Flexible Sigmoidoscopy: Background, Indications, Contraindications (original) (raw)

Background

Flexible sigmoidoscopy is a procedure wherein a sigmoidoscope is inserted through the anus, the distal colonic mucosa (up to 60 cm from the anal verge) is examined, and any diagnostic or therapeutic maneuvers performed, as needed.

Intracolonic visualization with an endoscope dates back to 1958, when Matsunaga used a gastroscope for this purpose in Japan. [1] The next step was the incorporation of the fiberoptic bundles into the gastroscopes, which in turn led to the development of the first fiberoptic flexible sigmoidoscope by Overholt and its successful use in 1963. [1] Continuing development through the years has led to the modern sigmoidoscope, which uses a charge–coupled device connected to a video processor.

Alternatives to flexible sigmoidoscopy include the following:

eMedicine Logo

Indications

The following are the usual indications for flexible sigmoidoscopy [6] :

Intraoperative flexible sigmoidoscopy may also prove useful for assessing a colorectal anastomosis, as an alternative to the conventional air-leak test. [14]

Evidence-based screening strategies for CRC are recommended in order to reduce morbidity and mortality. [15] Screening tools available include high-sensitivity guaiac fecal occult blood testing (HSgFOBT), fecal immunochemical testing (FIT), multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) testing, CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy), flexible sigmoidoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy with FIT, and traditional colonoscopy. Apart from the conventional screening tools, novel techniques such as liquid biopsy, colon capsule endoscopy, urinary metabolomics, and stool-based microbiome testing are being studied.

Although flexible sigmoidoscopy and fecal occult blood testing are comparable when applied as screening tools to reduce mortality due to colorectal cancer, there has been little evidence to indicate that screening with either approach reduces colorectal cancer deaths more than the other. [16] A systematic review and meta-analysis by Zhang et al (four randomized controlled trials [RCTs]; N = 457,871) found that flexible sigmoidoscopy–based screening was significantly associated with a 20% relative risk reduction in CRC incidence and a 24% reduction in CRC mortality, though this benefit did not translate to proximal colon cancer specifically. [17]

In a systematic review of 25 studies that analyzed the cost-effectiveness of sigmoidoscopy for CRC screening, Diedrich et al found that the combination of annual stool testing and sigmoidoscopy at 5-year intervals was a more cost-effective screening option than either strategy alone. [18]

In a systematic review on the recommended number of flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy biopsies for the diagnosis of microscopic colitis, Malik et al reported that a total of six biopsies should be taken from the ascending and descending colon for better diagnostic accuracy. [19]

Colonoscopy following an acute sigmoid diverticulitis is routinely recommended as part of colorectal cancer screening. Hannan et al described a possible alternative in the form of flexible sigmoidoscopy and reported lesser rates of detection of polyp in the sigmoid colon (5.9%) as well as beyond it (1.1%). [20] Hence, restricting the use of full-length colonoscopy to those patients with significant findings on flexible sigmoidoscopy offers numerous advantages with respect to time consumption, safety, cost, avoidance of bowel preparation, and intravenous (IV) sedation.

eMedicine Logo

Contraindications

Absolute contraindications for flexible sigmoidoscopy include the following:

Relative contraindications for flexible sigmoidoscopy include the following:

eMedicine Logo

Technical Considerations

Anatomy

The rectum lies in the sacrococcygeal hollow and changes to the anal canal at the puborectal sling formed by the innermost fibers of the levator ani. The rectum has a dilated middle part called the ampulla. The rectum is related anteriorly to the urinary bladder, prostate, seminal vesicles, and urethra in males and to the uterus, cervix, and vagina in females. Anterior to the rectum is the rectovesical pouch in males and the rectouterine pouch in females. The anal canal is related to the perineal body in front and the anococcygeal body behind; both of these are fibromuscular structures.

For more information about the relevant anatomy, see Large Intestine Anatomy, Colon Anatomy, and Anal Canal Anatomy.

Best practices

The following measures are recommended for improving the performance of flexible sigmoidoscopy:

eMedicine Logo

  1. Haycock A, Cohen C, Saunders B, Cotton PB, Williams CB. Cotton and Williams' Practical Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: The Fundamentals. 7th ed. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2014.
  2. Stern C. Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2014 Aug. 18 (4):471-2. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  3. Regge D, Iussich G, Senore C, Correale L, Hassan C, Bert A, et al. Population screening for colorectal cancer by flexible sigmoidoscopy or CT colonography: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial. Trials. 2014 Mar 28. 15:97. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].
  4. Duarte RB, Bernardo WM, Sakai CM, Silva GL, Guedes HG, Kuga R, et al. Computed tomography colonography versus colonoscopy for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018. 14:349-360. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].
  5. Chung SW, Hakim S, Siddiqui S, Cash BD. Update on Flexible Sigmoidoscopy, Computed Tomographic Colonography, and Capsule Colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2020 Jul. 30 (3):569-583. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  6. Cappell MS, Friedel D. The role of sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy in the diagnosis and management of lower gastrointestinal disorders: technique, indications, and contraindications. Med Clin North Am. 2002 Nov. 86 (6):1217-52. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  7. [Guideline] Lopes G, Stern MC, Temin S, Sharara AI, Cervantes A, Costas-Chavarri A, et al. Early Detection for Colorectal Cancer: ASCO Resource-Stratified Guideline. J Glob Oncol. 2019 Feb. 5:1-22. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].
  8. [Guideline] Rex DK, Boland CR, Dominitz JA, Giardiello FM, Johnson DA, Kaltenbach T, et al. Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul. 112 (7):1016-1030. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  9. [Guideline] Patel SG, May FP, Anderson JC, Burke CA, Dominitz JA, Gross SA, et al. Updates on Age to Start and Stop Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations From the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 1. 117 (1):57-69. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  10. Age to initiate colorectal cancer screening in average risk individuals: evidence brief, June 2019. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI). Available at https://www.icsi.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/ICSI-Colorectal-Cancer-Screening-Evidence-Brief-CEBP-Approved-FINAL.pdf. June 2019; Accessed: February 13, 2024.
  11. Armaroli P, Villain P, Suonio E, Almonte M, Anttila A, Atkin WS, et al. European Code against Cancer, 4th Edition: Cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol. 2015 Dec. 39 Suppl 1:S139-52. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  12. Doroudi M, Schoen RE, Pinsky PF. Early detection versus primary prevention in the PLCO flexible sigmoidoscopy screening trial: Which has the greatest impact on mortality?. Cancer. 2017 Dec 15. 123 (24):4815-4822. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  13. Holme Ø, Schoen RE, Senore C, Segnan N, Hoff G, Løberg M, et al. Effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in men and women and different age groups: pooled analysis of randomised trials. BMJ. 2017 Jan 13. 356:i6673. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].
  14. Williams E, Prabhakaran S, Kong JC, Bell S, Warrier SK, Simpson P, et al. Utility of intra-operative flexible sigmoidoscopy to assess colorectal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg. 2021 Apr. 91 (4):546-552. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  15. Jain S, Maque J, Galoosian A, Osuna-Garcia A, May FP. Optimal Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022 Apr. 23 (4):474-493. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  16. Holme Ø, Bretthauer M, Fretheim A, Odgaard-Jensen J, Hoff G. Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 1. 9:CD009259. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  17. Zhang C, Liu L, Li J, Lv Y, Wu D, Xu S, et al. Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy-based screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2023 Jul-Dec. 23 (11):1217-1227. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  18. Diedrich L, Brinkmann M, Dreier M, Rossol S, Schramm W, Krauth C. Is there a place for sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening? A systematic review and critical appraisal of cost-effectiveness models. PLoS One. 2023. 18 (8):e0290353. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].
  19. Malik A, Nadeem M, Javaid S, Malik MI, Enofe I, Abegunde AT. Estimating the optimum number of colon biopsies for diagnosing microscopic colitis: a systematic review. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jul 1. 34 (7):733-738. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  20. Hannan E, Harding T, Duggan W, Brosnan C, Maguire D. Routine Endoscopy After Acute Sigmoid Diverticulitis: Would a Sigmoidoscopy be Sufficient?. Cureus. 2021 Sep. 13 (9):e17648. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].
  21. Ormarsson OT, Asgrimsdottir GM, Loftsson T, Stefansson E, Kristinsson JO, Lund SH, et al. Clinical trial: free fatty acid suppositories compared with enema as bowel preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct. 6 (4):278-283. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  22. Cappell MS, Friedel D. The role of sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy in the diagnosis and management of lower gastrointestinal disorders: endoscopic findings, therapy, and complications. Med Clin North Am. 2002 Nov. 86 (6):1253-88. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  23. Levin TR, Farraye FA, Schoen RE, Hoff G, Atkin W, Bond JH, et al. Quality in the technical performance of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: recommendations of an international multi-society task group. Gut. 2005 Jun. 54 (6):807-13. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  24. Kindt IS, Martiny FHJ, Gram EG, Bie AKL, Jauernik CP, Rahbek OJ, et al. The risk of bleeding and perforation from sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review and meta-analyses. PLoS One. 2023. 18 (10):e0292797. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].

Author

Gaurav Arora, MD, MS Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Southwestern Medical School

Gaurav Arora, MD, MS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Gastroenterology, American Gastroenterological Association, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Frank J Lukens, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine, Program Director of GI Fellowship Program, Director of Endoscopy and Endoscopic Training, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Medical School

Frank J Lukens, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Texas Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Mary L Windle, PharmD Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Vikram Kate, MBBS, MS, PhD, FACS, FACG, FRCS, FRCS(Edin), FRCS(Glasg), FFST(Ed), FIMSA, MAMS, MASCRS Dean (Academic) and Professor of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery and Senior Consultant Surgeon, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), India

Vikram Kate, MBBS, MS, PhD, FACS, FACG, FRCS, FRCS(Edin), FRCS(Glasg), FFST(Ed), FIMSA, MAMS, MASCRS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Gastroenterology, American College of Surgeons, American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Fellow of the Faculty of Surgical Trainers (RCSEd), Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow, Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, Royal College of Surgeons of England, Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Joseph K Lim, MD Associate Professor of Medicine, Director, Yale Viral Hepatitis Program, Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine

Joseph K Lim, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, American College of Physicians, American Gastroenterological Association, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The Chief Editor would like to acknowledge the assistance of Dr Gurushankari Balakrishnan, Surgical Oncology Resident, Cancer Institute (WIA), Adyar, Chennai, India, and of Dr Lekshmi Satheesh, Senior Resident, Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry, India, in updating the review of this article.

Medscape Reference thanks Dawn Sears, MD, Associate Professor of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Scott and White Memorial Hospital; and Dan C Cohen, MD, Fellow in Gastroenterology, Scott and White Hospital, Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, for assistance with the video contribution to this article.