Audiovisual presentation demonstrates that selective adaptation in speech perception is purely auditory (original) (raw)

Reference Notes

1. Bailey, P. J.Perceptual adaptation in speech: Some properties of detectors for acoustical cues to phonetic distinctions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cambridge University, 1975.
2. Sawusch, J. R., & Jusczyk, P.Adaptation and contrast in the perception of voicing (Research on Speech Perception Progress Report No. 5). Bloomington: Indiana University, 1979.
   Google Scholar
3. Ganong, W. F.An experiment on “phonetic adaptation” (Progress Report 116, 206–210, Research Laboratory of Electronics). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1975.
4. Rosen, S. M., Moore, B. C. J., & Fourcin, A. J.Lipreading with fundamental frequency information. Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, 1979, 1A2, 5–8.

References

• Blumstein, S. E., Stevens, K. N., &Nigro, G. N. Property detectors for bursts and transitions in speech perception.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977,61, 1301–1313.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Cooper, W. E. Adaptation of phonetic feature analyzers for place of articulation.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1974,56, 617–627.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Cooper, W. E. Selective adaptation to speech. In F. Restle, R. M. Shiffrin, J. N. Castellan, H, Lindman, & D. B. Pisoni (Eds.),Cognitive theory (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1975.
  Google Scholar
• Cooper, W. E.Speech production and perception: Studies in selective adaptation. Norwood, N.J: Ablex, 1979.
  Google Scholar
• Darwin, C. J. The perception of speech. In E, C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman (Eds.),Handbook of perception (Vol. 7) Language and speech. London: Academic Press, 1976.
  Google Scholar
• Diehl, R. L. The effect of selective adaptation on the identification of speech sounds.Perception & Psychophysics, 1975,17, 48–52.
  Google Scholar
• Diehl, R. L., Elm An, J. L., &McCusker, S. B. Contrast effects on stop consonant identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1978,4, 599–609.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Diehl, R. L., Lang, M., &Parker, E. M. A further parallel between adaptation and contrast.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1980,6, 24–44.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Eimas, P. D., &Corbit, J. D. Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors.Cognitive Psychology, 1973,4, 99–109.
  Article Google Scholar
• Elman, J. L. Perceptual origins of the phoneme boundary effect and selective adaptation to speech: A signal detection theory analysis.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1979,65, 190–207.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Erber, N. P., &De Fillipo, C. L. Voice/mouth synthesis and tactual/visual perception of /pa, ba, ma/.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978,64,1015–1019.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Finney, D. J.Probit analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1971.
  Google Scholar
• Ganong, W. F. The selective adaptation of burst-cued stops.Perception & Psychophysics, 1978,24, 71–83.
  Google Scholar
• Howell, P. Vowel-contingent feature detection.Perception & Psychophysics, 1980,27, 37–42.
  Article Google Scholar
• Macdonald, J., &McGurk, H. Visual influences on speech perception processing.Perception & Psychophysics, 1978,24, 253–257.
  Google Scholar
• McGurk, H., &MacDonald, J. Hearing lips and seeing voices.Nature, 1976,264, 746–748.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Repp, B. H., Healy, A. F., &Crowder, R. G. Categories and context in the perception of isolated steady-state vowels.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1979,5, 129–145.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Sawusch, J. R. Peripheral and central processes in selective adaptation of place of articulation in stop consonants.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977,62, 738–750.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Sawusch, J. R., &Pisoni, D. B. Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,20, 413–418.
  Article Google Scholar
• Stevens, K. N., &Blumstein, S. E. Invariant cues for place of articulation in stop consonants.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978,64, 1358–1368.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Summerfield, Q. Use of visual information for phonetic perception.Phonetica, 1979,36, 314–331.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Tartter, V. C, &Eimas, P. D. The role of auditory feature detectors in the perception of speech.Perception & Psychophysics, 1975,18, 293–298.
  Article Google Scholar

Download references