020 64
July 2020 83
August 2020 93
September 2020 107
October 2020 98
November 2020 116
December 2020 77
January 2021 96
February 2021 94
March 2021 108
April 2021 106
May 2021 119
June 2021 71
July 2021 64
August 2021 60
September 2021 90
October 2021 103
November 2021 88
December 2021 107
January 2022 93
February 2022 101
March 2022 58
April 2022 139
May 2022 92
June 2022 72
July 2022 95
August 2022 86
September 2022 94
October 2022 120
November 2022 79
December 2022 50
January 2023 52
February 2023 84
March 2023 105
April 2023 61
May 2023 65
June 2023 60
July 2023 48
August 2023 69
September 2023 56
October 2023 45
November 2023 57
December 2023 65
January 2024 89
February 2024 82
March 2024 73
April 2024 99
May 2024 74
June 2024 78
July 2024 82
August 2024 85
September 2024 114
October 2024 86
November 2024 39

×

Email alerts

Citing articles via

More from Oxford Academic