Charpentier (1891) on the size—weight illusion (original) (raw)
References
Amazeen, E. L., &Turvey.M. T. (1996). Weight perception and the haptic size-weight illusion are functions of the inertia tensor.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 213–232. Article Google Scholar
Boro, G. (1962). Physical performance and perceived exertion. In_Studia Psychologies et Paedogogica: Series Altera. Investigationes XI_ (pp. 1–64). Lund: Gleerup. Google Scholar
Borg, G., Olsson, M. J., Borg, E., &Neely, G. (1996). LIME & #x2014; Level-anchored intersubjective ME. In S. C. Masin (Ed.),Fechner Day 96 (pp. 215–220). Padua: University of Padua, International Society for Psychophysics. Google Scholar
Boring, E. G. (1942).Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Google Scholar
Charpentier, A. (1891). Analyse expérimentale: De quelques élèments de la sensation de poids. [Experimental analysis: On some of the elements of sensations of weight].Archives de Physiologie Normale et Pathologique,3, 122–135. Google Scholar
Claparède, E. (1902). Expériences sur la vitesse de soulèvement des poids de volumes différents. [Experiments on the speed of lifting of weights of different volume].Archives de Psychologic1, 69–94. Google Scholar
Dresslar, F. B. (1894). Studies in the psychology of touch.American Journal of Psychology,6,313–368. Article Google Scholar
Dufour, M. (1916). Augustin Charpentier (1852–1916).Annales D,Oculistique,43, 505–519. Google Scholar
Fechner, G. T. (1860a).Elemente der Psychophysik (2 vols.). Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel. [Reprinted (1964): Amsterdam: E. J. Bonset. Vol. 1 only has been translated into English by H. Adler (1966) as_Elements of psychophysics_. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.] Google Scholar
Fechner, G. T. (1860b). Über die Contrastempfindung. [On sensations of contrast].Berichte über die Verhandlungen der königlich-sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Mathematischphysische Classe,12, 71–145. Google Scholar
Flournoy, T. (1894). De l’influence de la perception visuelle des corps sur leur poids apparent. [On the influence of the visual perception of bodies on their apparent heaviness].L’Année Psychologique,1, 198–208. Article Google Scholar
Furth, H. G. (1960). The effect of the size-weight illusion on adaptation level.Journal of Experimental Psychology,60, 150–154. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Gilbert, J. A. (1894). Researches on the mental and physical development of school-children.Studies from the Yale Psychological Laboratory,2, 40–100. Google Scholar
Gregory, R. L. (1958). Eye movements and the stability of the visual world.Nature,182, 1214–1216. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Hellström, A. (1985). The time-order error and its relatives: Mirrors of cognitive processes in comparing.Psychological Bulletin,97, 35–61. Article Google Scholar
Hershberger, W., &Misceo, G. (1983). A conditioned weight illusion: Reafference learning without a correlation store.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 391–398. Article Google Scholar
Holst, E. Von (1954). Relation between the central nervous system and the peripheral organs.British Journal of Animal Behaviour,2, 89–94. Article Google Scholar
James, W. (1890).Principles of psychology (2 vols.). New York: Holt. [Reprinted (1950), New York: Dover.] Google Scholar
Jones, L. A. (1986). Perception of force and weight: Theory and research.Psychological Bulletin,100, 29–42. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Jones, L. [A.] (1996). Proprioception and its contribution to manual dexterity. In A. M. Wing, P. Haggard, & J. R. Flanagan (Eds.),Hand and brain: The neurophysiology and psychology of hand movements (pp. 349–362). London: Academic Press. Google Scholar
Kilbreath, S. L., &Gandevia, S. C. (1991). Independent digit control: Failure to partition perceived heaviness of weights lifted by digits of the human hand.Journal of Physiology,472, 537–556. Google Scholar
Martin, L., &Müller, G. E. (1899).Zur Analyse der Unterschieds-empfindlichkeit [Toward an analysis of sensitivity to differences]. Leipzig: Barth. Google Scholar
Müller, G. E., &Schumann, F. (1889). Über die psychologischen Grundlagen der Vergleichung gehobener Gewichte [On the psychological foundations of the comparison of lifted weights].Archiv für die gesammte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere,45, 37–112. Article Google Scholar
Nicolas, S. (1998). Théodore Flournoy (1854–1920) and experimental psychology: Historical note.American Journal of Psychology,111,279–294. Article Google Scholar
Poulton, E. C. (1989).Bias in quantifying judgments. Hove, U.K.: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Ross, H. E., &Bischof, K. (1981). Wundt’s views on sensations of innervation: A réévaluation.Perception,10, 319–329. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Ross, H. E., &Murray, D. J. (1996).E. H. Weber on the tactile senses (2nd ed.) Hove, U.K.: Taylor & Francis, Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Ross, H. E., Schwartz, E., &Emmerson, P. (1987). The nature of sensorimotor adaptation to altered G levels: Evidence from mass discrimination.Aviation, Space, & Environmental Medicine,58 (9, Suppl.), A148-A152. Google Scholar
Scheerer, E. (1987). Muscle sense and innervation feelings: A chapter in the history of perception and action. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.),Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 171–194). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Seashore, C. E. (1895). Measurements of illusions and hallucinations in normal life.Studies From the Yale Psychological Laboratory,3, 1–67. Google Scholar
Sperry, R. W. (1950). Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual neural inversion.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,43, 482–489. Article Google Scholar
Teghtsoonian, R.,Teghtsoonian, M., &Karlsson, J. G. (1981). The limits of perceived magnitude: Comparison among individuals and among perceptual continua.Acta Psychologica,49, 83–94. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Wing, A. M. (1996). Anticipatory control of grip force in rapid arm movement. In A. M. Wing, P. Haggard, & J. R. Flanagan (Eds.),Hand and brain: The neurophysiology and psychology of hand movements (pp. 301–324). London: Academic Press. Google Scholar