Evidence for direct activation of an anthocyanin promoter by the maize C1 protein and comparison of DNA binding by related Myb domain proteins. (original) (raw)

Journal Article

,

Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene 97403, USA.

Search for other works by this author on:

,

Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene 97403, USA.

Search for other works by this author on:

Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene 97403, USA.

Search for other works by this author on:

Cite

M B Sainz, E Grotewold, V L Chandler, Evidence for direct activation of an anthocyanin promoter by the maize C1 protein and comparison of DNA binding by related Myb domain proteins., The Plant Cell, Volume 9, Issue 4, April 1997, Pages 611–625, https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.9.4.611
Close

Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search

Abstract

The enzyme-encoding genes of two classes of maize flavonoid pigments, anthocyanins and phlobaphenes, are differentially regulated by distinct transcription factors. Anthocyanin biosynthetic gene activation requires the Myb domain C1 protein and the basic helix-loop-helix B or R proteins. In the phlobaphene pathway, a subset of C1-regulated genes, including a1, are activated by the Myb domain P protein independently of B/R. We show sequence-specific binding to the a1 promoter by C1 in the absence of B. Activation is decreased by mutations in the C1 DNA binding domain or in a1 sequences bound by C1, providing direct evidence for activation of the anthocyanin biosynthetic genes by C1. The two C1 binding sites in the a1 promoter are also bound by P. One site is bound with higher affinity by P relative to C1, whereas the other site is bound with similar lower affinity by both proteins. Interestingly, either site is sufficient for C1 plus B/R or P activation in vivo, demonstrating that differences in DNA binding affinities between P and C1 are insufficient to explain the differential requirement for B. Results of DNA binding site-selection experiments suggest that C1 has a broader DNA binding specificity than does P, which may help C1 to activate a more diverse set of promoters.

This content is only available as a PDF.

© 1997 by American Society of Plant Biologists

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open\_access/funder\_policies/chorus/standard\_publication\_model)

Citations

Views

Altmetric

Metrics

Total Views 192

0 Pageviews

192 PDF Downloads

Since 3/1/2021

Month: Total Views:
March 2021 1
April 2021 1
May 2021 3
June 2021 7
July 2021 6
August 2021 7
September 2021 9
October 2021 7
November 2021 9
December 2021 6
January 2022 5
February 2022 5
March 2022 7
April 2022 4
May 2022 5
June 2022 1
July 2022 2
August 2022 4
September 2022 7
October 2022 4
November 2022 3
December 2022 12
January 2023 4
February 2023 2
March 2023 3
April 2023 5
May 2023 5
June 2023 3
July 2023 5
August 2023 4
September 2023 1
November 2023 6
December 2023 3
January 2024 5
February 2024 10
March 2024 4
April 2024 4
June 2024 3
July 2024 2
August 2024 1
September 2024 5
October 2024 2

Citations

176 Web of Science

×

Email alerts

Citing articles via

More from Oxford Academic