Egina Pereira - Academia.edu (original) (raw)
Papers by Egina Pereira
We will do here a study based on speech Analysis having as subject rhetoric, dialectic and argume... more We will do here a study based on speech Analysis having as subject rhetoric, dialectic and argumentation, which are a mechanism functioning in juridical discourse, and we will take it as a social practice of discourse. This kind of discourse is produced according to specific institutionalized norms and has special discourse laws that provide a language marked by technique and jargons, which stylizes it. The establishment of this discourse also makes possible the use of rhetorical and dialectical techniques to build up argumentation between the enunciation, who pass it to their target public with a view to convincing and persuading them. Interlocutors aim at attracting their public and therefore develop their these so much so that they be the most verisimilar as possible. This fact is due to the articulation between statements and enunciators and to the polyphonic process established by enunciation, a process that implies the notion of judgement of value set up by Rhetoric and Dialectic, which are both sides of this discourse coined by argumentation.
<jats:p>The present time enables a broad production on rhetoric, once we coexist with growi... more <jats:p>The present time enables a broad production on rhetoric, once we coexist with growing pluralist issues as well as a higher demand for more elaborated argumentative constructions to support standpoints. Among Legal Studies it is not that different, especially because of the methodological changes which involve applying and understanding the norm, which cooperates to build a broader argumentative environment, becoming necessary to insert value as an element of application, besides the fact and the norm. Along the thesis, we intend to focus, first, on the role of doxa concerning the legislation which is produced on the pronouncements of the individuals involved in the PH, built by authority discourses which are based in a doxa related to the STF itself. A second role would be to allow an interconnection among legal, political and social discourses. In the discursive production at the PH, at the STF, endoxas (medical discourse, biomedical, biological, religious, besides the legal discourse, which used to be the only one) are used to reach society (representative of doxa), aimed at reaching society in general through a wide dissemination of the utterances by the media. This explains why the decisions made by the STF need to be based and legitimated by society. For those decisions to be legitimate, they have to include the participation or the understanding of society, democracy requirement.</jats:p>
Scripta, Dec 23, 2016
pessoais são em geral expressos como juízos de valor largamente compartilhados (PERELMAN; OLBRECH... more pessoais são em geral expressos como juízos de valor largamente compartilhados (PERELMAN; OLBRECHTS-TYTECA, 2000, p. 203). É exatamente o lugar das figuras argumentativas em questão, os lugares-comuns da presente decisão: educação, professor, aluno e os papéis desempenhados por cada um.
O discurso juridico e construido a partir de processos argumentativos, e envolve relacoes de pode... more O discurso juridico e construido a partir de processos argumentativos, e envolve relacoes de poder decorrentes dos papeis devidamente institucionalizados; principalmente a decisao judicial, tendo em vista que ela deve ser justificada. Atualmente, o discurso juridico nao se limita a argumentos dessa esfera, mas permite a aplicacao de argumentos extrajuridicos. O ethos, o pathos e o logos sao mecanismos para se alcancar os objetivos perseguidos, e a analise da escolha dos argumentos permite identifica-los, cada um dentro de sua esfera, mas em conjunto como fios construtores da argumentacao por tri-dimensao discursiva. Assim, propomos analisar, atraves da Retorica e da Argumentacao, a decisao judicial que trata da manutencao ou nao da prisao de dois individuos sobre o furto de duas melancias, no que se refere aos argumentos que a fundamentam, considerando-se os elementos doxicos, os quais subsidiam os efeitos na decisao seja de imparcialidade, necessario em discursos decisorios, seja d...
A contemporaneidade proporciona, em termos de teorizacoes e analises, uma vasta producao sobre re... more A contemporaneidade proporciona, em termos de teorizacoes e analises, uma vasta producao sobre retorica, uma vez que convivemos com valores cada vez mais pluralistas e com uma exigencia cada vez maior de elaborar construcoes argumentativas para sustentar posicoes. No Direito, tal fato nao e diferente, inclusive por causa da alteracao metodologica na aplicacao e na interpretacao da norma, o que colabora para a construcao de um ambiente argumentativo mais amplo, sendo necessaria a insercao do valor como elemento de aplicacao, alem do fato e da norma. O objetivo da pesquisa e, nesse contexto, estudar os papeis desempenhados pela doxa na construcao argumentativa dos proferimentos apresentados em audiencias publicas (AP) das acoes constitucionais ADI (Acao Direta de Inconstitucionalidade) no 3.510 e da ADPF (Arguicao de Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental) no54 , no âmbito do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF). No percurso da tese, pretendemos focalizar, primeiramente, o papel da doxa ref...
The juridical discourse is built upon argumentative processes and involves power relations that a... more The juridical discourse is built upon argumentative processes and involves power relations that arise from duly institutionalized papers; mainly the judicial decision, considering that it must be justified. Nowadays, the juridical speech is not limited by arguments from that sphere, but allows the application of extralegal arguments. Ethos, Pathos and Logos are mechanisms used to reach the pursued objectives and the analysis of the choice of arguments allows us to identify them, each one in its own sphere, but also together, like wires that build argumentation through a discursive three-dimension. Then, we propose to analyze, through Rhetoric and Argumentation, the judicial decision that deals with the maintenance (or not) of the imprisonment of two individuals for stealing two watermelons, in terms of the arguments that underlie it, considering the doxic elements, which subsidize the effects of impartiality, necessary in decisive discourses, or of neutrality.
We will do here a study based on speech Analysis having as subject rhetoric, dialectic and argume... more We will do here a study based on speech Analysis having as subject rhetoric, dialectic and argumentation, which are a mechanism functioning in juridical discourse, and we will take it as a social practice of discourse. This kind of discourse is produced according to specific institutionalized norms and has special discourse laws that provide a language marked by technique and jargons, which stylizes it. The establishment of this discourse also makes possible the use of rhetorical and dialectical techniques to build up argumentation between the enunciation, who pass it to their target public with a view to convincing and persuading them. Interlocutors aim at attracting their public and therefore develop their these so much so that they be the most verisimilar as possible. This fact is due to the articulation between statements and enunciators and to the polyphonic process established by enunciation, a process that implies the notion of judgement of value set up by Rhetoric and Dialectic, which are both sides of this discourse coined by argumentation.
<jats:p>The present time enables a broad production on rhetoric, once we coexist with growi... more <jats:p>The present time enables a broad production on rhetoric, once we coexist with growing pluralist issues as well as a higher demand for more elaborated argumentative constructions to support standpoints. Among Legal Studies it is not that different, especially because of the methodological changes which involve applying and understanding the norm, which cooperates to build a broader argumentative environment, becoming necessary to insert value as an element of application, besides the fact and the norm. Along the thesis, we intend to focus, first, on the role of doxa concerning the legislation which is produced on the pronouncements of the individuals involved in the PH, built by authority discourses which are based in a doxa related to the STF itself. A second role would be to allow an interconnection among legal, political and social discourses. In the discursive production at the PH, at the STF, endoxas (medical discourse, biomedical, biological, religious, besides the legal discourse, which used to be the only one) are used to reach society (representative of doxa), aimed at reaching society in general through a wide dissemination of the utterances by the media. This explains why the decisions made by the STF need to be based and legitimated by society. For those decisions to be legitimate, they have to include the participation or the understanding of society, democracy requirement.</jats:p>
Scripta, Dec 23, 2016
pessoais são em geral expressos como juízos de valor largamente compartilhados (PERELMAN; OLBRECH... more pessoais são em geral expressos como juízos de valor largamente compartilhados (PERELMAN; OLBRECHTS-TYTECA, 2000, p. 203). É exatamente o lugar das figuras argumentativas em questão, os lugares-comuns da presente decisão: educação, professor, aluno e os papéis desempenhados por cada um.
O discurso juridico e construido a partir de processos argumentativos, e envolve relacoes de pode... more O discurso juridico e construido a partir de processos argumentativos, e envolve relacoes de poder decorrentes dos papeis devidamente institucionalizados; principalmente a decisao judicial, tendo em vista que ela deve ser justificada. Atualmente, o discurso juridico nao se limita a argumentos dessa esfera, mas permite a aplicacao de argumentos extrajuridicos. O ethos, o pathos e o logos sao mecanismos para se alcancar os objetivos perseguidos, e a analise da escolha dos argumentos permite identifica-los, cada um dentro de sua esfera, mas em conjunto como fios construtores da argumentacao por tri-dimensao discursiva. Assim, propomos analisar, atraves da Retorica e da Argumentacao, a decisao judicial que trata da manutencao ou nao da prisao de dois individuos sobre o furto de duas melancias, no que se refere aos argumentos que a fundamentam, considerando-se os elementos doxicos, os quais subsidiam os efeitos na decisao seja de imparcialidade, necessario em discursos decisorios, seja d...
A contemporaneidade proporciona, em termos de teorizacoes e analises, uma vasta producao sobre re... more A contemporaneidade proporciona, em termos de teorizacoes e analises, uma vasta producao sobre retorica, uma vez que convivemos com valores cada vez mais pluralistas e com uma exigencia cada vez maior de elaborar construcoes argumentativas para sustentar posicoes. No Direito, tal fato nao e diferente, inclusive por causa da alteracao metodologica na aplicacao e na interpretacao da norma, o que colabora para a construcao de um ambiente argumentativo mais amplo, sendo necessaria a insercao do valor como elemento de aplicacao, alem do fato e da norma. O objetivo da pesquisa e, nesse contexto, estudar os papeis desempenhados pela doxa na construcao argumentativa dos proferimentos apresentados em audiencias publicas (AP) das acoes constitucionais ADI (Acao Direta de Inconstitucionalidade) no 3.510 e da ADPF (Arguicao de Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental) no54 , no âmbito do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF). No percurso da tese, pretendemos focalizar, primeiramente, o papel da doxa ref...
The juridical discourse is built upon argumentative processes and involves power relations that a... more The juridical discourse is built upon argumentative processes and involves power relations that arise from duly institutionalized papers; mainly the judicial decision, considering that it must be justified. Nowadays, the juridical speech is not limited by arguments from that sphere, but allows the application of extralegal arguments. Ethos, Pathos and Logos are mechanisms used to reach the pursued objectives and the analysis of the choice of arguments allows us to identify them, each one in its own sphere, but also together, like wires that build argumentation through a discursive three-dimension. Then, we propose to analyze, through Rhetoric and Argumentation, the judicial decision that deals with the maintenance (or not) of the imprisonment of two individuals for stealing two watermelons, in terms of the arguments that underlie it, considering the doxic elements, which subsidize the effects of impartiality, necessary in decisive discourses, or of neutrality.