Hierarchical stages in the processing of visual information (original) (raw)
References
Beck, J., &Ambler, B. The effects of concentrated and distributed attention on peripheral acuity.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,14, 225–230. Article Google Scholar
Colegate, R. L., Hoffman, J. E., &Eriksen, C. W. Selective encoding from multielement visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,14, 217–224. Article Google Scholar
Cornsweet, T. N.Visual perception. New York: Academic Press, 1970. Google Scholar
Eriksen, B. A., &Eriksen, C. W. The importance of being first: A tachistoscopic study of the contribution of each letter to the recognition of four-letter words.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,15, 66–72. (a) Article Google Scholar
Eriksen, B. A., &Eriksen, C. W. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,16, 143–149. (b) Article Google Scholar
Eriksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E. Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays.Perception & psychophysics, 1972,12, 201–204. Article Google Scholar
Eriksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E. The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,14, 217–224. Article Google Scholar
Eriksen, C. W.. &Rohrbaught, J. W. Some factors determining efficiency of selective attention.American Journal of Psychology, 1970,83, 330–342. Article Google Scholar
Eriksen, C. W., &Spencer, T. Rate of information processing in visual perception: Some results and methodological considerations.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 1969,79, 1–16. Article Google Scholar
Estes, W. K. Interactions of signal and background variables in visual processing.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,12, 278–280. Article Google Scholar
Gardner, G. T. Evidence for independent parallel channels in tachistoscopic perception.Cognitive Psychology, 1973,4, 130–155. Article Google Scholar
Guzman, A. Decomposition of a visual scene into three-dimensional bodies, in A. Grasselh (Ed.),Automatic interpretation and classification of images. New York: Academic Press, 1969. Google Scholar
Holmgren, J. E. The effect of a visual indicator on rate of visual search: Evidence for processing control.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,15, 544–550. Article Google Scholar
Kinchla, R. A. Detecting target elements hi multi-element arrays: A confusability model.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,15, 149–158. Article Google Scholar
Neisser, T.Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. 1967. Google Scholar
Rohrbaugh, J. W., &Eriksen, C. W. Reaction time measurement of temporal integration and organization of form.Perception & Psychophysics, 1975,17, 53–58. Article Google Scholar
Shiffrin, R. M., &Gardner, G. T. Visual processing capacity and attentional control.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,93, 72–82. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Shiffrin, R. M., &Geisler, W. S. Visual recognition in a theory of information processing. In R. Solso (Ed.),The Loyola Symposium. Contemporary viewpoints in cognitive psychology. Washington: Winston, 1973. Google Scholar
Sokolov, E. N. Neuronal models and the orienting reflex. In M. A. B. Brazier (Ed.),The central nervous system and behavior. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr., Foundation, 1960. Google Scholar
Spencer, T. J. Some effects of different masking stimuli on iconic storage.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,81, 132–140. Article Google Scholar
Sperling, G. The information available in brief visual presentations.Psychological Monographs, 1960,74, No. 11.
Townsend, J. T., Taylor, S. G., &Brown, D. R. Lateral masking for letters with unlimited viewing time.Perception & Psychophysics, 1971,10, 375–378. Article Google Scholar
Treisman, A. M. Contextual cues in selective listening.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1960,12, 242–248. Article Google Scholar