probeBase: an online resource for rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes (original) (raw)
Journal Article
,
Lehrstuhl für Mikrobiologie, Technische Universität München, Am Hochanger 4, D-85350 Freising, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
,
Lehrstuhl für Mikrobiologie, Technische Universität München, Am Hochanger 4, D-85350 Freising, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Lehrstuhl für Mikrobiologie, Technische Universität München, Am Hochanger 4, D-85350 Freising, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
01 January 2003
Cite
Alexander Loy, Matthias Horn, Michael Wagner, probeBase: an online resource for rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes, Nucleic Acids Research, Volume 31, Issue 1, 1 January 2003, Pages 514–516, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg016
Close
Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search
Abstract
Ribosomal RNA-(rRNA)-targeted oligonucleotide probes are widely used for culture-independent identification of microorganisms in environmental and clinical samples. ProbeBase is a comprehensive database containing more than 700 published rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probe sequences (status August 2002) with supporting bibliographic and biological annotation that can be accessed through the internet at http://www.probebase.net . Each oligonucleotide probe entry contains information on target organisms, target molecule (small- or large-subunit rRNA) and position, G+C content, predicted melting temperature, molecular weight, necessity of competitor probes, and the reference that originally described the oligonucleotide probe, including a link to the respective abstract at PubMed. In addition, probes successfully used for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are highlighted and the recommended hybridization conditions are listed. ProbeBase also offers difference alignments for 16S rRNA-targeted probes by using the probe match tool of the ARB software and the latest small-subunit rRNA ARB database (release June 2002). The option to directly submit probe sequences to the probe match tool of the Ribosomal Database Project II (RDP-II) further allows one to extract supplementary information on probe specificities. The two main features of probeBase, ‘search probeBase’ and ‘find probe set’, help researchers to find suitable, published oligonucleotide probes for microorganisms of interest or for rRNA gene sequences submitted by the user. Furthermore, the ‘search target site’ option provides guidance for the development of new FISH probes.
Received July 8, 2002; Revised and Accepted August 29, 2002
INTRODUCTION
Comparative sequence analysis of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequences has become the gold standard to infer prokaryotic phylogeny and is widely used in microbial ecology. For example, the application of rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes in different hybridization formats such as dot blot ( 1 ) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) ( 2 ) allows one to identify uncultured prokaryotes and to quantitatively determine the composition of complex microbial communities ( 3 ). Several recent studies also demonstrated the applicability of FISH to routine diagnostic purposes in the clinical laboratory ( 4 – 6 ). In addition, a suite of new techniques circling around rRNA-targeted probes has been developed. rRNA-based phylogenetic DNA microarrays (so-called ‘PhyloChips’) ( 7 – 11 ) consisting of collections of oligonucleotide probes that detect the target microorganisms at multiple taxonomic levels of specificity are now increasingly being developed and applied for diagnostics and environmental microbiology. Furthermore, the combination of FISH and microautoradiography can be used to determine the ecophysiology of microorganisms by visualizing in situ uptake and subsequent incorporation of a radioactively labelled substrate into individual microbial cells ( 12 ). As a consequence of the apparent increase in interest in rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes during the past years, several hundred ready-to-use domain-, phylum-, genus-, and species-specific probes are already available. However, an overview over published probe sequences can only be obtained by a time-consuming, tedious literature search. Additionally, one has to keep in mind that with the increasing amounts of rRNA sequence data stored in public databases ( 13 , 14 ) (Strunk,O. and Ludwig,W., 1993–2002, ARB—a software environment for sequence data, http://www.arb-home.de ) the recognized specificity range for a probe might change. Thus, prior to the application of a rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probe, researchers are obliged to ascertain that the specificity proposed for this probe in the original publication is still valid. Probe match tools as implemented in the ARB program package (Strunk,O. and Ludwig,W., 1993–2002, ARB—a software environment for sequence data, http://www.arb-home.de ) or provided by the Ribosomal Database Project II (RDP-II) ( 13 ) offer an option to check for up-to-date specificity of a probe when used in combination with the latest rRNA databases. The pronounced interest of the scientific community in rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes is documented by the average 742 user sessions (347 different users) per month recorded for the probe match tool of RDP-II in 2001, making this tool one of the most frequently used software features of the RDP-II website (James R. Cole, personal communication). While oligonucleotide databases for, for example, viral (VirOligo) ( 15 ) or human genes (Molecular Probe Data Base) ( 16 ) are available, an up-to-date resource for rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probe sequences for the identification of prokaryotes is currently lacking. In 1996, Alm and coworkers compiled the Oligonucleotide Probe Database (OPD) that listed 96 PCR primers and probes mainly targeting small-subunit (SSU) and large-subunit (LSU) rRNA ( 17 ). However, OPD has not been updated since 1997 and is now no longer available through the internet. ProbeBase closes this gap by providing a user-friendly web-interface to search for published oligonucleotide probe sequences and annotated information. Using probeBase, it is possible to search for suitable probes by submitting the name of a target organism or by indicating a certain probe target site. In addition, the ‘find probe set’ tool can be used to rapidly retrieve all published probes perfectly matching rRNA gene query sequences.
ORGANIZATION OF probeBase
A schematic overview of the structure and organization of probeBase is shown in Figure 1 . ProbeBase currently comprises more than 700 published rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes (status August 2002). Each probe entry contains information on the probe sequence, target organisms, target molecule (SSU or LSU rRNA), target site, G+C content, melting temperature, molecular weight, and the reference that originally described the oligonucleotide probe. In order to facilitate database searches, each probe entry includes additional hidden information on the taxonomic context of the probe target organisms. If a probe has been successfully applied for FISH, the probe name is highlighted, and the recommended formamide concentration in the hybridization buffer required for specific hybridization is provided. For each probe, probeBase offers direct links to the probe match tool at the RDP-II web site and to the respective reference abstract at PubMed ( 18 ). Difference alignments for SSU rRNA-targeted probes are available that were generated using the probe match tool of the ARB software and the ARB database (release June 2002) (Strunk,O. and Ludwig,W., 1993–2002, ARB—a software environment for sequence data, http://www.arb-home.de ). Probe entries can also contain supplementary information, such as remarks on the application of the probe or the sequence of a possible competitor probe that has to be used together with the probe to ensure its specificity. In addition, probeBase offers a comprehensive and interactive list ‘Coverage of group-specific probes’ [modified from ( 19 )] showing the coverage of the main prokaryotic lines of descent by general group-specific probes.
Search probeBase
ProbeBase can either be searched for probe target organisms, for probe names, or for probe target sites. If probeBase is searched for oligonucleotide probes specific for certain target organisms, it returns a list of all oligonucleotide probes specific for the searched target organisms as well as probes targeting higher taxonomic levels. This list of probes supports researchers in the choice of an appropriate set of nested probes according to the ‘multiple probe concept’ ( 20 ). This approach takes advantage of the option to design and apply rRNA-targeted probes for phylogenetic groups at different taxonomic levels (e.g. phylum-, order-, family-, genus-, or species-specific probes). The simultaneous application of a set of hierarchical probes enhances the reliability of the detection of a particular microorganism.
The option to search for a given probe target site assists in the development of new oligonucleotide probes for FISH by providing information on whether a searched target site has previously been found accessible for oligonucleotide probes in other microorganisms. Studies by Fuchs and coworkers have demonstrated that some regions on the 16S and 23S rRNA of Escherichia coli are virtually inaccessible for oligonucleotide probes if used for FISH ( 21 , 22 ). Unfortunately, these results can only be extrapolated to distantly related microorganisms within certain limits. However, if different probes targeting microorganisms affiliated with different evolutionary lineages but sharing the same target site on the respective rRNA molecule have been successfully applied for FISH, it is very likely that the respective target site is generally accessible for oligonucleotide probes.
Find probe set
The ‘find probe set’ tool of probeBase can be used to rapidly retrieve all published probes targeting one or several query rRNA gene sequences without prior comparative sequence analysis. A set of up to 150 sequences, provided by the researcher as rRNA or DNA sense strand sequence in 5′–3′ orientation (FastA format) can be searched simultaneously for the presence of the perfect match target sites of all probes deposited at probeBase. The output is a table sequentially listing (i) each single query sequence with all perfectly matching probes found in probeBase and (ii) each possible probe with all perfectly matching query sequences. Using this probeBase feature researchers will, for example, easily be able to determine a set of already published probes that target the microbial sequences in a certain environmental rRNA gene clone library. This probe set might then be used in subsequent hybridization experiments to confirm the presence of the organisms detected in the rRNA gene clone library in situ and to gain insight into the actual abundance of these microorganisms in the investigated environment.
AVAILABILITY
ProbeBase is maintained and updated by the Microbial Ecology Group staff at the Lehrstuhl für Mikrobiologie of the Technische Universität München, Bavaria, Germany. Free access to probeBase is provided via the world wide web at http://www.probebase.net . Researchers are kindly invited and encouraged to deposit their newly designed probe sequences and supplementary information at probeBase. Submission might either be performed through the probe submission form ‘submit a probe’ accessible at the main page or by Email. For queries concerning probeBase and for alternative probe submission contact probebase@microbial-ecology.net.
CITING probeBase
If you use probeBase as a tool in your published research or if you have deposited your newly designed rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes at probeBase, we ask that this paper be cited.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We gratefully acknowledge Wolfgang Ludwig for providing the ARB software and the ARB database to the scientific community—without ARB, research on microbial phylogeny, diversity, and ecology would have been less efficient. We thank James R. Cole from RDP-II for allowing us to directly submit oligonucleotide sequences to the probe match tool of RDP-II and for giving us insight into the probe match user statistics. We also thank Manuela Hartmann and Silvia Weber for their help with database administration, and Klaus Ungerer for his generous support.
Figure 1. Concept and structure of probeBase.
References
Raskin,L., Poulsen,L.K., Noguera,D.R., Rittmann,B.E. and Stahl,D.A. (
1994
) Quantification of methanogenic groups in anaerobic biological reactors by oligonucleotide probe hybridization.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
,
60
,
1241
–1248.
Juretschko,S., Loy,A., Lehner,A. and Wagner,M. (
2002
) The microbial community composition of a nitrifying–denitrifying activated sludge from an industrial sewage treatment plant analyzed by the full-cycle rRNA approach.
Syst. Appl. Microbiol.
,
25
,
84
–99.
Daims,H., Ramsing,N.B., Schleifer,K.-H. and Wagner,M. (
2001
) Cultivation-independent, semiautomatic determination of absolute bacterial cell numbers in environmental samples by fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
,
67
,
5810
–5818.
Jansen,G.J., Mooibroek,M., Idema,J., Harmsen,H.J., Welling,G.W. and Degener,J.E. (
2000
) Rapid identification of bacteria in blood cultures by using fluorescently labeled oligonucleotide probes.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
,
38
,
814
–817.
Hu,J., Limaye,A.P., Fritsche,T.R., Horn,M., Juretschko,S. and Gautom,R. (
2002
) Direct detection of Legionellae in respiratory tract specimens using fluorescence in situ hybridization. In Marre,R. (ed.),
Legionella
. American Society of Microbiology Press, Washington, DC, pp.
221
–224.
Poppert,S., Essig,A., Marre,R., Wagner,M. and Horn,M. (
2002
) Detection and differentiation of chlamydiae by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
,
68
,
4081
–4089.
Guschin,D.Y., Mobarry,B.K., Proudnikov,D., Stahl,D.A., Rittmann,B.E. and Mirzabekov,A.D. (
1997
) Oligonucleotide microchips as genosensors for determinative and environmental studies in microbiology.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
,
63
,
2397
–2402.
Wilson,K.H., Wilson,W.J., Radosevich,J.L., De Santis,T.Z., Viswanathan,V.S., Kuczmarski,T.A. and Andersen,G.L. (
2002
) High-density microarray of small-subunit ribosomal DNA probes.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
,
68
,
2535
–2541.
Liu,W.T., Mirzabekov,A.D. and Stahl,D.A. (
2001
) Optimization of an oligonucleotide microchip for microbial identification studies: a non-equilibrium dissociation approach.
Environ. Microbiol.
,
3
,
619
–629.
Wu,L., Thompson,D.K., Li,G., Hurt,R.A., Tiedje,J.M. and Zhou,J. (
2001
) Development and evaluation of functional gene arrays for detection of selected genes in the environment.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
,
67
,
5780
–5790.
Loy,A., Lehner,A., Lee,N., Adamczyk,J., Meier,H., Ernst,J., Schleifer,K.-H. and Wagner,M. (
2002
) Oligonucleotide microarray for 16S rRNA gene-based detection of all recognized lineages of sulfate-reducing prokaryotes in the environment.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
,
68
,
5064
–5081.
Lee,N., Nielsen,P.H., Andreasen,K.H., Juretschko,S., Nielsen,J.L., Schleifer,K.-H. and Wagner,M. (
1999
) Combination of fluorescent in situ hybridization and microautoradiography—a new tool for structure-function analyses in microbial ecology.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
,
65
,
1289
–1297.
Maidak,B.L., Cole,J.R., Lilburn,T.G., Parker,C.T., Jr., Saxman,P.R., Farris,R.J., Garrity,G.M., Olsen,G.J., Schmidt,T.M. and Tiedje,J.M. (
2001
) The RDP-II (Ribosomal Database Project).
Nucleic Acids Res.
,
29
,
173
–174.
Wuyts,J., Van de Peer,Y., Winkelmans,T. and De Wachter,R. (
2002
) The European database on small subunit ribosomal RNA.
Nucleic Acids Res.
,
30
,
183
–185.
Onodera,K. and Melcher,U. (
2002
) VirOligo: a database of virus-specific oligonucleotides.
Nucleic Acids Res.
,
30
,
203
–204.
Campi,M.G., Romano,P., Milanesi,L., Marra,D., Manniello,M.A., Iannotta,B., Rondanina,G., Grasso,E., Ruzzon,T. and Santi,L. (
1998
) Molecular Probe Data Base (MPDB).
Nucleic Acids Res.
,
26
,
145
–147.
Alm,E.W., Oerther,D.B., Larsen,N., Stahl,D.A. and Raskin,L. (
1996
) The oligonucleotide probe database.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
,
62
,
3557
–3559.
Wheeler,D.L., Church,D.M., Lash,A.E., Leipe,D.D., Madden,T.L., Pontius,J.U., Schuler,G.D., Schriml,L.M., Tatusova,T.A., Wagner,L. and Rapp,B.A. (
2002
) Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information: 2002 update.
Nucleic Acids Res.
,
30
,
13
–16.
Loy,A., Daims,H. and Wagner,M. (
2002
) Activated sludge-Molecular techniques for determining community composition. In Bitton,G. (ed.),
The Encyclopedia of Environmental Microbiology
. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, pp.
26
–43.
Behr,T., Koob,C., Schedl,M., Mehlen,A., Meier,H., Knopp,D., Frahm,E., Obst,U., Schleifer,K., Niessner,R. and Ludwig,W. (
2000
) A nested array of rRNA targeted probes for the detection and identification of enterococci by reverse hybridization.
Syst. Appl. Microbiol.
,
23
,
563
–572.
Fuchs,B.M., Syutsubo,K., Ludwig,W. and Amann,R. (
2001
) In situ accessibility of Escherichia coli 23S rRNA to fluorescently labeled oligonucleotide probes.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
,
67
,
961
–968.
Fuchs,B.M., Wallner,G., Beisker,W., Schwippl,I., Ludwig,W. and Amann,R. (
1998
) Flow cytometric analysis of the in situ accessibility of Escherichia coli 16S rRNA for fluorescently labeled oligonucleotide probes.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
,
64
,
4973
–4982.
I agree to the terms and conditions. You must accept the terms and conditions.
Submit a comment
Name
Affiliations
Comment title
Comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.
Citations
Views
Altmetric
Metrics
Total Views 2,256
1,803 Pageviews
453 PDF Downloads
Since 1/1/2017
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
January 2017 | 6 |
March 2017 | 3 |
April 2017 | 4 |
May 2017 | 6 |
June 2017 | 5 |
July 2017 | 4 |
August 2017 | 3 |
September 2017 | 4 |
October 2017 | 3 |
November 2017 | 5 |
December 2017 | 174 |
January 2018 | 137 |
February 2018 | 142 |
March 2018 | 24 |
April 2018 | 24 |
May 2018 | 24 |
June 2018 | 47 |
July 2018 | 38 |
August 2018 | 45 |
September 2018 | 54 |
October 2018 | 47 |
November 2018 | 15 |
December 2018 | 15 |
January 2019 | 5 |
February 2019 | 12 |
March 2019 | 21 |
April 2019 | 25 |
May 2019 | 25 |
June 2019 | 19 |
July 2019 | 16 |
August 2019 | 20 |
September 2019 | 12 |
October 2019 | 21 |
November 2019 | 26 |
December 2019 | 9 |
January 2020 | 36 |
February 2020 | 17 |
March 2020 | 20 |
April 2020 | 19 |
May 2020 | 12 |
June 2020 | 20 |
July 2020 | 53 |
August 2020 | 19 |
September 2020 | 20 |
October 2020 | 18 |
November 2020 | 21 |
December 2020 | 19 |
January 2021 | 13 |
February 2021 | 14 |
March 2021 | 25 |
April 2021 | 17 |
May 2021 | 15 |
June 2021 | 25 |
July 2021 | 11 |
August 2021 | 15 |
September 2021 | 17 |
October 2021 | 26 |
November 2021 | 11 |
December 2021 | 7 |
January 2022 | 21 |
February 2022 | 9 |
March 2022 | 33 |
April 2022 | 25 |
May 2022 | 25 |
June 2022 | 27 |
July 2022 | 23 |
August 2022 | 14 |
September 2022 | 32 |
October 2022 | 24 |
November 2022 | 13 |
December 2022 | 17 |
January 2023 | 18 |
February 2023 | 14 |
March 2023 | 23 |
April 2023 | 17 |
May 2023 | 7 |
June 2023 | 16 |
July 2023 | 15 |
August 2023 | 21 |
September 2023 | 19 |
October 2023 | 20 |
November 2023 | 31 |
December 2023 | 25 |
January 2024 | 60 |
February 2024 | 23 |
March 2024 | 35 |
April 2024 | 24 |
May 2024 | 28 |
June 2024 | 22 |
July 2024 | 17 |
August 2024 | 24 |
September 2024 | 13 |
October 2024 | 11 |
Citations
332 Web of Science
×
Email alerts
Citing articles via
More from Oxford Academic