Phylogenetic Evidence for Frequent Positive Selection and Recombination in the Meningococcal Surface Antigen PorB (original) (raw)
Journal Article
,
Search for other works by this author on:
,
Search for other works by this author on:
,
Search for other works by this author on:
,
Search for other works by this author on:
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
01 October 2002
Cite
Rachel Urwin, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew J. Fox, Jeremy P. Derrick, Martin C. J. Maiden, Phylogenetic Evidence for Frequent Positive Selection and Recombination in the Meningococcal Surface Antigen PorB, Molecular Biology and Evolution, Volume 19, Issue 10, October 2002, Pages 1686–1694, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003991
Close
Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search
Abstract
Previous estimates of rates of synonymous (_d_S) and nonsynonymous (_d_N) substitution among Neisseria meningitidis gene sequences suggested that the surface loops of the variable outer membrane protein PorB were under only weak selection pressure from the host immune response. These findings were consistent with studies indicating that PorB variants were not always protective in immunological and microbiological assays and questioned the suitability of this protein as a vaccine component. PorB, which is expressed at high levels on the surface of the meningococcus, has been implicated in mechanisms of pathogenesis and has also been used as a typing target in epidemiological investigations. In this work, using more precise estimates of selection pressures and recombination rates, we have shown that some residues in the surface loops of PorB are under very strong positive selection, as great as that observed in human immunodeficiency virus-1 surface glycoproteins, whereas amino acids within the loops and the membrane-spanning regions of the protein are under purifying selection, presumably because of structural constraints. Congruence tests showed that recombination occurred at a rate that was not sufficient to erase all phylogenetic similarity and did not greatly bias selection analysis. Homology models of PorB structure indicated that many strongly selected sites encoded residues that were predicted to be exposed to host immune responses, implying that this protein is under strong immune selection and requires further examination as a potential vaccine candidate. These data show that phylogenetic inference can be used to complement immunological and biochemical data in the choice of vaccine candidates.
Introduction
The generation of antigenic diversity has evolved as a strategy for evading immune attack in a wide range of pathogenic and commensal organisms (Deitsch, Moxon, and Wellems 1997 ). It is effective against both natural and artificially induced immunity and represents a major obstacle to the development of vaccines against pathogens as diverse as Plasmodium falciparum, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and Neisseria meningitidis, the meningococcus. In an era when many new vaccine candidates are being identified by genomic techniques, sequence data of the antigen genes obtained from population samples of pathogens can be analyzed by phylogenetic and biochemical modeling techniques to provide a picture of the evolutionary processes acting on these sequences and hence a preliminary evaluation of their vaccine potential.
The meningococcus is an appropriate model system to evaluate this approach because it is a pathogen of global significance which is genetically and antigenically diverse and for which no comprehensive vaccine exists (Pollard and Frasch 2001 ). Further, large genetically defined isolate collections have been assembled and models of the population biology of this organism are available (Caugant et al. 1987 ; Maiden et al. 1998 ). Amongst the candidate vaccine components proposed are the variable outer membrane proteins, the trimeric porins, which act as pores for the passage of solutes into the cell (Tommassen et al. 1990 ). These molecules are targeted by the host immune response and have been used in meningococcal typing schemes (Bjune et al. 1991_a_ , 1991_b_ ; Sierra et al. 1991 ; van der Ley and Poolman 1992 ; van der Ley, van der Biezen, and Poolman 1995 ). Unlike most other Neisseria species, the meningococcus expresses two porins, PorA and PorB. Expression of PorA is regulated at transcription and exhibits three levels depending on the length of the polyguanidine stretch in the promoter region of the porA gene (van der Ende et al. 1995 ), whereas there is no evidence to suggest that PorB proteins are subject to phase variation. Mutant meningococcal strains that lack PorB do not grow well (Tommassen et al. 1990 ), suggesting that PorB has a function essential for growth. PorB is also capable of translocating vectorially into the membranes of mammalian cells (Blake and Gotschlich 1987 ), and of binding ATP and GTP, which down regulates pore size and alters voltage dependence and ion selectivity (Rudel et al. 1996 ). These functional and structural characteristics are thought to influence the early stages of neutrophil activation and therefore implicate the PorB protein in meningococcal pathogenesis (Rudel et al. 1996 ).
A PorB topology model has been constructed on the basis of nucleotide sequence data (Maiden et al. 1991 ; van der Ley et al. 1991 ) and, more recently, the structural similarity between the Neisseria porins and the Escherichia coli porins OmpF and PhoE has been exploited to generate a three-dimensional homology model for Neisseria porins (Derrick et al. 1999 ). These models predicted eight surface exposed “loops” interspersed with highly conserved outer membrane-spanning sequences that formed a “β-barrel” (Kleffel et al. 1985 ). The antigenically variable epitopes targeted in the host immune response (Saukkonen et al. 1989 ) were proposed to reside in the surface-exposed loops (McGuinness et al. 1990 ; Maiden et al. 1991 ). Serological and molecular characterization of the meningococcal porins have been used for epidemiological analyses of meningococcal carriage and disease (Frasch, Zollinger, and Poolman 1985 ; Poolman et al. 1986 ; Maiden et al. 1991 ), although the variability of these proteins means that they are not always reliable epidemiological markers (Achtman 1995 ; Urwin et al. 1998_a_ , 1998_b_ ).
The meningococcus possesses one of two PorB protein classes, PorB2 or PorB3, which are encoded by alternate allele classes present at the porB locus. Phylogenetic analyses show that the porB3 gene is most closely related to one of the gonococcal porin genes, porB1a (Smith, Maynard Smith, and Spratt 1995 ) and that these gene sequences form a clade together with gonococcal porB1b, N. lactamica por, and N. polysaccharea por gene sequences (Derrick et al. 1999 ). The meningococcal porB2 gene shares sequence similarity both with members of this clade (specifically, the sequence encoding the putative ATP and GTP binding site) and with the porin genes of most human commensal and animal Neisseria species, suggesting that porB2 may have arisen because of interspecies recombination (Derrick et al. 1999 ). Indeed, the incongruence between phylogenetic trees drawn for individual loop-encoding regions of porB3 genes (Bash et al. 1995 ) suggests that inter- and intraspecies recombination is a mechanism that increases genetic variation among porB alleles.
Previous comparisons of the rates and distribution of synonymous (_d_S) and nonsynonymous (_d_N) substitutions among meningococcal porin genes have concluded that, unlike the gonococcal PIA and PIB porins which were under positive selection in the surface loop regions, meningococcal porB genes were subject to only weak positive selection and purifying selection (Smith, Maynard Smith, and Spratt 1995 ). This observation supports the hypothesis that PorB is a less important vaccine constituent than the PorA protein. This conclusion was also drawn from studies of the bactericidal activity of monoclonal (Saukkonen et al. 1987 ) and polyclonal (van der Ley and Poolman 1992 ) antibodies in mice and immunological results from human vaccine trials (Rosenqvist et al. 1995 ; Perkins et al. 1998 ). In addition, some PorB3 proteins expressed on the surfaces of live meningococci have been reported to be poorly accessible for antibody binding (Michaelsen et al. 2001 ). Consequently, PorB has been deliberately excluded from some vaccine formulations (van der Ley, van der Biezen, and Poolman 1995 ). But the previous selection analysis was conducted on very small data sets, and _d_S and _d_N were estimated as mean values across whole or partial gene sequences, making it possible that strongly selected sites were missed in this broadscale comparison (Smith, Maynard Smith, and Spratt 1995 ). More recently, phylogenetic analyses carried out on a larger set of gonococcal porin gene sequences concluded that there were differences in the evolution of PIA and PIB homology groups, with positive selection driving evolution of the PIA proteins and both positive and purifying selection acting on PIB protein sequences (Posada et al. 2000 ).
In this work we undertook rigorous maximum likelihood analyses of selection pressures acting on a large set of meningococcal PorB sequences. A likelihood-based approach was also used to determine with more accuracy the extent of recombination in porB2 and porB3. Our study reveals that both genes are subject to exceptionally high rates of positive selection, as well as frequent recombination, which has important implications for the use of PorB as a potential vaccine candidate.
Materials and Methods
Meningococcal porB Gene Sequences
A total of 324 porB gene sequences was examined: 121 from GenBank, including previously published sequences (Murakami, Gotschlich, and Seiff 1989 ; Wolff and Stern 1991 ; Feavers et al. 1992 ; Ward, Lambden, and Heckels 1992 ; Bash et al. 1995 ; Sacchi et al. 1998 ; Urwin et al. 1998_a_ , 1998_b_ ), and two from complete meningococcal genome sequences (Parkhill et al. 2000 ; Tettelin et al. 2000 ); a further 203 porB sequences from meningococcal isolates were determined de novo, including 107 isolates from globally representative strain collections, (Maiden et al. 1998 ), 12 PorB serotyping reference strains (Feavers et al. 1992 ), 50 isolates from healthy carriers, and 44 disease-causing meningococci from England and Wales.
For de novo sequencing, the propagation of isolates, preparation of DNA, porB gene amplification, and nucleotide sequence determination were as described previously (Feavers et al. 1999 ; Urwin et al. 1998_a_ ). The sequences were assembled with the Staden sequence analysis package (Staden 1996 ) and all sequences aligned manually in the Seqlab alignment program (Genetics Computer Group, Madison, Wis.) (Devereux, Haeberli, and Smithies 1984 ). The sequence alignment was trimmed at 5′- and 3′-ends so that all sequences began at the 5′-end with the thirteenth codon of the sequence encoding the mature protein (GAA in all sequences) and ended seven codons from the 3′-end of this sequence (ATG in porB2; GGT in porB3) because this corresponded to the length of the shortest sequences in the data set. Calculation of the number of nucleotide differences between pairs of alleles was determined using MEGA version 1.01 (Kumar, Tamura, and Nei 1994 ). The porB allele sequences and alignments can be viewed at http://neisseria.org/typing/porb. There were 125 unique porB allele sequences, 46 of which were porB2 sequences (named _porB2_-1 to _porB2_-46, according to a previously defined nomenclature [Feavers and Maiden 1998] ) and 79, which were porB3 sequences (_porB3_-1 to _porB3_-79). Previously unpublished sequences have been submitted to GenBank, accession numbers AF520356–AF520416.
Analysis of Selection Pressures
A maximum likelihood (ML) approach was used to examine selection pressures acting on the meningococcal porB genes. Here, _d_N and _d_S were examined codon-by-codon, using different models of codon substitution that differed in how _d_N/_d_S ratios (parameter ω) varied along sequences, as well as incorporating information about the phylogenetic relationships of the sequences in question so that comparisons are independent (Yang et al. 2000 ). Model M0 estimated a single ω parameter for all sites, whereas the M1 model divided codons into conserved sites (_p_0), with ω0 fixed at 0 and neutral sites (_p_1) with ω1 set to 1. The M2 model could account for positive selection through a third category of sites (_p_2) with ω2 estimated from the data. M3 provided a more sensitive test by estimating, from the data, ω values for three classes of site all of which could be >1. The M7 and M8 models both used a discrete beta distribution (with 10 categories and described by parameters p and q) to model ω ratios among sites, although M8, unlike M7, considered an extra class of sites for which ω could be >1. Nested models could be compared using a likelihood ratio test (LRT) in which twice the difference in log likelihood between models was compared with the value obtained under a χ2 distribution (degrees of freedom equal to the difference in the number of parameters between models). Finally, Bayesian methods were used to determine the probability that a particular codon site fell into the positively selected class. All these analyses used the CODEML program from the PAML package (Yang 1997 ).
Phylogenetic trees for the two data sets were constructed using the maximum likelihood method available in the PAUP* package (Swofford 1998 ). The HKY85 model of nucleotide substitution was used, with values for both the transition-transversion ratio and the shape parameter (α) of a gamma distribution of rate variation among sites (with eight categories) estimated during tree reconstruction (trees and parameter values available on request).
Recombination Analysis
The extent of recombination in the porB sequence data was analyzed by assessing the degree of phylogenetic congruence. Because of the large numbers of sequences available, this analysis was performed on a set of 35 randomly sampled porB2 and porB3 alleles. The porB2 and porB3 alignments were first split into two equal-sized fragments. ML phylogenetic trees were then estimated for both halves of the alignments using the procedures described above. To establish whether the trees constructed on each half of the alignment were significantly different in topology, as might be expected given frequent recombination, the difference in log likelihood (δ) between the ML tree for the first half of the gene and the ML tree topology for the second half of the gene fitted to the data from the first half, but with branch lengths reoptimized, were compared. The significance of the likelihood differences was assessed using two randomization tests. The first test used Monte Carlo simulation on 100 replicate data sets simulated under the ML model parameters using the program Seq-Gen (Rambaut and Grassly 1997 ). Maximum likelihood trees were then constructed for each of these simulated data sets, using the procedures described above, and their likelihoods compared with those of ML topology on each data set. If the δ values for the real data fell within this null distribution of δ values, then the trees constructed for each half of the gene were not significantly different in topology. In the second test, 200 random trees were created using PAUP*. The likelihoods of these trees were then estimated on the data from the first half of the porB2 and porB3 alignments, again with the reoptimization of branch lengths, and the δ values between these random trees and the two ML trees were then compared. If the δ values for the two ML trees fall within the 99th percentile of this null distribution then we may say that they are no more similar than two random trees inferred from these data (Holmes, Urwin, and Maiden 1999 ).
Structural Models
Structural models for the PorB2 and PorB3 proteins were generated using the software package Modeller (Sali et al. 1995 ), using the crystal structure of the porin Omp32 from Comamonas acidovorans as a template (Zeth et al. 2000 ; PDB accession 1E54). The sequence alignment was based on that given by Zeth et al. for PorB, with minor modifications.
Results
Nucleotide and Amino Acid Sequence Diversity
A total of 14% (147 of 1,053, table 1 ) of the nucleotide sites of the 46 unique porB2 allele sequences were polymorphic, with percentage divergences (p distances) in pairwise comparisons ranging from 0.1% to 7.2% (mean 4.2%). For the 79 unique porB3 sequences, 15.2% (136 of 894, table 1 ) of the nucleotide sites were polymorphic, with p distances between 0.1% and 8.2% (mean 3.9%). Sequence divergence between the _porB_2 and _porB_3 allele classes ranged from 30.9% to 32.3%. The amino acid sequences of the putative surface exposed loop regions of the PorB2 and PorB3 proteins, determined according to the structural model for Neisseria porins, were longer in the PorB2 proteins. For the PorB2 proteins, putative loops V and VI were the most variable, with 25 distinct amino acid sequences (25.2% mean divergence) and 19 sequences (34.1% mean divergence), respectively. Putative loop VII was the most variable among PorB3 sequences, with 15 distinct amino acid sequences (35.9% mean divergence), although putative loops I, V, and VI were also variable, with 10 or more amino acid sequences (mean divergence >27%) in each loop region. The structural regions that interspersed the variable loops were largely conserved.
Analysis of Recombination Frequency
The maximum likelihood analysis of tree congruence provided evidence for recombination within both the porB2 and porB3 genes, although not at a rate sufficiently high to completely erase all phylogenetic similarity. Specifically, although the ML tree for the first half of the porB2 gene had a much higher likelihood than that of the ML tree for the second half of the gene fitted to the first half data (δ = 254.751), and this difference was far greater than expected by chance as determined using Monte Carlo simulation (max δ = 25.034), it was less than that seen in random tree topologies (99th percentile of δ = 327.565). Similar results were seen in porB3, where the difference between the two ML trees, δ = 350.571, also fell outside of the null distribution produced by Monte Carlo simulation (max δ = 32.876) but was less than that of random tree topologies (99th percentile of δ = 395.806).
Analysis of Selection Pressures Acting on the porB Genes of N. meningitidis
The maximum likelihood analysis of the selection pressures acting on the porB2 and porB3 alleles provided strong evidence for positive selection (tables 2 and 3 ). For both porB2 and porB3, the best-supported M3 model estimated ω (_d_N/_d_S) parameters ≫1, indicative of strong positive selection. Similarly, the M8 model, which could incorporate positive selection, was significantly favored over the M7 model which did not, and estimated ω ≫ 1 for both porB2 and porB3. The strength of the inferred selection pressures acting on both porB2 and porB3 was also striking, as was the similarity in selection pressures between these allele classes. For the M3 model, two classes of positively selected sites were apparent. In the case of porB2 ∼4.5% of sites fell into a relatively weakly positively selected class, where ω0 = 4.163, whereas ∼1.1% of sites are seemingly subject to very strong positive selection with ω2 = 18.553. The remaining 94% of sites were highly conserved (ω1 = 0.067). A similar distribution of sites was apparent in porB3. Here, ∼4.6% of sites had an ω value of 3.229, whereas 0.7% of sites were subject to much stronger positive selection pressures with ω2 = 13.923. In the case of porB3, 95% of sites were subject to strong selective constraints (ω1 = 0.033).
Bayesian methods were used to identify the sites with the highest probability of falling into the positively selected class under the M3 model (fig. 1 ). When these selected sites were mapped onto the three-dimensional structural models (fig. 2 ), it was clear that the majority fell within regions predicted to encode surface-exposed loop regions. Among PorB2 proteins there was evidence of weak or strong positive selection at multiple sites in all surface loops except putative loop II. Four residues in putative loop IV were shown to be under strong selection, six of the 23 amino acids in putative loop V were positively selected and all six selected sites in putative loop VI were under strong selection for amino acid change. For loops IV and V, there were nonselected residues at the center of the loop region, flanked by residues that were much more variable in sequence. Five selected sites were also identified within the structurally constrained membrane-spanning regions of PorB2. At position 39, the replacement of leucine with phenylalanine was always observed with a change at position 42 from methionine to isoleucine or valine. Among PorB3 sequences, most positively selected sites were located in putative surface loops I, V, VI, and VII. Seven sites in loop I were under positive selection compared with only one site in loop I of PorB2. No selected sites were identified in putative loop III, whereas three weakly selected sites were identified within the largely conserved membrane-spanning regions of PorB3.
Finally, because the maximum likelihood approach of Yang et al. (2000) explicitly assumes a phylogenetic tree when estimating selection pressures, we attempted to assess whether high rates of recombination could have produced a false-positive signal for positive selection. We therefore repeated the analysis assuming that sequences were linked by a “star” phylogeny, where the lineages diverge simultaneously from a single root node, thereby removing the affect of phylogenetic history. For both PorB2 and PorB3, this analysis again produced significant evidence for positive selection (P < 0.000 for M3 vs. M2 and M8 vs. M7) and for extremely high ω values at the selected sites—maximum values of 75.052 and 11.305, respectively, under the M3 model, with generally the same sites falling into the positively selected class as in the original analysis (full results available from authors on request).
Discussion
Here phylogenetic and structural modeling techniques have been used to reveal evolutionary processes acting on an established, but controversial, vaccine candidate, the meningococcal PorB protein. Maximum likelihood analysis of selection pressures provided powerful evidence for adaptive evolution of the porB genes of N. meningitidis. In both porB2 and porB3, codons were identified that had been subject to very strong selection pressure (d_N/d_S of 18.533 and 16.221, respectively). These values were some of the highest seen in any gene studied to date, and similar to the values observed in studies of the intrahost evolution of the HIV-1 env gene, often seen as a paradigm of immune driven positive selection (Nielson and Yang 1998 ; Zanotto et al. 1999 ). The fact that positive selection was still observed at these same sites after removing the effect of phylogenetic history by assuming a star phylogeny indicated that the analysis was unlikely to have been greatly biased by recombination. Mapping of these sites onto refined models of the protein structure of PorB confirmed that the majority of selected sites were located in regions of the protein predicted to be exposed to the host immune system. These results contradict those obtained previously (Smith, Maynard Smith, and Spratt 1995 ), which provided no evidence for positive selection in the putative loop regions of meningococcal PorB proteins, and in doing so highlight the need to consider each codon separately within amino acid alignments.
In addition, the analysis also revealed that although the PorB2 and PorB3 proteins were subject to very similar selection pressures they exhibited different distributions of positively selected sites. These findings were supported by flow cytometry analysis of live meningococci which demonstrated that some PorB3 variants were not easily accessible for antibody binding (Michaelsen et al. 2001 ), possibly because of shielding or due to PorB3 extracellular loops being shorter than those of PorB2, so that fewer residues were subject to intense immune selection. In contrast, the gonococcal porins PIA and PIB showed no significant difference in the distribution of selected sites despite reported differences in selection intensities between the two homology groups (Posada et al. 2000 ). Posada et al. therefore concluded that epidemiological differences between gonococci expressing PIA or PIB proteins were responsible for differences in selection rather than structural differences in the proteins. In meningococci, however, it is possible that the differences in the lengths of the surface loops of PorB2 and PorB3 porins are sufficient to affect the conformation and structure of epitopes presented by these proteins and that this will determine which sites are exposed to selective pressure from the host responses. Furthermore, although there may be some epidemiological differences between meningococci expressing PorB2 and PorB3 proteins, there is no evidence from these data that this has led to concomitant selective differences, although additional studies are required to test this hypothesis further.
The conformational effects of particular amino acid substitutions on PorB structure remain difficult to determine. The homology models used were useful for examining the approximate disposition of residues in space and could provide insights not readily apparent from a sequence alignment. The crystal structure of Omp32 from C. acidovorans was used as the basis for the homology models of PorB2 and PorB3; this is a closer homolog to the Neisseria porins than the E. coli porin crystal structures that were used previously (Derrick et al. 1999 ). But the size of most of the external loop regions precluded an accurate estimation of their conformations by standard homology modeling techniques, and the location of selected residues shown in external loop regions in figure 2 were approximate.
Figures 1 and 2 illustrate that the strongly and weakly selected sites are not distributed evenly across the loop regions. The presence of conserved residues at the apices of the PorB2 variable loops I, IV, and V suggested that these amino acids were not exposed to the host immune response because of protein folding, or perhaps they fulfill an important role retaining the surface loop structure. For example, the L2 loop in the OmpF protein of E. coli contributes to the stabilization of the porin trimer (Phale et al. 1998 ) and residues in other loop regions could play analogous roles in stabilizing the protein, using loop-loop interactions. Indeed, although the portions of polypeptide chain joining the ends of the β-barrel strands are frequently referred to as loops, they are likely to contain regions of regular secondary structure, as is seen in other porin structures (Koebnik, Locher, and Van Gelder 2000 ), and this would place constraints on the sequence variation within these regions in PorB2 and PorB3 proteins. These observations are borne out by the difficulty in mimicking PorB epitopes with linear peptides (Zapata et al. 1992 ) and by sequence variation identified among serologically similar PorB antigens (Urwin et al. 1998_a_ , 1998_b_ ).
Although most residues within the transmembrane β-strands of PorB2 were highly conserved, five positively selected sites were located among these structural regions. According to the structural model, two of these sites (positions 39 and 43 in fig. 1_a_ ) were located close to one another on opposite sides of a β-turn and were identified as positively selected with >99% probability (although falling into the weakly rather than the strongly positively selected class). A leucine residue at position 39 was invariably accompanied by a methionine residue at position 43, whereas the phenylalanine residue at position 39 was accompanied by the smaller hydrophobic residues valine or isoleucine at position 43. Within the limitations of the homology model, the side chains of the two residues may be in contact, suggesting that these are compensatory mutations. Elsewhere, the reasons for strong positive selection within the β-barrel region were more difficult to discern. The PorB2 protein contained a number of mutations within the L3 loop, which folds back into the center of the barrel creating a constricted channel for the passage of low molecular weight solutes (Zeth et al. 2000 ). Residues within the L3 loop were unlikely to be subject to immune selection but are probably involved in ion selectivity: the presence of a number of mutations which resulted in changes in charge within this region of the protein are consistent with this idea (Bauer et al. 1989 ; Benz et al. 1989 ; Saint et al. 1996 ; Schirmer and Phale 1999 ).
Despite the extensive evidence for recombinational reassortment in PorB proteins, (Vázquez et al. 1995 ; Cooke et al. 1998 ; Derrick et al. 1999 ), this has not been so frequent as to remove all phylogenetic signals. In contrast, congruence tests between different housekeeping genes from N. meningitidis, subject to strong purifying selection, revealed that most gene trees were no more similar to one another than expected by chance (Holmes, Urwin, and Maiden 1999 ). Overall, the diversity of meningococcal protein antigens explored here exhibits features which phylogenetic and structural models can exploit in the elucidation of the function and vaccine potential of these molecules. The insights obtained can complement data from both genomic studies and experimental studies of immunogenicity in man and animals to provide more complete information on the interactions of pathogen proteins with the hosts and its immune system.
Peer Bork, Reviewing Editor
Keywords: Neisseria meningitidis porB evolution recombination selection
Address for correspondence and reprints: Martin C. J. Maiden, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, U.K. martin.maiden@zoo.ox.ac.uk
Table 1 Nucleotide and Amino Acid Sequence Diversity Among Meningococcal porB Genes
Table 1 Nucleotide and Amino Acid Sequence Diversity Among Meningococcal porB Genes
Table 2 Parameter Estimates for the Maximum Likelihood Analysis of Selection Pressures Acting on the porB2 Gene of Neisseria meningitidis
Table 2 Parameter Estimates for the Maximum Likelihood Analysis of Selection Pressures Acting on the porB2 Gene of Neisseria meningitidis
Table 3 Parameter Estimates for the Maximum Likelihood Analysis of Selection Pressures Acting on the porB3 Gene of Neisseria meningitidis
Table 3 Parameter Estimates for the Maximum Likelihood Analysis of Selection Pressures Acting on the porB3 Gene of Neisseria meningitidis
Fig. 1.—Positive selection among PorB2 and PorB3 sequences. Translated (a) _porB2_-5 and (b) _porB3_-2 sequences are used as examples of PorB2 and PorB3 amino acid sequences. The locations of the putative surface-exposed loop sequences (I–VIII) are indicated. Amino acid residues that are subject to positive selection (probability >0.95) are shown in bold type. Sites under strong selection (ω = 18.553 and 13.923 for PorB2 and PorB3, respectively) are marked below the sequence with black blocks, and sites under weak selection (ω = 4.163 and 3.229 for PorB2 and PorB3, respectively) are denoted with white blocks
Fig. 2.—Ribbon diagrams of models for PorB2 (top) and PorB3 (bottom) with superposition of residues subject to positive selection. Residues under strong selection are shown in red and residues under weak selection are shown in yellow. The diagrams were produced using Molscript (Kraulis 1991)
This work was supported by The Wellcome Trust (047072), The Royal Society, The Lister Institute, and the United Kingdom Public Health Laboratory Service. We thank Dr. Z. Yang for useful advice regarding CODEML.
References
Achtman M.,
1995
Global epidemiology of meningococcal disease Pp 159–175 in K. A. V. Cartwright, ed. Meningococcal disease. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, U.K
Bash M. C., K. B. Lesiak, S. D. Banks, C. E. Frasch,
1995
Analysis of Neisseria meningitidis class 3 outer membrane protein gene variable regions and type identification using genetic techniques
Infect. Immun
63
:
1484
-1490
Bauer K., M. Struyve, D. Bosch, R. Benz, J. Tommassen,
1989
One single lysine residue is responsible for the special interaction between polyphosphate and the outer-membrane porin PhoE of Escherichia coli
J. Biol. Chem
264
:
16393
-16398
Benz R., A. Schmid, P. Van der Ley, J. Tommassen,
1989
Molecular-basis of porin selectivity—membrane experiments with OmpC-PhoE and OmpF-PhoE hybrid proteins of Escherichia coli K-12
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
981
:
8
-14
Bjune G., J. K. Gronnesby, E. A. Høiby, O. Closs, H. Nokleby,
1991
Results of an efficacy trial with an outer membrane vesicle vaccine against systemic serogroup B meningococcal disease in Norway
NIPH Ann
14
:
125
-130
Bjune G., E. A. Høiby, J. K. Grønnesby, et al. (16 co-authors)
1991
Effect of outer membrane vesicle vaccine against group B meningococcal disease in Norway
Lancet
338
:
1093
-1096.
Blake M. S., E. C. Gotschlich,
1987
Functional and immunologic properties of pathogeneic Neisserial surface proteins Pp 377–400 in M. Inouye, ed. Bacterial outer membranes as model systems. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, U.K
Caugant D. A., L. F. Mocca, C. E. Frasch, L. O. Frøholm, W. D. Zollinger, R. K. Selander,
1987
Genetic structure of Neisseria meningitidis populations in relation to serogroup, serotype, and outer membrane protein pattern
J. Bacteriol
169
:
2781
-2792
Cooke S. J., K. Jolley, C. A. Ison, H. Young, J. E. Heckels,
1998
Naturally occurring isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, which display anomalous serovar properties, express PIA/PIB hybrid porins, deletions in PIB or novel PIA molecules
FEMS Microbiol. Lett
162
:
75
-82
Deitsch K. W., E. R. Moxon, T. E. Wellems,
1997
Shared themes of antigenic variation and virulence in bacterial, protozoal, and fungal infections
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev
61
:
281
-293
Derrick J. P., R. Urwin, J. Suker, I. M. Feavers, M. C. J. Maiden,
1999
Structural and evolutionary inference from molecular variation in Neisseria porins
Infect. Immun
67
:
2406
-2413
Devereux J. P., P. Haeberli, O. Smithies,
1984
A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX
Nucleic Acids Res
12
:
387
-395
Feavers I. M., S. J. Gray, R. Urwin, J. E. Russell, J. A. Bygraves, E. B. Kaczmarski, M. C. J. Maiden,
1999
Multilocus sequence typing and antigen gene sequencing in the investigation of a meningococcal disease outbreak
J. Clin. Microbiol
37
:
3883
-3887
Feavers I. M., M. C. J. Maiden,
1998
A gonococcal porA pseudogene: implications for understanding the evolution and pathogenicity of Neisseria gonorrhoeae
Mol. Microbiol
30
:
647
-656
Feavers I. M., J. Suker, A. J. McKenna, A. B. Heath, M. C. J. Maiden,
1992
Molecular analysis of the serotyping antigens of Neisseria meningitidis
Infect. Immun
60
:
3620
-3629
Frasch C. E., W. D. Zollinger, J. T. Poolman,
1985
Serotype antigens of Neisseria meningitidis and a proposed scheme for designation of serotypes
Rev. Infect. Dis
7
:
504
-510
Holmes E. C., R. Urwin, M. C. J. Maiden,
1999
The influence of recombination on the population structure and evolution of the human pathogen Neisseria meningitidis
Mol. Biol. Evol
16
:
741
-749
Kleffel B., R. M. Garavito, W. Baumeister, J. P. Rosenbusch,
1985
Secondary structure of a channel-forming protein: porin from E. coli outer membranes
EMBO J
4
:
1589
-1592
Koebnik R., K. P. Locher, P. Van Gelder,
2000
Structure and function of bacterial outer membrane proteins: barrels in a nutshell
Mol. Microbiol
37
:
239
-253
Kraulis P. J.,
1991
MOLSCRIPT: a program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures
J. Appl. Cryst
24
:
946
-950
Kumar S., K. Tamura, M. Nei,
1994
MEGA: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software for microcomputers
Comput. Appl. Biosci
10
:
189
-191
Maiden M. C. J., J. A. Bygraves, E. Feil, et al. (12 co-authors)
1998
Multilocus sequence typing: a portable approach to the identification of clones within populations of pathogenic microorganisms
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95
:
3140
-3145.
Maiden M. C. J., J. Suker, A. J. McKenna, J. A. Bygraves, I. M. Feavers,
1991
Comparison of the class 1 outer membrane proteins of eight serological reference strains of Neisseria meningitidis
Mol. Microbiol
5
:
727
-736
McGuinness B., A. K. Barlow, I. N. Clarke, J. E. Farley, A. Anilionis, J. T. Poolman, J. E. Heckels,
1990
Deduced amino acid sequences of class 1 protein (PorA) from three strains of Neisseria meningitidis. Synthetic peptides define the epitopes responsible for serosubtype specificity
J. Exp. Med
171
:
1871
-1882
Michaelsen T. E., A. Aase, J. Kolberg, E. Wedege, E. Rosenqvist,
2001
PorB3 outer membrane protein on Neisseria meningitidis is poorly accessible for antibody binding on live bacteria
Vaccine
19
:
1526
-1533
Murakami K., E. C. Gotschlich, M. E. Seiff,
1989
Cloning and characterisation of the structural gene for the class 2 protein of Neisseria meningitidis
Infect. Immun
57
:
2318
-2323
Nielson R., Z. Yang,
1998
Likelihood models for detecting positively selected amino acid sites and applications to the HIV-1 envelope gene
Genetics
148
:
929
-936
Parkhill J., M. Achtman, K. D. James, et al. (27 co-authors)
2000
Complete DNA sequence of a serogroup A strain of Neisseria meningitidis Z2491
Nature
404
:
502
-506.
Perkins B. A., K. Jonsdottir, H. Briem, et al. (18 co-authors)
1998
Immunogenicity of two efficacious outer membrane protein-based serogroup B meningococcal vaccines among young adults in Iceland
J. Infect. Dis
177
:
683
-691.
Phale P. S., A. Philippsen, T. Kiefhaber, R. Koebnik, V. P. Phale, T. Schirmer, J. P. Rosenbusch,
1998
Stability of trimeric OmpF porin: the contributions of the latching loop L2
Biochemistry
37
:
15663
-15670
Pollard A. J., C. Frasch,
2001
Development of natural immunity to Neisseria meningitidis
Vaccine
19
:
1327
-1346
Poolman J. T., I. Lind, K. Jonsdottir, L. O. Frøholm, D. M. Jones, H. C. Zanen,
1986
Meningococcal serotypes and serogroup B disease in north-west Europe
Lancet
ii
:
555
-557
Posada D., K. A. Crandall, M. Nguyen, J. C. Demma, R. P. Viscidi,
2000
Population genetics of the porB gene of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: different dynamics in different homology groups
Mol. Biol. Evol
17
:
423
-436
Rambaut A., N. C. Grassly,
1997
Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees
Comput. Appl. Biosci
13
:
235
-238
Rosenqvist E., E. Arne Høiby, E. Wedege, K. Bryn, J. Kolberg, A. Klem, E. Rønnild, G. Bjune, H. Nøkleby,
1995
Human antibody responses to meningococcal outer membrane antigens after three doses of the Norwegian group B meningococcal vaccine
Infect. Immun
63
:
4642
-4652
Rudel T., A. Schmid, R. Benz, H. A. Kolb, F. Lang, T. F. Meyer,
1996
Modulation of Neisseria porin (PorB) by cytosolic ATP/GTP of target cells: parallels between pathogen accommodation and mitochondrial endosymbiosis
Cell
85
:
391
-402
Sacchi C. T., A. P. S. Lemos, A. M. Whitney, C. A. Solari, M. E. Brandt, C. E. A. Melles, C. E. Frasch, L. W. Mayer,
1998
Correlation between serological and sequencing analyses of the PorB outer membrane protein in the Neisseria meningitidis serotyping system
Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol
5
:
348
-354
Saint N., K. L. Lou, C. Widmer, M. Luckey, T. Schirmer, J. P. Rosenbusch,
1996
Structural and functional characterization of OmpF porin mutants selected for larger pore size 2. Functional characterization
J. Biol. Chem
271
:
20676
-20680
Sali A., L. Potterton, F. Yuan, H. van Vlijmen, M. Karplus,
1995
Evaluation of comparative protein modeling by MODELLER
Proteins
23
:
318
-326
Saukkonen K., H. Abdillahi, J. T. Poolman, M. Leinonen,
1987
Protective efficacy of monoclonal antibodies to class 1 and class 3 outer membrane proteins of Neisseria meningitidis B: 15: P1.16 in infant rat infection model: new prospects for vaccine development
Microb. Pathog
3
:
261
-267
Saukkonen K., M. Leinonen, H. Abdillahi, J. T. Poolman,
1989
Comparative evaluation of potential components for group B meningococcal vaccine by passive protection in the infant rat and in vitro bactericidal assay
Vaccine
7
:
325
-328
Schirmer T., P. S. Phale,
1999
Brownian dynamics simulation of ion flow through porin channels
J. Mol. Biol
294
:
1159
-1167
Sierra G. V. G., H. C. Campa, N. M. Varcacel, I. L. Garcia, P. L. Izquierdo, P. F. Sotolongo, G. V. Casanueva, C. O. Rico, C. R. Rodriguez, M. H. Terry,
1991
Vaccine against group B Neisseria meningitidis: protection trial and mass vaccination results in Cuba
National Institute for Public Health Annals
14
:
195
-207.
Smith N. H., J. Maynard Smith, B. G. Spratt,
1995
Sequence evolution of the porB gene of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Neisseria meningitidis: evidence of positive Darwinian selection
Mol. Biol. Evol
12
:
363
-370
Staden R.,
1996
The Staden sequence analysis package
Mol. Biotechnol
5
:
233
-241
Swofford D.,
1998
PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and other methods Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass
Tettelin H., N. J. Saunders, J. Heidelberg, et al. (41 co-authors)
2000
Complete genome sequence of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B strain MC58
Science
287
:
1809
-1815.
Tommassen J., P. Vermeij, M. Struyvé, R. Benz, J. T. Poolman,
1990
Isolation of Neisseria meningitidis mutants deficient in class 1 (PorA) and class 3 (PorB) outer membrane proteins
Infect. Immun
58
:
1355
-1359
Urwin R., I. M. Feavers, D. M. Jones, M. C. J. Maiden, A. J. Fox,
1998
Molecular variation of meningococcal serotype 4 antigen genes
Epidemiol. Infect
121
:
95
-101
Urwin R., A. J. Fox, M. Musilek, P. Kriz, M. C. J. Maiden,
1998
Heterogeneity of the PorB protein in serotype 22 Neisseria meningitidis
J. Clin. Microbiol
36
:
3680
-3682
van der Ende A., C. T. P. Hopman, S. Zaat, B. B. Oude Essink, B. Berkhout, J. Dankert,
1995
Variable expression of class 1 outer membrane protein in Neisseria meningitidis is caused by variation in the spacing between the −10 and −35 regions of the promoter
J. Bacteriol
177
:
2475
-2480
van der Ley P., J. E. Heckels, M. Virji, P. Hoogerhout, J. T. Poolman,
1991
Topology of outer membrane porins in pathogenic Neisseria species
Infect. Immun
59
:
2963
-2971
van der Ley P., J. T. Poolman,
1992
Construction of a multivalent meningococcal vaccine strain based on the class 1 outer membrane protein
Infect. Immun
60
:
3156
-3161
van der Ley P., J. van der Biezen, J. T. Poolman,
1995
Construction of Neisseria meningitidis strains carrying multiple chromosomal copies of the porA gene for use in the production of a multivalent outer membrane vesicle vaccine
Vaccine
13
:
401
-407
Vázquez J. A., S. Berron, M. O'Rourke, G. Carpenter, E. Feil, N. H. Smith, B. G. Spratt,
1995
Interspecies recombination in nature: a meningococcus that has acquired a gonococcal PIB porin
Mol. Microbiol
15
:
1001
-1007
Ward M. J., P. R. Lambden, J. E. Heckels,
1992
Sequence analysis and relationships between meningococcal class 3 serotype proteins and other porins of pathogenic and non-pathogenic Neisseria species
FEMS Microbiol. Lett
94
:
283
-290
Wolff K., A. Stern,
1991
The class 3 outer membrane protein (PorB) of Neisseria meningitidis: gene sequence and homology to the gonococcal porin PIA
FEMS Microbiol. Lett
83
:
179
-185
Yang Z.,
1997
PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood
Comput. Appl. Biol. Sci
13
:
555
-556
Yang Z., R. Nielsen, N. Goldman, A. M. K. Pedersen,
2000
Codon-substitution models for heterogenous selection pressure at amino acid sites
Genetics
155
:
431
-449
Zanotto P. M. de, E. G. Kallas, R. F. de Souza, E. C. Holmes,
1999
Genealogical evidence for positive selection in the nef gene of HIV-1
Genetics
153
:
1077
-1089.
Zapata G. A., W. F. Vann, Y. Rubinstein, C. E. Frasch,
1992
Identification of variable region differences in Neisseria meningitidis class 3 protein sequences among five group B serotypes
Mol. Microbiol
6
:
3493
-3499
Zeth K., K. Diederichs, W. Welte, H. Engelhardt,
2000
Crystal structure of Omp32, the anion-selective porin from Comamonas acidovorans, in complex with a periplasmic peptide at 2.1 Å resolution
Structure
8
:
981
-992
Citations
Views
Altmetric
Metrics
Total Views 753
502 Pageviews
251 PDF Downloads
Since 11/1/2016
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
November 2016 | 1 |
December 2016 | 3 |
January 2017 | 1 |
February 2017 | 1 |
March 2017 | 3 |
April 2017 | 2 |
May 2017 | 2 |
July 2017 | 2 |
August 2017 | 3 |
September 2017 | 2 |
October 2017 | 1 |
December 2017 | 17 |
January 2018 | 11 |
February 2018 | 7 |
March 2018 | 12 |
April 2018 | 22 |
May 2018 | 5 |
June 2018 | 11 |
July 2018 | 11 |
August 2018 | 13 |
September 2018 | 8 |
October 2018 | 6 |
November 2018 | 7 |
December 2018 | 4 |
January 2019 | 5 |
February 2019 | 3 |
March 2019 | 17 |
April 2019 | 15 |
May 2019 | 16 |
June 2019 | 9 |
July 2019 | 5 |
August 2019 | 5 |
September 2019 | 21 |
October 2019 | 12 |
November 2019 | 17 |
December 2019 | 5 |
January 2020 | 15 |
February 2020 | 10 |
March 2020 | 12 |
April 2020 | 12 |
May 2020 | 6 |
June 2020 | 3 |
July 2020 | 6 |
August 2020 | 7 |
September 2020 | 9 |
October 2020 | 13 |
November 2020 | 6 |
December 2020 | 8 |
January 2021 | 4 |
February 2021 | 7 |
March 2021 | 3 |
April 2021 | 6 |
May 2021 | 5 |
June 2021 | 2 |
July 2021 | 7 |
August 2021 | 3 |
September 2021 | 4 |
October 2021 | 8 |
November 2021 | 6 |
December 2021 | 4 |
January 2022 | 5 |
February 2022 | 6 |
March 2022 | 10 |
April 2022 | 8 |
May 2022 | 3 |
June 2022 | 6 |
July 2022 | 15 |
August 2022 | 16 |
September 2022 | 14 |
October 2022 | 13 |
November 2022 | 5 |
December 2022 | 9 |
January 2023 | 7 |
February 2023 | 2 |
March 2023 | 8 |
April 2023 | 12 |
May 2023 | 7 |
June 2023 | 3 |
July 2023 | 6 |
August 2023 | 11 |
September 2023 | 8 |
October 2023 | 7 |
November 2023 | 3 |
December 2023 | 11 |
January 2024 | 13 |
February 2024 | 12 |
March 2024 | 16 |
April 2024 | 15 |
May 2024 | 17 |
June 2024 | 9 |
July 2024 | 9 |
August 2024 | 3 |
September 2024 | 9 |
October 2024 | 4 |
Citations
80 Web of Science
×
Email alerts
Email alerts
Citing articles via
More from Oxford Academic