Shift-type SMEFT effects in dileptons at the LHC (original) (raw)

• CMS collaboration, Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
• ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
• I. Brivio and M. Trott, The Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory, Phys. Rept. 793 (2019) 1 [arXiv:1706.08945] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
• B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• B. Henning, X. Lu, T. Melia and H. Murayama, 2, 84, 30, 993, 560, 15456, 11962, 261485, ...: Higher dimension operators in the SM EFT, JHEP 08 (2017) 016 [Erratum ibid. 09 (2019) 019] [arXiv:1512.03433] [INSPIRE].
• L. Berthier and M. Trott, Towards consistent Electroweak Precision Data constraints in the SMEFT, JHEP 05 (2015) 024 [arXiv:1502.02570] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• L. Berthier and M. Trott, Consistent constraints on the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, JHEP 02 (2016) 069 [arXiv:1508.05060] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• M. Bjørn and M. Trott, Interpreting W mass measurements in the SMEFT, Phys. Lett. B 762 (2016) 426 [arXiv:1606.06502] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• L. Berthier, M. Bjørn and M. Trott, Incorporating doubly resonant W ± data in a global fit of SMEFT parameters to lift flat directions, JHEP 09 (2016) 157 [arXiv:1606.06693] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• C. Hartmann, W. Shepherd and M. Trott, The Z decay width in the SMEFT: y t and λ corrections at one loop, JHEP 03 (2017) 060 [arXiv:1611.09879] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• A. Falkowski, M. González-Alonso and K. Mimouni, Compilation of low-energy constraints on 4-fermion operators in the SMEFT, JHEP 08 (2017) 123 [arXiv:1706.03783] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• J. de Blas, M. Chala and J. Santiago, Global Constraints on Lepton-Quark Contact Interactions, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 095011 [arXiv:1307.5068] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• M. Farina, G. Panico, D. Pappadopulo, J. T. Ruderman, R. Torre and A. Wulzer, Energy helps accuracy: electroweak precision tests at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B 772 (2017) 210 [arXiv:1609.08157] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• A. Greljo and D. Marzocca, High-p T dilepton tails and flavor physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 548 [arXiv:1704.09015] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• S. Alioli, M. Farina, D. Pappadopulo and J. T. Ruderman, Catching a New Force by the Tail, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 101801 [arXiv:1712.02347] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• S. Alioli, W. Dekens, M. Girard and E. Mereghetti, NLO QCD corrections to SM-EFT dilepton and electroweak Higgs boson production, matched to parton shower in POWHEG, JHEP 08 (2018) 205 [arXiv:1804.07407] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• S. Dawson, P. P. Giardino and A. Ismail, Standard model EFT and the Drell-Yan process at high energy, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 035044 [arXiv:1811.12260] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• J. Fuentes-Martin, A. Greljo, J. Martin Camalich and J. D. Ruiz-Alvarez, Charm physics confronts high-p T lepton tails, JHEP 11 (2020) 080 [arXiv:2003.12421] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• S. Alte, M. König and W. Shepherd, Consistent Searches for SMEFT Effects in Non-Resonant Dilepton Events, JHEP 07 (2019) 144 [arXiv:1812.07575] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• I. Brivio and M. Trott, Scheming in the SMEFT... and a reparameterization invariance!, JHEP 07 (2017) 148 [Addendum ibid. 05 (2018) 136] [arXiv:1701.06424] [INSPIRE].
• S. Weinberg, Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 1566 [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• F. Wilczek and A. Zee, Operator Analysis of Nucleon Decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 1571 [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 621 [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• L. F. Abbott and M. B. Wise, The Effective Hamiltonian for Nucleon Decay, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2208 [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• L. Lehman, Extending the Standard Model Effective Field Theory with the Complete Set of Dimension-7 Operators, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 125023 [arXiv:1410.4193] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• L. Lehman and A. Martin, Low-derivative operators of the Standard Model effective field theory via Hilbert series methods, JHEP 02 (2016) 081 [arXiv:1510.00372] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
• Y. Liao and X.-D. Ma, Renormalization Group Evolution of Dimension-seven Baryon- and Lepton-number-violating Operators, JHEP 11 (2016) 043 [arXiv:1607.07309] [INSPIRE].
  Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
• H.-L. Li, Z. Ren, J. Shu, M.-L. Xiao, J.-H. Yu and Y.-H. Zheng, Complete Set of Dimension-8 Operators in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, arXiv:2005.00008 [INSPIRE].
• C. W. Murphy, Dimension-8 operators in the Standard Model Eective Field Theory, JHEP 10 (2020) 174 [arXiv:2005.00059] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• H.-L. Li, Z. Ren, M.-L. Xiao, J.-H. Yu and Y.-H. Zheng, Complete Set of Dimension-9 Operators in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, arXiv:2007.07899 [INSPIRE].
• Y. Liao and X.-D. Ma, An explicit construction of the dimension-9 operator basis in the standard model effective field theory, JHEP 11 (2020) 152 [arXiv:2007.08125] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
• ATLAS collaboration, Search for new high-mass phenomena in the dilepton final state using 36 fb _−_1 of proton-proton collision data at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 10 (2017) 182 [arXiv:1707.02424] [INSPIRE].
• S. Alte, M. König and W. Shepherd, Consistent Searches for SMEFT Effects in Non-Resonant Dijet Events, JHEP 01 (2018) 094 [arXiv:1711.07484] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP 07 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• I. Brivio, Y. Jiang and M. Trott, The SMEFTsim package, theory and tools, JHEP 12 (2017) 070 [arXiv:1709.06492] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• J. Aebischer et al., WCxf: an exchange format for Wilson coefficients beyond the Standard Model, Comput. Phys. Commun. 232 (2018) 71 [arXiv:1712.05298] [INSPIRE].
• T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P. Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual, JHEP 05 (2006) 026 [hep-ph/0603175] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• DELPHES 3 collaboration, DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, JHEP 02 (2014) 057 [arXiv:1307.6346] [INSPIRE].
• J. W. Walker, https://github.com/joelwwalker/AEACuS.git.
• ATLAS collaboration, Search for new non-resonant phenomena in high-mass dilepton final states with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 11 (2020) 005 [arXiv:2006.12946] [INSPIRE].