Multiresistant serotype O 12 Pseudomonas aeruginosa: evidence for a common strain in Europe | Epidemiology & Infection | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Article contents

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

A survey was made of serotype association and multiple antibiotic resistance in strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Europe. Of 208 epidemiologically distinct strains from 16 laboratories in 10 countries, 48 were resistant to carbenicillin (MIC > 128 μg/ml) and gentamicin (MIC > 4 μ g/ml), and 12 of these strains were of serotvpe O 12. Representative O 12 strains from different countries were compared with two multiresistant O 12 strains isolated 5 years apart, from a British burns unit and the antibiotic sensitive serotype reference strain. All O 12 strains were similar by phage and pyocin typing but lysogenic phage profiles indicated that two strains (the later burns isolate and the serotype strain) were distinct from the others. Electrophoretic characterization of outer membrane proteins, lipopoly- saccharides and esterase enzymes corroborated the relationship of the strains and restriction fragment length polymorphism of DNA fragments hybridized with a cDNA probe copy of rRNA from P. aeruginosa provided further proof of their relatedness. We propose that the uniformity of characters of multiresistant O 12 P. aeruginosa in Europe is suggestive of a common origin for the strains.

Information

Type

Research Article

Copyright

Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

References

1.Williams, RJ, Lindridge, MA, Said, AA, Livermore, DM, Williams, JD.National survey of antibiotic resistance in pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Antimicrob Chemother 1984; 14: 9–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

2.Legakis, NJ, Koukoubanis, N, Malliara, K, Michalitsianos, D, Papavassiliou, J.Importance of carbenicillin and gentamicin cross-resistant serotype O 12 Pseudomonas aeruginosa in six Athens hospitals. Europ J Clin Microbiol 1987; 6: 300–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

3.Del Piano, M, La Palombara, P, Picci, A, Nicosia, R.Serological and pyocin typing and antibiotic sensitivity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Microbiologica 1986; 9: 253–8.Google ScholarPubMed

4.Giammanco, A, Di Stephano, R, Arista, S, Sinatra, A, Chiarini, A. Infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: relatively frequent isolation of serogroup 12 from clinical specimens. Europ J Epidemiol 1985; 1: 104–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

5.Ninane, G, Harper, PB.The in vitro activity of ceftazidime against a multi-resistant serotype O 12 Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infection 1983; 11(suppl 1): S 16–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6.Allemeersch, D, Beumer, J, Devleeschouwer, M et al. , Marked increase of pseudomonas aeruginosa serotype O 12 in Belgium since 1982. Europ J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1988;7: 265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

8.Liu, PV, Matsumoto, H, Kusama, H, Bergan, T.Survey of heat stable, major somatic antigens of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1983; 33: 256–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9.Pitt, TL.A comparison of flagellar typing and phage typing as means of subdividing the O groups of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Med Microbiol 1981; 14: 261–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

10.Brokopp, CD, Farmer, JJ. Typing methods for Pseudomonas aereginosa. In: Doggett, RG. ed. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, clinical manifestations of infection and current therapy. New York: Academic Press. 1979; 89–133.Google Scholar

11.Rukmini-Devi, K, Bhaskaran, CS.Comparison of sero-aeruginocine-phage typing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Ind J Pathol Microbiol 1984; 27: 281–8.Google ScholarPubMed

12.Vieu, JF, Allos, G, Hassan-Massoud, B, Santos Ferreira, MO, Tselentis, G.Existe-t-il une épidémiologie géographique des sérogroupes O de Pseudomonas aeruginosa? Bull Soc Pathol Exot 1984; 77: 285–94.Google Scholar

13.Perinpanayagam, RM, Grundy, HC.Outbreak of gentamicin resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in a burns unit. J Hosp Infect 1983; 4: 71–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14.Asheshov, EH. An assessment of the methods used to type strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In: Arseni, A, ed. Proceedings of the sixth National Congress of Bacteriology. Athens: Leontiadi Medical Editions. 1974; 9–22.Google Scholar

15.Fyfe, JAM, Harris, G, Govan, JRW.Revised pyocin typing method for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Clin Microbiol 1984; 20: 47–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

16.Laemmli, UK.Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970; 227: 680–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

17.Tsai, OM, Frasch, CE.A sensitive silver stain for detecting lipopolysaccharides in polyacrylamide gels. Anal Biochem 1982; 119: 115–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

18.Selander, RK, Caugant, DA, Ochman, H, Musser, JM, Gilmour, MN, Whittam, TS.Methods of multilocus enzyme electrophoresis for bacterial population genetics and systematies. Appl Environ Microbiol 1986; 51: 873–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19.Picard, B, Goullet, Ph.Comparative electrophoretic profiles of esterases and of glutamate. lactate and malate dehydrogenases. from Aeromonas hydrophila. A. caviae and A. sobrio. J Gen Microbiol 1985; 131: 3385–91.Google Scholar

20.Pitcher, DG, Saunders, NA, Owen, RJ.Rapid extraction of bacterial genomic DNA with guanidium thiocyanate. Lett Appl Microbiol 1989; 8: 151–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21.Chirgwin, JM, Przybla, AE, MacDonald, RJ, Rutter, WJ.Isolation of biologically active ribonucleic acid from sources enriched in ribonuclease. Biochemistry 1979; 18: 5294–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

22.Maniatis, J, Fritsch, EF, Sambrook, J.Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor. N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.Google Scholar

23.Pitcher, DG, Owen, RJ, Dyal, P, Beck, A.Synthesis of a biotinylated DNA probe to detect ribosomal RNA cistrons in Providencia stuartii. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1987; 48: 283–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24.Livermore, DM, Pitt, TL.Dissociation of surface properties and intrinsic resistance to beta lactams in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Med Microbiol 1986: 22: 217–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

25.Pitt, TL.Epidemiological typing of pseudomonas aeruginosa. Europ J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1988; 7: 238–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

26.Govan, JRW. Pyocin typing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In: Methods in microbiology. Bergan, T, Norris, J. eds. London: Academic Press. 1978; 61–9.Google Scholar

27.Shionoya, H, Goto, S, Tsukamoto, M, Homma, JY.Relationship between pyocine and temperate phage of Pseudomonas aeruginoso. 1. Isolation of temperate phages from strain P1- III and their characteristics. Jpn J Exp Med 1967; 37: 359–72.Google Scholar

28.De Saxe, M, Notley, CM.Experiences with the typing of coagulase negative staphylococci. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg [A] 1978; 241: 46–59.Google ScholarPubMed

29.Hancock, REW, Carey, AM.Outer membrane of Pseadomonas aeruginosa: Heat- and 2- mercaptoethanol-modifiable proteins. J Bacteriol 1979; 140: 902–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

30.Hitchcock, PJ, Brown, TM.Morphological heterogeneity among Salmonella lipopoly-saccharide chemotypes in silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. J Bacteriol 1983; 154: 269–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

31.Tompkins, LS, Troup, N, Labigne-Roussel, A, Cohen, ML.Cloned random chromosomal sequences as probes to identify Salmonella species. J Infect Dis 1986; 154: 156–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

32.Grimont, F, Grimont, PAD.Ribosomal ribonucleic acid gene restriction patterns as potential taxonomic tools. Ann Inst Pasteur Microbiol 1986; 137: 165–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33.Stull, TL, LiPuma, JJ, Edlind, TD.A broad-spectrum probe for molecular epidemiology of bacterial ribosomal RNA. J Infect Dis 1988: 157: 280–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34.Orskov, F, Orskov, I.Summary of a workshop on the clone concept in the epidemiology, taxonomy and evolution of the Enterobacteriaceae and other bacteria. J Infect Dis 1983; 148: 346–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed