Evidence for a central representation of instrument timbre (original) (raw)

References

• Ades, A. E. (1974). How phonetic is selective adaptation? Experiments on syllable position and vowel environment.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 61–66.
  Google Scholar
• Backus, J. (1977).The acoustical foundations of music. New York: Norton.
  Google Scholar
• Benade, A. H. (1976).Fundamentals of musical acoustics. London: Oxford University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Berger, K.W. (1964). Some factors in the recognition of timbre.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,36, 1888–1891.
  Article Google Scholar
• Blakemore, C., &Sutton, P. (1969). Size adaptation: A new aftereffect.Science,166, 245–257.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Bricker, P., &Pruzansky, S. (1976). Speaker recognition. In N. Lass (Ed.),Contemporary issues in experimental phonetics (pp. 295–326). New York: Academic Press.
  Google Scholar
• Charbonneau, G. R. (1981). Timbre and the perceptual effects of three types of data reduction.Computer Music Journal,5, 10–19.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cutting, J. E., Rosner, B. S., &Foard, C. F. (1976). Perceptual categories for musiclike sounds: Implications for theories of speech perception.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,28, 361–378.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Diehl, R. (1976). Feature analyzers for the phonetic dimension stop vs. continuant.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 267–272.
  Google Scholar
• Diehl, R. (1981). Feature detectors for speech: A critical reappraisal.Psychological Bulletin,89, 1–18.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Eimas, P. D., Cooper, W. E., &Corbit, J. D. (1973). Some properties of linguistic feature detectors.Perception & Psychophysics,13, 247–252.
  Google Scholar
• Eimas, P. D., &Corbit, J. D. (1973). Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors.Cognitive Psychology,4, 99–109.
  Article Google Scholar
• Eimas, P. D., &Miller, J. L. (1978). Effects of selective adaptation of speech and visual patterns: Evidence for feature detectors. In H. L. Pick & R. D. Walk (Eds.),Perception and experience (pp. 307–345). New York: Plenum.
  Google Scholar
• Ganong, W. E., III (1978). The selective adaptation effects of burstcued stops.Perception & Psychophysics,24, 71–83.
  Google Scholar
• Grey, J. M. (1977). Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,61, 1270–1277.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Grey, J. M. (1978). Timbre discrimination in musical patterns.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,64, 467–472.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Grey, J. M., &Moorer, J. A. (1977). Perceptual evaluation of synthesized musical instrument tones.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,62, 454–462.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hall, M. D., & Pastore, R. E. (1993, November).An auditory analogue to feature integration. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Washington, DC.
• Handel, S. (1989).Listening: An introduction to the perception of auditory events. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  Google Scholar
• Hecker, M. (1971). Speaker recognition.American Speech and Hearing Association Monographs,16, 24–49.
  Google Scholar
• Iverson, P., &Krumhansl, C. L. (1993). Isolating the dynamic attributes of musical timbre.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,95, 2595–2603.
  Article Google Scholar
• Jamieson, D. G., &Cheesman, M. F. (1986). The locus of selective adaptation in speech perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,12, 286–294.
  Article Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. (1990). The role of perceived speaker identity in F0 normalization of vowels.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,88, 642–654.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Kat, D., &Samuel, A. G. (1984). More adaptation of speech by nonspeech.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 512–525.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kendall, R. A. (1986). The role of acoustic signal partitions in listener categorization of musical phrases.Music Perception,4, 185–214.
  Google Scholar
• Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., &Studdert-Kennedy,M. (1967). Perception of the speech code.Psychological Review,74, 431–461.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Liberman, A. M., &Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised.Cognition,21, 1–36.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Moore, F. R. (1990).Elements of computer music. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  Google Scholar
• Moore, F. R. (1993).The cmusic sound synthesis program [Computer program]. La Jolla, CA: Computer Audio Research Laboratory, Center for Music Experimentation, University of California at San Diego.
  Google Scholar
• Mullennix, J. W., &Pisoni, D. B. (1990). Stimulus variability and processing dependencies in speech perception.Perception & Psychophysics,47, 379- 390.
  Google Scholar
• Mullennix, J. W., Pisoni, D. B., &Martin, C. S. (1989). Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,85, 365–378.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Nearey, T. (1989). Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,85, 2088–2113.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Nygaard, L. C., Sommers, M. S., &Pisoni, D. B. (1994). Speech perception as a talker-contingent process.Psychological Science,5, 42–46.
  Article Google Scholar
• Opolko, F., &Wapnick, J. (Producers). (1987).McGill University master samples [Compact disk]. Montreal, Quebec: McGill University.
  Google Scholar
• Palmeri, T. J., Goldinger, S. D., &Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Episodic encoding of voice attributes and recognition memory for spoken words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 309–328.
  Article Google Scholar
• Pitt, M. A. (in press). Perception of pitch and timbre by musically trained and untrained listeners.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
• Pitt, M. A., &Samuel, A. G. (1993). An empirical and meta-analytic evaluation of the phoneme identification task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 699–725.
  Article Google Scholar
• Portnoff, M. R. (1976). Implementation of the digital phase vocoder using the fast Fourier transform.IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech & Signal Processing,ASSP-24, 243–248.
  Article Google Scholar
• Remez, R. E. (1979). Adaptation of the category boundary between speech and nonspeech: A case against feature detectors.Cognitive Psychology,11, 38–57.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Remez, R. E. (1980). Susceptibility of a stop consonant to adaptation on a speech-nonspeech continuum: Further evidence against feature detectors in speech perception.Perception & Psychophysics,27, 17–23.
  Article Google Scholar
• Remez, R. E. (1987). Neural models of speech perception: A case history. In S. Harnad (Ed.),Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition (pp. 199–225). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Remez, R. E., Cutting, J. E., &Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1980). Cross-series adaptation using song and string.Perception & Psychophysics,27, 524–530.
  Article Google Scholar
• Roberts, M., &Summerfield, Q. (1981). Audiovisual presentation demonstrates that selective adaptation in speech perception is purely auditory.Perception & Psychophysics,30, 309–314.
  Article Google Scholar
• Saldanha, E. L., &Corso, J. F. (1964). Timbre cues and the identification of musical instruments.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,36, 2021–2026.
  Article Google Scholar
• Samuel, A. G. (1986). Red herring detectors and speech perception: In defense of selective adaptation.Cognitive Psychology,18, 452–499.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Samuel, A. G. (1988). Central and peripheral representation of whispered and voiced speech.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 379–388.
  Article Google Scholar
• Samuel, A. G., & Kat, D. (1994).Levels of analysis of speech and other complex sounds. Manuscript submitted for publication.
• Samuel, A. G., &Newport, E. L. (1979). Adaptation of speech by nonspeech: Evidence for complex acoustic cue detectors.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 563–578.
  Article Google Scholar
• Sawusch, J. (1977). Peripheral and central processes in selective adaptation of place of articulation in stop consonants.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,62, 738–750.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Sawusch, J. R. (1986). Auditory and phonetic coding of speech. In E. C. Schwab & H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.),Pattern recognition by humans and machines (pp. 51–88). New York: Academic Press.
  Google Scholar
• Sawusch, J. R., &Jusczyk, P. (1981). Adaptation and contrast in the perception of voicing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 408–421.
  Article Google Scholar
• Slawson, A. W. (1967). Vowel quality and musical timbre as functions of spectrum envelope and fundamental frequency.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,43, 87–101.
  Article Google Scholar
• Sussman, J. E. (1993). Focused attention during selective adaptation along a place of articulation continuum.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,93, 488–498.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Van Lancker, D., Kreiman, J., &Emmorey, K. (1985). Familiar voice recognition: Patterns and parameters: Part I. Recognition of backward voices.Journal of Phonetics,13, 19–38.
  Google Scholar

Download references