Aquariums as Reservoirs for Multidrug-resistant Salmonella Paratyphi B (original) (raw)

Author affiliations: *Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, Camden, New South Wales, Australia; †University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia; ‡University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; §University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Structure of Salmonella genomic island 1 (SGI1). The SGI1 region of serovar Typhimurium DT104 (GenBank accession no. AF261825) is drawn to scale with In104 above. Different discrete segments are represented by open boxes and lines of different thicknesses. Vertical bars indicate the IR bounding In104. The chromosomal genes thdF and yidY flank SGI1. Fragments amplified by polymerase chain reaction are shown as thin lines with the primer pairs indicated. Sequences of primers have been

Figure 1. Structure of Salmonella genomic island 1 (SGI1). The SGI1 region of serovar Typhimurium DT104 (GenBank accession no. AF261825) is drawn to scale with In104 above. Different discrete segments are represented by...

Strains of Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi B that use d-tartrate as a carbon source (S. Paratyphi B dT+, formerly S. enterica serovar Java) primarily cause gastroenteritis (1). Since the late 1990s, multidrug-resistant S. Paratyphi B dT+ has been increasingly isolated from infected persons in different parts of the world. One type, which is resistant to streptomycin, spectinomycin, trimethoprim, and sulfonamides, carries a chromosomally located class 2 integron with the dfrA1_-sat1_-aadA1 (Tn_7) array of gene cassettes (2). This clone is predominantly associated with poultry and poultry products in Germany and the Netherlands (2,_3). Human cases of gastroenteritis caused by S. Paratyphi B dT+ with the resistance phenotype ApCmSmSpSuTc (Ap, ampicillin; Cm, chloramphenicol; Sm, streptomycin; Sp, spectinomycin; Su, sulfonamides; Tc, tetracycline) have also been found in Canada (4), the United Kingdom (5), France (6), and Australia (7), and their incidence is increasing. In most of the studied isolates, the resistance genes blaP1, floR, aadA2, sul1, and tetG are located in a complex class 1 integron recently designated In104 (7) (Figure 1). This integron is located within the Salmonella genomic island 1 (SGI1) that was first identified in S. enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 strains with the same phenotype (8). However, the source of the SGI1-containing S. Paratyphi B dT+ has not been identified. Whether isolates obtained in different countries are clonally related is also not known.

Although a few epidemiologic studies suggest that antimicrobial drug–susceptible S. Paratyphi B dT+ may be linked to aquacultural practices (9,10), no molecular data confirm this. However, the first reported SGI1-containing S. Paratyphi B dT+ isolate with drug-resistance phenotype ApCmSmSpSuTc was isolated in 1997 from a tropical fish in Singapore (11), raising the possibility that tropical fish and aquariums are a reservoir. The aim of this study was to determine if domestic aquariums are reservoirs for SGI1-containing, multidrug-resistant S. Paratyphi B dT+ that infect humans.

The Study

S. Paratyphi B dT+ with the resistance phenotype ApCmSmSpSuTc had been isolated sporadically in various states of Australia since 1997, and initial surveys showed a potential association with ownership of home aquariums (D. Lightfoot, unpub. data). In 2000, multidrug-resistant S. Paratyphi B dT+ with an identical phage type (reaction does not conform [RDNC]), designated here as Aus2, and the same drug-resistance profile (ApCmSmSpSuTc) was isolated from humans with gastroenteritis and from fish tanks in the homes of 2 infected patients (Table). In 2003 and 2004, 13 cases of ApCmSmSpSuTc S. Paratyphi B dT+ were investigated by state and commonwealth health departments, and all were associated with home aquariums containing tropical fish (J. Musto et al., unpub. data). Of these, 11 cases were phage type RDNC Aus3, 1 was phage type 1 var 15, and 1 was phage type 3b var. Water and gravel were collected from the domestic aquariums of 5 patients with RDNC Aus3-type infections, and identical isolates were recovered from each fish tank. Four matched sets of isolates, 2 from 2000 and 2 from 2003, were further examined (Table). One isolate (SRC50) characterized previously (7) was used as a control (Table).

To determine if the resistance phenotype of these strains was due to SGI1 (4,5,7,8,11), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with primer pairs shown in Figure 1 was used as previously described (7). The left and right junctions of SGI1 with the chromosome and of In104 with SGI1 were present in all cases. Regions containing the gene cassettes were amplified by using standard primers (L1 and R1) in the 5´- and 3´-conserved segments of class 1 integrons. Fragments of 1.0 and 1.2 kb were amplified from all isolates, and digestion of these amplicons with Rsa_I generated a profile (data not shown) that was indistinguishable from the pattern for the 2 amplicons containing the aadA2 and blaP1 cassettes found in In104 and S. Paratyphi B dT+ isolates SRC49 and SRC50 from 2001 (7). The aadA2 gene cassette was linked to SO26 in the SGI1 backbone, which indicates that it is on the left, as in In104, and the expected 1.8-kb PCR fragment was generated by using primers in groEL and blaP1 (Figure 1), which places the blaP1 cassette on the right. Southern hybridization of Xba I–digested whole-cell DNA with a probe for the floR gene as described previously (7) identified a band of ≈12 kb, which is consistent with an SGI1 structure identical to that reported previously (7,8,_11) and the _groEL_-blaP1 amplicon linked this 12-kb _Xba_I fragment with the adjacent 4.3-kb _Xba_I fragment (Figure 1).

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and IS200 profiles of Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi B dT+ isolates positive for Salmonella genomic island 1. A) PFGE profiles. Xba I–digested whole-cell DNA was separated by PFGE as previously described (12). Molecular mass markers (lane M) are low-range PFGE markers (New England BioLabs, Beverly, MA, USA) composed of concatamers of bacteriophage lambda DNA. The band absent in lane 147 was present in other runs. B) IS200 profiles. PstI

Figure 2. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and IS_200_ profiles of Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi B dT+ isolates positive for Salmonella genomic island 1. A) PFGE profiles. Xba I–digested whole-cell DNA was separated by...

To obtain further evidence for the identity of the matched human and fish tank isolates, macrorestriction analyses of Xba_I–digested whole-cell DNA by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) were performed as previously described (12). Several studies (3–6,13) suggest that S. Paratyphi B dT+ isolates possess considerable genetic heterogeneity. However, the SGI1-containing isolates appear to be homogeneous. The band patterns for all SGI1-containing S. Paratyphi B dT+ were identical from humans and fish tanks with phage type RDNC Aus3 (Figure 2A) and Aus2 (data not shown). IS_200 profiles were also analyzed by hybridization of an IS_200_ probe with Pst I–digested whole-cell DNA as described elsewhere (6). Again, all strains showed identical profiles (Figure 2B and data not shown) that differed by 1 band from profile IP1 recently described (6). Thus, matched isolates from humans and their fish tanks were indistinguishable from each other.

An unusual observation in this study was that isolates with different phage types showed identical PFGE and IS_200_ profiles, indicating that they represented a clonal cluster. The control strain SRC50 (RDNC) also displayed the same patterns, demonstrating that it also is a member of the same clone. Thus, variation in phage type (Table) appears to have occurred within a single clone. Variation in phage type has also been reported in other studies of multidrug-resistant S. Paratyphi B dT+ strains (4–6), although a number of related but slightly different _Xba_I PFGE patterns were observed in those studies. This finding suggests that all multidrug-resistant S. Paratyphi B dT+ found globally have a single origin, but that variations, possibly because of acquisition of other temperate phages or plasmids, have arisen over time. However, direct comparisons of strains from different countries will be needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Conclusions

This is the first definitive report showing that ornamental fish tanks are a reservoir for multidrug-resistant S. Paratyphi B dT+ (ApCmSmSpSuTc phenotype) containing SGI1 that causes severe disease in humans, particularly young children. In addition to containing SGI1, the matched isolates from humans and their fish tanks had the same phage type and the same Xba_I macrorestriction digest pattern and IS_200 profile. These findings identify home aquariums containing tropical fish as the most important, although not necessarily the only, source of multidrug-resistant S. Paratyphi B dT+. The fact that 12%–14% of Australian households have ornamental fish (14) and as many as 12 million American and 1 million Canadian families own domestic aquariums (9), together with the young age of most affected patients, indicate that multidrug-resistant S. Paratyphi B dT+ in home aquariums is a risk factor for Salmonella infection and thus becomes a public health issue.

Ms Levings is a PhD candidate at the Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute. Her research interests are the analysis of clustered antimicrobial drug-resistance genes and their spread among members of the Enterobacteriaceae.

Top

  1. Chart H. The pathogenicity of strains of Salmonella Paratyphi B and Salmonella Java. J Appl Microbiol. 2003;94:340–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Van Pelt W, van der Zee H, Wannet WJ, van de Giessen AW, Mevius DJ, Bolder NM, Explosive increase of Salmonella Java in poultry in the Netherlands: consequences for public health. Euro Surveill. 2003;8:31–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Miko A, Guerra B, Schroeter A, Dorn C, Helmuth R. Molecular characterization of multiresistant d-tartrate-positive Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi B isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:3184–91. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Mulvey MR, Boyd D, Cloeckaert A, Ahmed R, Ng LK. Emergence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella Paratyphi B dT+, Canada. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:1307–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Threlfall J, Levent B, Hopkins KL, de Pinna E, Ward LR, Brown DJ. Multidrug-resistant Salmonella Java. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:170–1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Weill FX, Fabre L, Grandry B, Grimont PA, Casin I. Multiple-antibiotic resistance in Salmonella enterica serotype Paratyphi B isolates collected in France between 2000 and 2003 is due mainly to strains harboring Salmonella genomic islands 1, 1-B, and 1-C. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:2793–801. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Levings RS, Lightfoot D, Partridge SR, Hall RM, Djordjevic SP. The genomic island SGI1, containing the multiple antibiotic resistance region of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 or variants of it, is widely distributed in other S. enterica serovars. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:4401–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyd D, Peters GA, Cloeckaert A, Boumedine KS, Chaslus-Dancla E, Imberechts H, Complete nucleotide sequence of a 43-kilobase genomic island associated with the multidrug resistance region of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 and its identification in phage type DT120 and serovar Agona. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:5725–32. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gaulin C, Vincent C, Alain L, Ismail J. Outbreak of Salmonella Paratyphi B linked to aquariums in the province of Quebec, 2000. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2002;28:89–93, 96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Senanayake SN, Ferson MJ, Botham SJ, Belinfante RT. A child with Salmonella enterica serotype Paratyphi B infection acquired from a fish tank. Med J Aust. 2004;180:250.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Meunier D, Boyd D, Mulvey MR, Baucheron S, Mammina C, Nastasi A, Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium DT104 antibiotic resistance genomic island I in serotype Paratyphi B. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:430–3. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Thong KL, Ngeow YF, Altwegg M, Navaratnam P, Pang T. Molecular analysis of Salmonella Enteritidis by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and ribotyping. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:1070–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Goh YL, Yasin R, Puthucheary SD, Koh YT, Lim VK, Taib Z, DNA fingerprinting of human isolates of Salmonella enterica serotype Paratyphi B in Malaysia. J Appl Microbiol. 2003;95:1134–42. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lehane L, Rawlin GT. Topically acquired bacterial zoonoses from fish: a review. Med J Aust. 2000;173:256–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar

The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.