A Brief Review of Research Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy to Measure Activation of the Prefrontal Cortex during Emotional Processing: The Importance of Experimental Design (original) (raw)

MINI REVIEW article

Front. Hum. Neurosci., 20 October 2016

Sec. Cognitive Neuroscience

Volume 10 - 2016 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00529

Abstract

During the past two decades there has been a pronounced increase in the number of published research studies that have employed near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) to measure neural activation. The technique is now an accepted neuroimaging tool adopted by cognitive neuroscientists to investigate a number of fields, one of which is the study of emotional processing. Crucially, one brain region that is important to the processing of emotional information is the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and NIRS is ideally suited to measuring activity in this region. Compared to other methods used to record neural activation, NIRS reduces the discomfort to participants, makes data collection from larger sample sizes more achievable, and allows measurement of activation during tasks involving physical movement. However, the use of NIRS to investigate the links between emotion and cognition has revealed mixed findings. For instance, whilst some studies report increased PFC activity associated with the processing of negative information, others show increased activity in relation to positive information. Research shows differences in PFC activity between different cognitive tasks, yet findings also vary within similar tasks. This work reviews a selection of recent studies that have adopted NIRS to study PFC activity during emotional processing in both healthy individuals and patient populations. It highlights the key differences between research findings and argues that variations in experimental design could be a contributing factor to the mixed results. Guidance is provided for future work in this area in order to improve consistency within this growing field.

Introduction

Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a non-invasive neuroimaging technique that measures changes in concentrations of specific chromophores (oxygenated hemoglobin [oxy-Hb] and deoxygenated hemoglobin [deoxy-Hb]) in biological tissue. Like functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), NIRS relies on the principle of neurovascular coupling (the relationship between cerebral blood flow and neural activity) to infer brain activity from changes in oxygenation. The first NIRS studies were published in 1993 (e.g., Chance et al., 1993) and during the past two decades there has been a dramatic rise in the use of NIRS as a neuroimaging technique in cognitive neuroscience research. Whilst NIRS does have limitations in comparison to other neuroimaging techniques, including its poor temporal resolution compared to electroencephalography (EEG) and poor spatial resolution compared to fMRI, it also offers numerous advantages. NIRS is easily combined with other neuroimaging techniques including EEG (Herrmann et al., 2008) and has a higher temporal resolution than fMRI. Additionally, NIRS can reduce the discomfort to participants, make data collection from larger sample sizes more feasible, and individuals with non-removable metal objects in their body or who have tattoos are not excluded. Further, NIRS allows for the measurement of brain activation during a variety of tasks (e.g., during exercise; Lucas et al., 2012). Lastly, due to the fact that it is less invasive than other techniques, NIRS permits the monitoring of brain activation from certain populations that would otherwise be more difficult to access, such as infants (Franceschini et al., 2007), the elderly (Mehagnoul-Schipper et al., 2002), and patient populations (Matsuo et al., 2004; Matsubara et al., 2014; Yokoyama et al., 2015; Ruocco et al., 2016).

Crucial to the current work, NIRS is a useful technique for studying the influence of emotion. It is proposed that during an emotional situation, or when presented with emotional information, two competing processing strategies are present. Emotion influences cognition in a bottom-up manner regardless of the demands of a task, whilst simultaneously individuals adopt top-down cognitive control strategies to direct resources to task completion and emotion regulation. Emotional control therefore involves higher order emotion-related regions, including the prefrontal cortex (PFC), and it is hypothesized that the degree of success in the recruitment of prefrontal neural systems has a direct impact on task performance in emotional situations. As NIRS can only measure neural activation from cortical structures approximately 1–2 cm deep in the brain, it cannot record amygdala-generated neural activation from the limbic system, an area traditionally associated with emotional processing. However, NIRS is ideal for recording PFC neural activation and has been adopted by cognitive neuroscientists investigating the influence of emotion on cognition (Doi et al., 2013).

Having outlined the suitability of NIRS as a tool for measuring emotion-related neural activation, the next stage is to review evidence from NIRS research implicating the PFC in tasks incorporating emotional processing. Research will be reviewed from studies measuring PFC activation during the presentation of emotional stimuli (Table 1), studies recording activity during task completion where naturally occurring emotion is recorded or emotion is artificially induced (Table 1), and from studies of PFC neural activation in patient populations (Table 2). Differences in experimental findings will be discussed in relation to the chosen experimental design. There are studies using NIRS to investigate emotional processing in brain regions outside of the PFC (e.g., Köchel et al., 2011; Plichta et al., 2011) and whilst processing emotional faces (e.g., Sun et al., 2015; Rodrigo et al., 2016), however these are outside the scope of the current review. A number of recent articles have also covered methodological issues including filtering of NIRS data and artifact rejection (Guerrero-Mosquera et al., 2016; Kamran et al., 2016; Tachtsidis and Scholkmann, 2016) and these are also not covered in the present work. It should also be noted that in this review we focus on experimental findings that report concentration changes in oxy-Hb. NIRS measures changes in oxy-Hb, deoxy-Hb, and compound activity (oxy; oxy-Hb–deoxy-Hb) and it is been argued that changes in oxy-Hb concentrations are the most reliable measure of cerebral blood flow and, by extension, neural activity (Malonek et al., 1997; Strangman et al., 2002). Despite this, it has been suggested that deoxy-Hb has a closer relation to the blood oxygen level dependent response in fMRI, and simultaneously reporting both oxy-Hb and deoxy-Hb allows better physiological interpretations to be made (Tachtsidis and Scholkmann, 2016).

Key findings from studies measuring PFC activation during passive viewing of emotional stimuli and cognitive tasks.

Key findings from studies measuring PFC activation in patient populations.

PFC activation during passive viewing of emotional stimuli

The neuroscientific study of emotional processing often involves individuals viewing images of differing emotional valence. This allows the underlying neural networks involved in emotional processing to be investigated. Researchers can create their own emotional stimuli or make use of validated stimuli databases developed by other investigators (e.g., International Affective Picture System; IAPS; Lang et al., 2008; Nencki Affective Picture System; Marchewka et al., 2014). Glotzbach et al. (2011) adopted such an approach using images from the IAPS. The researchers found that bilateral PFC oxy-Hb increased for negative compared to neutral images, suggesting that PFC regions are recruited during processing of negative stimuli. However, these findings are limited because a positive condition was not included. Hoshi et al. (2011) recorded PFC oxy-Hb changes during the presentation of both positive and negative stimuli. This study also found a significant increase in oxy-Hb for negative stimuli but also showed a significant decrease in oxy-Hb for positive stimuli (compared to neutral). Yet, Herrmann et al. (2003) found no differences in oxy-Hb between baseline activity and the viewing of neutral, negative, and positive images. This small collection of studies shows the importance of the stimuli conditions included in experiments investigating emotional processing. Choosing to omit a neutral, negative, or positive stimuli condition means that researchers are not always making the same comparisons within their studies (i.e., whilst some compare negative [and positive] to neutral, others compare negative to positive). This affects the results and makes comparison between studies problematic.

An additional factor that makes it difficult to compare findings is that researchers make use of different analytic approaches. Critically, this seems to have an impact on the findings. Ozawa et al. (2014) analyzed their data by comparing neutral and negative conditions to baseline oxy-Hb and the results suggested increases in oxy-Hb for both types of stimuli. However, when they compared neutral stimuli directly to negative stimuli no differences in oxy-Hb were evident. It may therefore be argued that a comparison to baseline can also reflect task-related activation in addition to any activation due to emotion. Herrmann et al. (2003) compared oxy-Hb in positive, negative, and neutral stimuli to baseline and were able to conclude no influence of emotion in addition to no influence of task. Researchers should ensure baseline data is included in analysis, in combination with control and experimental conditions to allow separation of task-related and emotion-related activation.

A further problem is that whilst some researchers report only group level analysis of PFC activation, others analyze data at both a group and an individual level. When analyzing activation at a group level, Hoshi et al. (2011) found decreased activation in response to positive stimuli and increased activation for negative stimuli. Individual level analysis revealed mostly decreases in oxy-Hb for pleasant stimuli, but both increases and decreases in oxy-Hb for unpleasant stimuli (compared to baseline oxy-Hb). This implies individual variation in the effect of emotional stimuli, but this is not always acknowledged. The choice of analysis clearly has important implications for the interpretation of results.

PFC activation during task completion

Researchers have also used NIRS to measure activation within more demanding tasks. In this section two types of studies are discussed. First, those investigating the influence of induced or naturally occurring mood on cognitive task performance, and, secondly, studies where the content of the task itself is emotional. Aoki et al. (2011) demonstrated that naturalistic levels of negative mood were negatively correlated with PFC activity during a verbal working memory (WM) task. This is an important observation as it suggests that naturally occurring negative mood influences PFC activity. However, Ozawa et al. (2014) also used a WM task and found increased PFC oxy-Hb when participants were induced into negative mood (compared to neutral). Whilst there are differences in the exact nature of the WM tasks used in these two studies [Ozawa et al. (2014) used an n-back task whilst Aoki et al. (2011) adopted a verbal matching task], as well as differences in study design (i.e., using naturally occurring mood vs. induced mood), these conflicting findings show that the relationship between negative mood and cognitive task-related PFC oxy-Hb needs clarifying and warrants further investigation.

Consideration of the associated behavioral data does not necessarily help to explain the differences in these findings. This is particularly the case due to the different practices used by the researchers. For instance, Ozawa et al. (2014) did not analyze task performance in conjunction with oxy-Hb, yet Ogawa et al. (2014) did and found a correlation between increased PFC oxy-Hb and improved performance in a WM task. On the basis of the findings reported by Aoki et al. (2011) it may be predicted that negative mood would lead to poor performance and the researchers did find a relationship between lower negative mood scores and improved verbal WM performance. However, this relationship was no longer significant after controlling for age and gender suggesting that age and gender influence PFC activity during emotional WM tasks, and, that the relationship between mood scores and WM performance is weak. Moreover, Aoki et al. (2011) only observed a weak trend when they correlated PFC oxy-Hb and WM performance. Consequently it is impossible to conclude the association between PFC activation, mood, and task performance.

Adopting a different approach, Tupak et al. (2014) used emotional images embedded in a top-down labeling task and a perceptual matching task to investigate emotional processing. No differences were observed in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC) activity during the labeling task between negative (threatening) and neutral visual stimuli. However, increased vlPFC activity occurred during the matching of threatening images compared to neutral images, showing that the vlPFC is involved during the cognitive evaluation of threatening stimuli.

Kreplin and Fairclough (2013) also incorporated emotion into an experimental task. When participants were asked to make judgments about artistic images they found increased activation for positive stimuli compared to negative stimuli. These findings contrast with studies investigating the passive viewing of emotional images and studies measuring activation during cognitive tasks. However, increases in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) activity in response to positive stimuli (compared to negative) has also been found using fMRI (Herrington et al., 2005).

One aspect that contributes to the mixed findings is the choice of behavioral task used to measure the effects of emotion on performance. Many researchers make use of WM tasks and this does aid comparison between the different studies, however it also limits the applicability of the findings. An issue arises however when a different task is used. For instance, Bendall and Thompson (2016) induced participants into positive, negative, and neutral moods and measured PFC oxy-Hb in a change detection task and found no difference in activation across emotion conditions. One argument for the non-significant findings was that task difficulty limited the influence of emotion, a claim also supported by behavioral findings (Bendall and Thompson, 2015), as well as the findings of Tupak et al. (2014). Despite this, it can be concluded that it is important to justify the choice of task and to consider the difficulty of the task used in this area of research. Researchers must ensure that the experimental task is selected with some acknowledgment of how the work can compare to other findings in the field.

PFC activation in patient populations

In addition to measuring the effect of emotion on cognition in general, research has also explored the way in which emotion influences cognitive performance in tasks incorporating emotional information. Altered emotional processing is a key feature in the pathophysiology of mood disorders (Matsubara et al., 2014). For example, it has been shown that increased dlPFC activity when regulating negative affect is correlated with decreases in depression severity (Heller et al., 2013). Furthermore, it has been argued that difficulty initiating top-down control processes required to regulate emotion is a contributing factor in various patient groups or disorders, including major depressive disorder (MDD; Johnstone et al., 2007; Matsubara et al., 2014), bipolar disorder (BD; Matsubara et al., 2014), and borderline personality disorder (New et al., 2008; Krause-Utz et al., 2012).

Matsubara et al. (2014) used an emotional adaptation of the Stroop paradigm (Stroop, 1935) to investigate prefrontal activation in response to emotional words in patients with BD and MDD. They found different patterns of PFC activity for BD and MDD patients compared to healthy controls. In response to threat-related words, BD patients demonstrated increased oxy-Hb in the left inferior frontal region whilst MDD patients showed increased oxy-Hb in the left middle frontal region. Additionally, when responding to happy words, BD patients showed decreased oxy-Hb in the middle frontal regions in both hemispheres, whereas MDD patients showed no significant differences to healthy controls. Moreover, BD patients showed both increased and decreased oxy-Hb in the superior frontal and middle frontal regions compared to MDD patients when responding to happy words. These results suggest that altered PFC neural responses to emotional stimuli may be a trait marker in patient populations (Matsubara et al., 2014). However, additional research is needed to confirm these initial findings. Further, differences in emotion-related oxy-Hb between patient groups suggests that different neural pathways play a role in emotional processing in these disorders.

BD and MDD have been shown to be comorbid with social anxiety disorder (SAD; Kessler et al., 2005) and all three disorders appear to show altered neural responses during emotional processing. Using a verbal fluency task that induced fear of evaluation by others, Yokoyama et al. (2015) measured oxy-Hb and found that SAD patients exhibited smaller increases in vlPFC oxy-Hb compared to healthy controls. In addition, right vlPFC activity was shown to be negatively correlated with social avoidance in SAD patients. In contrast, this correlation was reversed in healthy controls. Decreased vlPFC oxy-Hb suggests that SAD patients may have difficulty successfully recruiting emotion regulation-related brain regions. Liu et al. (2014) also adopted a verbal fluency task and found that MDD patients demonstrated smaller increases in oxy-Hb during task completion, and that bilateral PFC and antero-medial PFC oxy-Hb is correlated with depression severity. NIRS studies reporting observable differences in oxy-Hb between patient groups, as well as between patient groups and healthy individuals, demonstrate that NIRS is an effective imaging methodology in the study of the pathophysiology of patient disorders. Yet, given how research shows that state and trait emotion can have separate and combined effects on cognitive processing (Crocker et al., 2012), future studies need to consider the role of both state and trait emotion in their experimental design.

Recommendations for future research

There are a number of aspects related to experimental design that NIRS researchers should consider when investigating the influence of emotion on cognition.

• Inclusion of sufficient experimental conditions
  Altered neural processing has been observed in relation to both positive and negative stimuli (Glotzbach et al., 2011; Hoshi et al., 2011; Kreplin and Fairclough, 2013; Ozawa et al., 2014). Consequently, the inclusion of positive, negative, and neutral experimental conditions whenever possible will permit more accurate comparisons between studies and allow more precise conclusions about underlying neural substrates to be generated.
• Experimental task considerations
  Task difficulty can influence PFC neural activity and mitigate the influence of emotion on task performance. Thus, the choice of experimental task needs to be carefully considered. Additionally, some studies do not attempt to relate neural activation to task performance and future work should include neural activation, emotion, and task performance in their analysis framework.
• Inclusion of baseline data and experimental conditions within analysis framework
  It is also important for future work to report analysis for activation changes compared between conditions (experimental conditions and control conditions) as well as comparison of oxy-Hb activity in relation to baseline oxy-Hb activity. Reporting both may help to disentangle task-related changes in activation from emotion-related differences in activation (during a task). It would also be advisable for researchers to report the way in which their baseline recordings are taken as this is an important consideration when reflecting on the changes taking place in response to emotional processing.
• Inclusion of individual level and group level analysis
  The content of emotional stimuli is subjective, and consequently PFC activation has been shown to vary across individuals in relation to emotional stimuli (Hoshi et al., 2011). We propose that researchers consider using individual level analysis to investigate these variations. This data would allow the investigation of any mitigating influence of emotion on task performance and underlying neural activity. Additionally, Tachtsidis and Scholkmann (2016) suggest that the strength of task-related systemic physiological change is dependent upon the emotional state of the individual, thus the inclusion of individual level analysis may be beneficial in avoiding false positives and false negatives in oxy-Hb analysis due to the influence of systemic physiological fluctuations.

Conclusion

The growing field of emotion science stands to benefit from studies adopting NIRS to measure neural activation during emotional and cognitive tasks. NIRS is well suited to measuring PFC neural activity, and the PFC has been shown to be involved in the processing of emotional information. Many of the benefits that NIRS affords, including its portability, reduction in participant discomfort, and ability to study a wider range of behavioral tasks, make it an excellent tool for the study of neural functioning in healthy and patient populations. Conflicting data has been reported concerning emotion-related neural activation and it is hoped that the recommendations included in this article may help researchers to unravel some of these inconsistences in future research. Specifically, researchers need to adopt more consistent experimental designs, critically consider their choice of experimental task, and provide more detail regarding analysis to allow for effective comparison between studies and better explore the influence of emotion on cognition.

Statements

Author contributions

RB: review concept, verification of analytic methods, main conclusions, article drafting. PE: verification of review concept, conclusion verification, proof reading. CT: verification of review concept, verification of analytic methods, conclusion verification, article drafting.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

• 1
  AokiR.SatoH.KaturaT.UtsugiK.KoizumiH.MatsudaR.et al. (2011). Relationship of negative mood with prefrontal cortex activity during working memory tasks: an optical topography study. _Neurosci. Res._70, 189–196. 10.1016/j.neures.2011.02.011
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 2
  BendallR. C. A.ThompsonC. (2015). Emotion has no impact on attention in a change detection flicker task. _Front. Psychol._6:1592. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01592
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 3
  BendallR. C. A.ThompsonC. (2016). Emotion does not influence prefrontal cortex activity during a visual attention task. A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study, in 5th Annual International Conference Proceedings on Cognitive and Behavioural Psychology (Singapore), 36–43.
  • Google Scholar
• 4
  ChanceB.ZhuangZ.UnAhC.AlterC.LiptonL. (1993). Cognition-activated low-frequency modulation of light absorption in human brain. _Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A._90, 3770–3774. 10.1073/pnas.90.8.3770
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 5
  CrockerL. D.HellerW.SpeilbergJ. M.WarrenS. L.BredemeierK.SuttonB. P.et al. (2012). Neural mechanisms of attentional control differentiate trait and state negative affect. _Front. Psychol._3:298. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00298
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 6
  DoiH.NishitaniS.ShinoharaK. (2013). NIRS as a tool for assaying emotional function in the prefrontal cortex. _Front. Hum. Neurosci._7:770. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00770
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 7
  FranceschiniM. A.ThakerS.ThemelisG.KrishnamoorthyK. K.BortfeldH.DiamondS. G.et al. (2007). Assessment of infant brain development with frequency-domain near-infrared spectroscopy. _Pediatr. Res._61, 546–551. 10.1203/pdr.0b013e318045be99
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 8
  GlotzbachE.MühlbergerA.GschwendtnerK.FallgatterA. J.PauliP.HerrmannM. J. (2011). Prefrontal brain activation during emotional processing: a functional near infrared spectroscopy study (fNIRS). _Open Neuroimag. J._5, 33–39. 10.2174/1874440001105010033
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 9
  Guerrero-MosqueraC.BorragánG.PeigneuxP. (2016). Automatic detection of noisy channels in fNIRS signal based on correlation analysis. _J. Neurosci. Methods_271, 128–138. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.07.010
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 10
  HellerA. S.JohnstoneT.PetersonM. J.KoldenG. G.KalinN. H.DavidsonR. J. (2013). Increases in prefrontal cortex activity when regulating negative emotion predicts symptom severity trajectory over six months in depression. _JAMA Psychiatry_70, 1181–1189. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.2430
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 11
  HerringtonJ. D.MohantyA.KovenN. S.FisherJ. E.StewartJ. L.BanichM. T.et al. (2005). Emotion-modulated performance and activity in left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. _Emotion_5, 200–207. 10.1037/1528-3542.5.2.200
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 12
  HerrmannM. J.EhlisA. C.FallgatterA. J. (2003). Prefrontal activation through task requirements of emotional induction measured with NIRS. _Biol. Psychol._64, 255–263. 10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00095-4
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 13
  HerrmannM. J.HuterT.PlichtaM. M.EhlisA. C.AlpersG. W.MühlbergerA.et al. (2008). Enhancement of activity of the primary visual cortex during processing of emotional stimuli as measured with event-related functional near-infrared spectroscopy and event-related potentials. _Hum. Brain Mapp._29, 28–35. 10.1002/hbm.20368
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 14
  HoshiY.HuangJ.IguchiY.NayaM.OkamotoT.OnoS. (2011). Recognition of human emotions from cerebral blood flow changes in the frontal region: a study with event-related near-infrared spectroscopy. _J. Neuroimaging_21, 94–101. 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2009.00454.x
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 15
  JohnstoneT.van ReekumC. M.UrryH. L.KalinN. H.DavidsonR. J. (2007). Failure to regulate: counterproductive recruitment of top-down prefrontal-subcortical circuitry in major depression. _J. Neurosci._27, 8877–8884. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2063-07.2007
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 16
  KamranM. A.MannanM. M. N.JeongM. Y. (2016). Cortical signal analysis and advances in functional near-infrared spectroscopy signal: a review. _Front. Hum. Neurosci._10:261. 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00261
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 17
  KesslerR. C.ChuiW. T.DemlerO.WaltersE. E. (2005). Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. _Arch. Gen. Psychiatry_62, 617–627. 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.617
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 18
  KöchelA.PlichtaM. M.SchäferA.LeutgebV.ScharmüllerW.FallgatterA. J.et al. (2011). Affective perception and imagery: a NIRS study. _Int. J. Psychophysiol._80, 192–197. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.03.006
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 19
  Krause-UtzA.OeiN. Y. L.NiedtfeldI.BohusM.SpinhovenP.SchmahlC.et al. (2012). Influence of emotional distraction on working memory performance in borderline personality disorder. _Psychol. Med._42, 2181–2192. 10.1017/S0033291712000153
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 20
  Kreplin Fairclough, (2013). Activation of the rostromedial prefrontal cortex during the experience of positive emotion in the context of esthetic experience. An fNIRS study. _Front. Hum. Neurosci._7:879. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00879
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 21
  LangP. J.BradleyM. M.CuthbertB. N. (2008). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective Ratings of Pictures and Instruction Manual. Technical Report A-8. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
  • Google Scholar
• 22
  LiuX.SunG.ZhangX.XuB.ShenC.ShiL.et al. (2014). Relationship between the prefrontal function and the severity of the emotional symptoms during a verbal fluency task in patients with major depressive disorder: a multi-channel NIRS study. _Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry_54, 114–121. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2014.05.005
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 23
  LucasS. J. E.AinslieP. N.MurrellC. J.ThomasK. N.FranzE. A.CotterJ. D. (2012). Effect of age on exercise-induced alterations in cognitive executive function: relationship to cerebral perfusion. _Exp. Gerontol._47, 541–551. 10.1016/j.exger.2011.12.002
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 24
  MalonekD.DirnaglU.LindauerK.YamadaK.KannoI.GrinvaldA. (1997). Vascular imprints of neuronal activity: relationships between the dynamics cortical blood flow, oxygenation, and volume changes following sensory stimulation. _Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A._94, 14826–14831. 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14826
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 25
  MarchewkaA.ZurawskiL.JednorógK.GrabowskaA. (2014). The Nencki Affective Picture System (NAPS): introduction to a novel, standardized, wide-range, high-quality, realistic picture database. _Behav. Res. Methods_46, 596–610. 10.3758/s13428-013-0379-1
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 26
  MatsubaraT.MatsuoK.NakashimaM.NakanoM.HaradaK.WatanukiT.et al. (2014). Prefrontal activation in response to emotional words in patients with bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. _Neuroimage_85, 489–497. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.098
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 27
  MatsuoK.WatanabeA.OnoderaY.KatoN.KatoT. (2004). Prefrontal hemodynamic response to verbal-fluency task and hyperventilation in bipolar disorder measured by multi-channel near-infrared spectroscopy. _J. Affect. Disord._82, 85–92. 10.1016/j.jad.2003.10.004
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 28
  Mehagnoul-SchipperD. J.van der KallenB. F.ColierW. N.van der SluijsM. C.van ErningL. J.ThijssenH. O.et al. (2002). Simultaneous measurements of cerebral oxygenation changes during brain activation by near-infrared spectroscopy and functional magnetic resonance imaging in healthy young and elderly subjects. _Hum. Brain Mapp._16, 14–23. 10.1002/hbm.10026
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 29
  NewA. S.GoodmanM.TriebwasserJ.SieverL. J. (2008). Recent advances in the biological study of personality disorders. _Psychiatr. Clin. North Am._31, 441–461. 10.1016/j.psc.2008.03.011
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 30
  OgawaY.KotaniK.JimboY. (2014). Relationship between working memory performance and neural activation measured using near-infrared spectroscopy. _Brain Behav._4, 544–551. 10.1002/brb3.238
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 31
  OzawaS.MatsudaG.HirakiK. (2014). Negative emotion modulates prefrontal cortex activity during a working memory task: a NIRS study. _Front. Hum. Neurosci._8:46. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00046
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 32
  PlichtaM. M.GerdesA. B.AlpersG. W.HarnischW.BrillS.WieserM. J.et al. (2011). Auditory cortex activation is modulated by emotion: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study. _Neuroimage_55, 1200–1207. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.011
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 33
  RodrigoA. H.AyazH.RuoccoA. C. (2016). Examining the neural correlates of incidental facial emotion encoding within the prefrontal cortex using functional near-infrared spectroscopy, in Foundations of Augmented Cognition: Neuroergonomics and Operational Neuroscience, Vol. Part I, LNAI 9743, eds SchmorrowD. D.FidopiastisC. M. (Toronto: Springer International Publishing), 1–11.
  • Google Scholar
• 34
  RuoccoA. C.RodrigoA. H.McMainS. F.Page-GouldE.AyazH.LinksP. S. (2016). Predicting treatment outcomes from prefrontal cortex activation for self-harming patients with borderline personality disorder: a preliminary study. _Front. Hum. Neurosci._10:220. 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00220
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 35
  StrangmanG.CulverJ. P.ThompsonJ. H.BoasD. A. (2002). A quantitative comparison of simultaneous BOLD fMRI and NIRS recordings during functional brain activation. _Neuroimage_17, 719–731. 10.1006/nimg.2002.1227
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 36
  StroopJ. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. _J. Exp. Psychol._18, 643–662. 10.1037/h0054651
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 37
  SunY.AyazH.AkansuA. N. (2015). Neural correlates of affective context in facial expression analysis: a simultaneous EEG-fNIRS study, in IEEE GlobalSIP (Orlando, FL), 820–824.
  • Google Scholar
• 38
  TachtsidisI.ScholkmannF. (2016). False positives and false negatives in functional near-infrared spectroscopy: issues, challenges, and the way forward. _Neurophotonics_3, 1–6. 10.1117/1.NPh.3.3.031405
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 39
  TupakS. V.DreslerT.GuhnA.EhlisA.-C.FallgatterA. J.PauliP.et al. (2014). Implicit emotion regulation in the presence of threat: neural and autonomic correlates. _Neuroimage_85, 372–379. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.066
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
• 40
  YokoyamaC.KaiyaH.KumanoH.KinouM.UmekageT.YasudaS.et al. (2015). Dysfunction of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex underlying social anxiety disorder: a multi-channel NIRS study. _Neuroimage Clin._8, 455–461. 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.05.011
  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Keywords

emotion, prefrontal cortex, near-infrared spectroscopy, review, mood, neuroimaging, affective neuroscience

Citation

Bendall RCA, Eachus P and Thompson C (2016) A Brief Review of Research Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy to Measure Activation of the Prefrontal Cortex during Emotional Processing: The Importance of Experimental Design. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10:529. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00529

Received

14 July 2016

Accepted

05 October 2016

Published

20 October 2016

Volume

10 - 2016

Edited by

Yukiori Goto, Kyoto University, Japan

Reviewed by

Thomas Dresler, University of Tübingen, Germany; Hasan Ayaz, Drexel University, USA

Updates

Copyright

© 2016 Bendall, Eachus and Thompson.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Robert C. A. Bendall r.c.a.bendall@salford.ac.uk

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.