Hassanin Khaled - Academia.edu (original) (raw)
Papers by Hassanin Khaled
Originally, the "Israeli experience" was born from the womb of the Holy Land, even when the "chil... more Originally, the "Israeli experience" was born from the womb of the Holy Land, even when the "children of Israel" lived in diaspora; the "Land" is everything for all Israelis, as it represents the homeland, religion and history, the Promise of the Lord, the people's dream, Jerusalem, the Wailing Wall, and other holy sites. Therefore, to the Jews, there is nothing comparable to the "Holy Land or Eretz Ysrael". Similarly, as history supports, several peoples have populated the land of Palestine, not just Arabs and Jews. Moreover, they used to live together, intermix, intermarry, and merge, and so on. Geo-politically the land of "Palestine/Eretz Israel" was known as "Greater Syria" before being divided by the then "Great Powers" into four countries, two small cantons, and five nationalities. On today's world map, these are known as Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Israel, and the Palestinian territories. However, this study aims to argue the development of this land from a historical and geopolitical point of view up until 1947; the names and borders, the holiness of the land to the Palestinians and Israelis, the land without a state that was waiting for the Lord's promise for the people without a homeland. Moreover, this study concludes that on the modern map, one would have great difficulty finding a country labeled "Palestine." It is not until 1922 that the name Palestine emerged with any "official" status, so what is all this talk about Palestine? Furthermore, whereas the Israelis could easily prove their historical and religious right to the holy or sacred land, it would be very hard for the Palestinians to do so. Finally, there are reasonable doubts about certain facts, and, so far, nobody has been able to provide a logical answer to such questions as, who is fighting who exactly? These facts are discussed from a historical and geopolitical perspective in the "Israeli Experience".
Originally, the "Israeli experience" was born from the womb of the Holy Land, even when the "chil... more Originally, the "Israeli experience" was born from the womb of the Holy Land, even when the "children of Israel" lived in diaspora; the "Land" is everything for all Israelis, as it represents the homeland, religion and history, the Promise of the Lord, the people's dream, Jerusalem, the Wailing Wall, and other holy sites. Therefore, to the Jews, there is nothing comparable to the "Holy Land or Eretz Ysrael". Similarly, as history supports, several peoples have populated the land of Palestine, not just Arabs and Jews. Moreover, they used to live together, intermix, intermarry, and merge, and so on. Geo-politically the land of "Palestine/Eretz Israel" was known as "Greater Syria" before being divided by the then "Great Powers" into four countries, two small cantons, and five nationalities. On today's world map, these are known as Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Israel, and the Palestinian territories. However, this study aims to argue the development of this land from a historical and geopolitical point of view up until 1947; the names and borders, the holiness of the land to the Palestinians and Israelis, the land without a state that was waiting for the Lord's promise for the people without a homeland. Moreover, this study concludes that on the modern map, one would have great difficulty finding a country labeled "Palestine." It is not until 1922 that the name Palestine emerged with any "official" status, so what is all this talk about Palestine? Furthermore, whereas the Israelis could easily prove their historical and religious right to the holy or sacred land, it would be very hard for the Palestinians to do so. Finally, there are reasonable doubts about certain facts, and, so far, nobody has been able to provide a logical answer to such questions as, who is fighting who exactly? These facts are discussed from a historical and geopolitical perspective in the "Israeli Experience".
Originally, the "Israeli experience" was born from the womb of the Holy Land, even when the "chil... more Originally, the "Israeli experience" was born from the womb of the Holy Land, even when the "children of Israel" lived in diaspora; the "Land" is everything for all Israelis, as it represents the homeland, religion and history, the Promise of the Lord, the people's dream, Jerusalem, the Wailing Wall, and other holy sites. Therefore, to the Jews, there is nothing comparable to the "Holy Land or Eretz Ysrael". Similarly, as history supports, several peoples have populated the land of Palestine, not just Arabs and Jews. Moreover, they used to live together, intermix, intermarry, and merge, and so on. Geo-politically the land of "Palestine/Eretz Israel" was known as "Greater Syria" before being divided by the then "Great Powers" into four countries, two small cantons, and five nationalities. On today's world map, these are known as Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Israel, and the Palestinian territories. However, this study aims to argue the development of this land from a historical and geopolitical point of view up until 1947; the names and borders, the holiness of the land to the Palestinians and Israelis, the land without a state that was waiting for the Lord's promise for the people without a homeland. Moreover, this study concludes that on the modern map, one would have great difficulty finding a country labeled "Palestine." It is not until 1922 that the name Palestine emerged with any "official" status, so what is all this talk about Palestine? Furthermore, whereas the Israelis could easily prove their historical and religious right to the holy or sacred land, it would be very hard for the Palestinians to do so. Finally, there are reasonable doubts about certain facts, and, so far, nobody has been able to provide a logical answer to such questions as, who is fighting who exactly? These facts are discussed from a historical and geopolitical perspective in the "Israeli Experience".
This paper examines an alternate version of the Palestinian dilemma historically rooted in their ... more This paper examines an alternate version of the Palestinian dilemma historically rooted in their selves, and over the ages and times got to be as a main component and the hallmark of their culture and a chronic flaw alike; existence under historical tutelage and political guardianship. Shockingly, the Palestinians prepared-according to their history-to live under the control and governance of their conquerors or victors, in addition to experience the sense of oppressed colonized people under the weight of colonizers. The present examination attempts to investigate the Palestinian dilemma; people under historical tutelage and political guardianship until 1967, and to focus on the notions of the nation, nationalism and national sovereignty. Another aim is exploring Palestine, a land without any national sovereignty and the Palestinian attitude toward it until 1967, alongside nationalism and the Palestinian national movement. This led to emergence, reformation, and said implications until 1967. The analyst infers that the most exceedingly awful chronicled problem, for any individuals, that they habituated to live under tutelage and political guardianship, as this paper demonstrated concerning the Palestinians. Both Palestinian and Arab neighboring pioneers never had any accurate patterns or disposition to secure an independent state in Palestine from the fall of Ottoman Empire until UN allotment was arranged in 1947, or even during and after the 1948 war. Additionally, the Palestinian national movement was unable to lead its people to national sovereignty in their territory in 1967!
This paper attempts to establish a framework to understand the influence of the managerial compet... more This paper attempts to establish a framework to understand the influence of the managerial competencies factor among SMEs in Selangor, Malaysia, by reviewing of the profiles of SMEs in Malaysia. The proposed framework focuses on the following factors: managerial competencies and organizational performance, attitude of managers, managerial competency and leadership, managerial competency and organization design and development, managerial background and competency, human resource development and managerial competency, competencies of HRD practitioners, managerial competency towards competitive strategy, personal factors affecting managerial competencies. This study has employed qquestionnaire survey to collect data. We have identified that the managerial competencies factors among the SMEs in Selangor, Malaysia have a great impact in motivating the managers towards the growth and development of the SMEs. The study has reviewed the significant studies related to the factors influencing the managerial competencies among SMEs in Selangor, Malaysia. The aim of this paper is to serve as a literature review on managerial competencies in the SMEs of Malaysia. This study has discussed the various managerial factors that influence the managerial competencies in an organization. The main objectives of this paper are (i) to examine the organization design, which benefits the managerial competencies, (ii) to assess the managerial background, which influences the growth and development, (iii) to evaluate the HRM development factor in increasing the managerial competencies and (iv) to investigate the managerial leadership generating the managerial competencies and the role of the personal factors, in influencing the growth and development of the SMEs in Malaysia. Ultimately, this study has concluded that, there is an urgent need to identify the influence of the managerial competencies factor among SMEs in Selangor, Malaysia.
This study deals with the Psycho-Political relationship between the Abrahamic cousins, namely Jew... more This study deals with the Psycho-Political relationship between the Abrahamic cousins, namely Jews and Arabs, from the end of the Ottoman period until 1949. The absent of socio-political wisdom or rational decisions led to the "incredible story" of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict 1914-49. However this paper aims to investigate the separatism attitude in the Palestinian-Israeli mentality: "culture" or "reaction"?, the principles of peaceful coexistence and religion role in peace-building between humans, the coexistence , cooperation and trust between Palestinians and Jews from Ottoman empire till establishing of Israel, the road for hatred and war between Israelis and Palestinians, and the British, Israeli and Palestinian target till the 1948 war; "peaceful coexistence" or "apartheid"? Finally, this paper concludes that the conflict between the Palestinian and Israelis has classified and marked by unsteady cases. The start point between them was coexisted (partially peacefully with some fears), after that turned into hatred (because of various extremist and bloody actions), after that both of them preferred the separatism attitude. Then it followed by the war between them and expulsion policy from the land by the hand of one of them toward the other side, to become finally apartheid (by separation wall) between both forever.
There has been constrained consideration paid to the issue of the Palestinian historical dilemma,... more There has been constrained consideration paid to the issue of the Palestinian historical dilemma, which is politically known as "leaderless," the period ranging from the fall of the Ottoman Empire until Nakbah (catastrophe) war in 1948. The researcher endeavors to shed light on this socio-political issue that created the squandering of several chronicled opportunities, rights and political gains for the Palestinian people. This study means to audit several sorts and meanings of leadership, the fundamentals of selecting the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem in the period from the Ottoman Empire until the British Mandate. Who precisely selects the Palestinian leaders? Or used with a different meaning: when the enemy selects his enemy's leader. Moreover, this paper assumes that the Palestinian grand mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini could not fill in the vacuum, and thus Palestine came about to be "leaderless." It struggles to gain only one goal: "autonomous statehood" to be alongside an "Israeli state". However, al-Husseini had no any sense or character of leadership; he did not have qualifications, skills, or even charisma that other well-known national leaders such as Herzl, Gandhi, Mandela, or Ben-Gurion had. In addition, the researcher thinks it intelligently happened in light of the fact that he was chosen deliberately and exceptionally well by his great enemy: "the Jewish and Zionist leader ".
This study investigates the struggle for the national leadership in the Israeli Experience, and a... more This study investigates the struggle for the national leadership in the Israeli Experience, and answers the question: what was the direct and indirect historically effective role of the famous leaders-Herzl, Weizmann and al-Husseini-in the Israeli Experience? In addition, this paper aims to achieve various goals, such as explaining the Israeli experience, which is considered a great historical lesson and added value to the human knowledge, and the consideration of the historical and religious rights of Palestinians and Israelis in the same land, and the direct and indirect influential role of national leadership in the Israeli experience. The researcher concludes that there were two different types of struggle for the national leadership that led to the success of the Israeli experience; one being the effective, very positive and direct role by Herzl and Weizmann, and, in contrast, the second being the indirect role of the Grand Mufti, al-Husseini. In summary, the researcher could not ignore the Israeli experience as being a great historical lesson and of benefit to human knowledge. In addition, various socio-historic-political benefits can be gained from the experience. Moreover, there are numerous conflicting considerations in the historical and religious rights for the Palestinians and Israelis in the land of Palestine.
Originally, the "Israeli experience" was born from the womb of the Holy Land, even when the "chil... more Originally, the "Israeli experience" was born from the womb of the Holy Land, even when the "children of Israel" lived in diaspora; the "Land" is everything for all Israelis, as it represents the homeland, religion and history, the Promise of the Lord, the people's dream, Jerusalem, the Wailing Wall, and other holy sites. Therefore, to the Jews, there is nothing comparable to the "Holy Land or Eretz Ysrael". Similarly, as history supports, several peoples have populated the land of Palestine, not just Arabs and Jews. Moreover, they used to live together, intermix, intermarry, and merge, and so on. Geo-politically the land of "Palestine/Eretz Israel" was known as "Greater Syria" before being divided by the then "Great Powers" into four countries, two small cantons, and five nationalities. On today's world map, these are known as Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Israel, and the Palestinian territories. However, this study aims to argue the development of this land from a historical and geopolitical point of view up until 1947; the names and borders, the holiness of the land to the Palestinians and Israelis, the land without a state that was waiting for the Lord's promise for the people without a homeland. Moreover, this study concludes that on the modern map, one would have great difficulty finding a country labeled "Palestine." It is not until 1922 that the name Palestine emerged with any "official" status, so what is all this talk about Palestine? Furthermore, whereas the Israelis could easily prove their historical and religious right to the holy or sacred land, it would be very hard for the Palestinians to do so. Finally, there are reasonable doubts about certain facts, and, so far, nobody has been able to provide a logical answer to such questions as, who is fighting who exactly? These facts are discussed from a historical and geopolitical perspective in the "Israeli Experience".
Journal of Law Policy and Globalization, 2014
This study investigates the struggle for the national leadership in the Israeli Experience, and a... more This study investigates the struggle for the national leadership in the Israeli Experience, and answers the question: what was the direct and indirect historically effective role of the famous leaders-Herzl, Weizmann and al-Husseini-in the Israeli Experience? In addition, this paper aims to achieve various goals, such as explaining the Israeli experience, which is considered a great historical lesson and added value to the human knowledge, and the consideration of the historical and religious rights of Palestinians and Israelis in the same land, and the direct and indirect influential role of national leadership in the Israeli experience. The researcher concludes that there were two different types of struggle for the national leadership that led to the success of the Israeli experience; one being the effective, very positive and direct role by Herzl and Weizmann, and, in contrast, the second being the indirect role of the Grand Mufti, al-Husseini. In summary, the researcher could not ignore the Israeli experience as being a great historical lesson and of benefit to human knowledge. In addition, various socio-historic-political benefits can be gained from the experience. Moreover, there are numerous conflicting considerations in the historical and religious rights for the Palestinians and Israelis in the land of Palestine.
International Affairs and Global Strategy, 2014
Originally, the "Israeli experience" was born from the womb of the Holy Land, even when the "chil... more Originally, the "Israeli experience" was born from the womb of the Holy Land, even when the "children of Israel" lived in diaspora; the "Land" is everything for all Israelis, as it represents the homeland, religion and history, the Promise of the Lord, the people's dream, Jerusalem, the Wailing Wall, and other holy sites. Therefore, to the Jews, there is nothing comparable to the "Holy Land or Eretz Ysrael". Similarly, as history supports, several peoples have populated the land of Palestine, not just Arabs and Jews. Moreover, they used to live together, intermix, intermarry, and merge, and so on. Geo-politically the land of "Palestine/Eretz Israel" was known as "Greater Syria" before being divided by the then "Great Powers" into four countries, two small cantons, and five nationalities. On today's world map, these are known as Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Israel, and the Palestinian territories. However, this study aims to argue the development of this land from a historical and geopolitical point of view up until 1947; the names and borders, the holiness of the land to the Palestinians and Israelis, the land without a state that was waiting for the Lord's promise for the people without a homeland. Moreover, this study concludes that on the modern map, one would have great difficulty finding a country labeled "Palestine." It is not until 1922 that the name Palestine emerged with any "official" status, so what is all this talk about Palestine? Furthermore, whereas the Israelis could easily prove their historical and religious right to the holy or sacred land, it would be very hard for the Palestinians to do so. Finally, there are reasonable doubts about certain facts, and, so far, nobody has been able to provide a logical answer to such questions as, who is fighting who exactly? These facts are discussed from a historical and geopolitical perspective in the "Israeli Experience".
This study investigates the struggle for the national leadership in the Israeli Experience, and a... more This study investigates the struggle for the national leadership in the Israeli Experience, and answers the question: what was the direct and indirect historically effective role of the famous leaders – Herzl, Weizmann and al-Husseini – in the Israeli Experience? In addition, this paper aims to achieve various goals, such as explaining the Israeli experience, which is considered a great historical lesson and added value to the human knowledge, and the consideration of the historical and religious rights of Palestinians and Israelis in the same land, and the direct and indirect influential role of national leadership in the Israeli experience. The researcher concludes that there were two different types of struggle for the national leadership that led to the success of the Israeli experience; one being the effective, very positive and direct role by Herzl and Weizmann, and, in contrast, the second being the indirect role of the Grand Mufti, al-Husseini. In summary, the researcher could not ignore the Israeli experience as being a great historical lesson and of benefit to human knowledge. In addition, various socio-historic-political benefits can be gained from the experience. Moreover, there are numerous conflicting considerations in the historical and religious rights for the Palestinians and Israelis in the land of Palestine.
Originally, the “Israeli experience” was born from the womb of the Holy Land, even when the “chil... more Originally, the “Israeli experience” was born from the womb of the Holy Land, even when the “children of Israel” lived in diaspora; the “Land” is everything for all Israelis, as it represents the homeland, religion and history, the Promise of the Lord, the people’s dream, Jerusalem, the Wailing Wall, and other holy sites. Therefore, to the Jews, there is nothing comparable to the “Holy Land or Eretz Ysrael”. Similarly, as history supports, several peoples have populated the land of Palestine, not just Arabs and Jews. Moreover, they used to live together, intermix, intermarry, and merge, and so on. Geo-politically the land of “Palestine/Eretz Israel” was known as “Greater Syria” before being divided by the then “Great Powers” into four countries, two small cantons, and five nationalities. On today’s world map, these are known as Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Israel, and the Palestinian territories. However, this study aims to argue the development of this land from a historical and geopolitical point of view up until 1947; the names and borders, the holiness of the land to the Palestinians and Israelis, the land without a state that was waiting for the Lord’s promise for the people without a homeland. Moreover, this study concludes that on the modern map, one would have great difficulty finding a country labeled “Palestine.” It is not until 1922 that the name Palestine emerged with any “official” status, so what is all this talk about Palestine? Furthermore, whereas the Israelis could easily prove their historical and religious right to the holy or sacred land, it would be very hard for the Palestinians to do so. Finally, there are reasonable doubts about certain facts, and, so far, nobody has been able to provide a logical answer to such questions as, who is fighting who exactly? These facts are discussed from a historical and geopolitical perspective in the “Israeli Experience”.
This study deals with the Psycho-Political relationship between the Abrahamic cousins, namely Jew... more This study deals with the Psycho-Political relationship between the Abrahamic cousins, namely Jews and Arabs, from the end of the Ottoman period until 1949. The absent of socio-political wisdom or rational decisions led to the “incredible story” of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict 1914-49. However this paper aims to investigate the separatism attitude in the Palestinian-Israeli mentality: “culture” or “reaction”?, the principles of peaceful coexistence and religion role in peace-building between humans, the co-existence, co-operation and trust between Palestinians and Jews from Ottoman empire till establishing of Israel, the road for hatred and war between Israelis and Palestinians, and the British, Israeli and Palestinian target till the 1948 war; “peaceful coexistence” or “apartheid”? Finally, this paper concludes that the conflict between the Palestinian and Israelis has classified and marked by unsteady cases. The start point between them was coexisted (partially peacefully with some fears), after that turned into hatred (because of various extremist and bloody actions), after that both of them preferred the separatism attitude. Then it followed by the war between them and expulsion policy from the land by the hand of one of them toward the other side, to become finally apartheid (by separation wall) between both forever.
There has been constrained consideration paid to the issue of the Palestinian historical dilemma,... more There has been constrained consideration paid to the issue of the Palestinian historical dilemma, which is politically known as "leaderless," the period ranging from the fall of the Ottoman Empire until Nakbah (catastrophe) war in 1948. The researcher endeavors to shed light on this socio-political issue that created the squandering of several chronicled opportunities, rights and political gains for the Palestinian people. This study means to audit several sorts and meanings of leadership, the fundamentals of selecting the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem in the period from the Ottoman Empire until the British Mandate. Who precisely selects the Palestinian leaders? Or used with a different meaning: when the enemy selects his enemy’s leader. Moreover, this paper assumes that the Palestinian grand mufti Haj Amin al- Husseini could not fill in the vacuum, and thus Palestine came about to be "leaderless." It struggles to gain only one goal: "autonomous statehood" to be alongside an "Israeli state". However, al- Husseini had no any sense or character of leadership; he did not have qualifications, skills, or even charisma that other well-known national leaders such as Herzl, Gandhi, Mandela, or Ben-Gurion had. In addition, the researcher thinks it intelligently happened in light of the fact that he was chosen deliberately and exceptionally well by his great enemy: "the Jewish and Zionist leader ".
This paper examines an alternate version of the Palestinian dilemma historically rooted in their ... more This paper examines an alternate version of the Palestinian dilemma historically rooted in their selves, and over the ages and times got to be as a main component and the hallmark of their culture and a chronic flaw alike; existence under historical tutelage and political guardianship. Shockingly, the Palestinians prepared - according to their history - to live under the control and governance of their conquerors or victors, in addition to experience the sense of oppressed colonized people under the weight of colonizers. The present examination attempts to investigate the Palestinian dilemma; people under historical tutelage and political guardianship until 1967, and to focus on the notions of the nation, nationalism and national sovereignty. Another aim is exploring Palestine, a land without any national sovereignty and the Palestinian attitude toward it until 1967, alongside nationalism and the Palestinian national movement. This led to emergence, reformation, and said implications until 1967. The analyst infers that the most exceedingly awful chronicled problem, for any individuals, that they habituated to live under tutelage and political guardianship, as this paper demonstrated concerning the Palestinians. Both Palestinian and Arab neighboring pioneers never had any accurate patterns or disposition to secure an independent state in Palestine from the fall of Ottoman Empire until UN allotment was arranged in 1947, or even during and after the 1948 war. Additionally, the Palestinian national movement was unable to lead its people to national sovereignty in their territory in 1967!
This paper examines at the most complicated and intractable dilemmas for the century from 1914-20... more This paper examines at the most complicated and intractable dilemmas for the century from 1914-2014, made by the hand of its people. The researcher debates the Palestinian dilemma which has shaped and created in the Arab-Palestinian mentalities, before its formation on the ground, as well as three chronic and fatal defects in their attitudes: Palestinianization of the (Muslim/Arab) mentality, Islamization of the (Palestinian) Cause, and Cantonization (fragmentation and shorthand the meaning of) the Land. In short, this study plans to explore the Arab-Palestinian dilemma, the “Piece” of “Land” of “Southern Syria” in 1948, the two peoples, the backwardness and modernization of Palestine from Ottoman Empire to Jewish settlement, and the Great Powers and "Refashioning" of “Greater Syria” from 1917-48. However, this work has entirely framed the main aspects and manifestations of the “Palestinian Dilemma” through the three endless imperfections of Arab culture and their attitudes; Palestinianization, Islamization and Cantonization; in the same context, the Palestinians (or even Arabs) have no single answer for the very simple question: “Which Piece of land they mean and want alike?” or which Palestine precisely in "Southern Syria": Greek "Philistia", Roman "Syria Palaestina", Byzantine "Palaestina", Ottoman-Mamluk province, Jordan, Israel, West Bank or Gaza? Along with the real blame that the Palestinians have dual standards in dealing with their (past) enemy “the Israelis”, they have a stereotype for Jews in terms of their creative energies, perhaps due to religion. The Palestinians in reality rely on Israeli services and products, which appears to onlookers in the Palestinian-Israeli clash as a form of "Mental Schizophrenia".
Originally, the "Israeli experience" was born from the womb of the Holy Land, even when the "chil... more Originally, the "Israeli experience" was born from the womb of the Holy Land, even when the "children of Israel" lived in diaspora; the "Land" is everything for all Israelis, as it represents the homeland, religion and history, the Promise of the Lord, the people's dream, Jerusalem, the Wailing Wall, and other holy sites. Therefore, to the Jews, there is nothing comparable to the "Holy Land or Eretz Ysrael". Similarly, as history supports, several peoples have populated the land of Palestine, not just Arabs and Jews. Moreover, they used to live together, intermix, intermarry, and merge, and so on. Geo-politically the land of "Palestine/Eretz Israel" was known as "Greater Syria" before being divided by the then "Great Powers" into four countries, two small cantons, and five nationalities. On today's world map, these are known as Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Israel, and the Palestinian territories. However, this study aims to argue the development of this land from a historical and geopolitical point of view up until 1947; the names and borders, the holiness of the land to the Palestinians and Israelis, the land without a state that was waiting for the Lord's promise for the people without a homeland. Moreover, this study concludes that on the modern map, one would have great difficulty finding a country labeled "Palestine." It is not until 1922 that the name Palestine emerged with any "official" status, so what is all this talk about Palestine? Furthermore, whereas the Israelis could easily prove their historical and religious right to the holy or sacred land, it would be very hard for the Palestinians to do so. Finally, there are reasonable doubts about certain facts, and, so far, nobody has been able to provide a logical answer to such questions as, who is fighting who exactly? These facts are discussed from a historical and geopolitical perspective in the "Israeli Experience".
Originally, the "Israeli experience" was born from the womb of the Holy Land, even when the "chil... more Originally, the "Israeli experience" was born from the womb of the Holy Land, even when the "children of Israel" lived in diaspora; the "Land" is everything for all Israelis, as it represents the homeland, religion and history, the Promise of the Lord, the people's dream, Jerusalem, the Wailing Wall, and other holy sites. Therefore, to the Jews, there is nothing comparable to the "Holy Land or Eretz Ysrael". Similarly, as history supports, several peoples have populated the land of Palestine, not just Arabs and Jews. Moreover, they used to live together, intermix, intermarry, and merge, and so on. Geo-politically the land of "Palestine/Eretz Israel" was known as "Greater Syria" before being divided by the then "Great Powers" into four countries, two small cantons, and five nationalities. On today's world map, these are known as Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Israel, and the Palestinian territories. However, this study aims to argue the development of this land from a historical and geopolitical point of view up until 1947; the names and borders, the holiness of the land to the Palestinians and Israelis, the land without a state that was waiting for the Lord's promise for the people without a homeland. Moreover, this study concludes that on the modern map, one would have great difficulty finding a country labeled "Palestine." It is not until 1922 that the name Palestine emerged with any "official" status, so what is all this talk about Palestine? Furthermore, whereas the Israelis could easily prove their historical and religious right to the holy or sacred land, it would be very hard for the Palestinians to do so. Finally, there are reasonable doubts about certain facts, and, so far, nobody has been able to provide a logical answer to such questions as, who is fighting who exactly? These facts are discussed from a historical and geopolitical perspective in the "Israeli Experience".
Originally, the "Israeli experience" was born from the womb of the Holy Land, even when the "chil... more Originally, the "Israeli experience" was born from the womb of the Holy Land, even when the "children of Israel" lived in diaspora; the "Land" is everything for all Israelis, as it represents the homeland, religion and history, the Promise of the Lord, the people's dream, Jerusalem, the Wailing Wall, and other holy sites. Therefore, to the Jews, there is nothing comparable to the "Holy Land or Eretz Ysrael". Similarly, as history supports, several peoples have populated the land of Palestine, not just Arabs and Jews. Moreover, they used to live together, intermix, intermarry, and merge, and so on. Geo-politically the land of "Palestine/Eretz Israel" was known as "Greater Syria" before being divided by the then "Great Powers" into four countries, two small cantons, and five nationalities. On today's world map, these are known as Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Israel, and the Palestinian territories. However, this study aims to argue the development of this land from a historical and geopolitical point of view up until 1947; the names and borders, the holiness of the land to the Palestinians and Israelis, the land without a state that was waiting for the Lord's promise for the people without a homeland. Moreover, this study concludes that on the modern map, one would have great difficulty finding a country labeled "Palestine." It is not until 1922 that the name Palestine emerged with any "official" status, so what is all this talk about Palestine? Furthermore, whereas the Israelis could easily prove their historical and religious right to the holy or sacred land, it would be very hard for the Palestinians to do so. Finally, there are reasonable doubts about certain facts, and, so far, nobody has been able to provide a logical answer to such questions as, who is fighting who exactly? These facts are discussed from a historical and geopolitical perspective in the "Israeli Experience".
This paper examines an alternate version of the Palestinian dilemma historically rooted in their ... more This paper examines an alternate version of the Palestinian dilemma historically rooted in their selves, and over the ages and times got to be as a main component and the hallmark of their culture and a chronic flaw alike; existence under historical tutelage and political guardianship. Shockingly, the Palestinians prepared-according to their history-to live under the control and governance of their conquerors or victors, in addition to experience the sense of oppressed colonized people under the weight of colonizers. The present examination attempts to investigate the Palestinian dilemma; people under historical tutelage and political guardianship until 1967, and to focus on the notions of the nation, nationalism and national sovereignty. Another aim is exploring Palestine, a land without any national sovereignty and the Palestinian attitude toward it until 1967, alongside nationalism and the Palestinian national movement. This led to emergence, reformation, and said implications until 1967. The analyst infers that the most exceedingly awful chronicled problem, for any individuals, that they habituated to live under tutelage and political guardianship, as this paper demonstrated concerning the Palestinians. Both Palestinian and Arab neighboring pioneers never had any accurate patterns or disposition to secure an independent state in Palestine from the fall of Ottoman Empire until UN allotment was arranged in 1947, or even during and after the 1948 war. Additionally, the Palestinian national movement was unable to lead its people to national sovereignty in their territory in 1967!
This paper attempts to establish a framework to understand the influence of the managerial compet... more This paper attempts to establish a framework to understand the influence of the managerial competencies factor among SMEs in Selangor, Malaysia, by reviewing of the profiles of SMEs in Malaysia. The proposed framework focuses on the following factors: managerial competencies and organizational performance, attitude of managers, managerial competency and leadership, managerial competency and organization design and development, managerial background and competency, human resource development and managerial competency, competencies of HRD practitioners, managerial competency towards competitive strategy, personal factors affecting managerial competencies. This study has employed qquestionnaire survey to collect data. We have identified that the managerial competencies factors among the SMEs in Selangor, Malaysia have a great impact in motivating the managers towards the growth and development of the SMEs. The study has reviewed the significant studies related to the factors influencing the managerial competencies among SMEs in Selangor, Malaysia. The aim of this paper is to serve as a literature review on managerial competencies in the SMEs of Malaysia. This study has discussed the various managerial factors that influence the managerial competencies in an organization. The main objectives of this paper are (i) to examine the organization design, which benefits the managerial competencies, (ii) to assess the managerial background, which influences the growth and development, (iii) to evaluate the HRM development factor in increasing the managerial competencies and (iv) to investigate the managerial leadership generating the managerial competencies and the role of the personal factors, in influencing the growth and development of the SMEs in Malaysia. Ultimately, this study has concluded that, there is an urgent need to identify the influence of the managerial competencies factor among SMEs in Selangor, Malaysia.
This study deals with the Psycho-Political relationship between the Abrahamic cousins, namely Jew... more This study deals with the Psycho-Political relationship between the Abrahamic cousins, namely Jews and Arabs, from the end of the Ottoman period until 1949. The absent of socio-political wisdom or rational decisions led to the "incredible story" of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict 1914-49. However this paper aims to investigate the separatism attitude in the Palestinian-Israeli mentality: "culture" or "reaction"?, the principles of peaceful coexistence and religion role in peace-building between humans, the coexistence , cooperation and trust between Palestinians and Jews from Ottoman empire till establishing of Israel, the road for hatred and war between Israelis and Palestinians, and the British, Israeli and Palestinian target till the 1948 war; "peaceful coexistence" or "apartheid"? Finally, this paper concludes that the conflict between the Palestinian and Israelis has classified and marked by unsteady cases. The start point between them was coexisted (partially peacefully with some fears), after that turned into hatred (because of various extremist and bloody actions), after that both of them preferred the separatism attitude. Then it followed by the war between them and expulsion policy from the land by the hand of one of them toward the other side, to become finally apartheid (by separation wall) between both forever.
There has been constrained consideration paid to the issue of the Palestinian historical dilemma,... more There has been constrained consideration paid to the issue of the Palestinian historical dilemma, which is politically known as "leaderless," the period ranging from the fall of the Ottoman Empire until Nakbah (catastrophe) war in 1948. The researcher endeavors to shed light on this socio-political issue that created the squandering of several chronicled opportunities, rights and political gains for the Palestinian people. This study means to audit several sorts and meanings of leadership, the fundamentals of selecting the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem in the period from the Ottoman Empire until the British Mandate. Who precisely selects the Palestinian leaders? Or used with a different meaning: when the enemy selects his enemy's leader. Moreover, this paper assumes that the Palestinian grand mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini could not fill in the vacuum, and thus Palestine came about to be "leaderless." It struggles to gain only one goal: "autonomous statehood" to be alongside an "Israeli state". However, al-Husseini had no any sense or character of leadership; he did not have qualifications, skills, or even charisma that other well-known national leaders such as Herzl, Gandhi, Mandela, or Ben-Gurion had. In addition, the researcher thinks it intelligently happened in light of the fact that he was chosen deliberately and exceptionally well by his great enemy: "the Jewish and Zionist leader ".
This study investigates the struggle for the national leadership in the Israeli Experience, and a... more This study investigates the struggle for the national leadership in the Israeli Experience, and answers the question: what was the direct and indirect historically effective role of the famous leaders-Herzl, Weizmann and al-Husseini-in the Israeli Experience? In addition, this paper aims to achieve various goals, such as explaining the Israeli experience, which is considered a great historical lesson and added value to the human knowledge, and the consideration of the historical and religious rights of Palestinians and Israelis in the same land, and the direct and indirect influential role of national leadership in the Israeli experience. The researcher concludes that there were two different types of struggle for the national leadership that led to the success of the Israeli experience; one being the effective, very positive and direct role by Herzl and Weizmann, and, in contrast, the second being the indirect role of the Grand Mufti, al-Husseini. In summary, the researcher could not ignore the Israeli experience as being a great historical lesson and of benefit to human knowledge. In addition, various socio-historic-political benefits can be gained from the experience. Moreover, there are numerous conflicting considerations in the historical and religious rights for the Palestinians and Israelis in the land of Palestine.
Originally, the "Israeli experience" was born from the womb of the Holy Land, even when the "chil... more Originally, the "Israeli experience" was born from the womb of the Holy Land, even when the "children of Israel" lived in diaspora; the "Land" is everything for all Israelis, as it represents the homeland, religion and history, the Promise of the Lord, the people's dream, Jerusalem, the Wailing Wall, and other holy sites. Therefore, to the Jews, there is nothing comparable to the "Holy Land or Eretz Ysrael". Similarly, as history supports, several peoples have populated the land of Palestine, not just Arabs and Jews. Moreover, they used to live together, intermix, intermarry, and merge, and so on. Geo-politically the land of "Palestine/Eretz Israel" was known as "Greater Syria" before being divided by the then "Great Powers" into four countries, two small cantons, and five nationalities. On today's world map, these are known as Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Israel, and the Palestinian territories. However, this study aims to argue the development of this land from a historical and geopolitical point of view up until 1947; the names and borders, the holiness of the land to the Palestinians and Israelis, the land without a state that was waiting for the Lord's promise for the people without a homeland. Moreover, this study concludes that on the modern map, one would have great difficulty finding a country labeled "Palestine." It is not until 1922 that the name Palestine emerged with any "official" status, so what is all this talk about Palestine? Furthermore, whereas the Israelis could easily prove their historical and religious right to the holy or sacred land, it would be very hard for the Palestinians to do so. Finally, there are reasonable doubts about certain facts, and, so far, nobody has been able to provide a logical answer to such questions as, who is fighting who exactly? These facts are discussed from a historical and geopolitical perspective in the "Israeli Experience".
Journal of Law Policy and Globalization, 2014
This study investigates the struggle for the national leadership in the Israeli Experience, and a... more This study investigates the struggle for the national leadership in the Israeli Experience, and answers the question: what was the direct and indirect historically effective role of the famous leaders-Herzl, Weizmann and al-Husseini-in the Israeli Experience? In addition, this paper aims to achieve various goals, such as explaining the Israeli experience, which is considered a great historical lesson and added value to the human knowledge, and the consideration of the historical and religious rights of Palestinians and Israelis in the same land, and the direct and indirect influential role of national leadership in the Israeli experience. The researcher concludes that there were two different types of struggle for the national leadership that led to the success of the Israeli experience; one being the effective, very positive and direct role by Herzl and Weizmann, and, in contrast, the second being the indirect role of the Grand Mufti, al-Husseini. In summary, the researcher could not ignore the Israeli experience as being a great historical lesson and of benefit to human knowledge. In addition, various socio-historic-political benefits can be gained from the experience. Moreover, there are numerous conflicting considerations in the historical and religious rights for the Palestinians and Israelis in the land of Palestine.
International Affairs and Global Strategy, 2014
Originally, the "Israeli experience" was born from the womb of the Holy Land, even when the "chil... more Originally, the "Israeli experience" was born from the womb of the Holy Land, even when the "children of Israel" lived in diaspora; the "Land" is everything for all Israelis, as it represents the homeland, religion and history, the Promise of the Lord, the people's dream, Jerusalem, the Wailing Wall, and other holy sites. Therefore, to the Jews, there is nothing comparable to the "Holy Land or Eretz Ysrael". Similarly, as history supports, several peoples have populated the land of Palestine, not just Arabs and Jews. Moreover, they used to live together, intermix, intermarry, and merge, and so on. Geo-politically the land of "Palestine/Eretz Israel" was known as "Greater Syria" before being divided by the then "Great Powers" into four countries, two small cantons, and five nationalities. On today's world map, these are known as Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Israel, and the Palestinian territories. However, this study aims to argue the development of this land from a historical and geopolitical point of view up until 1947; the names and borders, the holiness of the land to the Palestinians and Israelis, the land without a state that was waiting for the Lord's promise for the people without a homeland. Moreover, this study concludes that on the modern map, one would have great difficulty finding a country labeled "Palestine." It is not until 1922 that the name Palestine emerged with any "official" status, so what is all this talk about Palestine? Furthermore, whereas the Israelis could easily prove their historical and religious right to the holy or sacred land, it would be very hard for the Palestinians to do so. Finally, there are reasonable doubts about certain facts, and, so far, nobody has been able to provide a logical answer to such questions as, who is fighting who exactly? These facts are discussed from a historical and geopolitical perspective in the "Israeli Experience".
This study investigates the struggle for the national leadership in the Israeli Experience, and a... more This study investigates the struggle for the national leadership in the Israeli Experience, and answers the question: what was the direct and indirect historically effective role of the famous leaders – Herzl, Weizmann and al-Husseini – in the Israeli Experience? In addition, this paper aims to achieve various goals, such as explaining the Israeli experience, which is considered a great historical lesson and added value to the human knowledge, and the consideration of the historical and religious rights of Palestinians and Israelis in the same land, and the direct and indirect influential role of national leadership in the Israeli experience. The researcher concludes that there were two different types of struggle for the national leadership that led to the success of the Israeli experience; one being the effective, very positive and direct role by Herzl and Weizmann, and, in contrast, the second being the indirect role of the Grand Mufti, al-Husseini. In summary, the researcher could not ignore the Israeli experience as being a great historical lesson and of benefit to human knowledge. In addition, various socio-historic-political benefits can be gained from the experience. Moreover, there are numerous conflicting considerations in the historical and religious rights for the Palestinians and Israelis in the land of Palestine.
Originally, the “Israeli experience” was born from the womb of the Holy Land, even when the “chil... more Originally, the “Israeli experience” was born from the womb of the Holy Land, even when the “children of Israel” lived in diaspora; the “Land” is everything for all Israelis, as it represents the homeland, religion and history, the Promise of the Lord, the people’s dream, Jerusalem, the Wailing Wall, and other holy sites. Therefore, to the Jews, there is nothing comparable to the “Holy Land or Eretz Ysrael”. Similarly, as history supports, several peoples have populated the land of Palestine, not just Arabs and Jews. Moreover, they used to live together, intermix, intermarry, and merge, and so on. Geo-politically the land of “Palestine/Eretz Israel” was known as “Greater Syria” before being divided by the then “Great Powers” into four countries, two small cantons, and five nationalities. On today’s world map, these are known as Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Israel, and the Palestinian territories. However, this study aims to argue the development of this land from a historical and geopolitical point of view up until 1947; the names and borders, the holiness of the land to the Palestinians and Israelis, the land without a state that was waiting for the Lord’s promise for the people without a homeland. Moreover, this study concludes that on the modern map, one would have great difficulty finding a country labeled “Palestine.” It is not until 1922 that the name Palestine emerged with any “official” status, so what is all this talk about Palestine? Furthermore, whereas the Israelis could easily prove their historical and religious right to the holy or sacred land, it would be very hard for the Palestinians to do so. Finally, there are reasonable doubts about certain facts, and, so far, nobody has been able to provide a logical answer to such questions as, who is fighting who exactly? These facts are discussed from a historical and geopolitical perspective in the “Israeli Experience”.
This study deals with the Psycho-Political relationship between the Abrahamic cousins, namely Jew... more This study deals with the Psycho-Political relationship between the Abrahamic cousins, namely Jews and Arabs, from the end of the Ottoman period until 1949. The absent of socio-political wisdom or rational decisions led to the “incredible story” of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict 1914-49. However this paper aims to investigate the separatism attitude in the Palestinian-Israeli mentality: “culture” or “reaction”?, the principles of peaceful coexistence and religion role in peace-building between humans, the co-existence, co-operation and trust between Palestinians and Jews from Ottoman empire till establishing of Israel, the road for hatred and war between Israelis and Palestinians, and the British, Israeli and Palestinian target till the 1948 war; “peaceful coexistence” or “apartheid”? Finally, this paper concludes that the conflict between the Palestinian and Israelis has classified and marked by unsteady cases. The start point between them was coexisted (partially peacefully with some fears), after that turned into hatred (because of various extremist and bloody actions), after that both of them preferred the separatism attitude. Then it followed by the war between them and expulsion policy from the land by the hand of one of them toward the other side, to become finally apartheid (by separation wall) between both forever.
There has been constrained consideration paid to the issue of the Palestinian historical dilemma,... more There has been constrained consideration paid to the issue of the Palestinian historical dilemma, which is politically known as "leaderless," the period ranging from the fall of the Ottoman Empire until Nakbah (catastrophe) war in 1948. The researcher endeavors to shed light on this socio-political issue that created the squandering of several chronicled opportunities, rights and political gains for the Palestinian people. This study means to audit several sorts and meanings of leadership, the fundamentals of selecting the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem in the period from the Ottoman Empire until the British Mandate. Who precisely selects the Palestinian leaders? Or used with a different meaning: when the enemy selects his enemy’s leader. Moreover, this paper assumes that the Palestinian grand mufti Haj Amin al- Husseini could not fill in the vacuum, and thus Palestine came about to be "leaderless." It struggles to gain only one goal: "autonomous statehood" to be alongside an "Israeli state". However, al- Husseini had no any sense or character of leadership; he did not have qualifications, skills, or even charisma that other well-known national leaders such as Herzl, Gandhi, Mandela, or Ben-Gurion had. In addition, the researcher thinks it intelligently happened in light of the fact that he was chosen deliberately and exceptionally well by his great enemy: "the Jewish and Zionist leader ".
This paper examines an alternate version of the Palestinian dilemma historically rooted in their ... more This paper examines an alternate version of the Palestinian dilemma historically rooted in their selves, and over the ages and times got to be as a main component and the hallmark of their culture and a chronic flaw alike; existence under historical tutelage and political guardianship. Shockingly, the Palestinians prepared - according to their history - to live under the control and governance of their conquerors or victors, in addition to experience the sense of oppressed colonized people under the weight of colonizers. The present examination attempts to investigate the Palestinian dilemma; people under historical tutelage and political guardianship until 1967, and to focus on the notions of the nation, nationalism and national sovereignty. Another aim is exploring Palestine, a land without any national sovereignty and the Palestinian attitude toward it until 1967, alongside nationalism and the Palestinian national movement. This led to emergence, reformation, and said implications until 1967. The analyst infers that the most exceedingly awful chronicled problem, for any individuals, that they habituated to live under tutelage and political guardianship, as this paper demonstrated concerning the Palestinians. Both Palestinian and Arab neighboring pioneers never had any accurate patterns or disposition to secure an independent state in Palestine from the fall of Ottoman Empire until UN allotment was arranged in 1947, or even during and after the 1948 war. Additionally, the Palestinian national movement was unable to lead its people to national sovereignty in their territory in 1967!
This paper examines at the most complicated and intractable dilemmas for the century from 1914-20... more This paper examines at the most complicated and intractable dilemmas for the century from 1914-2014, made by the hand of its people. The researcher debates the Palestinian dilemma which has shaped and created in the Arab-Palestinian mentalities, before its formation on the ground, as well as three chronic and fatal defects in their attitudes: Palestinianization of the (Muslim/Arab) mentality, Islamization of the (Palestinian) Cause, and Cantonization (fragmentation and shorthand the meaning of) the Land. In short, this study plans to explore the Arab-Palestinian dilemma, the “Piece” of “Land” of “Southern Syria” in 1948, the two peoples, the backwardness and modernization of Palestine from Ottoman Empire to Jewish settlement, and the Great Powers and "Refashioning" of “Greater Syria” from 1917-48. However, this work has entirely framed the main aspects and manifestations of the “Palestinian Dilemma” through the three endless imperfections of Arab culture and their attitudes; Palestinianization, Islamization and Cantonization; in the same context, the Palestinians (or even Arabs) have no single answer for the very simple question: “Which Piece of land they mean and want alike?” or which Palestine precisely in "Southern Syria": Greek "Philistia", Roman "Syria Palaestina", Byzantine "Palaestina", Ottoman-Mamluk province, Jordan, Israel, West Bank or Gaza? Along with the real blame that the Palestinians have dual standards in dealing with their (past) enemy “the Israelis”, they have a stereotype for Jews in terms of their creative energies, perhaps due to religion. The Palestinians in reality rely on Israeli services and products, which appears to onlookers in the Palestinian-Israeli clash as a form of "Mental Schizophrenia".