Preanalytical Factors Affecting RIA Measurement of Plasma Kisspeptin (original) (raw)

Journal Article

,

Department of Metabolic Medicine

, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK

Division of Clinical Chemistry

, Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other works by this author on:

,

Department of Metabolic Medicine

, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK

Search for other works by this author on:

,

Department of Metabolic Medicine

, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK

Search for other works by this author on:

,

Department of Metabolic Medicine

, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK

Search for other works by this author on:

,

Department of Metabolic Medicine

, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK

Search for other works by this author on:

,

Department of Metabolic Medicine

, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK

Search for other works by this author on:

,

Department of Metabolic Medicine

, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK

Search for other works by this author on:

Department of Metabolic Medicine

, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK

Address correspondence to this author at: Department of Metabolic Medicine, Imperial College London, 6th Floor Commonwealth Building, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK, Fax +44 (0) 20 8383 3142, e-mail s.bloom@imperial.ac.uk

Search for other works by this author on:

Cite

Radha Ramachandran, Michael Patterson, Kevin G Murphy, Waljit S Dhillo, Sejal Patel, Anna Kazarian, Mohammad A Ghatei, Stephen R Bloom, Preanalytical Factors Affecting RIA Measurement of Plasma Kisspeptin, Clinical Chemistry, Volume 54, Issue 3, 1 March 2008, Pages 615–617, https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2007.093005
Close

Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search

To the Editor:

Kisspeptins are peptide products of the KiSS-1 metastasis-suppressor (KISS1) gene and the natural ligands of the G-protein–coupled receptor GPR54. KISS1 was initially investigated as an antimetastasis gene. More recent studies have demonstrated that the kisspeptins are potent stimulators of the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis. Mice and humans with defective kisspeptin signaling show hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism and impaired sexual development (1)(2).

Plasma kisspeptin concentrations are <2 pmol/L in men and nonpregnant women. KiSS-1 mRNA is highly expressed in the placenta, and plasma kisspeptin concentrations increase dramatically, to thousands of picomoles per liter, during pregnancy (3). In addition, plasma kisspeptin is increased in women with gestational trophoblastic tumors, thus raising the possibility of measuring plasma kisspeptin as a novel tumor marker (4). Previous studies that have measured plasma kisspeptin in women during pregnancy have found significantly different concentrations of circulating kisspeptin (3)(4) that may be attributable to differences in preanalytical variables, such as collection tube type, processing times, and storage conditions.

Use of a standardized sample collection method for the measurement of circulating kisspeptin immunoreactivity (IR) would facilitate comparisons between separate studies and is necessary if plasma kisspeptin concentrations are to be used as a disease marker. We thus assessed the effects of processing time, anticoagulant type, and repeated freeze-thaw cycles on kisspeptin-IR measurement in plasma samples.

To evaluate the effects of collection tube type and processing time on plasma kisspeptin-IR measurement, we recruited 4 healthy pregnant women who gave informed consent [age range 25–37 years, mean (SD) 32.8 (5.3) years; body mass index (BMI) 19–35.5, 25.4 (7.07); gestation 15–35 weeks, 27 (8.83) weeks]. Blood was collected, using a Vacutainer® system, directly into 4 tubes of each of the tube-types studied: lithium heparin with 2000 U/tube of trasylol (L), citrate (C), EDTA (E), serum clot-activator (S), and serum separator (SST) tubes (BD Vacutainer® Blood Collection Tubes). Both S and SST tubes are coated with silicone and micronized silicon particles to accelerate clotting. The SST tubes have, in addition, a barrier polymer at the bottom of the tube. The density of this polymer allows it to rise up to the clot–serum interface during centrifugation, thus forming a physical barrier separating the serum from the clot.

Of the 4 samples in each tube type, the first was processed immediately, and the second, third, and fourth samples were maintained at room temperature (18–20 °C) for 1, 2, and 4 h, respectively, before processing. All samples were processed by centrifugation at 4 °C for 10 min at 855_g_. Serum and plasma were then aspirated, divided into aliquots, frozen, and stored at −80 °C until assayed. Kisspeptin-IR was assayed using a specific RIA (5). The detection limit of the assay was 2 pmol/L of plasma kisspeptin-IR at a 95% confidence limit. The inter- and intraassay CVs were <11% and <9%, respectively. All samples were assayed in duplicate. Differences of means were assessed by paired _t_-test.

Kisspeptin-IR degraded rapidly in serum tubes. Kisspeptin-IR was undetectable in serum samples that were processed at t = 1 h and later time points, and concentrations detected in serum samples processed immediately were significantly lower than those detected in plasma (P <0.05). Kisspeptin-IR concentrations in plasma samples collected in C tubes were consistently lower than those obtained from E and L collected samples, but this difference was not statistically significant (Table 1 ). Kisspeptin-IR in plasma samples decreased with increased processing time, suggesting that kisspeptin-IR is best measured in plasma samples that are processed immediately after sampling.

Table 1.

Kisspeptin-IR values (pmol/L) measured in plasma and serum samples collected in 4 different tube types from 4 healthy pregnant women.1

Time, h EDTA Mean (SD) Paired _t_-test (time vs t = 0)
Subject 1 Subject 2 Subject 3 Subject 4
0 8200 7700 4600 3900 6100 (2200)
1 6600 6100 4900 4200 5500 (1100) >0.05
2 6600 6000 3800 3800 5100 (1400) >0.05
4 4700 1900 4400 3100 3500 (1300) >0.05
Lithium heparin
0 8800 5300 3600 3800 5400 (2400)
1 7200 3800 3500 2900 4400 (1900) >0.05
2 8600 3700 1000 3100 4100 (3200) >0.05
4 6500 1200 <2 2600 2700 (2800) <0.05
Citrate
0 6000 3000 3100 2600 3700 (1500)
1 5400 3400 2300 3700 3700 (1300) >0.05
2 4500 2900 1800 1900 2800 (2800) = 0.05
4 4800 1100 700 1100 1900 (1900) <0.05
SST
0 2300 800 1500 1400 1500 (600)
1 <2 <2 <2 <2 <0.05
2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <0.05
4 <2 <2 <2 <2 <0.05
Serum
0 6500 700 1500 2800 2800 (2200)
1 <2 <2 <2 <2 >0.05
2 <2 <2 <2 <2 >0.05
4 <2 <2 <2 <2 >0.05
Time, h EDTA Mean (SD) Paired _t_-test (time vs t = 0)
Subject 1 Subject 2 Subject 3 Subject 4
0 8200 7700 4600 3900 6100 (2200)
1 6600 6100 4900 4200 5500 (1100) >0.05
2 6600 6000 3800 3800 5100 (1400) >0.05
4 4700 1900 4400 3100 3500 (1300) >0.05
Lithium heparin
0 8800 5300 3600 3800 5400 (2400)
1 7200 3800 3500 2900 4400 (1900) >0.05
2 8600 3700 1000 3100 4100 (3200) >0.05
4 6500 1200 <2 2600 2700 (2800) <0.05
Citrate
0 6000 3000 3100 2600 3700 (1500)
1 5400 3400 2300 3700 3700 (1300) >0.05
2 4500 2900 1800 1900 2800 (2800) = 0.05
4 4800 1100 700 1100 1900 (1900) <0.05
SST
0 2300 800 1500 1400 1500 (600)
1 <2 <2 <2 <2 <0.05
2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <0.05
4 <2 <2 <2 <2 <0.05
Serum
0 6500 700 1500 2800 2800 (2200)
1 <2 <2 <2 <2 >0.05
2 <2 <2 <2 <2 >0.05
4 <2 <2 <2 <2 >0.05

1

The paired _t_-test was used to look for significant differences for a given sample type at different times compared to time zero (P values shown in the final column). Paired _t_-test was used to compare the values at time zero in each tube type to those obtained with lithium heparin tubes (used in our laboratory as a calibrator). At time zero a statistically significant difference was observed between lithium heparin and serum and SST tubes (P <0.05) but not between lithium heparin and EDTA or between lithium heparin and citrate tubes (_P_ >0.05). P = 0.051 for comparison of concentrations obtained in the EDTA and citrate tubes. Kisspeptin-IR concentrations reported to the nearest 100 pmol/L.

Table 1.

Kisspeptin-IR values (pmol/L) measured in plasma and serum samples collected in 4 different tube types from 4 healthy pregnant women.1

Time, h EDTA Mean (SD) Paired _t_-test (time vs t = 0)
Subject 1 Subject 2 Subject 3 Subject 4
0 8200 7700 4600 3900 6100 (2200)
1 6600 6100 4900 4200 5500 (1100) >0.05
2 6600 6000 3800 3800 5100 (1400) >0.05
4 4700 1900 4400 3100 3500 (1300) >0.05
Lithium heparin
0 8800 5300 3600 3800 5400 (2400)
1 7200 3800 3500 2900 4400 (1900) >0.05
2 8600 3700 1000 3100 4100 (3200) >0.05
4 6500 1200 <2 2600 2700 (2800) <0.05
Citrate
0 6000 3000 3100 2600 3700 (1500)
1 5400 3400 2300 3700 3700 (1300) >0.05
2 4500 2900 1800 1900 2800 (2800) = 0.05
4 4800 1100 700 1100 1900 (1900) <0.05
SST
0 2300 800 1500 1400 1500 (600)
1 <2 <2 <2 <2 <0.05
2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <0.05
4 <2 <2 <2 <2 <0.05
Serum
0 6500 700 1500 2800 2800 (2200)
1 <2 <2 <2 <2 >0.05
2 <2 <2 <2 <2 >0.05
4 <2 <2 <2 <2 >0.05
Time, h EDTA Mean (SD) Paired _t_-test (time vs t = 0)
Subject 1 Subject 2 Subject 3 Subject 4
0 8200 7700 4600 3900 6100 (2200)
1 6600 6100 4900 4200 5500 (1100) >0.05
2 6600 6000 3800 3800 5100 (1400) >0.05
4 4700 1900 4400 3100 3500 (1300) >0.05
Lithium heparin
0 8800 5300 3600 3800 5400 (2400)
1 7200 3800 3500 2900 4400 (1900) >0.05
2 8600 3700 1000 3100 4100 (3200) >0.05
4 6500 1200 <2 2600 2700 (2800) <0.05
Citrate
0 6000 3000 3100 2600 3700 (1500)
1 5400 3400 2300 3700 3700 (1300) >0.05
2 4500 2900 1800 1900 2800 (2800) = 0.05
4 4800 1100 700 1100 1900 (1900) <0.05
SST
0 2300 800 1500 1400 1500 (600)
1 <2 <2 <2 <2 <0.05
2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <0.05
4 <2 <2 <2 <2 <0.05
Serum
0 6500 700 1500 2800 2800 (2200)
1 <2 <2 <2 <2 >0.05
2 <2 <2 <2 <2 >0.05
4 <2 <2 <2 <2 >0.05

1

The paired _t_-test was used to look for significant differences for a given sample type at different times compared to time zero (P values shown in the final column). Paired _t_-test was used to compare the values at time zero in each tube type to those obtained with lithium heparin tubes (used in our laboratory as a calibrator). At time zero a statistically significant difference was observed between lithium heparin and serum and SST tubes (P <0.05) but not between lithium heparin and EDTA or between lithium heparin and citrate tubes (_P_ >0.05). P = 0.051 for comparison of concentrations obtained in the EDTA and citrate tubes. Kisspeptin-IR concentrations reported to the nearest 100 pmol/L.

To evaluate the effects of repeated freezing and thawing on plasma kisspeptin-IR concentrations, 5 mL of blood from each of 4 volunteers [age range 23–41 years, mean (SD) 30.5 (7.6) years; BMI 22–28, 25 (2.45); gestation 23–31 weeks, 30 (0.82) weeks] was collected directly into L and E collection tubes. L and E tubes were used, on the basis of results obtained in the first part of the study, which suggested that kisspeptin-IR was most stable in these 2 tube types. The samples were centrifuged and plasma was separated immediately after collection. An aliquot was taken from the plasma before the first cycle of freezing and after 1, 2, and 3 freeze-thaw cycles. Kisspeptin-IR concentrations in samples collected in L or E tubes did not significantly change even after 4 freeze-thaw cycles (data not shown).

Our studies suggest that circulating kisspeptin-IR concentrations should be measured in plasma samples processed immediately after collection. L or E tubes may preserve kisspeptin-IR better than C tubes. Repeated freezing and thawing does not significantly influence the measurement of kisspeptin-IR concentrations.

Grant/funding Support: KGM is supported by a BBSRC New Investigator Award. MP is supported by the BBSRC. WSD is supported by a UK Department of Health Clinician Scientist Award. The Department of Metabolic Medicine receives funding from the Medical Research Council, Wellcome Trust, EU 6th Framework Programme (LSHM-CT-2003-503041) and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Funding Scheme.

Financial Disclosures: None declared.

References

1

Seminara SB, Messager S, Chatzidaki EE, Thresher RR, Acierno JS, Jr, Shagoury JK, et al. The GPR54 gene as a regulator of puberty.

N Engl J Med

2003

;

349

:

1614

-1627.

2

Kuohung W, Kaiser UB. GPR54 and KiSS-1: role in the regulation of puberty and reproduction.

Rev Endocr Metab Disord

2006

;

7

:

257

-263.

3

Horikoshi Y, Matsumoto H, Takatsu Y, Ohtaki T, Kitada C, Usuki S, et al. Dramatic elevation of plasma metastin concentrations in human pregnancy: metastin as a novel placenta-derived hormone in humans.

J Clin Endocrinol Metab

2003

;

88

:

914

-919.

4

Dhillo WS, Savage P, Murphy KG, Chaudhri OB, Patterson M, Nijher GM, et al. Plasma kisspeptin is raised in patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia and falls during treatment.

Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab

2006

;

291

:

E878

-E884.

5

Dhillo WS, Chaudhri OB, Patterson M, Thompson EL, Murphy KG, Badman MK, et al. Kisspeptin-54 stimulates the hypothalamic-pituitary gonadal axis in human males.

J Clin Endocrinol Metab

2005

;

90

:

6609

-6615.

© 2008 The American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Citations

Views

Altmetric

Metrics

Total Views 429

306 Pageviews

123 PDF Downloads

Since 1/1/2020

Month: Total Views:
January 2020 2
February 2020 2
March 2020 1
April 2020 10
May 2020 3
June 2020 7
July 2020 5
August 2020 5
September 2020 16
October 2020 16
November 2020 14
December 2020 7
January 2021 11
February 2021 6
March 2021 8
April 2021 6
May 2021 8
June 2021 4
July 2021 3
August 2021 2
September 2021 2
October 2021 10
November 2021 13
December 2021 10
January 2022 6
February 2022 7
March 2022 8
April 2022 5
May 2022 5
June 2022 6
July 2022 11
August 2022 8
September 2022 18
October 2022 8
November 2022 7
December 2022 6
January 2023 4
February 2023 3
March 2023 2
April 2023 4
May 2023 5
June 2023 6
July 2023 9
August 2023 7
September 2023 4
October 2023 13
November 2023 11
December 2023 4
January 2024 14
February 2024 12
March 2024 9
April 2024 17
May 2024 8
June 2024 9
July 2024 7
August 2024 2
September 2024 6
October 2024 7

Citations

33 Web of Science

×

Email alerts

Citing articles via

More from Oxford Academic