A Non-neuroleptic Treatment for Schizophrenia: Analysis of the Two-year Postdischarge Risk of Relapse* (original) (raw)

Journal Article

,

Research Social Science Analyst,

Center for Studies of Schizophrenia, National Institute of Mental Health

Rockville, Md.

Reprint requests should be sent to Ms. Matthews at Center for Studies of Schizophrenia, NIMH, Rm. 10C-26, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857

Search for other works by this author on:

,

Mathematical Statistician,

Bureau of Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug Administration

Rockville, Md.

.; Ms. Roper was formerly on the staff of the

Statistical and Mathematical Applications Branch, National Institute of Mental Health

Rockville, Md.

Search for other works by this author on:

,

Chief,

Center for Studies of Schizophrenia, National Institute of Mental Health

Rockville, Md.

Search for other works by this author on:

Soteria Project Director,

Mental Research Institute

Palo Alto, Calif.

Search for other works by this author on:

*The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent any official position of the National Institute of Mental Health.

Author Notes

Published:

01 January 1979

Cite

Susan M. Matthews, Margaret T. Roper, Loren R. Mosher, Alma Z. Menn, A Non-neuroleptic Treatment for Schizophrenia: Analysis of the Two-year Postdischarge Risk of Relapse, Schizophrenia Bulletin, Volume 5, Issue 2, 1979, Pages 322–333, https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/5.2.322
Close

Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search

Abstract

The efficacy of antipsychotic drug maintenance in reducing the risk of relapse among previously hospitalized schizophrenic patients has been well documented. However, data from an ongoing study comparing two cohorts of young first admission schizophrenics—one receiving neuroleptic-oriented treatment on the wards of a community mental health center (CMHC), the other an intensive interpersonal approach in a small homelike facility in the community (Soteria House)—raise questions about the routine use of neuroleptics with this population. Our questioning of this practice is based on data analyzed from these two cohorts by means of the life table, a statistical technique appropriate for longitudinal studies. Data are presented in two ways: (1) The overall effectiveness of the two independent treatment programs (Soteria, _N_=32, vs. CMHC, _N_=36) is compared in terms of the probabilities of not being readmitted over the 2-year postdischarge interval. (2) Analyses that look at the influence of the original treatment setting and postdischarge antipsychotic drug status on readmission rates are presented. Program comparisons reveal Soteria patients to have a consistently higher survival rate than CMHC patients throughout 2 years postdischarge. At 12 months postdischarge, the cumulative probability of remaining well (no readmissions) significantly favors the Soteria patients (p<.05, Mantelx2). The overall results of the Soteria program were achieved despite the fact that all CMHC patients received neuroleptics during their original inpatient stays and about 50 percent were maintained on neuroleptics up to the point of readmission or study termination, whereas only 10 percent of Soteria subjects were treated with or maintained on neuroleptics. The survival rates by postdischarge drug status and program affiliation show the Soteria no-drug group to have the highest proportion of survivors at almost every interval throughout 24 months, the CMHC drug-maintained group to have the lowest survival rate, and the CMHC unmaintained group to be surviving at a rate generally comparable to the Soteria no-drug group.

This content is only available as a PDF.

Author notes

*The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent any official position of the National Institute of Mental Health.

© Oxford University Press

Topic:

Citations

Views

Altmetric

Metrics

Total Views 140

12 Pageviews

128 PDF Downloads

Since 2/1/2017

Month: Total Views:
February 2017 3
March 2017 2
April 2017 2
May 2017 6
September 2017 2
October 2017 2
November 2017 1
December 2017 1
January 2018 2
June 2018 1
July 2018 3
August 2018 2
October 2018 1
November 2018 1
December 2018 1
February 2019 1
April 2019 1
May 2019 2
June 2019 1
August 2019 1
October 2019 5
May 2020 2
July 2020 2
September 2020 1
October 2020 1
November 2020 2
December 2020 5
February 2021 1
March 2021 5
April 2021 2
May 2021 1
June 2021 2
August 2021 1
September 2021 1
October 2021 3
November 2021 3
January 2022 2
February 2022 5
April 2022 5
June 2022 1
July 2022 1
October 2022 2
November 2022 1
December 2022 4
January 2023 2
February 2023 2
April 2023 1
May 2023 2
July 2023 3
September 2023 1
November 2023 2
December 2023 2
January 2024 3
February 2024 2
March 2024 2
April 2024 6
May 2024 2
June 2024 5
July 2024 6
August 2024 2
September 2024 3

Citations

58 Web of Science

×

Email alerts

Citing articles via

More from Oxford Academic