GitHub - friendly/nestedLogit: Nested Dichotomy Logistic Regression Models (original) (raw)

Lifecycle: stable Last Commit CRAN status Downloads

nestedLogit

Version 0.3.2

The nestedLogit package provides functions for fitting nested dichotomy logistic regression models for a polytomous response. Nested dichotomies are statistically independent, and hence provide an additive decomposition of tests for the overall polytomous response. When the dichotomies make sense substantively, this method can be a simpler alternative to the standard multinomial logistic model which compares response categories to a reference level.

Installation

CRAN version install.packages("nestedLogit")
Development version remotes::install_github("friendly/nestedLogit")

Package overview

The package provides one main function, nestedLogit() for fitting the set of (m−1)(m-1)(m1) binary logistic regression models for a polytomous response with mmm levels. These can be specified using helper functions,

For instance, a 4-category response, with levels A, B, C, D, and successive binary splits for the dichotomies of interest could be specified as:

(ABCD <- logits(AB.CD = dichotomy(c("A", "B"), c("C", "D")), A.B = dichotomy("A", "B"), C.D = dichotomy("C", "D") ) ) #> AB.CD: {A, B} vs. {C, D} #> A.B: {A} vs. {B} #> C.D: {C} vs. {D}

These dichotomies are effectively a tree structure of lists, which can be displayed simply using lobstr::tree().

lobstr::tree(ABCD) #> S3 #> ├─AB.CD: #> │ ├─<chr [2]>"A", "B" #> │ └─<chr [2]>"C", "D" #> ├─A.B: #> │ ├─"A" #> │ └─"B" #> └─C.D: #> ├─"C" #> └─"D"

Alternatively, the nested dichotomies can be specified more compactly as a nested (i.e., recursive) list with optionally named elements. For example, where people might choose a method of transportation among the categories plane, train, bus, car, a sensible set of three dichotomies could be specified as:

transport <- list( air = "plane", ground = list( public = list("train", "bus"), private = "car" ))

lobstr::tree(transport) #> #> ├─air: "plane" #> └─ground: #> ├─public: #> │ ├─"train" #> │ └─"bus" #> └─private: "car"

There are also methods including as.matrix.dichotomies(),as.character.dichotomies() to facilitate working with dichotomiesobjects in other representations. The ABCD example above corresponds to the matrix below, whose rows represent the dichotomies and columns are the response levels:

as.matrix(ABCD) #> A B C D #> AB.CD 0 0 1 1 #> A.B 0 1 NA NA #> C.D NA NA 0 1

as.character(ABCD) #> [1] "AB.CD = {{A B}} {{C D}}; A.B = {{A}} {{B}}; C.D = {{C}} {{D}}"

The result of nestedLogit() is an object of class "nestedLogit". It contains the set of (m−1)(m-1)(m1) glm() models fit to the dichotomies.

Methods

As befits a model-fitting function, the package defines a nearly complete set of methods for "nestedLogit" objects:

These functions are supplemented by various methods for testing hypotheses about and comparing nested-logit models:

Examples

This example uses data on women’s labor force participation to fit a nested logit model for the response, partic, representing categoriesnot.work, parttime and fulltime for 263 women from a 1977 survey in Canada. This dataset is explored in more detail in the package vignette, vignette("nestedLogits", package = "nestedLogit").

A model for the complete polytomy can be specified as two nested dichotomies, using helper functions dichotomy() and logits(), as shown in the example that follows:

nestedLogit() effectively fits each of these dichotomies as logistic regression models via glm(..., family = binomial)

data(Womenlf, package = "carData")

Use logits() and dichotomy() to specify the comparisons of interest

comparisons <- logits(work=dichotomy("not.work", working=c("parttime", "fulltime")), full=dichotomy("parttime", "fulltime"))

m <- nestedLogit(partic ~ hincome + children, dichotomies = comparisons, data=Womenlf) coef(m) #> work full #> (Intercept) 1.33582979 3.4777735 #> hincome -0.04230843 -0.1072679 #> childrenpresent -1.57564843 -2.6514557

The "nestedLogit" object contains the components of the fitted model. The structure can be shown nicely using lobstr::tree():

m |> lobstr::tree(max_depth=1) #> S3 #> ├─models: ... #> ├─formula: S3 partic ~ hincome + children... #> ├─dichotomies: S3... #> ├─data: S3<data.frame>... #> ├─data.name: Womenlf #> ├─subset: #> ├─contrasts: #> └─contrasts.print: "NULL"

The separate models for the work and full dichotomies can be extracted via models(). These are the binomial glm() models.

models(m) |> lobstr::tree(max_depth = 1) #> #> ├─work: S3<glm/lm>... #> └─full: S3<glm/lm>...

Anova() produces analysis of variance deviance tests for the terms in this model for each of the submodels, as well as for the combined responses of the polytomy. The LR Chisq and df for terms in the combined model are the sums of those for the submodels.

car::Anova(m) #> #> Analysis of Deviance Tables (Type II tests) #>
#> Response work: {not.work} vs. working{parttime, fulltime} #> LR Chisq Df Pr(>Chisq)
#> hincome 4.8264 1 0.02803 *
#> children 31.3229 1 2.185e-08 *** #> --- #> Signif. codes: 0 '' 0.001 '' 0.01 '' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 #> #> #> Response full: {parttime} vs. {fulltime} #> LR Chisq Df Pr(>Chisq)
#> hincome 8.981 1 0.002728 ** #> children 32.136 1 1.437e-08 *** #> --- #> Signif. codes: 0 '' 0.001 '' 0.01 '' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 #> #> #> Combined Responses #> LR Chisq Df Pr(>Chisq)
#> hincome 13.808 2 0.001004 ** #> children 63.459 2 1.66e-14 *** #> --- #> Signif. codes: 0 '' 0.001 '' 0.01 '' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

Plots

A basic plot of predicted probabilities can be produced using theplot() method for "nestedLogit" objects. It can be called several times to give multi-panel plots. By default, a 95% pointwise confidence envelope is added to the plot. Here, they are plotted withconf.level = 0.68 to give pm1\pm 1pm1 std. error bounds.

op <- par(mfcol=c(1, 2), mar=c(4, 4, 3, 1) + 0.1) plot(m, "hincome", list(children="absent"), conf.level = 0.68, xlab="Husband's Income", legend=FALSE) plot(m, "hincome", list(children="present"), conf.level = 0.68, xlab="Husband's Income")

Vignettes

Authors

References

S. Fienberg (1980) The Analysis of Cross-Classified Categorical Data, 2nd Edition, MIT Press, Section 6.6.

J. Fox (2016) Applied Regression Analysis and Generalized Linear Models, 3rd Edition, Sage, Section 14.2.2.

M. Friendly and D. Meyers (2016) Discrete Data Analysis with R, CRC Press, Section 8.2.