Prognostic Value of the Lymph Node Ratio in Stage III Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review (original) (raw)

• World Health Organization. Global burden of cancer. Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/index.html. Accessed September 29, 2009.
• Greene FL, Stewart AK, Norton HJ. New tumor-node-metastasis staging strategy for node-positive (stage III) rectal cancer: an analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1778–84.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Greene FL, Stewart AK, Norton HJ. A new TNM staging strategy for node-positive (stage III) colon cancer—an analysis of 50,042 patients. Ann Surg. 2002;236:416–21.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Merkel S, Mansmann U, Papadopoulos T, et al. The prognostic inhomogeneity of colorectal carcinomas stage III—a proposal for subdivision of stage III. Cancer. 2001;92:2754–9.
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Johnson PM, Porter GA, Ricciardi R, Baxter NN. Increasing negative lymph node count is independently associated with improved long-term survival in stage IIIB and IIIC colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3570–5.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, Moyer VA. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:433–41.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Swanson RS, Compton CC, Stewart AK, Bland KI. The prognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:65–71.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Xing Y, Badgwell BD, Ross MI, et al. Lymph node ratio predicts disease-specific survival in melanoma patients. Cancer. 2009;115:2505–13.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Woodward WA, Vinh-Hung V, Ueno NT, et al. Prognostic value of nodal ratios in node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2910–6.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Inoue K, Nakane Y, Iiyama H, et al. The superiority of ratio-based lymph node staging in gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:27–34.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Levels of evidence. March 2009. Available at: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025. Accessed October 2, 2009.
• Wang JP, Kulaylat M, Rockette H, et al. Should total number of lymph nodes be used as a quality of care measure for stage III colon cancer? Ann Surg. 2009;249:559–63.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• De Ridder M, Vinh-Hung V, Van Nieuwenhove Y, et al. Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio in node positive colon cancer (letter). Gut. 2006;55:1681.
  Article Google Scholar
• Trufelli DC, Miranda VDC, Palos CC, et al. Positive total dissected lymph nodes ratio as a prognostic factor in colon cancer. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2007;53:539–42.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Derwinger K, Gustavsson B. A study of lymph node ratio in stage IV colorectal cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2008;6:127.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Stocchi L, Nelson H, Sargent DJ, et al. Impact of surgical and pathologic variables in rectal cancer: a United States Community and Cooperative Group report. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:3895–902.
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Schumacher P, Dineen S, Barnett C, Fleming J, Anthony T. The metastatic lymph node ratio predicts survival in colon cancer. Am J Surg. 2007;194:827–32.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Rosenberg R, Friederichs J, Schuster T, et al. Prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer is associated with lymph node ratio a single-center analysis of 3026 patients over a 25-year time period. Ann Surg. 2008;248:968–78.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Berger AC, Sigurdson ER, LeVoyer T, et al. Colon cancer survival is associated with decreasing ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8706–12.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Peschaud F, Benoist S, Julie C, et al. The ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes is a powerful independent prognostic factor in rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2008;248:1067–73.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Punglia RS, Morrow M, Winer EP, Harris JR. Current concepts: local therapy and survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2399–405.
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Curti G, Maurer CA, Buchler MW. Colorectal carcinoma: is lymphadenectomy useful? Dig Surg. 1998;15:193–208.
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Nagawa H, Muto T, Sunouchi K, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of lateral node dissection vs. nerve-preserving resection in patients with rectal cancer after preoperative radiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1274–80.
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Soreide K, Nedrebo B, Soreide JA, Slewa A, Korner H. Lymph node evaluation in colon cancer is influenced by proximal location and microsatellite instability with lymph node ratio as independent prognostic factor. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:23.
  Google Scholar
• Gilbert SM. Separating surgical quality from causality—gaining perspective in the debate on lymph node count and extent of lymphadenectomy. Cancer. 2008;112:2331–3.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Wong SL, Ji H, Hollenbeck BK, et al. Hospital lymph node examination rates and survival after resection for colon cancer. JAMA. 2007;298:2149–54.
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A, et al. Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:583–96.
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Schofield JB, Mounter NA, Mallett R, Haboubi NY. The importance of accurate pathological assessment of lymph node involvement in colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2006;8:460–70.
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Turner J, Vollmer RT. Lymph nodes in colorectal carcinoma—the Poisson probability paradigm. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;125:866–72.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Goldstein NS. Lymph node recoveries from 2427 pT3 colorectal resection specimens spanning 45 years—recommendations for a minimum number of recovered lymph nodes based on predictive probabilities. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26:179–89.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Gonen M, Schrag D, Weiser MR. Nodal staging score: a tool to assess adequate staging of node-negative colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:6166–71.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Le Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL, et al. Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:2912–9.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• West NP, Morris EJA, Rotimi O, et al. Pathology grading of colon cancer surgical resection and its association with survival: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:857–65.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, et al. Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9666):821–8.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Beresford M, Glynne-Jones R, Richman P, et al. The reliability of lymph-node staging in rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Clin Oncol. 2005;17:448–55.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Wichmann MW, Muller C, Meyer G, et al. Effect of preoperative radiochemotherapy on lymph node retrieval after resection of rectal cancer. Arch Surg. 2002;137:206–10.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Proscurshim I, et al. Absence of lymph nodes in the resected specimen after radical surgery for distal rectal cancer and neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: what does it mean? Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:277–83.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Doll D, Gertler R, Maak M, et al. Reduced lymph node yield in rectal carcinoma specimen after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy has no prognostic relevance. World J Surg. 2009;33:340–7.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Leibold T, Shia J, Ruo L, et al. Prognostic implications of the distribution of lymph node metastases in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2106–11.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Park IJ, Choi GS, Jun SH. Nodal stage of stage III colon cancer: the impact of metastatic lymph node ratio. J Surg Oncol. 2009;100:240–3.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Edler D, Ohrling K, Hallstrom M, Karlberg M, Ragnhammar P. The number of analyzed lymph nodes—a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. Acta Oncol. 2007;46:975–81.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Lee HY, Choi HJ, Park KJ, et al. Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio in node-positive colon carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1712–7.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Derwinger K, Carlsson G, Gustavsson B. A study of lymph node ratio as a prognostic marker in colon cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:771–5.
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Peng JJ, Xu Y, Guan ZQ, et al. Prognostic significance of the metastatic lymph node ratio in node-positive rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:3118–23.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Wang JP, Hassett JM, Dayton MT, Kulaylat MN. Lymph node ratio: role in the staging of node-positive colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1600–8.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Kim YS, Kim JH, Yoon SM, et al. Lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor in patients with stage III rectal cancer treated with total mesorectal excision followed by chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;74:796–802.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Moug SJ, Saldanha JD, McGregor JR, Balsitis M, Diament RH. Positive lymph node retrieval ratio optimises patient staging in colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2009;100:1530–3.
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Priolli DG, Cardinalli IA, Pereira JA, et al. Metastatic lymph node ratio as an independent prognostic variable in colorectal cancer: study of 113 patients. Techn Coloproctol. 2009;13:113–21.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Vather R, Sammour T, Kahokehr A, Connolly AB, Hill AG. Lymph node evaluation and long-term survival in stage II and stage III colon cancer: a national study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:585–93.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Vaccaro CA, Im V, Rossi GL, et al. Lymph node ratio as prognosis factor for colon cancer treated by colorectal surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 2009;52:1244–50.
  PubMed Google Scholar