N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics (original) (raw)
References
Andrews, S. (1996). Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 775–800. Article Google Scholar
Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 439–461. Article Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., &van Rijn, H. (1995).The CELEX Lexical Database. Release 2 [CD-ROM]. Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. Google Scholar
Balota, D. A., Pilotti, M., &Cortese, M. J. (2001). Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words.Memory & Cognition,29, 639–647. Article Google Scholar
Bird, H., Franklin, S., &Howard, D. (2001). Age of acquisition and imageability ratings for a large set of words, including verbs and function words.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,33, 73–79. Article Google Scholar
Bowers, J. S., Davis, C. J., & Hanley, D. (2003).Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a “hat” in “that?” Manuscript submitted for publication.
Brown, G. D., &Watson, F. L. (1987). First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and naming latency.Memory & Cognition,15, 208–216. Article Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B., &White, M. N. (1973). Word frequency and age of acquisition as determiners of picture-naming latency.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,25, 85–95. Article Google Scholar
Chambers, S. M. (1979). Letter and order information in lexical access.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 225–241. Article Google Scholar
Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC Psycholinguistic Database.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 497–505. Article Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., &Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., &Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual-route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.Psychological Review,108, 204–256. Article Google Scholar
Davis, C. J., & Taft, M. (in press). More words in the neighborhood: Interference in lexical decision due to deletion neighbors.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
Forster, K. I., &Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 627–635. Article Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 256–281. Article Google Scholar
Gilhooly, K. J., &Logie, R. H. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,12, 395–427. Article Google Scholar
Grainger, J., O’Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., &Segui, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 189–195. Article Google Scholar
James, C. T. (1975). The role of semantic information in lexical decisions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,1, 130–136. Google Scholar
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press. Google Scholar
McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–407. Article Google Scholar
Monsell, S., Doyle, M. C., &Haggard, P. N. (1989). Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 43–71. Article Google Scholar
Morrison, C. M., Chappell, T. D., &Ellis, A. W. (1997). Age of acquisition norms for a large set of object names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50A, 528–559. Article Google Scholar
Morrison, C. M., &Ellis, A. W. (1995). Roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 116–153. Google Scholar
Oldfield, R. C., &Wingfield, A. (1965). Response latencies in naming objects.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,17, 273–281. Article Google Scholar
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., &Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,76(Suppl. 2), 1–25. Article Google Scholar
Pugh, K. R., Rexer, K., &Katz, L. (1994). Evidence of flexible coding in visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 807–825. Google Scholar
Rastle, K., Harrington, J., &Coltheart, M. (2002). 358,534 nonwords: The ARC nonword database.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psycholog,55A, 1339–1362. Article Google Scholar
Taft, M., &van Graan, F. (1998). Lack of phonological mediation in a semantic categorization task.Journal of Memory & Language,38, 203–224. Article Google Scholar
Toglia, M. P., &Battig, W. R. (1978).Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Whaley, C. P. (1978). Word-nonword classification time.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 143–154. Article Google Scholar