Effect of Telomere Length on Telomeric Gene Expression (original) (raw)

Journal Article

,

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California

,

San Francisco, CA, USA

Search for other works by this author on:

,

1

Laboratoire de Cytogénétique et Génétique, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique

,

Fontenay-aux Roses, France

Search for other works by this author on:

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California

,

San Francisco, CA, USA

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 415 476 9083; Fax +1 415 476 9069; Email: murnane@dmc.ucsf.edu

Search for other works by this author on:

Accepted:

05 September 1996

Published:

01 November 1996

Cite

Carl N. Sprung, Laure Sabatier, John P. Murnane, Effect of Telomere Length on Telomeric Gene Expression, Nucleic Acids Research, Volume 24, Issue 21, 1 November 1996, Pages 4336–4340, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/24.21.4336
Close

Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search

Abstract

Telomeres gradually shorten as human somatic cells divide and a correlation has been observed between the average telomere length and cell senescence. It has been proposed that the genes responsible for cell senescence are located near the telomere and are activated when telomere length reaches a critical point. This is consistent with evidence from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, in which genes are regulated differently depending on their distance from the telomere. We investigated the possibility that differential gene expression is conferred by telomere length in human cells. A plasmid containing the neomycin phosphotransferase (neo) gene was transfected into the SV40-transformed human fibroblast cell line LM217. In one transfectant the plasmid was integrated at the telomere of chromosome 13. Subclones of this cell line that had various lengths of telomeric repeat sequences on the end of this chromosome were isolated. No effect on neo gene expression was found when the length of the telomere varied between 25 and 0.5 kb, as demonstrated by colony forming ability, growth rates and RNA blot analysis. These results therefore suggest that putative chromatin structural differences conferred by telomere length do not affect the expression of genes located near telomeres.

Introduction

Telomeres are unique structures made up of short DNA repeat sequences and associated proteins that have multiple functions, including protection of the ends of chromosomes, chromosome organization and segregation and regulation of nearby genes (1). The importance of telomeres is inferred by the similarities in the short DNA repeat sequences in a wide array of eukaryotes spanning yeast to human. The short repetitive sequence for the telomeres of all vertebrates studied is the hexamer TTAGGG (2). The telomeric repeat sequences are added on by the enzyme telomerase (3,4), which compensates for the loss of DNA from the ends of chromosomes due to incomplete replication. Telomeres have been found to be organized in unique chromatin structures (5–10).

Although the length of telomeres in germline cells is maintained, the length of telomeres in most human somatic cells decreases with age (11,12). Consistent with this observation, telomerase activity is not found in most somatic cells (13,14). However, more recent studies have reported telomerase activity in some somatic cells (15,16) and therefore other factors besides the presence of telomerase activity also appear to be involved in the regulation of telomere length. Regardless of the mechanism for regulation of telomere addition, the correlation between aging and telomere shortening has led to the hypothesis that short telomeres may be the signal for senescence (17).

Several different mechanisms have been proposed for how telomere shortening may lead to senescence. One possible mechanism involves the regulation of a gene or set of genes located near a telomere in which expression is influenced by telomere length (18). Numerous studies have shown that the expression of genes can be influenced by proximity to heterochromatin or telomeric repeat sequences. Early evidence that genes can be regulated by unique chromatin structures was shown in Drosophila, in which a gene involved in eye pigmentation was placed adjacent to pericentric heterochromatin, resulting in variegated eye color (19,20). Furthermore, in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, a gene placed within the central domain of the three centromeres showed variegated expression characteristic of position effect variegation (21). Formation of a new telomere next to genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae resulted in reversible repression (22). Likewise, genes located near a telomere in S.cerevisiae were found to be transcriptionally repressed and this silencing, called the telomere position effect (TPE), was relieved in a distance-dependent manner (22,23). Recently, telomeric sequences positioned internally in a chromosome have been found to act as silencers in S.cerevisiae (24).

Proteins are important components involved in the silencing function of the telomeres. In yeast, mutations in specific genes, such as SIR2, SIR3, SIR4, NAT1, ARD1 and HHF2, resulted in the relief of silencing of a gene adjacent to a telomere (25). TPE silencing can be enhanced by overexpression of SIR3 (23), whereas the presence of other transcription factors can decrease the silencing caused by TPE in a dose-dependent manner (26). Many proteins, such as Rap1p, Est1p, Rif1p, Pif1p, cdc17p, Tel1p, Tel2p, Sir3p and Sir4p, have also been found to have profound effects on telomere length (27–33).

Although it is clear from the above studies in yeast that gene expression can be influenced by proximity to telomeres or other heterochromatic regions, it is unclear whether a similar phenomenon occurs in mammalian cells. The telomeres of mammalian cells have been shown to have a structure that is distinct from that of bulk chromatin (8–10). In addition, the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-tk) promoter was shown to be inhibited by its proximity to centromeres (34,35). In contrast, the simian virus 40 (SV40) early promoter was found not to be inhibited by its proximity to either telomeres or α satellite DNA in hamster cells (36). Whether these differences in suppression are due to cell type, integration site or the nature of the transcriptional promoters used is unclear.

Structure and location of the integrated plasmid. The pMSTK-neo plasmid integration site at the telomere of the long arm of chromosome 13 in the KB319 cell line is shown. The neo gene is located ∼4 kb from the beginning of the telomeric repeat sequences; the direction of transcription is shown by the arrow. The location of the XbaI site used to digest the genomic DNA for Southern blot analysis is indicated. Representation of DNA is as follows (left to right): cell DNA (solid line), pBR322 sequences (open box), thymidine kinase promoter and termination sequence (hatched box), neo gene (cross-hatched box), SV40 DNA (stippled box), human DNA (solid box) and TTAGGG repeat sequences (triangles). The human DNA within the plasmid (solid box) was used as a probe for Southern blot analysis.

Figure 1

Structure and location of the integrated plasmid. The pMSTK-neo plasmid integration site at the telomere of the long arm of chromosome 13 in the KB319 cell line is shown. The neo gene is located ∼4 kb from the beginning of the telomeric repeat sequences; the direction of transcription is shown by the arrow. The location of the _Xba_I site used to digest the genomic DNA for Southern blot analysis is indicated. Representation of DNA is as follows (left to right): cell DNA (solid line), pBR322 sequences (open box), thymidine kinase promoter and termination sequence (hatched box), neo gene (cross-hatched box), SV40 DNA (stippled box), human DNA (solid box) and TTAGGG repeat sequences (triangles). The human DNA within the plasmid (solid box) was used as a probe for Southern blot analysis.

To further investigate the role of telomeres in suppression of gene expression, we have studied the effect of telomere length on expression of the HSV-tk promoter in human cells. For these studies we used an immortal SV40-transformed human fibroblast cell line (KB319) that had a plasmid containing a selectable neo gene integrated at the end of chromosome 13 (37). The presence of the plasmid sequences at the telomere was previously used to investigate the dynamics of changes in length of this telomere (38). In the current study, subclones of this cell line with various lengths of telomeric repeat sequences at this telomere were analyzed to determine whether the length of the telomeric repeat sequences influenced expression of the adjacent telomeric neo gene.

Materials and Methods

Cell lines and cell culture

The KB319 cell line contains a plasmid (pMSTK-neo) integrated at a telomere (37). KB319 was derived from LM217, an immortal SV40-transformed human fibroblast cell line. The cell lines E9-6D, E8, E1-6, E9-7 and E9-2 are all second and third generation subclones of KB319. Cell line 2.0–23 has the pMSTK-neo plasmid integrated at an interstitial site (39).

Cell growth experiments involved culturing cells for 8 days in triplicate in medium containing 0, 200 or 600 µg/ml G418. The cells were then harvested and counted and the number of cells was compared with the number of cells grown in non-selective medium. LM217, which does not contain the neo gene, was used as a control. In another growth rate experiment, cells were grown in 400 µg/ml G418 and harvested at 0, 24, 48 or 170 h after addition of the selective medium. For the survival experiments, the cells were plated in duplicate in medium with or without 400 µg/ml G418. After 3 weeks the flasks were stained with methylene blue and the colonies counted.

Southern, RNA and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis

Southern blot analysis was performed after digestion of cellular DNA with _Xba_I, which cuts the integrated plasmid sequences ∼3 kb from the telomeric repeat sequences at the end of the chromosome (37). The probe used for analysis of the length of the marker telomere consisted of human sequences contained within the plasmid (Fig. 1). These human sequences are also found at their original location in these cells and produce a single band that serves as an internal control for a stable fragment. Photographs from Southern blots run under identical conditions (38) were scanned and placed adjacent to each other by using computer manipulation so that relative telomeric band migration could be easily observed.

mRNA was isolated from the KB319 subclones E9-6D, E8, E1-6, E9-7 and E9-2 and the cell line 2.0–23 using a Fastrack mRNA isolation kit (Invitrogen). The RNA was quantified and RNA blot analysis was performed with 2 µg mRNA (40). The blot was hybridized with a probe specific for the neo gene and subsequently washed and reprobed with an actin probe. The amount of mRNA hybridized was determined by using a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics) and densitometric analysis.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed as previously described (38), with the entire pMSTK-neo plasmid used as probe.

Results

The integrated pMSTK-neo plasmid at the end of chromosome 13 in an immortal SV40-transformed cell clone KB319 (37) was used to study the dynamics of changes in length of a single telomere (38). Sequences within the plasmid were used as a probe for Southern blot analysis to determine the length of the terminal restriction fragment containing the telomeric repeat sequences. The integrated pMSTK-neo plasmid in this cell line contains a selectable marker gene (neo) with a HSV-tk transcriptional promoter (Fig. 1) that is located within 4 kb of the telomeric repeat sequences. Thus, this cell line provided an opportunity to test the effect of telomere length on gene expression. Because of the extensive telomere polymorphism in KB319, subclones selected at random demonstrated a wide distribution in the length of the telomere on the marker chromosome (38). Representative KB319 subclones E9-6D, E8, E1-6, E9-7 and E9-2, which were isolated and grown without G418 selection, had telomeres of ∼25, 6, 3, 1 and 0.5 kb respectively (Fig. 2). Fluoresence in situ hybridization demonstrated that the subclones E8, E1-6, E9-7 and E9-2 have only a single copy of chromosome 13 with the integrated plasmid at its end, although in each subclone a small percentage of cells in the population have two copies (data not shown). One subclone, E9-6D, contains two copies of chromosome 13 with the telomeric plasmid (data not shown). Subclone E9-7 also has a small percentage of cells in the population (<5%) with interstitial sites (data not shown). The terminal fragment containing the telomeric repeat sequences is easily identifiable on Southern blots by its extensive polymorphism, which is observed as a diffuse band. For comparison, a homogeneous band from a stable interstitial sequence served as a convenient internal control. The length of the telomeric sequences (Fig. 2B) was determined from the average size of the diffuse bands after subtracting the length of the subtelomeric plasmid sequence (3 kb). The relative equivalence of the plasmid copy number in the various clones is also evident by comparison of the internal control bands and the telomeric bands seen by Southern blot analysis (Fig. 2a).

Southern blot analysis of the relative telomere lengths in the KB319 subclones. (a) Photographs from Southern blots for the parental cell line without the telomeric plasmid sequences (LM217) and KB319 subclones E9-6D, E8, E1-6, E9-7 and E9-2 (40) were scanned and placed adjacent to each other by means of computer manipulation so that relative telomeric band migration could be compared. The telomere band is polymorphic in length as compared with the control band from an interstitial sequence (asterisk). The approximate size of size standards is shown at the left (in kb). (b) The length of the telomeric repeat sequences in the KB319 subclones as determined from the Southern blots in (a) after subtracting the length of the subtelomeric plasmid sequence (3 kb).

Figure 2

Southern blot analysis of the relative telomere lengths in the KB319 subclones. (a) Photographs from Southern blots for the parental cell line without the telomeric plasmid sequences (LM217) and KB319 subclones E9-6D, E8, E1-6, E9-7 and E9-2 (40) were scanned and placed adjacent to each other by means of computer manipulation so that relative telomeric band migration could be compared. The telomere band is polymorphic in length as compared with the control band from an interstitial sequence (asterisk). The approximate size of size standards is shown at the left (in kb). (b) The length of the telomeric repeat sequences in the KB319 subclones as determined from the Southern blots in (a) after subtracting the length of the subtelomeric plasmid sequence (3 kb).

Transcription levels of the neo gene in the KB319 subclones with telomeres of various lengths were analyzed by RNA blot analysis (Fig. 3a). mRNA was isolated from the KB319 subclones and from the cell line 2.0–23, which has the neo plasmid integrated at an interstitial site. All of the KB319 subclones and the 2.0–23 cell line had been cultured without selection for the neo gene for extended periods of time (>30 cell doublings) before mRNA isolation. The RNA blot was first hybridized with a neo probe and subsequently washed and reprobed with an actin probe (Fig. 3a). Transcription from the neo gene in the KB319 subclones and 2.0–23 cell line was quantified by densitometric scanning (Fig. 3b). Variability in loading amounts was normalized by standardization with the actin band densities. The amount of neo mRNA in each of the five KB319 subclones reproducibly showed only modest variation. However, the 2.0–23 cell line, which contains the interstitial neo gene, showed a 3- to 4-fold higher level of expression than cell lines containing the neo gene integrated at a telomere.

RNA blot analysis can determine only the average amount of mRNA in all of the cells in the population. To learn more about the influence of telomere length on neo expression in individual cells, we tested the KB319 subclones for colony forming ability and growth rate in G418. The colony forming ability of the KB319 subclones was tested by plating cells in duplicate with or without 400 µg/ml G418. The number of colonies from the flasks with non-selective medium was standardized to 100% for each cell line. No significant differences were observed in any of the KB319 subclones (Fig. 4). For the study of growth rates, the KB319 subclones containing the telomeric neo gene were grown for 8 days in triplicate in medium containing 0, 200 or 600 µg/ml G418. All the cell lines had equivalent growth rates in the presence of increasing amounts of G418, with a slight decrease in cell survival at higher concentrations (Fig. 5). The control cell line LM217, which does not contain the neo gene, showed complete inhibition of growth at all G418 concentrations tested. The KB319 subclones were also grown for various lengths of time with or without 400 µg/ml G418 and cell numbers were determined. Again, no major differences in growth rates were observed in any of the KB319 subclones containing the telomeric neo gene or in the 2.0–23 cell line (data not shown).

Discussion

As shown by RNA blot analysis (Fig. 3), the level of expression of the telomeric neo gene was essentially invariant for all of the KB319 subclones having telomere lengths ranging from 0.5 to 25 kb (Fig. 2). Similarly, growth rate and colony forming ability did not differ among the KB319 subclones. These results suggest that the control of gene regulation is not influenced by telomere length. The results therefore do not support the hypothesis that specific genes near telomeres are involved in the regulation of cell senescence.

Several factors must be taken into consideration when interpreting these results. First, did telomere length shorten sufficiently to influence telomere expression? The average length of all telomeres in senescent fibroblasts is ∼6 kb (11). However, the length of some telomeres is much shorter and therefore it is impossible to determine if a specific telomere length is associated with senescence. Although the length of the single telomere analyzed in our study was reduced to 0.5 kb, the size distribution of the band demonstrated that this telomere was much shorter in a substantial proportion of the cells in the population. Second, was the neo gene close enough to the telomere to allow suppression to occur? Studies in yeast demonstrated that the suppression due to chromatin conformation was distance dependent, with suppression seen at 3–12 kb, but not at 20 kb (22,23,41). The neo gene in our study was within 4 kb of the telomeric repeat sequences and therefore should have been susceptible to suppression. mRNA analysis showed that the neo gene in the telomeric plasmid in KB319 was expressed at one third the level of the same plasmid integrated at an interstitial site. However, many factors could influence the level of expression at different integration sites and therefore it cannot be concluded that this difference in expression is due to suppression by telomeric repeat sequences. Regardless, the lack of effect of telomere length on neo expression demonstrates that telomere shortening does not influence gene regulation in our system. Finally, is the transcriptional promoter used in this study resistant to the TPE? Studies in yeast demonstrated that a strong transcriptional promoter can overcome the TPE (26). However, the HSV-tk promoter used here has previously been shown to be relatively weak and can be suppressed easily by epigenetic mechanisms (42) and by proximity to centromeres (34,35). The HSV-tk promoter is therefore clearly susceptible to suppression and should have been sensitive to TPE had it been present. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that specific transcriptional promoters are required for expression of the TPE. A definitive answer on the role of telomeres in gene regulation may therefore have to await the discovery of endogenous genes located adjacent to telomeric repeat sequences.

RNA blot analysis of neo gene expression in subclones of the KB319 cell line. (a) RNA blot analysis of mRNA from the KB319 subclones E9-6D, E8, E1-6, E9-7 and E9-2, each containing the telomeric plasmid, and from cell line 2.0–23, which has the neo plasmid integrated at an interstitial site. mRNA was hybridized with a neo probe and subsequently washed and hybridized with an actin probe. (b) Quantification of mRNA in the cell lines shown in (a) by densitometric scanning; values were normalized by standardization with the actin band densities.

Figure 3

RNA blot analysis of neo gene expression in subclones of the KB319 cell line. (a) RNA blot analysis of mRNA from the KB319 subclones E9-6D, E8, E1-6, E9-7 and E9-2, each containing the telomeric plasmid, and from cell line 2.0–23, which has the neo plasmid integrated at an interstitial site. mRNA was hybridized with a neo probe and subsequently washed and hybridized with an actin probe. (b) Quantification of mRNA in the cell lines shown in (a) by densitometric scanning; values were normalized by standardization with the actin band densities.

Influence of telomere length on colony forming ability of the KB319 subclones in the presence of G418. Cells from the parental cell line without a neo gene (LM217) and the KB319 subclones E9-6D, E8, E1-6, E9-7 and E9-2, containing the telomeric plasmid, were plated in duplicate in medium with or without 400 µg/ml G418. The number of surviving colonies in G418 was standardized by comparison with the number of colonies grown without G418.

Figure 4

Influence of telomere length on colony forming ability of the KB319 subclones in the presence of G418. Cells from the parental cell line without a neo gene (LM217) and the KB319 subclones E9-6D, E8, E1-6, E9-7 and E9-2, containing the telomeric plasmid, were plated in duplicate in medium with or without 400 µg/ml G418. The number of surviving colonies in G418 was standardized by comparison with the number of colonies grown without G418.

Acknowledgements

We thank Mary McKenney for editing the manuscript and Luis Martins for his expert technical assistance in chromosome preparations. This study was supported by the Office of Health and Environmental Research, US Department of Energy, contract DE-AC03-76-SF01012.

References

1

,

Telomeres

,

1995

Cold Spring Harbor, NY

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

2

,

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

,

1989

, vol.

86

(pg.

7049

-

7056

)

3

,

Cell

,

1985

, vol.

43

(pg.

405

-

413

)

4

,

Nature

,

1990

, vol.

344

(pg.

126

-

132

)

5

,

Cell

,

1984

, vol.

38

(pg.

501

-

510

)

6

,

J. Biol. Chem

,

1986

, vol.

261

(pg.

363

-

369

)

7

,

Genes Dev.

,

1992

, vol.

6

(pg.

197

-

210

)

Figures and Tables

Influence of telomere length on the growth rate of the KB319 subclones in the presence of G418. The number of cells after 8 days of culture in 200 or 600 µg/ml G418 were compared with control cultures grown without G418. The rate of growth was determined for the subclones E9-6 (o), E8 (n), E9-7 (q) and E9-2 (+) containing the telomeric plasmid, the 2.0–23 cell clone (Δ) containing the interstitial plasmid and the parental LM217 cell line (solid line) without the integrated plasmid.

Figure 5

Influence of telomere length on the growth rate of the KB319 subclones in the presence of G418. The number of cells after 8 days of culture in 200 or 600 µg/ml G418 were compared with control cultures grown without G418. The rate of growth was determined for the subclones E9-6 (o), E8 (n), E9-7 (q) and E9-2 (+) containing the telomeric plasmid, the 2.0–23 cell clone (Δ) containing the interstitial plasmid and the parental LM217 cell line (solid line) without the integrated plasmid.

References

8

,

Cell

,

1993

, vol.

73

(pg.

775

-

787

)

9

,

Mol. Cell. Biol.

,

1994

, vol.

14

(pg.

5777

-

5785

)

10

,

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

,

1995

, vol.

92

(pg.

2393

-

2397

)

11

,

Nature

,

1990

, vol.

345

(pg.

458

-

460

)

12

,

Nature

,

1990

, vol.

346

(pg.

866

-

868

)

13

,

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

,

1994

, vol.

91

(pg.

2900

-

2904

)

14

,

Science

,

1994

, vol.

266

(pg.

2011

-

2015

)

15

,

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

,

1995

, vol.

92

(pg.

9082

-

9086

)

16

,

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

,

1995

, vol.

92

(pg.

4818

-

4822

)

17

,

Mutat. Res.

,

1991

, vol.

256

(pg.

271

-

282

)

18

,

Trends Genet.

,

1992

, vol.

8

(pg.

193

-

197

)

19

,

EMBO J.

,

1985

, vol.

4

(pg.

3489

-

3499

)

20

,

Bioessays

,

1989

, vol.

11

(pg.

14

-

17

)

21

,

Cell

,

1994

, vol.

76

(pg.

157

-

169

)

22

,

Cell

,

1990

, vol.

63

(pg.

751

-

762

)

23

,

Genes Dev.

,

1993

, vol.

7

(pg.

1133

-

1145

)

24

,

Genes Dev.

,

1994

, vol.

8

(pg.

1411

-

1422

)

25

,

Cell

,

1991

, vol.

66

(pg.

1279

-

1287

)

26

,

Genes Dev.

,

1994

, vol.

8

(pg.

1133

-

1146

)

27

,

Cell

,

1985

, vol.

42

(pg.

249

-

257

)

28

,

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

,

1986

, vol.

83

(pg.

1398

-

1402

)

29

,

Cell

,

1989

, vol.

57

(pg.

633

-

643

)

30

,

Cell

,

1990

, vol.

63

(pg.

739

-

750

)

31

,

Genes Dev.

,

1992

, vol.

6

(pg.

801

-

814

)

32

,

Cell

,

1993

, vol.

75

(pg.

543

-

555

)

33

,

Cell

,

1994

, vol.

76

(pg.

145

-

155

)

34

,

Mol. Cell. Biol.

,

1986

, vol.

6

(pg.

4440

-

4449

)

35

,

Mol. Cell. Biol.

,

1988

, vol.

8

(pg.

1336

-

1344

)

36

,

Hum. Mol. Genet.

,

1994

, vol.

3

(pg.

539

-

546

)

37

,

Mol. Cell. Biol.

,

1993

, vol.

13

(pg.

977

-

983

)

38

,

EMBO J.

,

1994

, vol.

13

(pg.

4953

-

4962

)

39

,

Somat. Cell Mol. Genet.

,

1990

, vol.

16

(pg.

195

-

209

)

40

,

Int. J. Radiat. Biol.

,

1994

, vol.

66

(pg.

S77

-

S84

)

41

,

Mol. Cell. Biol.

,

1988

, vol.

8

(pg.

2523

-

2535

)

42

,

Mol. Cell. Biol.

,

1986

, vol.

6

(pg.

792

-

800

)

© 1996 Oxford University Press

I agree to the terms and conditions. You must accept the terms and conditions.

Submit a comment

Name

Affiliations

Comment title

Comment

You have entered an invalid code

Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.

Citations

Views

Altmetric

Metrics

Total Views 1,004

782 Pageviews

222 PDF Downloads

Since 1/1/2017

Month: Total Views:
January 2017 2
February 2017 5
March 2017 2
August 2017 4
September 2017 1
October 2017 1
November 2017 4
December 2017 8
January 2018 21
February 2018 13
March 2018 9
April 2018 6
May 2018 7
June 2018 8
July 2018 9
August 2018 7
September 2018 5
October 2018 3
November 2018 7
December 2018 26
January 2019 10
February 2019 3
March 2019 10
April 2019 16
May 2019 12
June 2019 20
July 2019 8
August 2019 8
September 2019 17
October 2019 6
November 2019 13
December 2019 6
January 2020 10
February 2020 7
March 2020 11
April 2020 12
May 2020 9
June 2020 14
July 2020 11
August 2020 12
September 2020 10
October 2020 15
November 2020 17
December 2020 17
January 2021 12
February 2021 18
March 2021 14
April 2021 11
May 2021 16
June 2021 10
July 2021 7
August 2021 7
September 2021 10
October 2021 24
November 2021 6
December 2021 13
January 2022 20
February 2022 11
March 2022 15
April 2022 18
May 2022 30
June 2022 25
July 2022 16
August 2022 7
September 2022 6
October 2022 8
November 2022 6
December 2022 6
January 2023 6
February 2023 4
March 2023 6
April 2023 13
May 2023 11
June 2023 2
July 2023 8
August 2023 11
September 2023 9
October 2023 3
November 2023 12
December 2023 11
January 2024 18
February 2024 26
March 2024 24
April 2024 31
May 2024 23
June 2024 20
July 2024 10
August 2024 10
September 2024 6
October 2024 2

Citations

28 Web of Science

×

Email alerts

Citing articles via

More from Oxford Academic