CI: rfl: move job forward to Linux v6.14-rc3 by ojeda · Pull Request #137169 · rust-lang/rust (original) (raw)
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Conversation11 Commits1 Checks6 Files changed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
[ Show hidden characters]({{ revealButtonHref }})
Linux v6.14-rc3 contains commit 6273a058383e ("x86: rust: set rustc-abi=x86-softfloat on rustc>=1.86.0"), which resolves the error from #136146.
r? @lqd @Kobzol
try-job: x86_64-rust-for-linux
@rustbot label A-rust-for-linux
@bors try
Linux v6.14-rc3 contains commit 6273a058383e ("x86: rust: set rustc-abi=x86-softfloat on rustc>=1.86.0"), which resolves the error from rust-lang#136146.
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda ojeda@kernel.org
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Relevant for the Rust-for-Linux project
labels
15 tasks
cool, hopefully bors wakes up soon to test it out
hypothesis that bors doesn't look at the OP
@bors try
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request
CI: rfl: move job forward to Linux v6.14-rc3
Linux v6.14-rc3 contains commit 6273a058383e ("x86: rust: set rustc-abi=x86-softfloat on rustc>=1.86.0"), which resolves the error from rust-lang#136146.
r? @lqd @Kobzol
try-job: x86_64-rust-for-linux
@rustbot label A-rust-for-linux
@bors try
Maybe it doesn't like me... :(
Yeah I think that bors doesn't look at PR descriptions.
Yeah I think that bors doesn't look at PR descriptions.
And also the top-level review comment
While a robot uprising is not unlikely, IIUC bors will only look at posted comments @ojeda
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 67a81d9 (67a81d914c3942a6be201d3d5241307981856ed7)
📌 Commit f46c765 has been approved by lqd
It is now in the queue for this repository.
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request
Rollup merge of rust-lang#137169 - ojeda:rfl, r=lqd
CI: rfl: move job forward to Linux v6.14-rc3
Linux v6.14-rc3 contains commit 6273a058383e ("x86: rust: set rustc-abi=x86-softfloat on rustc>=1.86.0"), which resolves the error from rust-lang#136146.
r? @lqd @Kobzol
try-job: x86_64-rust-for-linux
@rustbot label A-rust-for-linux
@bors try
Labels
Relevant for the Rust-for-Linux project
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.