Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity (original) (raw)

References

• Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are Lexical Decisions A Good Measure of Lexical Access? The Role of Word Frequency in the Neglected Decision stage.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 340–357.
  Article Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The Locus Of Word-Frequency Effects in the Pronunciation Task: Lexical Access and/Or Production?Journal of Memory & Language,24, 89–106.
  Article Google Scholar
• Balota, O. A., Pollatsek, A., &Rayner, K. (1985). The Interaction of Contextual Constraints and Parafoveal Visual Reformation In Reading.Cognitive Psychology,17, 364–390.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Bierwlsch, M. (1970). Semantics. In J. Lyons (Ed.),new Horizons in Linguistics. London: Penguin.
  Google Scholar
• Carpenter, P. A., &Daneman, M. (1981). Lexical Retrieval And Error Recovery In Reading: A Model Based on Eye Fixations.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 137–160.
  Article Google Scholar
• Carpenter, P. A., &Just, M. A. (1975). Sentence Comprehension: A Psycholinguistic Processing Model of Verification.Psychological Review,82, 45–73.
  Article Google Scholar
• Chumbley, J. I., &Balota, D. A. (1984). A Word’S Meaning Affects the Decision In Lexical Decision.Memory & Cognition,12, 590–606.
  Google Scholar
• Clark, H., &Chase, W. (1972). On the Process of Comparing Sentences Against Pictures.Cognitive Psychology,3, 472–517.
  Article Google Scholar
• Clark, H., &Clark, E. (1977).Psychology and Language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  Google Scholar
• Conrad, C. (1974). Context Effects in Sentence Comprehension: A Study of The Subjective Lexicon.Memory & Cognition,2, 130–138.
  Google Scholar
• Cutler, A. (1983). Lexical Complexity and Sentence Processing. In G. B. Flores D’Arcais and R. J. Jarvella (Eds.),The Processes of Language Understanding. New York: Wiley.
  Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, K., &Ravner, K. (1983). Pronoun Assignment and Semantic Integration During Reading: Eye Movements And Immediacy Of Processing.journal Of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 75–87.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hrlich, S. F., &Rayner, K. (1981). Contextual Effects on Word Perception And Eye Movements During Reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 641–655.
  Article Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. A., Garrett, M., Walker, E., &Parkes, C. (1980). Against Definitions.Cognition,8, 263–367.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. D., Fodor, J. A, &Garrett, M. (1975). The Psychological Unreality of semantic representations.Linguistic Inquiry,6, 515–531.
  Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., &Rayner, K. (1982). Making and Correcting Errors During Sentence Comprehension: Eye Movements in the Analysis of Structurally Ambiguous sentences.Cognitive Psychology,14, 178–210.
  Article Google Scholar
• Gels, M., &Winograd, E. (1974). Norms of Semantic Encoding Variability for fifty homographs.Bulletin Of The Psychonomlc Society,3, 429–431.
  Google Scholar
• Gorfein, D, Viviani, J., &Leddo, J. (1982). Norms as A Tool For The Study of homography.Memory & Cognition,10, 503–509.
  Google Scholar
• Hogaboam, Z., &Perfetti, C (1975). Lexical Ambiguity and Sentence Comprehension.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal behavior,14, 265–274.
  Article Google Scholar
• Holmes, V. M., &O’Regan, J. K. (1981). Eye Fixation Patterns During The Reading of Relative-Clause Sentences Journal of Verbal_Learning & Verbal Behavior_,20, 417–430
  Article Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A. W (1984). Two Stages of Word Processing During Eye Fixations in The Reading of Prose.Urnal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,3, 612–624.
  Article Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A. W. (1985). The Effect Of Factivity On Lexical Retrieval And Postlexical Processes During Eye Fixations In Reading.Journal Of Psycholinguistic Research,14, 45–56.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986).Parafoveal Word Processing during Eye fixations in Reading. Effects of word Frequency. Manuscript submitted for publication.
• Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. (1980) A Theory of Reading: From Eye Fixations to Comprehension_Psychological Review_,87, 329–354
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., &Clark, H. (1973). Drawing Inferences from The Presuppositions and Implications of Affirmative and Negative Sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 21–31.
  Article Google Scholar
• Karttunen, L. (1971) Some Observations on Factivity.Papers M Linguistics,4, 55–69
  Google Scholar
• Katz, J. (1972).semantic Theory. New York: Harper & Row.
  Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1974).The Representation of Meaning in Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Kiparsky, P., &Kiparsky, C. (1971) Fact. In D. Steinberg & L. Jakobovits (Eds.),Semantics (pp. 345–369). Cambridge, England Cambridge University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Kliegl, R., Olson, R. K., &Davidson, B. J. (1982). Regression Analysis as a tool for Studying Reading Processes: Comment on Just and Carpenter’s eye Fixation Theory_Memory & Cognition_, 10, 287–296.
  Google Scholar
• KČera, H., &Francis, W. (1967)Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English. Providence, Ri: Brown University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Lakoff, R. (1973). Review of Progress in Linguistics.Language,49, 685–697.
  Article Google Scholar
• Mayzner, M., &Tresselt, M. (1965a). Tables of Single-Letter and Digram Frequency Counts for Various Word-Length and Letter-Position Combinations.Psychonomic Monograph Supplements,1, 13–32
  Google Scholar
• Mayzner, M., &Tresselt, M. (1965b). Tables Of Trigram Frequency Counts for Various Word-Length and Letter-Position Combinations.Psychonomic Monograph Supplements,1, 33–78.
  Google Scholar
• Mehler, J., Segui, J., &Carey, P. (1978). Tails of Words: Monitormg Ambiguity.Journal Of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 29–35.
  Article Google Scholar
• Newman, J. E., &Dell, G. S (1978). The Phonological Nature of Phoneme Monitoring: A Critique of some ambiguity Studies.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 359–374.
  Article Google Scholar
• Norman, D., &Rumelhart, D. (1975)Explorations in Cognition San Francisco: Freeman.
  Google Scholar
• Onifer, W., &Swinney, D. (1981). Accessing Lexical Ambiguities During Sentence Comprehension: Effects of Frequency of Meaning and Contextual Bias.Memory & Cognition,9, 225–236.
  Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1975). The Perceptual Span And Peripheral Cues In Reading.Cognitive Psychology,7, 65–81.
  Article Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1977). Visual Attention in Reading: Eye Movements Reflect Cognitive Processes.Memory & Cognition,4, 443–448.
  Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1978). Eye Movements in reading and Reformation Processing.Psychological Bulletin,85, 618–660.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1984). Visual Selection in Reading, Picture Perception, and Visual Search: A Tutorial Review. In H. Bouma & D. W. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and Performance X (Pp. 67–96). Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Carlson, M., &Frazier, L (1983). The interaction of Syntax and Semantics during Sentence Processing. Eye Movements M The Analysis of Semantically Biased Sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 358–374.
  Article Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Slowiaczek, M L., Clifton, C., &Bertera, J H (1983) Latency of Sequential Eye Movements: Implications for Reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance,9, 912–922.
  Article Google Scholar
• Schank, R. (1972). Conceptual Dependency: A Theory of Natural Language Understanding_Cognitive Psychology_,3, 552–631
  Article Google Scholar
• Schvaneveldt, R., Meyer, D., &Becker C (1976). Lexical Ambiguity, Semantic context, and Visual Word Recognition.Journal Of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance,2, 243–256
  Article Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S, Tanenhaus, M. K. Leiman, J M., &Bienkowski, M. (1982). Automatic Access of the Meanings of Ambiguous Words in Context: Some Limitations of Knowledge-Based processing_Cognitive Psychology_,14, 489–537.
  Article Google Scholar
• Sherman, M. (1973) Bound To Be Easier? The Negative Prefix and Sentence Comprehension_Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior_,12, 76–84.
  Article Google Scholar
• Sherman, M. (1976). Adjectival Negation and the Comprehension of Multiply Negated Sentences_Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior_,15, 143 -157
  Article Google Scholar
• Simpson, G. (1981). Meaning Dominance and Semantic Context In The Processing of Lexical Ambiguity.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 120–136
  Article Google Scholar
• Simpson, G (1984). Lexical Ambiguity and Its Role in Models of Word Recognition.Psychological Bulletin,96, 316–340
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Simpson, G , & Burgess, C. (1982 , November).Processing Lexical Ambiguity &. A Chronometric Analysis. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of The Psychonomic Society, Minneapolis. MN
• Swinney, D A. (1979). Lexical Access During & Sentence Comprehension (Re) Consideration of context effects.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 645–659
  Article Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus, M. K, Leiman, J. M., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1979). Evidence for Multiple Stages in The Processing of Ambiguous Words in Syntactic Contexts.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18. 427–440
  Article Google Scholar
• Trabasso, T, Rollins, H., &Shaughnessy, E (1971) Storage and Verification Stages M Processing Concepts.Cognitive Psychology,2. 239–289
  Article Google Scholar
• Yates, J. (1978). Priming Dominant and Unusual Senses of Ambiguous Words.Memory & Cognition,6, 636–643
  Google Scholar
• Zola.D. (1984). Redundancy and Word Perception During Reading.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 277–284
  Google Scholar

Download references