Exploring lexical co-occurrence space using HiDEx (original) (raw)
References
Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723. Article Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H. (2001). Word frequency distributions. Boston: Kluwer. Book Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium. Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189–208. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Balota, D. A., Black, S. R., & Cheney, M. (1992). Automatic and attentional priming in young and older adults: Reevaluation of the two-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 485–502. Google Scholar
]Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2002). The English Lexicon Project: A Web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 English words and nonwords. Retrieved October 5, 2005, from http://elexicon.wustl.edu/.
Binder, J. R., Westbury, C. F., McKiernan, K. A., Possing, E. T., & Medler, D. A. (2005). Distinct brain systems for processing concrete and abstract concepts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 905–917. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Brants, T., & Franz, A. (2006). Web 1T 5-Gram Corpus (Version 1). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium. Google Scholar
Buchanan, L., Burgess, C., & Lund, K. (1996). Overcrowding in semantic neighborhoods: Modeling deep dyslexia. Brain & Cognition, 32, 111–114. Google Scholar
Buchanan, L., Westbury, C., & Burgess, C. (2001). Characterizing semantic space: Neighborhood effects in word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 531–544. Article Google Scholar
Bullinaria, J. A., & Levy, J. P. (2007). Extracting semantic representations from word co-occurrence statistics: A computational study. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 510–526. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Burgess, C. (1998). From simple associations to the building blocks of language: Modeling meaning in memory with the HAL model. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 188–198. Article Google Scholar
Burgess, C., & Livesay, K. (1998). The effect of corpus size in predicting reaction time in a basic word recognition task: Moving on from Kučera and Francis. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 272–277. Article Google Scholar
Burgess, C., Livesay, K., & Lund, K. (1998). Explorations in context space: Words, sentences, discourse. Discourse Processes, 25, 211–257. Article Google Scholar
Burgess, C., & Lund, K. (1997). Modelling parsing constraints with high-dimensional context space. Language & Cognitive Processes, 12, 177–210. Article Google Scholar
Burgess, C., & Lund, K. (2000). The dynamics of meaning in memory. In E. Dietrich & A. B. Markman (Eds.), Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual and representational change in humans and machines (pp. 117–156). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Chapman, B., Jost, G., van der Pas, R., & Kuck, D. (2007). Using OpenMP: Portable shared memory parallel programming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Cree, G. S., McNorgan, C., & McRae, K. (2006). Distinctive features hold a privileged status in the computation of word meaning: Implications for theories of semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32, 643–658. Google Scholar
Durda, K., & Buchanan, L. (2008). WINDSORS: Windsor improved norms of distance and similarity of representations of semantics. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 705–712. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Durda, K., Buchanan, L., & Caron, R. (2009). Grounding co-occurrence: Identifying features in a lexical co-occurrence model of semantic memory. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1210–1223. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Fristrup, J. A. (1994). USENET: Netnews for everyone. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
Hollis, G., Westbury, C. F., & Peterson, J. B. (2006). NUANCE 3.0: Using genetic programming to model variable relationships. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 218–228. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Jones, M. N., Kintsch, W., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2006). Highdimensional semantic space accounts of priming. Journal of Memory & Language, 55, 534–552. Article Google Scholar
Jones, M. N., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2007). Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon. Psychological Review, 114, 1–37. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240. Article Google Scholar
Lifchitz, A., Jhean-Larose, S., & Denhière, G. (2009). Effect of tuned parameters on an LSA multiple choice questions answering model. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1201–1209. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, & Computers, 28, 203–208. Article Google Scholar
Mirman, D., & Magnuson, J. S. (2008). Attractor dynamics and semantic neighborhood density: Processing is slowed by near neighbors and speeded by distant neighbors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 65–79. Google Scholar
Moss, H. E., & Tyler, L. K. (1995). Investigating semantic memory impairments: The contribution of semantic priming. Memory, 3, 359–395. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Murdock, B. B. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review, 89, 609–626. Article Google Scholar
]Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Available from www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/.
Pexman, P. M., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Semantic ambiguity and the process of generating meaning from print. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 1252–1270. Google Scholar
Recchia, G., & Jones, M. N. (2009). More data trumps smarter algorithms: Comparing pointwise mutual information with latent semantic analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 647–656. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
]Rohde, D. L. T., Gonnerman, L. M., & Plaut, D. C. (2005). An improved method model of semantic similarity based on lexical co-occurrence. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved April 20, 2007, from http://tedlab.mit.edu/\~dr/.
Russell, B. (1910). The study of mathematics. In Philosophical essays. London: Longmans, Green. Google Scholar
]Shaoul, C., & Westbury, C. (2006a). USENET orthographic frequencies for the 40,481 words in the English lexicon project [Data file]. Available from the University of Alberta Web site: www.psych.ualberta.ca/\~westburylab/downloads.html.
Shaoul, C., & Westbury, C. (2006b). Word frequency effects in highdimensional co-occurrence models: A new approach. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 190–195. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Siakaluk, P. D., Buchanan, L., & Westbury, C. (2003). The effect of semantic distance in yes/no and go/no-go semantic categorization tasks. Memory & Cognition, 31, 100–113. Article Google Scholar
]Song, D., & Bruza, P. (2001, September 10). Discovering information flow using a high dimensional conceptual space. Paper presented at the 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, New Orleans.
Song, D., Bruza, P., & Cole, R. (2004, July 30). Concept learning and information inferencing on a high-dimensional semantic space. Paper presented at the ACM SIGIR 2004 Workshop on Mathematical/ Formal Methods in Information Retrieval, Sheffield, U.K.
Song, D., Bruza, P., Huang, Z., & Lau, R. K. (2003). Classifying document titles based on information inference. In J. G. Carbonell & J. Siekmann (Eds.), Foundations of intelligent systems (pp. 297–306). Berlin: Springer. Chapter Google Scholar
]Stallman, R. (2009). GNU General Public License. Available from www.fsf.org/licensing/.
]Westbury, C. (2007). ACTUATE: Assessing Cases, The University of Alberta Testing Environment. Available from the University of Alberta Web site: www.psych.ualberta.ca/\~westburylab.
Yates, M., Locker, L., Jr., & Simpson, G. B. (2003). Semantic and phonological influences on the processing of words and pseudohomophones. Memory & Cognition, 31, 856–866. Article Google Scholar
Zipf, G. K. (1935). The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Google Scholar
Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. New York: Addison-Wesley. Google Scholar