Run Cygwin CI workflow commands in login shells by EliahKagan · Pull Request #1709 · gitpython-developers/GitPython (original) (raw)

EliahKagan

This passes --login to the bash shell used to run commands in the Cygwin environment on CI. This eliminates the need to work around a partly broken environment, and the extra code what was used to do that is accordingly removed. There are two benefits of this change:

A theoretical disadvantage of this is that login shells take slightly longer to start up, but that delay is insignificant in this application. A more significant disadvantage is that setting the -x shell option the way it was done before would produce a lot of noise at the beginning of the output for every command-running step. To work around that, -x is omitted from the value of shell and set -x is added at the end of the startup script for login shells, so it runs before each step's "payload" command, but without applying to the commands run in the startup script itself.

@EliahKagan

This passes --login to the bash shell used to run commands in the Cygwin environment on CI. This eliminates the need to work around a partly broken environment, and the extra code what was used to do that is accordingly removed. There are two benefits of this change:

A theoretical disadvantage of this is that login shells take slightly longer to start up, but that delay is insigificant in this application. A more significant disadvantage is that setting the -x shell option the way it was done before would produce a lot of noise at the beginning of the output for every command-running step. To work around that, -x is omitted from the value of "shell" and "set -x" is added at the end of the startup script for login shells, so it runs before each step's "payload" command, but without applying to the commands run in the startup script itself.

Byron

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's so awesome! Great discovery!

I can sense that native Windows support is just around the corner :).

renovate bot referenced this pull request in allenporter/flux-local

Oct 20, 2023

@renovate

EliahKagan added a commit to EliahKagan/GitPython that referenced this pull request

Dec 23, 2023

@EliahKagan

This makes a pip -> pip3 symlink in /usr/bin in a new step prior to the first step that runs the pip command. Using "pip3", "pip3.9", or a command like "python -m pip" would work, but this allows the Cygwin workflow to continue using the same installation commands as the main testing workflow.

Adding this fixes two problems:

  1. When the pip version installed by the python39-pip package is current, so that upgrading pip doesn't install any new commmand, no "pip" command is created in /usr/local. This has happened not to be the case for a long time, which is why the Cygwin workflow was able to pass. (That the recent failures started at the merge of gitpython-developers#1783 turns out to be a coincidence: rerunning jobs on prior commits has the failure, as does experimentally reverting it.)

  2. Even when the pip version installed by python39-pip is behind the latest available version, pip is still used before being upgraded to check if setuptools is installed, to decide whether to upgrade it. This is to keep similar steps in the two testing workflows similar, since the Cygwin workflow only uses Python 3.9, which always has setuptools. Because pip was never in $PATH in that step, the Cygwin workflow wrongly refrained from trying to upgrade setuptools.

When the "Update PyPA packages" step does find a newer version of pip to upgrade to, it installs it in /usr/local/bin, which we have in $PATH before /usr/bin, so the upgraded version, when present, will still be preferred in subsequent commands, as before.

Running "pip" on Cygwin when it may not be in $PATH -- and, for one step, never is -- was a bug introduced in e8956e5 (gitpython-developers#1709). Before that, "pip" still was not always available, but it was not used. This change fixes the bug by making sure "pip" is always available.

EliahKagan added a commit to EliahKagan/GitPython that referenced this pull request

Dec 23, 2023

@EliahKagan

This makes a pip -> pip3 symlink in /usr/bin in a new step prior to the first step that runs the pip command. Using "pip3", "pip3.9", or a command like "python -m pip" would work, but this allows the Cygwin workflow to continue using the same installation commands as the main testing workflow.

Adding this fixes two problems:

  1. When the pip version installed by the python39-pip package is current, so that upgrading pip doesn't install any new commmand, no "pip" command is created in /usr/local. This has happened not to be the case for a long time, which is why the Cygwin workflow was able to pass. (That the recent failures started at the merge of gitpython-developers#1783 turns out to be a coincidence: rerunning jobs on prior commits has the failure, as does experimentally reverting it.)

  2. Even when the pip version installed by python39-pip is behind the latest available version, pip is still used before being upgraded to check if setuptools is installed, to decide whether to upgrade it. This is to keep similar steps in the two testing workflows similar, since the Cygwin workflow only uses Python 3.9, which always has setuptools. Because pip was never in $PATH in that step, the Cygwin workflow wrongly refrained from trying to upgrade setuptools.

When the "Update PyPA packages" step does find a newer version of pip to upgrade to, it installs it in /usr/local/bin, which we have in $PATH before /usr/bin, so the upgraded version, when present, will still be preferred in subsequent commands, as before.

Running "pip" on Cygwin when it may not be in $PATH -- and, for one step, never is -- was a bug introduced in e8956e5 (gitpython-developers#1709). Before that, "pip" still was not always available, but it was not used. This change fixes the bug by making sure "pip" is always available.

EliahKagan added a commit to EliahKagan/GitPython that referenced this pull request

Dec 23, 2023

@EliahKagan

This makes a pip -> pip3 symlink in /usr/bin in a new step prior to the first step that runs the pip command. Using "pip3", "pip3.9", or a command like "python -m pip" would work, but this allows the Cygwin workflow to continue using the same installation commands as the main testing workflow.

Adding this fixes two problems:

  1. When the pip version installed by the python39-pip Cygwin package is current, so that upgrading pip doesn't install any new commmand, no "pip" command is created in /usr/local. This has happened not to be the case for a long time, which is why the Cygwin workflow was able to pass. (That the recent failures started at the merge of gitpython-developers#1783 turns out to be a coincidence: rerunning jobs on prior commits has the failure, as does experimentally reverting it.)

  2. Even when the pip version installed by python39-pip is behind the latest available version, pip is still used before being upgraded to check if setuptools is installed, to decide whether to upgrade it. This is to keep similar steps in the two testing workflows similar, since the Cygwin workflow only uses Python 3.9, which always has setuptools. Because pip was never in $PATH in that step, the Cygwin workflow wrongly refrained from trying to upgrade setuptools.

When the "Update PyPA packages" step does find a newer version of pip to upgrade to, it installs it in /usr/local/bin, which we have in $PATH before /usr/bin, so the upgraded version, when present, will still be preferred in subsequent commands, as before.

Running "pip" on Cygwin when it may not be in $PATH -- and, for one step, never is -- was a bug introduced in e8956e5 (gitpython-developers#1709). Before that, "pip" still was not always available, but it was not used. This change fixes the bug by making sure "pip" is always available.

EliahKagan added a commit to EliahKagan/GitPython that referenced this pull request

Dec 23, 2023

@EliahKagan

This makes a pip -> pip3 symlink in /usr/bin in a new step prior to the first step that runs the pip command. Using "pip3", "pip3.9", or a command like "python -m pip" would work, but this allows the Cygwin workflow to continue using the same installation commands as the main testing workflow.

Adding this fixes two problems:

  1. When the pip version installed by the python39-pip Cygwin package is current, so that upgrading pip doesn't install any new commmand, no "pip" command is created in /usr/local. This has happened not to be the case for a long time, which is why the Cygwin workflow was able to pass. (That the recent failures started at the merge of gitpython-developers#1783 turns out to be a coincidence: rerunning jobs on prior commits has the failure, as does experimentally reverting it.)

  2. Even when the pip version installed by python39-pip is behind the latest available version, pip is still used before being upgraded to check if setuptools is installed, to decide whether to upgrade it. This is to keep similar steps in the two testing workflows similar, since the Cygwin workflow only uses Python 3.9, which always has setuptools. Because pip was never in $PATH in that step, the Cygwin workflow wrongly refrained from trying to upgrade setuptools.

When the "Update PyPA packages" step does find a newer version of pip to upgrade to, it installs it in /usr/local/bin, which we have in $PATH before /usr/bin, so the upgraded version, when present, will still be preferred in subsequent commands, as before.

Running "pip" on Cygwin when it may not be in $PATH -- and, for one step, never is -- was a bug introduced in e8956e5 (gitpython-developers#1709). Before that, "pip" still was not always available, but it was not used. This change fixes the bug by making sure "pip" is always available.