util: inspect() should not exceed breakLength by BridgeAR · Pull Request #26914 · nodejs/node (original) (raw)

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Conversation6 Commits1 Checks0 Files changed

Conversation

This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters

[ Show hidden characters]({{ revealButtonHref }})

BridgeAR

Using util.inspect() with the compact option set to a number
could result in output that exceeded the breakLength option. This
change makes sure that limit is taken into account.

Checklist

@BridgeAR

Using util.inspect() with the compact option set to a number could result in output that exceeded the breakLength option. This change makes sure that limit is taken into account.

@nodejs-github-bot

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added assert

Issues and PRs related to the assert subsystem.

util

Issues and PRs related to the built-in util module.

labels

Mar 26, 2019

@nodejs-github-bot

@BridgeAR

@BridgeAR BridgeAR removed the assert

Issues and PRs related to the assert subsystem.

label

Mar 27, 2019

targos

@BridgeAR BridgeAR added the author ready

PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.

label

Mar 29, 2019

@BridgeAR

mcollina

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@BridgeAR

BridgeAR added a commit to BridgeAR/node that referenced this pull request

Apr 3, 2019

@BridgeAR

Using util.inspect() with the compact option set to a number could result in output that exceeded the breakLength option. This change makes sure that limit is taken into account.

PR-URL: nodejs#26914 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso targos@protonmail.com Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina matteo.collina@gmail.com

BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Apr 5, 2019

@BridgeAR @BethGriggs

Using util.inspect() with the compact option set to a number could result in output that exceeded the breakLength option. This change makes sure that limit is taken into account.

PR-URL: #26914 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso targos@protonmail.com Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina matteo.collina@gmail.com

BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Apr 9, 2019

@BridgeAR @BethGriggs

Using util.inspect() with the compact option set to a number could result in output that exceeded the breakLength option. This change makes sure that limit is taken into account.

PR-URL: #26914 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso targos@protonmail.com Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina matteo.collina@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Beth Griggs Bethany.Griggs@uk.ibm.com

BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Apr 9, 2019

@BridgeAR @BethGriggs

Using util.inspect() with the compact option set to a number could result in output that exceeded the breakLength option. This change makes sure that limit is taken into account.

PR-URL: #26914 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso targos@protonmail.com Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina matteo.collina@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Beth Griggs Bethany.Griggs@uk.ibm.com

BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Apr 10, 2019

@BridgeAR @BethGriggs

Using util.inspect() with the compact option set to a number could result in output that exceeded the breakLength option. This change makes sure that limit is taken into account.

PR-URL: #26914 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso targos@protonmail.com Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina matteo.collina@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Beth Griggs Bethany.Griggs@uk.ibm.com

@BridgeAR BridgeAR deleted the improve-util-inspect-compact branch

January 20, 2020 11:57

Reviewers

@mcollina mcollina mcollina approved these changes

@targos targos targos approved these changes

@addaleax addaleax Awaiting requested review from addaleax

@antsmartian antsmartian Awaiting requested review from antsmartian

@jasnell jasnell Awaiting requested review from jasnell

Labels

author ready

PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.

util

Issues and PRs related to the built-in util module.