Evidence for nuclear factors involved in recognition of 5′ splice sites (original) (raw)

Journal Article

,

Verna and Marrs McClean Department of Biochemistry, Baylor College of Medicine

One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030. USA

Search for other works by this author on:

Verna and Marrs McClean Department of Biochemistry, Baylor College of Medicine

One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030. USA

Search for other works by this author on:

Received:

14 December 1988

Revision received:

22 February 1989

Accepted:

22 February 1989

Cite

Maria L. Zapp, Susan M. Berget, Evidence for nuclear factors involved in recognition of 5′ splice sites, Nucleic Acids Research, Volume 17, Issue 7, 11 April 1989, Pages 2655–2674, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/17.7.2655
Close

Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search

Abstract

To investigate soluble factors involved in pre-messenger RNA splicing we have fractionated nuclear extract by simple centrifugation to produce a supernatant pellet pair. Factors larger than 15S including U2, U4, U5, and U6 snRNPs fractionate with the pellet; U1 snRNPs distribute equally in pellet and supernatant. Each fraction is individually incompetent for splicing and spliceosome assembly; mixing restores wild type activity and assembly. The pellet fraction directs an aberrant assembly pathway in which proper 3′, but improper 5′ splice site recognition occurs. Complexes formed with the pellet fraction are distinguishable from wild-type complexes using native gel electrophoresis. Pellet complexes contain U1 snRNP antigens and their formation requires ATP, U1 snRNPs, U2 snRNPs, and sequences at the 3′ end of the intron - properties shared with the initial steps of normal assembly and directed by sequences at the 3′ end of the intron. In contrast, pellet complex assembly shows no dependence on the presence of a 5′ splice junction within precursor RNA. Furthermore, binding of factors to the 5′ splice junction is deficient in pellet assemblies. Thus, the pellet lacks a factor required for proper recognition of 5′ splice sites. This factor can be supplied by the supernatant. Complementation occurs when supernatant U1 RNA is destroyed, suggesting that the supernatant factor recognizing 5′ splice sites is not U1 snRNPs.

This content is only available as a PDF.

© IRL Press

I agree to the terms and conditions. You must accept the terms and conditions.

Submit a comment

Name

Affiliations

Comment title

Comment

You have entered an invalid code

Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.

Citations

Views

Altmetric

Metrics

Total Views 46

9 Pageviews

37 PDF Downloads

Since 2/1/2017

Month: Total Views:
February 2017 2
August 2017 1
October 2017 3
December 2017 2
January 2018 5
February 2018 4
March 2018 5
April 2018 4
November 2019 1
September 2020 1
October 2020 1
June 2021 3
August 2022 1
October 2022 2
November 2022 1
December 2022 1
September 2023 1
November 2023 1
December 2023 2
April 2024 1
June 2024 1
July 2024 1
August 2024 1
October 2024 1

Citations

34 Web of Science

×

Email alerts

Citing articles via

More from Oxford Academic