On the estimation of distances from trigonometric parallaxes (original) (raw)
Journal Article
,
Search for other works by this author on:
Search for other works by this author on:
Received:
18 January 1996
Accepted:
31 January 1996
PDF Cite
Haywood Smith, Heinrich Eichhorn, On the estimation of distances from trigonometric parallaxes, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 281, Issue 1, July 1996, Pages 211–218, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/281.1.211
Close
Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search
Abstract
A general series is derived for the expectation of the distance computed from a measured trigonometric parallax, given the true distance, on the assumption that the measurement errors are normally distributed with known standard deviation around the true parallax. This expectation is in general different from the true distance; the difference can be either positive or negative. The variance of the computed distances is shown to be infinite, which makes the application of a correction for bias pointless. Two approaches to render the variance finite and thereby make possible application of such a correction are explored: (1) transformation of the observed parallax, and (2) a weighting that virtually eliminates distances for measured parallaxes near zero. The first approach turns out to allow estimation of distance with a relatively small bias, of the order of 10 per cent for a standard error equal to twice the true parallax. It also can be modified to yield an estimate of the absolute magnitude to within 0.1 – 0.2 mag for the same error. The method is tested for sets of synthetic data incorporating effects of observational selection, including an apparent magnitude limit or selection according to proper motion. Typically the bias in these tests is a few per cent in distance or less than 0.1 in absolute magnitude.
This content is only available as a PDF.
© 1996 RAS
Citations
Views
Altmetric
Metrics
Total Views 300
22 Pageviews
278 PDF Downloads
Since 11/1/2016
| Month: | Total Views: |
|---|---|
| November 2016 | 1 |
| January 2017 | 7 |
| February 2017 | 1 |
| March 2017 | 3 |
| April 2017 | 1 |
| May 2017 | 2 |
| June 2017 | 2 |
| July 2017 | 2 |
| August 2017 | 1 |
| September 2017 | 1 |
| October 2017 | 2 |
| November 2017 | 1 |
| December 2017 | 6 |
| January 2018 | 3 |
| February 2018 | 2 |
| March 2018 | 9 |
| April 2018 | 3 |
| May 2018 | 6 |
| June 2018 | 4 |
| July 2018 | 6 |
| August 2018 | 4 |
| September 2018 | 4 |
| October 2018 | 4 |
| November 2018 | 6 |
| January 2019 | 4 |
| February 2019 | 3 |
| March 2019 | 11 |
| April 2019 | 7 |
| May 2019 | 8 |
| June 2019 | 3 |
| July 2019 | 2 |
| August 2019 | 6 |
| September 2019 | 4 |
| October 2019 | 3 |
| November 2019 | 6 |
| December 2019 | 4 |
| January 2020 | 4 |
| February 2020 | 4 |
| March 2020 | 7 |
| April 2020 | 8 |
| May 2020 | 5 |
| June 2020 | 3 |
| July 2020 | 5 |
| September 2020 | 1 |
| November 2020 | 4 |
| December 2020 | 1 |
| February 2021 | 3 |
| March 2021 | 1 |
| April 2021 | 2 |
| May 2021 | 1 |
| June 2021 | 3 |
| September 2021 | 1 |
| October 2021 | 2 |
| November 2021 | 3 |
| January 2022 | 3 |
| February 2022 | 1 |
| March 2022 | 2 |
| April 2022 | 6 |
| May 2022 | 1 |
| June 2022 | 1 |
| July 2022 | 3 |
| August 2022 | 2 |
| October 2022 | 4 |
| November 2022 | 2 |
| January 2023 | 7 |
| February 2023 | 5 |
| March 2023 | 2 |
| April 2023 | 1 |
| May 2023 | 2 |
| July 2023 | 3 |
| August 2023 | 2 |
| September 2023 | 4 |
| November 2023 | 5 |
| December 2023 | 2 |
| January 2024 | 3 |
| February 2024 | 1 |
| March 2024 | 4 |
| April 2024 | 5 |
| May 2024 | 7 |
| June 2024 | 5 |
| July 2024 | 5 |
| August 2024 | 6 |
| September 2024 | 6 |
Citations
64 Web of Science
×
Email alerts
Citing articles via
More from Oxford Academic