bpo-35134: Move non-limited C API files to Include/cpython/ by nw0 · Pull Request #24561 · python/cpython (original) (raw)
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Conversation5 Commits3 Checks0 Files changed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
[ Show hidden characters]({{ revealButtonHref }})
Contributor
nw0 commented
• Loading
Move Include/{odictobject.h,parser_interface.h,picklebufobject.h,pydebug.h,pyfpe.h} into Include/cpython/.
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ |
---|
Move odictobject.h, parser_interface.h, picklebufobject.h, pydebug.h, and |
pyfpe.h into the cpython/ directory. They must not be included directly, as |
they are already included by Python.h: :ref:`Include Files `. |
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hum. If we move more header files, the risk of breaking 3rd C extensions is higher. I'm still supportive of this change, but please document it also at C API > Porting to Python 3.10:
https://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/3.10.html#id2
In What's New in Python 3.10, document also the other header files that you already moved.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated. I assume the main concern is if they have been included directly? I've worded my note with that in mind, but let me know if I should add anything else.
I've taken a quick look at the remaining files: there are still more than 10 header files that could be moved into cpython/ wholesale, and about the same number which require some surgery. Would you support making these changes (hopefully to close bpo-35134 entirely) within 3.10?
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ |
---|
#include "parser_interface.h" |
#include "cpython/parser_interface.h" |
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can't we include Python.h here instead?
adorilson pushed a commit to adorilson/cpython that referenced this pull request
Include/{odictobject.h,parser_interface.h,picklebufobject.h,pydebug.h,pyfpe.h} into Include/cpython/.
Parser: peg_api: include Python.h instead of parser_interface.h.