Allow to choose between Procfile.dev or Puma plugin · rails/tailwindcss-rails · Discussion #327 (original) (raw)
Navigation Menu
Appearance settings
- GitHub Copilot Write better code with AI
- GitHub Models New Manage and compare prompts
- GitHub Advanced Security Find and fix vulnerabilities
- Actions Automate any workflow
- Codespaces Instant dev environments
- Issues Plan and track work
- Code Review Manage code changes
- Discussions Collaborate outside of code
- Code Search Find more, search less
Explore - Why GitHub
- All features
- Documentation
- GitHub Skills
- Blog
- By company size
- Topics
- Pricing
Provide feedback
We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
Include my email address so I can be contacted
Saved searches
Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly
Appearance settings
rails / tailwindcss-rails Public
Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings
Additional navigation options
Closed
javierav started this conversation inIdeas
Allow to choose between Procfile.dev or Puma plugin #327
javierav Feb 6, 2024
· 3 comments· 1 reply
Discussion options
{{title}}
Something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
after the PR #300 has been merged, the user should be allowed to choose whether to use the Procfile.dev or the Puma plugin in the installation generator. Currently the Procfile.dev and the foremangem installation are always used.
You must be logged in to vote
Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
Comment options
{{title}}
Something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Maintainer
@javierav This is a great idea! If you'd like to attempt to implement it, I'd gladly review a PR.
You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
Comment options
{{title}}
Something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Author
Hi Mike!
I started thinking about it, but I don't see what is the best way to parameterize the generator. Any suggestions?
Comment options
{{title}}
Something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Author
You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options
{{title}}
Something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Maintainer
I think, long-term, the real solution here is to use the engine server hook approach from #347. I'll be working on landing some version of that patch.
You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Category
Labels
None yet
2 participants
Converted from issue
This discussion was converted from issue #326 on February 07, 2024 02:56.
Heading
Bold
Italic
Quote
Code
Link
Numbered list
Unordered list
Task list
Attach files
Mention
Reference
Menu
- Heading
- Bold
- Italic
- Quote
- Code
- Link
- Numbered list
- Unordered list
- Task list
- Attach files
- Mention
- Reference
Select a reply
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
👍 1 reacted with thumbs up emoji 👎 1 reacted with thumbs down emoji 😄 1 reacted with laugh emoji 🎉 1 reacted with hooray emoji 😕 1 reacted with confused emoji ❤️ 1 reacted with heart emoji 🚀 1 reacted with rocket emoji 👀 1 reacted with eyes emoji