Harry Lwin - Academia.edu (original) (raw)

Harry Lwin

Related Authors

Kevin Koehler

Nikolay Marinov

Jonathan  Powell

Laçin İdil ÖZTIĞ

Holger  Albrecht

Tore Wig

Felix S. Bethke

Felix S. Bethke

Centre for Global Cooperation Research, University of Duisburg-Essen

Uploads

Teaching Documents by Harry Lwin

Research paper thumbnail of Coup d'État and Democracy

This paper explains coup activity in democracies by adapting insights from the literature on comm... more This paper explains coup activity in democracies by adapting insights from the literature on commitment problems and framing coup around the threats leaders and potential coup plotters pose to each other. I claim democratic constraints on executive power inhibit a leader's ability to repress threats from political rivals. This simultaneously decreases motivations for coup attempts while also making democracies softer targets should coup attempts occur. Consequently, democratic constraints on executive power do not reduce the frequency of coup attempts, but coups attempted against democracies are much more likely to succeed. Using several datasets of coup activity and democratic constraints, I find significant differences in coup activity in democracies and non-democracies. Relative to civilian non-democracies, democracies are about half as likely to use coup-related repression, but they face a similar frequency of coup attempts. Plots against democracies are nearly twice as likely to succeed.

Research paper thumbnail of Coup d'État and Democracy

This paper explains coup activity in democracies by adapting insights from the literature on comm... more This paper explains coup activity in democracies by adapting insights from the literature on commitment problems and framing coup around the threats leaders and potential coup plotters pose to each other. I claim democratic constraints on executive power inhibit a leader's ability to repress threats from political rivals. This simultaneously decreases motivations for coup attempts while also making democracies softer targets should coup attempts occur. Consequently, democratic constraints on executive power do not reduce the frequency of coup attempts, but coups attempted against democracies are much more likely to succeed. Using several datasets of coup activity and democratic constraints, I find significant differences in coup activity in democracies and non-democracies. Relative to civilian non-democracies, democracies are about half as likely to use coup-related repression, but they face a similar frequency of coup attempts. Plots against democracies are nearly twice as likely to succeed.

Log In