Richard Gamauf - Academia.edu (original) (raw)
Related Authors
Uploads
Papers by Richard Gamauf
Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History, 2014
Gai. 3,212, IJ. 4,3,10 and D. 9,2,22,1 (Paul. 22 ed.) deal with the killing of a member of a grou... more Gai. 3,212, IJ. 4,3,10 and D. 9,2,22,1 (Paul. 22 ed.) deal with the killing of a member of a group of slaves or animals falling under the first chapter of the lex Aquilia. In such cases, the damages exceeded the highest value of the dead slave or animal because the plaintiff was awarded compensation for the devaluation of the remaining slaves or animals as well. This article deals with the question whether the Roman jurists applied this solution only when the unit had one owner or also when the slaves or animals belonged to different owners, as in the societas-case dealt with by Celsus in D. 17,2,58 pr. (Ulp. 31 ed.). None of the relevant texts excludes such an interpretation a priori, since unitary ownership of the whole group of slaves or animals is never mentioned as a prerequisite. If the parts of such a unit belonged to different partners of a societas (and no co-ownership existed with regard to the societas' assets), the only way of holding the wrongdoer responsible for al...
Cum aliter nulla domus tuta esse possit... : Fear of Slaves and Roman Law
Gamauf R. Cum aliter nulla domus tuta esse possit... : Fear of Slaves and Roman Law. In: Fear of ... more Gamauf R. Cum aliter nulla domus tuta esse possit... : Fear of Slaves and Roman Law. In: Fear of Slaves - Fear of Enslavement in the Ancient Mediterranean (Discourse, representations, practices). Rethymnon 4-7 november 2004. Besançon : Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté, 2007. pp. 145-164. (Actes des colloques du Groupe de recherche sur l'esclavage dans l'antiquité, 29
Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History, 2014
Gai. 3,212, IJ. 4,3,10 and D. 9,2,22,1 (Paul. 22 ed.) deal with the killing of a member of a grou... more Gai. 3,212, IJ. 4,3,10 and D. 9,2,22,1 (Paul. 22 ed.) deal with the killing of a member of a group of slaves or animals falling under the first chapter of the lex Aquilia. In such cases, the damages exceeded the highest value of the dead slave or animal because the plaintiff was awarded compensation for the devaluation of the remaining slaves or animals as well. This article deals with the question whether the Roman jurists applied this solution only when the unit had one owner or also when the slaves or animals belonged to different owners, as in the societas-case dealt with by Celsus in D. 17,2,58 pr. (Ulp. 31 ed.). None of the relevant texts excludes such an interpretation a priori, since unitary ownership of the whole group of slaves or animals is never mentioned as a prerequisite. If the parts of such a unit belonged to different partners of a societas (and no co-ownership existed with regard to the societas' assets), the only way of holding the wrongdoer responsible for al...
Cum aliter nulla domus tuta esse possit... : Fear of Slaves and Roman Law
Gamauf R. Cum aliter nulla domus tuta esse possit... : Fear of Slaves and Roman Law. In: Fear of ... more Gamauf R. Cum aliter nulla domus tuta esse possit... : Fear of Slaves and Roman Law. In: Fear of Slaves - Fear of Enslavement in the Ancient Mediterranean (Discourse, representations, practices). Rethymnon 4-7 november 2004. Besançon : Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté, 2007. pp. 145-164. (Actes des colloques du Groupe de recherche sur l'esclavage dans l'antiquité, 29