Migration of individual microvessel endothelial cells: stochastic model and parameter measurement (original) (raw)
RESEARCH ARTICLE| 01 June 1991
Department of Chemical Engineering
,
Uniuersity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
*Author for correspondence at: Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Department of Chemical Engineering
,
Uniuersity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Department of Chemical Engineering
,
Uniuersity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Cynthia L. Stokes*
Department of Chemical Engineering
,
Uniuersity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Douglas A. Lauffenburger
Department of Chemical Engineering
,
Uniuersity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Stuart K. Williams
Department of Chemical Engineering
,
Uniuersity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
*Author for correspondence at: Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA
Received: 29 Nov 1990
Accepted: 28 Feb 1991
Online ISSN: 1477-9137
Print ISSN: 0021-9533
© 1991 by Company of Biologists
1991
J Cell Sci (1991) 99 (2): 419–430.
- Views Icon Views Open Menu
- Article Versions Icon Versions
- Version of Record 01 June 1991
- Tools Icon Tools Open Menu
- Search Site
ABSTRACT
Analysis of cell motility effects in physiological processes can be facilitated by a mathematical model capable of simulating individual cell movement paths. A quantitative description of motility of individual cells would be useful, for example, in the study of the formation of new blood vessel networks in angiogenesis by microvessel endothelial cell (MEC) migration. In this paper we propose a stochastic mathematical model for the random motility and chemotaxis of single cells, and evaluate migration paths of MEC in terms of this model. In our model, cell velocity under random motility conditions is described as a persistent random walk using the Omstein-Uhlenbeck (O.U) process. Two parameters quantify this process: the magnitude of random movement accelerations, α, and a decay rate constant for movement velocity, β. Two other quantities often used in measurements of individual cell random motility properties - cell speed, S, and persistence time in velocity, P v - can be defined in terms of the fundamental stochastic parameters α and β by: S=√ (α/β) and P v =l/p. We account for chemotactic cell movement in chemoattractant gradients by adding a directional bias term to the O-U process. The magnitude of the directional bias is characterized by the chemotactic responsiveness, K. A critical advantage of the proposed model is that it can generate, using experimentally measured values of α, β and K, computer simulations of theoretical individual cell paths for use in evaluating the role of cell migration in specific physiological processes.
We have used the model to assess MEC migration in the presence or absence of the angiogenic stimulus acidic fibroblast growth factor (aFGF). Time-lapse video was used to observe and track the paths of cells moving in various media, and the mean square displacement was measured from these paths. To test the validity of the model, we compared the mean square displacement measurements of each cell with model predictions of that displacement The comparison indicates that the O-U process provides a satisfactory description of the random migration at this level of comparison. Using nonlinear regression in these comparisons, we measured the magnitude of random accelerations, a, and the velocity decay rate constant β, for each cell path. We consequently obtained values for the derived quantities, speed and persistence time. In control medium, we find that _α_=250±100 _μ_m2h−3 and _β_=0.22±0.03h-1, while in stimulus medium (control plus unpurified aFGF) _α_=1900±720_μ_m2h-3 and _β=_0.99±0.37h-1. These results indicate that both random acceleration and velocity decay rate are enhanced by aFGF. From the perspective of the derived quantities, cell speed is increased (from 25 to 42 μ_mh-1) but persistence time is decreased (from 5.4 to 2.9 h) by this chemical stimulus. These results suggest that the intracellular mechanisms that control rate of movement of MEC may be different from those that control movement direction. We also estimated a value for the chemotactic responsiveness K by relating computer-simulated cell paths to previous measurements of population chemotactic migration in aFGF gradients. A value kao=2400 μ_m2h-2, where ao, is the source attractant concentration, was obtained for the chemotactic responsiveness. The ratio of chemotactic to random migration, represented by kao/ (α/β)_=Ka/S_2, is approximately 1.5, demonstrating that MEC display a numerically significant degree of directional sensitivity to aFGF.
© 1991 by Company of Biologists
1991
You do not currently have access to this content.
Sign in
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Email address / Username ?
Password
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Pay-Per-View Access
$30.00
Email alerts
Cited by
Call for papers - Imaging Cell Architecture and Dynamics
We invite you to submit your latest research to our upcoming special issue: Imaging Cell Architecture and Dynamics. This issue will be guest edited by Francesca Bottanelli (Freie Universität Berlin, Germany) and Giulia Zanetti (The Francis Crick Institute, UK), alongside our Editor Guillaume Jacquemet (Åbo Akademi University, Finland). The deadline for submitting articles is 1 April 2026.
JCS fast-track option
Have a paper that has been reviewed elsewhere? JCS is pleased to consider such manuscripts for fast-tracked decision making. Send us your manuscript together with the full set of reviews and decision letters, and we will make an initial decision within one week.
Register for our 2026 Imaging Cell Dynamics meeting
Following the success of our 2023 Imaging Cell Dynamics meeting, we are delighted to announce that we’ll be hosting a second meeting on this topic in 2026. This meeting will provide a unique opportunity to bring together experts working at the interface between cell biology and imaging. The abstract deadline for this meeting is 13 February 2026, and the final deadline for applications is 27 March 2026.
Evolutionary cell biology comes of age
At the helm of JCS – Editors-in-Chief past, present… and future
Other journals from
The Company of Biologists