The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: Number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks (original) (raw)

References

• Balota, D. A., Ferraro, R. F., &Connor, L. T. (1991). On the early influence of meaning in word recognition: A review of the literature. In P. J. Schwanenflugel (Ed.),The psychology of word meanings (pp. 187–221). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Besner, D., &Joordens, S. (1995). Wrestling with ambiguity—Further reflections: Reply to Masson and Borowsky (1995) and Rueckl (1995).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 515–519.
  Article Google Scholar
• Besner, D., &Smith, M. C. (1992). Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 468–482.
  Article Google Scholar
• Borowsky, R., &Besner, D. (1993). Visual word recognition: A multistage activation model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 813–840.
  Article Google Scholar
• Borowsky, R., &Masson, M. E. J. (1996). Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 63–85.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., &Provost, J. (1993). Psy-Scope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 257–271.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cortese, M. J., Simpson, G. B., &Woolsey, S. (1997). Effects of association and imageability on phonological mapping.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 226–231.
  Article Google Scholar
• De Groot, A. M. (1989). Representational aspects of word imageability and word frequency as assessed through word association.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 824–845.
  Article Google Scholar
• Gibbs, P., &Van Orden, G. C. (1998). Pathway selection's utility for control of word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1162–1187.
  Article Google Scholar
• Gottlob, L. R., Goldinger, S. D., Stone, G. O., &Van Orden, G. C. (1999). Reading homographs: Orthographic, phonologic, and semantic dynamics.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 561–574.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hino, Y., &Lupker, S. J. (1996). Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming: An alternative to lexical access accounts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1331–1356.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hino, Y., Lupker, S. J., &Pexman, P. M. (2002). Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: Interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 686–713.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hino, Y., Lupker, S. J., Sears, C. R., &Ogawa, T. (1998). The effects of polysemy for Japanese katakana words.Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,10, 395–424.
  Article Google Scholar
• James, C. T. (1975). The role of semantic information in lexical decisions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,1, 130–136.
  Article Google Scholar
• Jastrzembski, J. E. (1981). Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon.Cognitive Psychology,13, 278–305.
  Article Google Scholar
• Jastrzembski, J. E., &Stanners, R. F. (1975). Multiple word meanings and lexical search speed.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 534–537.
  Article Google Scholar
• Jones, G. V. (1985). Deep dyslexia, imageability, and ease of predication.Brain & Language,24, 1–19.
  Article Google Scholar
• Joordens, S., &Besner, D. (1994). When banking on meaning is not (yet) money in the bank: Explorations in connectionist modeling.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1051–1062.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kawamoto, A. H., Farrar, W. T., &Kello, C. T. (1994). When two meanings are better than one: Modeling the ambiguity advantage using a recurrent distributed network.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1233–1247.
  Article Google Scholar
• Keil, F. C. (1989).Concepts, kinds and cognitive development. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.
  Google Scholar
• Kellas, G., Ferraro, F. R., &Simpson, G. B. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 601–609.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kučera, H., &Francis, W. (1967).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Lichacz, F. M., Herdman, C. M., LeFevre, J., &Baird, B. (1999). Polysemy effects in naming.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,53, 189–193.
  Google Scholar
• McRae, K., & Cree, G. S. (in press). Factors underlying category specific semantic deficits. In E. M. E. Forde & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.),Category-specificity in brain and mind. East Sussex, U.K.: Psychology Press.
• McRae, K., Cree, G. S., Westmacott, R., &de Sa, V. R. (1999). Further evidence for feature correlations in semantic memory.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,53, 360–373.
  Google Scholar
• McRae, K., de Sa, V. R., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1997). On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 99–130.
  Article Google Scholar
• Medin, D. L. (1989). Concepts and conceptual structure.American Psychologist,44, 1469–1481.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Millis, M. L., &Button, S. B. (1989). The effect of polysemy on lexical decision time: Now you see it, now you don't.Memory & Cognition,17, 141–147.
  Article Google Scholar
• Pecher, D. (2001). Perception is a two-way junction: Feedback semantics in word recognition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 545–551.
  Article Google Scholar
• Pexman, P. M., &Lupker, S. J. (1999). Ambiguity and visual word recognition: Can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects?Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,53, 323–334.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Pexman, P. M., Lupker, S. J., &Jared, D. (2001). Homophone effects in lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 139–156.
  Article Google Scholar
• Piercey, C. D., &Joordens, S. (2000). Turning an advantage into a disadvantage: Ambiguity effects in lexical decision versus reading tasks.Memory & Cognition,28, 657–666.
  Article Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C., &Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology.Cognitive Neuropsychology,10, 377–500.
  Article Google Scholar
• Rips, L. J. (1989). Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.),Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 21–59). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  Chapter Google Scholar
• Rubenstein, H., Garfield, L., &Millikan, J. A. (1970). Homographic entries in the internal lexicon.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,9, 487–494.
  Article Google Scholar
• Rubenstein, H., Lewis, S. S., &Rubenstein, M. A. (1971). Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,10, 645–657.
  Article Google Scholar
• Rueckl, J. G. (1995). Ambiguity and connectionist networks: Still settling into a solution—Comment on Joordens and Besner (1994).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 501–508.
  Article Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., &McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychological Review,96, 523–568.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Stolz, J. A., &Neely, J. H. (1995). When target degradation does and does not enhance semantic context effects in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 596–611.
  Article Google Scholar
• Stone, G. O., Vanhoy, M., &Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition.Journal of Memory & Language,36, 337–359.
  Article Google Scholar
• Stone, G. O., &Van Orden, G. C. (1993). Strategic control of processing in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 744–774.
  Article Google Scholar
• Strain, E., &Herdman, C. M. (1999). Imageability effects in word naming: An individual differences analysis.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,53, 347–359.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Strain, E., Patterson, K., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1995). Semantic effects in single-word naming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1140–1154.
  Article Google Scholar
• Van Orden, G. C., &Goldinger, S. D. (1994). The interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1269–1291.
  Article Google Scholar
• Zevin, J. D., &Balota, D. A. (2000). Priming and attentional control of lexical and sublexical pathways during naming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 121–135.
  Article Google Scholar

Download references