Harvesting in boreal forests and the biofuel carbon debt (original) (raw)
References
Braastad H (1975) Yield Tables and Growth Models for Picea abies. Reports from The Norwegian Forest Research Institute 31.9
Bright RM, Strømman AH (2009) Life cycle assessment of second generation bioethanol produced from Scandinavian boreal forest resources. J Ind Ecol 13:514–530 Article Google Scholar
Carey EV, Sala A, Keane R, Callaway RM (2001) Are old forests underestimated as global carbon sinks? Global Change Bio 7:339–344 Article Google Scholar
Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319:1235–1238 Article Google Scholar
Fontaine S, Barot S, Barré P, Bdioui N, Mary B, Rumpel C (2007) Stability of organic carbon in deep soil layers controlled by fresh carbon supply. Nature 450:277–281 Article Google Scholar
Friedland AJ, Gillingham KT (2010) Carbon accounting a tricky business. Science 327:411–412 Article Google Scholar
Gibbs HK, Ruesch AS, Achard F, Clayton MK, Holmgren P, Ramankutty N, Foley JA (2010) Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. P Natl Acad Sci 107:16732–16737 Article Google Scholar
Gurgel AJ, Reilly M, Paltsev S (2007) Potential land use implications of a global biofuels industry. J Agr Food Ind Organ 5:1–34 Google Scholar
Hill J, Nelson E, Tilman D, Polasky S, Tiffany D (2006) Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. P Natl Acad Sci 103:11206–11210 Article Google Scholar
Holmgren K, Eriksson E, Olsson O, Olsson M, Hillring B, Parikka M (2007) Biofuels and climate neutrality—system analysis of production and utilisation. Elforsk report 07:35 Google Scholar
Holtsmark B (2010) Use of wood fuels from boreal forests will create a biofuel carbon debt with along payback time. Discussion Paper 637. Statistics Norway
Hutchinson E, Kennedy PW, Martinez C (2010) Subsidies for the Production of Cleaner Energy: When do they Cause Emissions to Rise? The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy: Vol. 10, Iss. 1, Article 28
IPCC (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios. Working Group III, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
Kasischke ES (2000) Boreal ecosystems in the global carbon cycle. In: Kasischke ES, Stocks BJ (eds) Fire, climate and carbon cycling in the boreal forest. Springer, New York Google Scholar
Kirkinen J, Palosuo T, Holmgren K, Savolainen I (2008) Greenhouse impact due to the use of combustible fuels: life cycle viewpoint and relative radiative forcing commitment. Environ Manage 42:458–469 Article Google Scholar
Kjønaas O, Aalde JH, Dalen LS, de Wit HA, Eldhuset T, Øyen BH (2000) Carbon stocks in Norwegian forested systems. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 4:311–314 Google Scholar
Kujanpää M, Eggers J, Verkerk H, Helin T, Lindner M, Wessman H (2010) Carbon balance of forest residue collection and combustion in Southern Finland. Proceeding paper from the 18th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition
Lapola D, Schaldach MR, Alcamo J, Bondeau A, Koch J, Koelking C, Priess JA (2010) Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil. P Natl Acad Sci 103:11206–11210 Google Scholar
Larsson JY, Hylen G (2007) Statistics of forest conditions and forest resources in Norway. Reports from The Norwegian Forest Research Institute 1/07
Liski TP, Peltoniemi M, Sievänen R (2005) Carbon and decomposition model Yasso for forest soils. Ecol Model 189:168–182 Article Google Scholar
Luyssaert S, Schulze ED, Börner A, Knohl A, Hessenmöller D, Law BE, Ciais P, Grace J (2008) Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks. Nature 455:213–215 Article Google Scholar
Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences (2010) Massachusetts Biomass Sustainability and Carbon Policy Study: Report to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources. In Walker T (ed) Natural Capital Initiative Report NCI-2010-03. Brunswick, ME, USA
McKechnie J, Colombo S, Chen J, Mabee W, Maclean HL (2011) Forest bioenergy of forest carbon? Assessing trade-offs in greenhouse gas mitigation with wood-based fuels. Environ Sci Technol 45:789–795 Article Google Scholar
Melillo JM, Reilly JM, Kicklighter DW et al (2009) Indirect emissions from biofuels: how important? Science 326:1397–1399 Article Google Scholar
Nakane K, Lee NJ (1995) Simulation of soil carbon cycling and carbon balance following clear-cutting in a mid-temperate forest and contribution to the sink of atmospheric CO2. Vegetatio 121:147–156 Article Google Scholar
NCPA (2010) Tiltak og virkemidler for å nå norske klimamål mot 2020 (Efforts and policies for Norwegian climate goals toward 2020). The Norwegian Climate and Pollution Agency (NCPA), Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate, The Norwegian Petroleum Directorate, Statistics Norway, The Norwegian Public Road Administration. Report TA2590
NCPA (2011) Skog som biomasseressurs (Forests as biomass resources). Report from The Norwegian Climate and Pollution Agency. Report TA 2762
Nilsen P, Hobbelstad K, Clarke N (2008) Opptak og utslipp av CO2 i skog (Capture and Emission of CO2 from Norwegian Forests). Norwegian Forest and Landscape Institute, report no. 06/2008
Palosuo T, Wihersaari M, Liski J (2001) Net greenhouse gas emissions due to energy use of forest residues—impact of soil carbon balance. EFI Proceedings no 39, Wood biomass as an energy source challenge in Europe. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, 115–130
Petersen AK, Solberg B (2005) Environmental and economic impacts of substitution between wood products and alternative materials: a review of micro-level analyses from Norway and Sweden. Forest Policy Econ 7:249–259 Article Google Scholar
Pregitzer KS, Euskirchen ES (2004) Carbon cycling and storage in world forests: biome patterns related to forest age. Glob Change Biol 10:2052–2077 Article Google Scholar
Raymer AKP (2006) A comparison of avoided greenhouse gas emissions when using different kinds of wood energy. Biomass Bioenerg 30:605–617 Article Google Scholar
Repo A, Tuomi M, Liski J (2011) Indirect carbon dioxide emissions from producing bioenergy from forest harvest residues. GCB Bioenergy 3:107–115 Article Google Scholar
Schlamadinger B, Spitzer J, Kohlmaier GH, Lüdeke M (1995) Carbon balance of bioenergy from logging residues. Biomass Bioenerg 8:221–234 Article Google Scholar
Searchinger TD, Heimlich TD, Houghton RA et al (2008) Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gas through emissions from land-use change. Science 319:1238–1240 Article Google Scholar
Searchinger TD, Hamburg SP, Melillo J et al (2009) Fixing a critical climate accounting error. Science 326:527–528 Article Google Scholar
Seely B, Welham C, Kimmins H (2002) Carbon sequestration in a boreal forest ecosystem: results from the ecosystem simulation model, FORECAST. Forest Ecol Manag 169:123–135 Article Google Scholar
Sjølie HK, Solberg B (2009) Greenhouse Gas Implications by Production of Wood Pellets at the BioWood Norway plant at Averøy, Norway. Report drawn up for BioWood Norway. Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Sjølie HK, Trømborg E, Solberg B, Bolkesjø TF (2010) Effects and costs of policies to increase bioenergy use and reduce GHG emissions from heating in Norway. Forest Policy Econ 12:57–66 Article Google Scholar
Storaunet KO, Rolstad J (2002) Time since death and fall of Norway spruce logs in old-growth and selectively cut boreal forest. Can J For Res 32:1801–1812 Article Google Scholar
Weisser D (2007) A guide to life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from electric supply technologies. Energy 32:1453–1559 Article Google Scholar
Wise M, Calvin K, Thomson A, Clarke L, Bond-Lamberty B, Sands R, Smith SJ, Janetos A, Edmonds J (2009) Implications of limiting CO2 concentrations for land use and energy. Science 324:1183–1186 Article Google Scholar
Zhang Y, McKechnie J, Cormier D, Lyng R, Mabee W, Ogino A, MacLean HI (2010) Life cycle emissions and cost of producing electricity from coal, natural gas, and wood pellets in Ontario, Canada. Environ Sci Technol 44:538–544 Article Google Scholar